Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click to edit Master title style »Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level Fifth level Construction Update 11/13/2012 Larry.
Advertisements

4-1 Application Workshop. 4-2 Module Objectives Apply the concepts learned to a freeway lane closure Case 1. Without a back up Case 2. With a back up.
Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
Joe Rouse California Department of Transportation Division of Traffic Operations Office of System Management Operations.
Ed Cox City of Sacramento, Department of Public Works Bicycle Solutions in Sacramento.
TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS: GETTING THE MOST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK! GPA Fall Conference 2013 Garth Lynch, PE, AICP HNTB Corporation October 10, 2013.
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Ginger Goodin, Texas Transportation Institute Greg Jones, Federal Highway Administration.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES.
The USDOT Urban Partners & FHWA August 20, 2007 Webcast with Division Offices Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
I-35W and 46 th Street Final Service Restructuring Plan.
CEE 8207 Design of Sustainable Transportation System CEE 8207 Design of Sustainable Transportation System Today’s Topic A tool of sustainability Types.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
An Integrated Systems Approach for Border Crossings Transportation Border Working Group Semiannual Meeting Burlington VT June 10-11, 2003 Kevin L. Bebenek.
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Mn/DOT Metro District 20- Year Highway Investment Plan Update: (Adopted: December 21, 2011) FHWA and Georgia Operations Summit and Planning for.
Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.
FAST Lanes Program Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Association of Metropolitan Municipalities August 16, 2004 Minnesota Department.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Virginia Department of Education
Control the movement of traffic Give commands or set limits No U-Turn.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Congestion Pricing and Urban Partnerships Presentation 11 US Department of Transportation Part 4: Urban Partnership Agreements.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
I-394 MnPASS Express Lanes Project Update Guidestar Board Meeting September 7th, 2005.
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – Mn/DOT Traffic Operations – Mn/DOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
Pricing Traffic: Pacing Growth Robert T. Dunphy Senior Resident Fellow Urban Land Institute.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Travel Reliability – Reliable traffic flow is more important than reducing congestion – traffic congestion is often a sign of an area’s economic vitality.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
I-394 MnPASS Enhancements: A Vision for the Future Center For Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota 19 th Annual Transportation Research Conference.
Brian Kary – Freeway Operations Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
I-95 Corridor Study: Phase 1 Discussion January 7, 2016.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
Brian Kary Freeway Operations Engineer. Active Traffic Management.
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study
I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
Indiana Department of Transportation
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation

I-35W UPA Project Summary I-35W UPA Project Budget: $65.7M Combined $133 M in Federal funds, with $50.2 M in State Funds Funded 24 different projects and initiatives in four areas – Congestion Pricing (Tolling) – Transit – Telecommuting – Technology

I-35W HOV to HOT Conversion Existing HOV Lane extended/ converted to HOT Lane – Extend existing HOV through system interchange – Widen HOT lane to add buffer – Added tolling and lane management technology – Modified signing and striping HOT Lane now complete through the I-35W/Crosstown project

Priced Dynamic Shoulder Lane (PDSL): Segment 3: 3 miles Priced Dynamic Shoulder Lane North of 42 nd St on NB 35W Maintains existing 4 lanes with an added PDSL Lane Effectively extends the MnPASS lane to downtown Minneapolis using existing road space

I-35W HOT Lane Signing

ILCS located every ½ mile over every lane. A total of 174 ILCS are installed ILCS are a 4ft x 5ft full color matrix signs. Use of the ILCS is primarily for incident management and speed harmonization. Designates when the priced dynamic shoulder lane is open or closed along with additional signing. I-35W Intelligent Lane Control Signals

ILCS Sign Options Blank – default Green – Lane Open Flashing Yellow – Caution Red X – Closed  X  X 1 MILE Yellow X – Closed Ahead Merge Speed Limit White Diamond 40 MPH >>>

Variable Speed Limits Advisory Only Detection measures traffic speeds downstream Speeds are posted up to 1 ½ miles upstream

Innovative Design

I-35W MnPASS Early Results MnPASS users per day prior to Crosstown opening; use PDSL 6000 new transponders holders in I-35W corridor About 150 new-account holders sign up for 35W per week % of total customers are MnPASS – 8% violation rate Almost 2000 new transponder holders in I-394 corridor

BRT Integration In I-35 W Corridor

What’s Next for MnPASS Congestion Pricing? All existing HOV lanes converted to HOT Seeking MnPASS expansion opportunities under several design concepts: – 2 miles extension of I-35W HOT lane in 2011 – Implementing managed lanes and shoulders on I-94 in 2011 – Studying MnPASS lane using movable barrier on major river crossing – More dynamic shoulders under consideration MnPASS Phase II Study prioritizing system expansion areas