Wireless Sensor Networks ‘WSN’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
Advertisements

Decentralized Reactive Clustering in Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu April 26, 2015.
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Sensor Network 教育部資通訊科技人才培育先導型計畫. 1.Introduction General Purpose  A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a wireless network using sensors to cooperatively.
SENSOR NETWORKS ECE 654 Irene Ioannou. Sensor networks communication architecture.
CSE 5392By Dr. Donggang Liu1 CSE 5392 Sensor Network Security Introduction to Sensor Networks.
S-MAC Sensor Medium Access Control Protocol An Energy Efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks.
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin.
Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks.
CMPE280n An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin presented by Venkatesh Rajendran.
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin -- Adapted the authors’ Infocom 2002 talk.
PEDS September 18, 2006 Power Efficient System for Sensor Networks1 S. Coleri, A. Puri and P. Varaiya UC Berkeley Eighth IEEE International Symposium on.
A Survey on Sensor Networks Rick Han CSCI 7143 Secure Sensor Networks Fall 2004.
Self Organization and Energy Efficient TDMA MAC Protocol by Wake Up For Wireless Sensor Networks Zhihui Chen; Ashfaq Khokhar ECE/CS Dept., University of.
A Survey on Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Huma Naushad.
1 Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling Wei Ye Fabio Silva John Heidemann Presented by: Ronak Bhuta Date: 4 th December 2007.
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Topics in Internet Research
Cross-Layer Application-Specific WSN Design over SS-Trees -Prepared by Amy.
Wireless Distributed Sensor Networks Special Thanks to: Jasvinder Singh Hitesh Nama.
On the Energy Efficient Design of Wireless Sensor Networks Tariq M. Jadoon, PhD Department of Computer Science Lahore University of Management Sciences.
Medium Access Control With Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks Debate 1 - Defense Joseph Camp Anastasios Giannoulis.
Efficient MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
1 MAC Layer Design for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye USC Information Sciences Institute.
1 Energy Efficient Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu 8/14/2015.
NAME: NASIRAHMADPROGRAM: B.S TELECOMSEMESTER: 7THREG#: SU/ PRESENTED TO: ENGR. GUL ZAMEEN KHANDATE: UNIVERSITY: SARHAD UNIVERSITY.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Wireless LAN Advantages 1. Flexibility 2. Planning 3. Design
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks The First ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2003) November.
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks “S-MAC” Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin Presentation: Deniz Çokuslu May 2008.
Power Save Mechanisms for Multi-Hop Wireless Networks Matthew J. Miller and Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BROADNETS October.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks (S-MAC) Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin.
1 Wireless sensor network Wireless sensor network: a survey LF.Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramanisam, E. Cayirci Computer Network 38 (2002) Speaker:
The University of Iowa. Copyright© 2005 A. Kruger 1 Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks Medium Access Control (MAC) 21 February 2005.
Why Visual Sensor Network & SMAC Implementation Group Presentation Raghul Gunasekaran.
Lan F.Akyildiz,Weilian Su, Erdal Cayirci,and Yogesh sankarasubramaniam IEEE Communications Magazine 2002 Speaker:earl A Survey on Sensor Networks.
Medium Access Control With Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks Instructor : Dr Yingshu Li Presented By : D M Rasanjalee Himali Paper.
SENSOR NETWORKS BY Umesh Shah Mayuresh Patil G P Reddy GUIDES Prof U.B.Desai Prof S.N.Merchant.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
A SURVEY OF MAC PROTOCOLS FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
A Survey on Sensor Networks Hussein Alzoubi Rami Alnamneh
1 An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin IEEE infocom /1/2005 Hong-Shi Wang.
SNU Mobile Networks Lab. S-MAC (Sensor-MAC) T-MAC (Timeout-MAC) Kae Won, Choi Kyoung hoon, Kim.
A Wakeup Scheme for Sensor Networks: Achieving Balance between Energy Saving and End-to-end Delay Xue Yang, Nitin H.Vaidya Department of Electrical and.
SMAC: An Energy-efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Tijs van Dam, Koen Langendoen In ACM SenSys /1/2005 Hong-Shi Wang.
KAIS T Medium Access Control with Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Network Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin 2003 IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Speaker: hsiwei Wei Ye, John Heidemann and Deborah Estrin. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Page
Link Layer Support for Unified Radio Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks IPSN 2007 Kevin Klues, Guoliang Xing and Chenyang Lu Database Lab.
0.1 IT 601: Mobile Computing Wireless Sensor Network Prof. Anirudha Sahoo IIT Bombay.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Contention-based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Neil Tang 4/20/2009.
S-MAC Taekyoung Kwon. MAC in sensor network Energy-efficient Scalable –Size, density, topology change Fairness Latency Throughput/utilization.
Sensor Networks Jason Turbyfill 16 February 2005.
Oregon Graduate Institute1 Sensor and energy-efficient networking CSE 525: Advanced Networking Computer Science and Engineering Department Winter 2004.
ROUTING TECHNIQUES IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: A SURVEY.
Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
2016/7/31 A Survey on Sensor Networks Ian F. Akyildiz, Weilian Su, Yogesh Sankarasubramaniam, and Erdal Cayirci Georgia Institute of Technology Report.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
Protocols.
Protocols.
Presentation transcript:

Wireless Sensor Networks ‘WSN’ Telecommunication EE-400 Presented By: Abdullah AL-Tuwairgi Mohammad Al-Saleh

Outline Introduction Sensor network topology Applications Generic Node Architecture Constraints for Sensor Nodes Hardware Overview Protocols Stack Conclusion

Introduction-Definition Sensor:  measures a physical phenomenon (motion, heat, light …) and converts it into an electrical signal.

Introduction-Definition Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN): A wireless sensor network is a special network with large numbers of nodes. The nodes are equipped with embedded processors, sensors and radios. These nodes collaborate to accomplish a common task such as environment monitoring or asset tracking.

Introduction Smart Sensor = Processor + Sensors + Wireless Interface

Ad Hoc Wireless Networks In many applications, the nodes are deployed in Ad Hoc fashion.

Introduction

Sensor network topology The sensor nodes are usually scattered in a sensor field. Nodes collect data and route data back to the end users by a multi-hop infrastructure-less architecture through the sink. The sink may communicate with the task manager node via Internet or Satellite.

Applications Smart Buildings to improve living conditions and reduce energy consumption Inventory Management Environmental monitoring Seismic activity detection; Industrial monitoring and control High-precision agriculture Structural health monitoring healthcare and medical research Homeland security. military applications. Fire Monitoring

Generic Node Architecture A sensor node is made up of four basic components: Sensing Unit. 2) Processing Unit. 3) Transceiver Unit 4) Power Unit. Additional units  location finding system--power generator--mobilizer.

Constraints for Sensor Nodes Required small size: Can be placed in more locations and used in more scenarios (applications)  more flexibility. Collect more data  deployed densely.

Constraints for Sensor Nodes Consume extremely low power (µAmps.): use low-power hardware components . Transmit and receive only if necessary. Power consumption in each node: sensing, data processing and communication. Radio communication will consume a significant fraction of total energy.

Constraints for Sensor Nodes Strategies to reduce the average supply current of the radio: Reduce the amount of data transmitted through data compression and reduction. Reduce the frame overhead. Implement strict power management mechanisms (power-down and sleep modes). only transmit data when a sensor event occurs

Constraints for Sensor Nodes Have low production cost. In some application response time is a critical (security system)  quick response time is required. WSN need privacy & also be able to authenticate data communication. Scalability: Some nodes may die or new nodes may join

Hardware Overview Node (1/2) Examples of nodes

Hardware Overview Node (2/2) (( Mica Z Mote )) Sensors: light, temperature, pressure, acceleration, acoustic, magnetic… Characteristics: Microcontroller (ATMega128L): 7.4 MHz, 8 bit. Memory: 4KB data, 128 KB program. Radio: < 40 Kbps, 2.4GHz, DS-SS (ZigBee). Special connector for Crossbow sensor boards. Special Operating System: TinyOS. Power Alkaline/Lithium batteries. Lifetime of 450 days requires 1% duty cycle.

Protocol Stack The protocol stack used by the sink and all sensor nodes: Combines power and routing awareness, integrates data with networking protocols, communicates power efficiently through the wireless medium. promotes cooperative efforts of nodes.

Protocol Stack The power, mobility, and task management planes: monitor the power, mobility, and task distribution among the sensor nodes.

Physical Layer (1/3) Responsible of: Frequency selection : 916 MHz, 2.4 GHz carrier frequency generation, signal detection, modulation and data encryption.

Physical Layer (2/3)-Propagation Aspects Energy minimization has significant importance more than: scattering, shadowing, reflection, diffraction, multi-path and fading effects. Multi-hop communication can effectively overcome shadowing and path-loss effects, if the node density is high enough.

Physical Layer (3/3)-Modulation Scheme M-ary scheme  increased radio power consumption. Binary modulation scheme is more energy efficient BFSK used.

Data Link Layer Responsible for: the multiplexing of data streams, data frame detection, medium access and error control.

Data Link Layer-MAC Protocol Sources of energy inefficiency: Collision. Overhearing. Control packet overhead. Idle listening.  So, there is a need for a MAC protocol that solve these problems.

Data Link Layer-MAC Protocol Several Protocols used in the Link Layer: Self-Organizing Medium Access Control for Sensor Networks (S-MACS) CSMA. Hybrid TDMA/FDMA based.

Data Link Layer/S-MAC S-MAC: MAC protocol specifically designed for WSN. Building on random access - based protocols. S-MAC solve the problem of all the major sources of energy waste: idle listening, collision, overhearing and control overhead. Not suitable for time-critical applications  because latency in end-to-end communication. Design goals: Reduce energy consumption Support good scalability Self-configurable

Data Link Layer/S-MAC Uses a sleep/wakeup cycle to allow nodes to spend most of their time sleep: Listen period: for nodes that have data to send to coordinate. A sleep period : nodes sleep if they have no data to send or receive, and nodes remain awake and exchange data if they are involved in communication. In a sleep mode when the radio is switched off, the node sets a timer to awake later. When the timer expires, it wakes up. Selection of sleep and listen duration is based on the application scenarios.

Data Link Layer/S-MAC Each node maintains a schedule table. Nodes exchange schedules by broadcast. Multiple neighbors contend for the medium A communication link : a pair of time slots operating at a randomly chosen but fixed frequency (or frequency hopping sequence). Once transmission starts, it does not stop until completed.

Data Link Layer/S-MAC Nodes a and b follow different schedules. If a wants to send to b, it just wait until b is listening.

Neighboring nodes are synchronized together. Data Link Layer/S-MAC Neighboring nodes are synchronized together. Maintaining Synchronization: Needed to prevent clock drift Periodic updating using a SYNC packet Receivers adjust their timer counters Sender Node ID Next-Sleep Time SYNC Packet

Data Link Layer/S-MAC Collision avoidance: Perform virtual and physical carrier sense before transmission. RTS/CTS solves the hidden terminal problem. Interfering nodes go to sleep after they hear the RTS or CTS packet Overhearing Avoidance: NAV. indicates how long the remaining transmission will be. The medium is busy when the NAV value is not zero All immediate neighbors of sender and receiver should go to sleep  avoiding energy waste on overhearing.

Data Link Layer/S-MAC

Network Layer (1/6) Special multi-hop wireless routing protocols between sink node and sensors are needed. Traditional ad hoc routing techniques do not usually fit. When we design network layer protocols for sensor networks, we need to consider: Power efficiency. Sensor networks are data-centric. addressing and location awareness.

Network Layer (2/6) Routing Techniques: Maximum PA route: Max. total PA without including routes that add extra hops. Minimum Energy route: Route that consumes min. energy. Energy-efficient routes: can be found based on the available power (PA) and the energy required α for transmission in the links. Minimum hop route: Min. hop to reach the sink. Maximum minimum PA node route: Use the route in which the min. PA is larger than the min. PAs of the other routes. This scheme prevents the risk of using up a sensor node with low PA much earlier than the others just because it is on the route with nodes that have very high PAs.

Network Layer (3/6) Protocols Used: Flooding SPIN Directed Diffusion LEACH

Network Layer (4/6) Flooding is an old technique for routing. Duplicate messages. Overlap. Resource blindness. Sensor Protocols for Information via Negotiations (SPIN): Send sensor data instead of all the data. 3 types of messages: Advertise, Request & Data.

Network Layer (5/6) The Directed diffusion: Sink send out “interest”. Each S-node stores the interest entry in its cache. Interest entry contains a timestamp and several gradient fields. As the interest propagates, the gradients back to sink are set up. When the source has data for the interest, the source sends data along the interest’s gradient path. Based on data-centric routing.

Network Layer (6/6) (Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy) LEACH The characteristics of LEACH: Randomly rotating the cluster-head among sensors. Low energy consumption.

Transport Layer Transport layer is especially needed when the system is planned to be accessed through the Internet or other external networks. TCP: transmission window mechanisms is not suitable, TCP splitting will be used: Between User Sink (TCP or UDP) Between Sink nodes (UDP)

Application Layer Sensor Management protocol: Exchanging the data. Time synchronization Moving the nodes, turning them on and off etc. Sensor Query and Data distribution protocol. User applications with interfaces to issue queries, respond to queries and collect incoming replies.

Conclusion The Protocols used are not well defined and they are open research issues. The advantages of WSN’s create many new and exciting application areas for remote sensing, so they will be an integral part of our lives.

Thank You