3D Reconnection in Prominences. Gibson & Fan 2006 Negative Points: Pros and Cons of the Flux-Rope-Dip Model 4. Flux ropes are a basic element of low 

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Van Tend & Kuperus (1978) Three-Dimensional Configuration of Titov & Démoulin (1999) 3. line-current 1. flux rope 2. magnetic charges 3.

Advertisements

Using plasma dynamics to determine the strength of a prominence's magnetic fields GCOE Symposium Kyoto University Andrew Hillier.

1 Hinode Coordinated Observations: Coronal Cavities On February 23, 2012, a coronal cavity and associated prominence was observed by Hinode. XRT data clearly.

The 3D picture of a flare Loukas Vlahos. Points for discussion  When cartoons drive the analysis of the data and the simulations….life becomes very complicated.

The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.

The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.

Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.

Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of CMEs’ Source Regions Yingna Su Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Adriaan van Ballegooijen,

Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,

Lecture 4 The Formation and Evolution of CMEs. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Appear as loop like features that breakup helmet streamers in the corona.

1. Helicity: basic properties, open geometries 2. Observations of helicity and helicity flux 3. Twist and Writhe Mitchell Berger Review of Magnetic Helicity.

Jan 13, 2009ISSI1 Modeling Coronal Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A Collaborators:

1 Hinode Coordinated Observations: Plasma Composition Photospheric composition ~ 1 in coronal hole (CH) -> fast wind Coronal composition ~1.5-3 in active.

EUV filaments in 3D from magnetic extrapolations toward stereoscopic observations G. Aulanier & B. Schmieder Observatoire de Paris, LESIA.

The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.

3D Simulations of Large-Scale Coronal Dynamics

7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Observing prominence dynamics with STEREO David Alexander, Rui Liu, and Holly Gilbert Rice University

Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.

Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,

Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:

Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.

Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.

Incorporating Vector Magnetic Field Measurements into MHD models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley and B.T. Welsch,

Judy Karpen, Spiro Antiochos, Rick DeVore, and Mark Linton MHD Simulations of Flux Cancellation on the Sun* *Work supported by ONR and NASA.

Properties of Prominence Motions Observed in the UV T. A. Kucera (NASA/GSFC) E. Landi (Artep Inc, NRL)

Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.

Flares and Eruptive Events Observed with the XRT on Hinode Kathy Reeves Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection in Coronal Mass Ejection Current Sheets Crystal L. Pope Elmhurst College Advisors: Nick Murphy & Mari Paz Miralles Harvard-Smithsonian.

Direct Evidence of Emergence of a Helical Flux Rope under an Active- Region Prominence Joten Okamoto Kyoto Univ. ／ NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow Saku Tsuneta,

Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)

Sept. 13, 2007 CORONAL HEATING (Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)

Magnetic configurations responsible for the coronal heating and the solar wind Hwanhee Lee 1, Tetsuya Magara 1 1 School of Space research, Kyung Hee University.

Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.

Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.

Beijing UniversityTuesday 18-May-2010 Quiescent Prominence Instabilities Hinode/SOT and AIA Explorations Thomas Berger Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics.

1 Searching for Alfvén Waves John Yoritomo The Catholic University of America Mentor: Dr. Adriaan van Ballegooijen The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.

Helicity Condensation: The Origin of Coronal/Heliospheric Structure S. K. Antiochos, C. R. DeVore, et al NASA/GSFC Key features of the corona and wind.

Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,

Evolution of Emerging Flux and Associated Active Phenomena Takehiro Miyagoshi (GUAS, Japan) Takaaki Yokoyama (NRO, Japan)

Reconnection & Flares Part II movie courtesy of G. Stenborg.

Partially Ionized Plasma Effect in Dynamic Solar Atmosphere Naoki Nakamura 2015/07/05 Solar Seminar.

3D Reconnection Simulations of Descending Coronal Voids Mark Linton in collaboration with Dana Longcope (MSU)

3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.

II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)

Spectroscopic Detection of Reconnection Evidence with Solar-B II. Signature of Flows in MHD simulation Hiroaki ISOBE P.F. Chen *, D. H. Brooks, D. Shiota,

Katharine K. Reeves 1, Terry G. Forbes 2, Jon Linker 3 & Zoran Mikić 3 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2 University of New Hampshire 3 Science.

Prominence Dynamics: the Key to Prominence Structure Judy Karpen Naval Research Laboratory SVST.

XRT and EIS Observations of Reconnection associated Phenomena D. Shiota, H. Isobe, D. H. Brooks, P. F. Chen, and K. Shibata

Energy Budgets of Flare/CME Events John Raymond, J.-Y. Li, A. Ciaravella, G. Holman, J. Lin Jiong Qiu will discuss the Magnetic Field Fundamental, but.

Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,

III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.

SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,

Cycle 24 Meeting, Napa December 2008 Ryan Milligan NASA/GSFC Microflare Heating From RHESSI and Hinode Observations Ryan Milligan NASA-GSFC.

Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops

Show 1 -- photosphere & sunspots SUN COURSE - SLIDE SHOW 4 Show 2 -- corona & solar cycle Today: Sun today + waves + prominences +UFO’s Show 3 -- SOHO.

Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of the Flare/CME Event on 2010 April 8 Yingna Su Bernhard Kliem, Adriaan van Ballegooijen, Vincent Surges, Edward.

On the spectroscopic detection of magnetic reconnection evidence with Solar B – I. Emission line selection and atomic physics issues P. F. Chen 1,2, H.

Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,

What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)

1 Hinode Highlights: Coronal Cavity Structure On October 9, 2014 a coronal cavity was observed by Hinode and IRIS as part of IHOP 264 The cavity structure.

THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.

Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,

November 18, 2008Jonathan Cirtain SCIENCE & MISSION SYSTEMS Solar-C Plan ‘A’ Coronal observations Jonathan Cirtain MSFC/NASA November 18, 2008.

Observations of Filament Channels by Hinode/XRT and STEREO

Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares

Ward Manchester University of Michigan

Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Photosphere: The Vector Magnetic Field under Active Region Filaments B.W.Lites the Astrophysical Journal, 622: ,2005,

Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.

Sakai, J. I., Nishi, K., and Sokolov, I. V. ApJ, 2002, 576, 1018

Fig. 5 3D MHD simulation of multiple plasmoid formation and ejection in the vertical current sheet spawned by an erupting flux rope. 3D MHD simulation.

Presentation transcript:

3D Reconnection in Prominences

Gibson & Fan 2006 Negative Points: Pros and Cons of the Flux-Rope-Dip Model 4. Flux ropes are a basic element of low  plasmas 2. Good predictor of location & shape 1. A physical mechanism for static support 3. Provides eruptive mechanism 1. Inconsistent with observed flows in barbs 2. Provides no mechanism for the generation of flows 3. Ignores radiation dynamics 4. Ignores ever present 3D reconnection Positive Points:

Aulanier, Srivistava & Martin (2000) Dip Model Success: Prominence Location

2 1/2 D MHD Simuation (courtesy of Pete Riley) Flux-Rope Model of Prominence Eruption

Simulation of Flux-Rope Eruption in 3D MHD courtesy of John Linker at Predictive Science top view ( XRT )side views

Yeates & Mackay 2009 van Ballegooijen & Mackay 2007 Flux Ropes Are Characteristic of Low  Plasmas prominence plasma  << 1  P  j  B  blue: flux ropes red: flux ropes that erupted j  B j along B produces twist flux rope defined as enough twist to produce inverse polarity (about 1 turn)

Prominence Flows in Barbs Doppler Shift Observations: Schmieder et al Zirker et al. Hinode SOT

Karpen & Antiochos 2008 Apparent Motions Generated by Steady Heating What would this look line in a 3D model? 1D loop model with asymmetric heating at chromosphere loop top loop feet (loop shape is distorted)

What Is the Effect of Magnetic Carpet Reconnection? H  from Hinode SOT

ambiguity of field line motion in 3D Slip-Running Reconnection (Aulanier, Pariat, Démoulin 2006) erupted configuration initial configuration vertical field at surface reconnection leads to apparent motion of flux rope footprint

Flux Tube Shredding in 3D Reconnection collision of two flux tubes at 90º Linton & Priest 2003

Apparent motions due to radiation? Moving field lines & dips? Chaotic 3D reconnection? (shredding) Dip overflows?