Executive Evaluation The Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System Training Session February 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
PORTFOLIO.
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Pioneer High School Our Journey: Becoming and Sustaining a Professional Learning Community.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
System Office Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Session Materials  Wiki
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Lewiston Porter PEC Standards- Based Report Card Grades K-3 Report Card Committee Members: Heidi Kazulak, Suzanne Hedemann, Lisa Winslow, Kelly Millville,
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
June 5, Use of the district’s financial resources is key to the ongoing operations : Facilities Transportation Food Service Staff Development.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Improving Performance Outcomes in an Age of Accountability Oregon Conference 2008 Dr. Krista D. Parent South Lane School District.
C andler C ounty S chool D istrict
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Setting the context Multiplying leaders to build movements everywhere requires that development be designed around the needs of the individual as.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Scholars Academy Update from the Board of Directors
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Presentation transcript:

Executive Evaluation The Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System Training Session February 10, 2011

Leadership Matters “The Lighthouse Inquiry: School Board/Superintendent Team Behaviors in School Districts with Extreme Differences in Student Achievement” by The Iowa Association of School Board, 2000 School board members and superintendents in high-achieving districts think and act differently from their counterparts in low- achieving districts.

Buckeye Association of School Administrators Superintendent-School Board Leadership Development Workshop “The Lighthouse Inquiry” Superintendents and School Board Members in high-achieving districts are significantly different in their knowledge and beliefs than school boards in low-achieving districts. The way you think, act, and work together makes a significant difference in the student achievement in your district.

Buckeye Association of School Administrators Superintendent-School Board Leadership Development Workshop Key Findings SimilaritiesDifferences Caring about childrenCaring about children Peaceable relationshipsPeaceable relationships Board Opinion of Supt.Board Opinion of Supt. Tension about roles in site-based systemTension about roles in site-based system Students in categorical programsStudents in categorical programs Local backgrounds of board members and staffLocal backgrounds of board members and staff Elevating vs. Accepting Belief SystemsElevating vs. Accepting Belief Systems Prioritization of organizational focus and disciplinePrioritization of organizational focus and discipline Accountability for measurable objectivesAccountability for measurable objectives

Buckeye Association of School Administrators Superintendent-School Board Leadership Development Workshop Roles and Responsibilities BoardSuperintendent Leadership Team What? Why? How Much? How Well? End Results Mission Vision Goals Policies Standards Vote Means How? When? Where? By Whom? Strategies Procedures Regulations Assignments Documentation Recommendation Focus Questions Tools Method How do we cooperate to accomplish our distinct yet complimentary roles? Confusion Modified from Table 1 OSBA Board-Superintendent Partnership 2008, page 4

Buckeye Association of School Administrators Superintendent-School Board Leadership Development Workshop Roles and Responsibilities “…Confusion regarding the roles, responsibilities and relations between boards and superintendents likely creates more problems than any other issue.” -- OSBA: Board-Superintendent Partnership, 2008

Buckeye Association of School Administrators Superintendent-School Board Leadership Development Workshop Roles and Responsibilities New Superintendent Questions in BASA Executive Coaching Program

2008 Thirty-five Board Members, Superintendents, and University Representatives met for over 18 months to develop the Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System.

2008 Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Vision, Continuous Improvement, and Focus on District Work Communication and Collaboration Policies and Governance Instruction Resources

1.It is important to create a standards-based job description 2.The governance team should focus on 3-5 annual objectives 3.A mid-year formative assessment should be used to communicate about progress and to provide an opportunity for mid-course correction 4.An annual summative evaluation should completed in narrative form 5.The system must be kept simple OSES Themes:2008

Jan.- May June- Sept. Dec.-Jan. June-July

Standards-Based Job Description

Annual Objectives

Key Concepts: Annual Objectives Annual objectives are specific, measurable statements of what should be accomplished within a specified time frame to improve the district. They provide the basis for evaluating the Superintendent’s annual progress. Annual objectives must be: Clear Focused Based on data Within the scope of the superintendent’s control Aligned with broader district goals Set with an understanding of the district’s capacity Designed the stretch but not exceed district capacity Measurable Set with a clear timeframe

Annual Objectives Develop 3 rd Grade Writing RubricDevelop 3 rd Grade Writing Rubric Pave High School Parking LotsPave High School Parking Lots Design Professional Development for Advanced Placement TeachersDesign Professional Development for Advanced Placement Teachers Institute a K-12 Writing RubricInstitute a K-12 Writing Rubric Audit Maintenance Needs of the DistrictAudit Maintenance Needs of the District Design Comprehensive Professional Development Strategies for Ohio Academic AssessmentsDesign Comprehensive Professional Development Strategies for Ohio Academic Assessments Unit Level ObjectivesDistrict Level Objectives

SAMPLE

Work Plans

SAMPLE

Formative Assessment

Key Concepts: Formative Assessments 1.Linked to standards Job Descriptions and Annual Objectives 2. Monitors progress, offers suggestions, confirms achievement Non punitive Provides opportunities for coaching 3. Provides evidence Artifacts and Portfolios 4.Promotes self-assessment Encourages alternative approaches to current practice

SAMPLE

SAMPLE

Summative Evaluation

Key Concepts: Summative Assessments Summative assessment comments should be made in a general yet comprehensive manner, and they should address each of the five standards. Descriptors similar to those cited below may be useful. Exemplary Proficient Progressing Not meeting standards

SAMPLE

SAMPLE

Preliminary Findings: The process… Creates standards-based job description for the superintendentCreates standards-based job description for the superintendent Stimulates meaningful discussion about the important work of the district– creates a limited number (3-5) of focused annual objectivesStimulates meaningful discussion about the important work of the district– creates a limited number (3-5) of focused annual objectives Helps the district to focus on key priorities and to minimize distractionsHelps the district to focus on key priorities and to minimize distractions Charts a clear path or work plan to achieve district prioritiesCharts a clear path or work plan to achieve district priorities Provides alignment of priorities in administrative teamProvides alignment of priorities in administrative team Improves communication and understanding of marching ordersImproves communication and understanding of marching orders Determines up front the criteria for judging successDetermines up front the criteria for judging success What is the Return on Investment of Time and Energy?

What is the Estimated Time Commitment? Standards- Based Job Description Annual Objectives and Work Plans Formative Assessment Summative Evaluation Board Member Time Commitment 2 hours 3-5 hours 2-3 hours 2 hours Total Estimated time 9 to 12 hours

School board establishes new objectives for Superintendent JIM FISCHER ThisWeek Community Newspapers Improving the process for superintendent evaluations was the focus of a Marysville Exempted Village School District Board of Education work session last Monday. The board discussed a new mechanism for the evaluations based on a model developed by the Ohio Department of Education that board president Jeff Mabee said is "an incredible change from where we were." The board set goals for superintendent Larry Zimmerman in three broad areas: academics, specifically as relates to achieving an "Excellent" rating on the ODE school district report cards; communications, both with the community and internally; and health and safety, with an eye toward maintaining a drug-free school environment. Mabee said the evaluation process includes setting the goals, developing a work plan, interim reviews and the annual summary. In the past, Mabee said, reviews have been less than effective. "We used to assign a numerical rating at the end of the year," he said, "but we learned that a certain number doesn't necessarily mean the same to each board member." The new mechanism "helps the board and it helps (Zimmerman) by having an ongoing conversation throughout the year." "It also allows the public to see what the board and superintendent are focused on," he added. Superintendent evaluations are done annually. Zimmerman is currently on a five-year contract that expires at the end of June 2012.

U.S. Airways Flight 1594 Lessons on Leadership and Teamwork Planning and prep matters– essential to know key priorities Attention to detail matters– step-by-step procedures make a difference Being focused matters– capacity to tune out distractions Communication matters– clear direction and feedback are important Understanding unique roles matters—everyone must understand how they contribute to a successful mission

Dr. Ralph Johnson, Director of Leadership Charles R. Parsons, President Charles R. Parsons Group