The Lost Soldiers of the Battle of Fromelles, July 19-20th th 1916 Professor Margaret Cox PhD President – Inforce Foundation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?
Advertisements

Scientific aspects of cold case reviews Presented by: Ian Hamilton Biology Manager SPSA (Glasgow) SIPR Annual Conference
LYNDAL BUGEJA Keynote Presentation MANAGER CORONERS PREVENTION UNIT.
A TRIP TO FLANDERS- FIELDS AND THE YOUNG PEOPLE ASK WHY ARE THEY MARCHING FOR. AND I ASK MYSELF THE SAME QUESTION ( © Eric Bogle) Commercial use of this.
The Battle of Verdun and the Battle of the Somme
Trench Warfare S4. Battle of Ypres German advance through Belgium in 1914 was halted at Ypres in Flanders. The territory became known as The.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 5—Fatality Management What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Think back over last lesson Why did the attack on the Somme fail?
Scots at War The Somme After Loos After the Battle of Loos, Scotland would never again provide half the number of infantrymen for a massed attack.
Trench Battles 1916 The Battle of Verdun and the Battle of the Somme.
“In those few moment’s I witnessed the berth of a nation.” BGen A.E. Ross.
Neil Bartley and Martin Williams Press ‘Esc’ on your keyboard at any time to end the presentation.
Why was the Battle of the Somme a disaster?
Death Scene Investigation Homicide: Case #021858T Unidentified Hispanic Male.
Ypres 2nd, Somme, and Vimy.
Intro. to Archaeology and Anthropology CHW-3M1. Some cartoons..
A Tour of the Saint Mary’s University Archaeological Excavations at Grand-Pr National Historic Site Excavations at Grand-Pré National Historic Site Jonathan.
Second Battle of Ypres April – May 1915 British offensive tactics prove ineffective First use of chlorine gas Establishes Canada as a fighting force 59,000.
The Battle of the Somme The Somme July 1, 1916 – November 18, 1916 July 1, 1916 – November 18, 1916 Attack along a 30 km front Attack along a 30.
The 3 major players in this battle were France, Britain and Germany British General: Sir Douglas Haig (nickname was the Butcher of the Somme) French General:
By: Jan Nason & Allison Bishop
Was General Haig the “Butcher of the Somme”? The Battle of the Somme started on July 1st It lasted until November For many years those who.
Events of WWI.
After the Gallipoli campaign, the Australian infantry divisions went on to fight some of the worst battles of the war in France and in Flanders (Belgium).
Playing movies KEY STAGE 3 and 4 National Curriculum History THE FIRST WORLD WAR INTERACTIVE Why did Britain and her allies defeat Germany in.
The Anzac Legend Simpson and his donkey Battle of the Nek
 2500 Canadian women joined medical and field ambulance corps during the war; some served as nurses during the war.  Canadian nurses were called “ Bluebirds.
Ypres The Somme Vimy Ridge Passchendaele.  The Canadian Division reached the Western Front in February 1915  2 months later, the Germans began using.
Somme Battle Plan: You have… Study the Source. What does it suggest happened at the Battle of the Somme? From the RGA 69 th Siege Battery Study the Source.
Handling the Dead in a Mass Fatality Incident Kathy Taylor, Ph.D. Forensic Anthropologist King County Medical Examiner’s Office.
and Beyond. 1954: U.S. Involvement in Vietnam begins when we jump in to help France with the growing problem Between 1954 and 1964 our presence.
Canada’s Main Contributions The Battle of the Atlantic Hong Kong The Italian Campaign D-Day on Juno Beach Dieppe.
Battles of WWI IB 20 th Century Topics. Overview: Killing Fields  WWI remains one of the bloodiest and most destructive wars ever.  Its global impact.
Harry Orr By Nelli. Introduction Harry Orr is related to my Gran. He is my Gran’s uncle. He served in ww2 Harry Orr is related to my Gran. He is my Gran’s.
The Piper of Loos Fill in your sheet in pairs: What do you see, think, wonder, hope, hear? Fill in your sheet in pairs: What would a soldier see, think,
By Des Quinn and Martin Williams. Unfortunately, we don’t know who Bert was. He is just one of the countless young men who went from Wales to fight in.
Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon
Passchendale (October-November 1917). Overview Also known as the Third Battle of Ypres. Begins July 31, 1917 General Haig’s objective was to achieve a.
Canadians In Battle. Ypres ~ April 1915 The 1st Canadian Division had just arrived at the front and were moved to Ypres Salient, in front of the City.
The Battle that Defined Canada
Ypres. Dates and Locations - 2 nd battle, April in and around the Belgian city of Ypres in Flanders.
Somme, Passchendaele, Vimy Ridge, Ypres, 100 Day Campaign
BATTLES OF WORLD WAR I.
Was the Battle of the Somme a bloodbath or a tactical necessity?
“In those few moment’s I witnessed the berth of a nation.” Gen A.E. Ross “The seeds of Canadian nationhood were planted at Vimy, watered with the blood.
1. The Battle of Fromelles
Second Battle of Ypres, March 1915
Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?
Major Canadian Battles
Who was to blame for the failure at the Somme?
Washoe County Regional Medical Examiner’s Office
THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME.
World War One Battles, Leadership and Deaths & Casualties
CHC2D.
Somme, Passchendaele, Vimy Ridge, Ypres, 100 Day Campaign
1. The Battle of Cambrai 20 November – 4 December 1917
Canadians on the Western Front
Battles on the Western Front
What countries make up the Allied forces?
The Battle of Verdun and the Battle of the Somme
5. Scottish Battles of WWI
Scots on the Western Front
Newfoundland & the Great War (#3)
Chapter 18: Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology
The Nature of the Great War
“Fight for It Lads” Battle of Somme
Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?
Science of Crime Scenes
At the beginning …. The focus was on collecting bodies, missing evidence of circumstances of death ….
Presentation transcript:

The Lost Soldiers of the Battle of Fromelles, July 19-20th th 1916 Professor Margaret Cox PhD President – Inforce Foundation

Senior Scientific Advisor to the Australian and British Governments. Contracted by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission to advise on all matters relating to archaeology, anthropology and identification. To recommend other specialists as necessary. Acknowledgements Ministry of Defence, UK Defence Defence Department, Australia Commonwealth War Graves Commission, UK Oxford Archaeology The Fromelles Project My Role:

The Battle of Fromelles 19 th to 20th July 1916 Fromelles is c16km south of Lille. The Battle involved the 5 th Australians & 61 st British, against the 16th, 17th & 21 st Bavarian infantry along a 3.7km front focussing on Sugar Loaf. It aimed to draw German troops away from the Somme offensive, but by July 1916 this was no longer necessary.

‘Lions Led by Donkeys’  While this view has been largely changed for the latter part of WWI, for Fromelles it is apt.  Despite clear signs that the battle would be a massacre Field Marshall Sir Douglas Haig sanctioned Lieutenant Sir Richard Haking’s plan and it went ahead.  The Germans had been bunkered in on the higher ground of Aubers Ridge for months and could see everything the Allied Forces did in preparation.  Our troops were mowed down (in part by friendly fire) and nothing was gained.  Approximately 8,000 men were killed and 1,400 are still unaccounted for.  A battle near this spot a year before had the same outcome.

The worst losses ever for the Australian Army  The 5th Australian Division lost 5,533 men, whilst the 61st British Division suffered 1,547 fatalities. German casualties were approximately 1,000.

Background to the Project Research by Mr Lambis Englesos built a convincing case suggesting that the missing soldiers from Fromelles were buried near Pheasant Wood. References in Red Cross records to 1600 Commonwealth soldiers being buried by Germans. Col von Braun, commander of Bavarian Infantry Regiment 21, ordered his men to prepare mass graves for 400 British soldiers. Aerial imagery of disturbed ground near the wood and references to a railway track running in the direction of the wood from the battle site.

Commonwealth soldiers‘ bodies lying near or over the German lines were buried by the Germans and transported to graves by railway Note that most of the dead soldiers have no boots on their feet

Pheasant Wood, Fromelles Grave site New CWGC cemetery site VC Corner Cemetery and memorial 

Official response:  A series of test pits and trenches were dug across the grave. Results suggested that 200 to 300 soldiers were present in five of the eight graves close to Pheasant Wood. The Fromelles Management Board was subsequently formed, comprising representatives of the Australian and UK governments. In response to this research, plus public interest, the Australian Government commissioned a geophysical survey in 2007, and in 2008 an archaeological evaluation into a series of suspected mass graves at Pheasant Wood, Fromelles. This was undertaken by GUARD.

Aims of the Fromelles Project:  To safely, scientifically and respectfully excavate the eight features alongside Pheasant Wood To scientifically record and recover all of the human remains from the graves To record and recover all associated artefacts whether military or personal in nature To fully analyse the soldiers’ mortal remains to attempt to determine their identity and the army for which they fought To fully analyse all artefacts recovered with the soldiers to help to determine their identity and army To rebury the soldiers in marked graves in a new purpose built cemetery in Fromelles Village in 2010

Methods deployed Archaeological excavation, recording and recovery using forensic principles. Site to be managed as a crime scene re issues of chain of custody and contamination Full anthropological analysis including radiography DNA analysis of bone and teeth from each individual Tracing families of missing soldiers through the UK JCCC and the Australian Army Where possible, taking DNA samples from appropriate relatives of the families of the c.1600 missing soldiers Asking families for photographs and other information that may help us establish an identity Collating all archaeological, anthropological, historical, family and genetic information to attempt to identify the soldiers.

Commissioning and timescales The archaeological and anthropological work (subject to competitive tender) was undertaken by Oxford Archaeology from May to October 2009 A concurrent programme of DNA analysis was carried out by LGC Forensics (UK), this was initially complete by March 2010 Cemetery construction was from June to December 2009, horticultural work in Spring 2010, and burial of the soldiers (except one) took place in February 2010 The first identification process took place from January to May 2010 The formal opening, final burial and blessing of the cemetery was on July 19 th 2010 Work will continue until 2014 with annual ID commissions Total cost £5m - shared between the two governments.

The Archaeology Clay substrate - waterlogged environment; area prone to very heavy rainfall all year around so specialist engineering and drainage solutions sought. Standards and Protocols Based on those developed by the Inforce Foundation which are internationally accepted as being the highest possible standards. Published in 2008: The Scientific Investigation of Mass Graves. CUP. By: Cox, M., Flavel, A., Hanson. I., Laver, J. and Wessling, R.

Excavation was within a very large tent – graves machined to 20cm above deposits, then hand dug. Evaluation trenches excavated first. Graves pedestalled within excavated areas, perimeter trenches and sumps used to help remove water.

The graves were excavated by a team of highly experienced forensic archaeologists, anthropologists, surveyors, photographers, scene of crime officers and logistics and health and safety managers (including EOD/UXO).

Results of the 17 week excavation: Six of the graves contained human remains with associated finds assemblages Five graves had between 44 and 52 soldiers in each and the sixth had three. The soldiers had been carefully placed lying head to feet across the 10 X 2 yard graves in two layers separated by soil and lime Two graves appeared never to have been used as such The remains of 250 soldiers were recovered – another c.1400 remain missing 6,200 artefacts were recovered – all subject to analysis, recording and short term conservation.

Initial examination and recording of both human remains and artefacts was in the field

Military artefacts: Belt buckle – shape important Right: corroded Rising Sun badge

Collecting DNA samples 1.Pilot study established survival and condition of the DNA and the best bones or teeth to use 2.DNA samples of teeth and bone from each individual were taken in the grave using forensic protocols and immediately transferred to a fridge or freezer in the main mortuary complex using strict chain of custody protocols.

Site layout DNA – sampling…………….. Human remains

Work within the DNA protection zone Scene of Crime Officer and Grave Supervisor

The Anthropology - State of the art temporary mortuary complex constructed and equipped for this project

Cleaning and sorting human remains Note - no gloves or masks had to be worn in the temporary mortuary for DNA purposes as samples were removed for this on site.

Radiography – digital x-rays used for human remains and artefacts following strict scene of crime protocols

The anthropology laboratory

Skeletons examined, photographed, analysed and recorded

Dentures and dental work

 Coin purse (left), pen nib, penknife and train ticket

Personal items can assist with identification

ID tags and other medallions

2. Data Analysis Team Data Collation Provisional identification level Data Analysis 3. Joint Identification Board Review recommendation Determine identity 4. Notification NGOs e.g. ICRC Public & Media Government Agencies First Families of the Missing Other nations The Buried Soldiers Post-mortem data including DNA. The Missing Ante mortem data for the Missing from family records, historical and military sources. The Families DNA profiles for some families of the Missing. 1. Data Sets  The Identification Process (ID):  Collect and analyse each relevant data type  Collate and analyse all data sets for each soldiers’ (archaeology, anthropology, DNA, historical data)  Examine this with ante mortem data from missing soldiers and the DNA from family donors  Recommend an ID level to the JIB: (i) ID to name, (ii) ID to army, (iii) known unto God

DNA – Crucial for positive identifications  In material of this age, mitochondrial DNA or Y-STR analyses only  Pilot study undertaken to assess if the DNA survived in suitable quantities and quality - e.g. all base pairs for Y-STR  Prevention of contamination is crucial during recovery, storage and analysis – elimination database established  Appropriate storage of samples is crucial as is chain of custody through the process  DNA samples from living male and/or female relations of the missing soldiers are crucial:  Soldier’s family must still survive  Appropriate relatives must exist - ie have to be either direct male descendants from the soldier or his brothers’ or uncles’, or direct female descendants from his sisters’ or maternal aunts’  Have to be traced and the relationship verified via genealogical research  Must be prepared to donate DNA  Soldier must not be adopted or illegitimate as this is not recorded from this period – such soldiers cannot be identified to their ‘families’ only their genetic families which raises ethical issues  Single or combined probability values must be high enough to be convincing, and fit in with other data types, as IDs must be ‘significantly more likely than not’.

Y Chromosomal Paternal Line Mitochondrial Maternal Line

Our work has (so far) led to 119 men like these having their identity restored

 We are still attempting to name the remainder but cannot do this unless relevant families of missing soldiers exist, come forward and donate DNA.  Work will continue until 2014  We have to-date identified 119 of the 250 men recovered from Pheasant Wood.  219 have been identified as having fought for the Australian Army (119 by name), two for the British army and 29 remain ‘Known unto God’.

End here unless time permits

Cemetery construction June 2009

January 2010 – burial of 249 soldiers

Formal opening of the new cemetery – July 19 th 2010

Lest we forget…..