ICMEs and Magnetic Clouds Session Summary Charlie Farrugia and Lan Jian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Advertisements

A Whole-Heliosphere View of the Solar Wind Hale Lecture American Astronomical Society 5/24/2010 Marcia Neugebauer University of Arizona.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging in Improving Space Weather Prediction SHINE Session 6 Simon Plunkett and Doug Biesecker Thursday Morning.
ICME properties and their Solar cycle dependence Yan Li and Janet Luhmann UC Berkeley.
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
Center for Space Environment Modeling T. H. Zurbuchen, on behalf of W. Manchester, J. Kota, I. Roussev, T. H. Zurbuchen, N.
Synoptic maps and applications Yan Li Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA HMI team meeting, Jan 27, 2005, Stanford.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
F1B: Determine the Dominant Processes of Particle Acceleration Phase , Open the Frontier UV Spectroscopic determin- ation of pre/post-shock density,
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
1. Background2. Flux variation3. Polarity reversal4. Electron evolution5. Conclusions The role of coronal mass ejections in the solar cycle evolution of.
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Flux Transport into the Heliosphere
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
Solar System Missions Division Solar Orbiter Next major Solar and Heliospheric mission ESA ILWS flagship Now with the Inner Heliospheric Sentinels.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Outline of WG 2 Sessions: Interplanetary Phenomena Working Group Leaders: Ian Richardson and Ilia Roussev.
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
New STEREO/SECCHI Processing for Heliospheric Transients David F. Webb ISR, Boston College, MA, USA New England Space Science Consortium.
The Solar Wind.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Radial Evolution of Major Solar Wind Structures Lan K. Jian Thanks to: C.T. Russell, J.G. Luhmann, R.M. Skoug Dept. of Earth and Space Sciences Institute.
Interplanetary Shocks in the Inner Solar System: Observations with STEREO and MESSENGER During the Deep Solar Minimum of 2008 H.R. Lai, C.T. Russell, L.K.
Evolution of Magnetic Fields from the Sun’s Surface to the Heliopause of one Solar Cycle Nathan Schwadron, Boston University.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
Origins of Solar Minimum CMEs with ICMEs Yan Li 1 B. J. Lynch 1, J. G. Luhmann 1, A. Thernisien 2, A. Vourlidas 2, E. Kilpua 3, L. Jian 4, A. B. Gavin.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
1 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; K. E. J. Huttunen, Y. Li, J. Luhmann, B. Lynch, UCB/SSL; Angelos Vourlidas & R. A. Howard, NRL;
Variability of the Heliospheric Magnetic Flux: ICME effects S. T. Lepri, T. H. Zurbuchen The University of Michigan Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic,
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Inferring the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Back to the Maunder Minimum
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
Solar cycle variation of the heliospheric magnetic field
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Miho Janvier (IAS) & Ben Lynch (UCB)
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
How does the solar atmosphere connect to the inner heliosphere?
MDI Global Field & Solar Wind
Modeling Coronal Mass Ejections with EUHFORIA
Presentation transcript:

ICMEs and Magnetic Clouds Session Summary Charlie Farrugia and Lan Jian

Ian Richardson Manifold signatures of ICMEs – 24 signatures (mag, plasma, composition, engertic particle, charge states, cosmic ray depression, etc.) – None is unique or sufficient to identify ICMEs Solar cycle variation of ICMEs and MCs

Main Points

The poloidal field of low inclination MCs reverses on the solar cycle scale. The leading edge of MCs has the same field direction with the solar dipole field. Over 3 sunspot cycles of annual occurrences of NS and SN MCs combining our results from Wind and ACE data ( ), PVO results ( ) by Mulligan et al. (1998) and OMNI results (grey bar) by Bothmer and Rust (1997) MC Polarity Reversal over Three Sunspot Cycle Y. Li SSL/UCB

Filled circle: SN MCs; Open circle: NS MCs Properties of bipolar MCs in solar cycle 23 NP SP reversal MINMAXMIN Y. Li SSL/UCB Bipolar MC parameter variation with time in solar cycle 23. Bipolar MCs have the same speed distribution with all ICMEs.

Reconstructing CMEs with coordinated imaging and in situ data In situ reconstruction Image forward modeling Geometric triangulation In situ data Ying Liu (SSL, UCB) Combine images with in situ data to constrain the global structure and kinematics of CMEs: Image modeling gives propagation direction and rope orientation (Thernisien); Geometric triangulation gives propagation direction, radial distance, velocity and arrival time; All these results are compared with in situ measurements and reconstruction.

Main conclusions CME propagation directions can be determined to a relatively good precision as shown by the consistency between different methods; The geometric triangulation technique shows a promising capability to link solar observations with corresponding in situ signatures at 1 AU and to predict CME arrival at the Earth; The flux-rope orientation derived from imaging observations may have a large uncertainty as indicated by the comparison with in situ reconstruction; The flux rope within CMEs, which has the most hazardous southward magnetic field, cannot be imaged at large distances due to expansion; We find that CMEs undergo a westward migration with respect to the Sun-Earth line at their acceleration phase, which we suggest as a universal feature produced by the magnetic field connecting the Sun and ejecta.

Dusan Odstrcil: MHD Modeling of ICMEs Initialized by Cone- and Rope-Model Fittings of Coronagraph Observations, and Comparison with Observations Cone model vs. rope model – Rope model is more consistent with observations – Different solar input can lead to discrepancies Other – Additional parameters from multipoint can put more constraints on the model and input the model

Cone Model FRONT VIEW Lon Lat SIDE VIEW Rmajor Tilt Lon Lat CME – Hydrodynamic Models Elliptical Cone ModelRope Model Tilt Lon Lat Rmajor Rminor Rleg Rmajor

Apr 26, 2008

Jack Gosling: Small Flux Ropes, Torsional Alfven Waves, Reconnection Exhausts in Connection with ICMEs

Comparison of Crooker et al. Vortical Event with 12 January 2003 Flux Rope

Sketch of the 12 January 2003 Flux Rope

A MHD Reconstruction of the Flux Rope Field and Stream Lines at Wind Field lines in black Stream lines in red Planar Projections

Alexis Roullard Joint in situ – imaging possibilities for understanding ICMEs with applications to small transients entrained in stream interaction regions

HI-2B 2008/06/03 01:29 UT Venus Earth sheath CIR-MC interaction SECCHI HI-2B imagesFormation of merged interaction region SECCHI HI-1A Sun accumulated plasma expansion flux rope The aspect of CMEs can often be interpreted in coronagraphs using a croissant-shaped flux rope, higher up in the atmosphere the aspect of CME changes dramatically through expansion of the flux rope, solar-wind pile-up (shock formation) and CIR-CME interaction.

SECCHI reveals that arch-like structures are continually ejected from streamers (2 to 3 loops are observed per day at one longitude (probably 18 per day for the entire belt). Another example of an arch-like structure: The closed field must open (footpoint exchange).