1 Measure M Investment Plan Update. 2 Measure M: A Contract With the Voters Approved by 55 percent of voters in November 1990 after two failures One-half.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To insert photo, click View > Master > Slide Master 1.42” x 1.83" To insert photo, click View > Master > Slide Master 2” x 2.68" To insert photo, click.
Advertisements

Q2 Board Meeting.  The Silicon Valley economy is booming... & traffic reflects it  Leadership Group has long history of championing successful countywide.
Orange County Transportation Authority Measure M2 M2020 Update and Select Project Highlights Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December.
Measure M Sunset Action Plan. Overview  Promises Made, Promises Kept  Funding Picture  Use of Measure M (M1) Freeway Funds  Next Steps 2.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
American Society for Public Administration State and Local Fiscal Challenges April 12, 2010 Santa Clara County, California.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Overview CMAA May 29, What is Metro Regional Rail >Manage more than 165 miles of R/W in L.A. County >Develop capital improvement projects and.
Ballot Financing Alameda County Presented by Tess Lengyel, Deputy Director Center for Transportation Excellence June 22, 2011.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Public transit in Indiana – the path forward November 2012.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center Project Update.
Recent Actions By the City and County of Los Angeles To Address Family Homelessness Ruth Schwartz Shelter Partnership, Inc.
David Armijo, CEO Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Potential Transit Enhancements With Gas Tax Funding Hillsborough County Transportation Task Force.
Pass-through Fund and Grant Programs Update A Presentation by John Hemiup Senior Transportation Engineer October 2012.
Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.
October Prop K Strategic Plan & 5-Year Prioritization Programs Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee October 24, 2007.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR LOW INCOME SENIORS October 22, 2013.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
Finance—The Critical Link Shifting Sands The Evolution of Surface Transportation Finance The California Experience UCLA Policy and Research Symposium Series.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ACEC-LA Luncheon February 12, 2014 Frank Quon, P.E. Executive Officer, Highway Program.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Public-Private Partnership Program 2015 Update 2015 American Council of Engineering Companies ACEC – Los Angeles Chapter Luncheon, July 8, 2015.
Wake County Transit Plan Choose how you move! December 7, 2011 Capital Area Friends of Transit 1.
California High-Speed Train Project California High-Speed Rail Metro Bus Operations Subcommittee January 2010.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee March 13, 2012 Will Kempton, OCTA CEO.
Department of Transportation Consideration of Potential City of Pasadena Position Related to SR710 Extension Alternatives Being Considered By Metro City.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
What & Why? The Current State of California’s Transportation Funding Therese W. McMillan Deputy Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Measure D Renewal Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District August 4, 2015 Charles Heath, Partner.
91 Express Lanes Kirk Avila Treasurer/General Manager.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
CHSRA SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM Society of American Military Engineers (SAME) Thursday, November 8, 2012.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
OneBayArea Grant Update ( Cycle 2 STP/CMAQ) Regional Advisory Working Group April 3, 2012 Craig Goldblatt, MTC.
SB 1024 (Perata and Torlakson) The Safe Facilities, Improved Mobility, Disaster Preparedness and Clean Air Bond Act of 2005.
T3 Webinar – April 26, 2012 Fare Integration A Regional Approach U.S. DOT Southern California Regional Rail Authority Orange County Transportation Authority.
Fiscal Year Annual Report Measure A Oversight Committee February 23, 2016.
Community Outreach Spring A New Way to Think Transportation vs. Mobility Photo credits: Top right, Richard Masoner, Flickr; bottom right: Wldehart,
PROTECT CALIFORNIA’S KIDS SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE Association of California School Administrators April 14 th 2016.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
I-80 San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Project – Phase 1.
Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
OUR CHALLENGE, OUR CHOICE RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS Policy Leadership Group July 16, 2015.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
NORTH & SOUTH FULTON TRANSPORTATION VOTE November 8, 2016.
Measure M2 Performance Assessment
Regional Roads Committee
Montgomery County Capital & Operating Budget Process Briefing
Community Outreach Spring 2016.
Motion Measure M Movement Mojo
Public transit in Indiana – the path forward November 2012
Transportation Funding Update
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
SANDY SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WATER PORTFOLIO. WATER PORTFOLIO WATER RESILIENCY CHALLENGES Fractured Jurisdiction Pollution Climate Change Limited Infrastructure Reliance on Imported.
The OC Plan and Integrated Regional Water Management in Orange County
Regional Projects Report 5-Year Integrated Plan Projects Status
Early Voting Starts Oct. 20 | Election Day Nov
Preparing for Our Future
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Measure M Investment Plan Update

2 Measure M: A Contract With the Voters Approved by 55 percent of voters in November 1990 after two failures One-half cent local transportation sales tax for twenty years Specific spending plan approved by voters Ends on April 1, 2011 Can be extended only with two-thirds majority voter approval

3 Measure M: A Contract Fulfilled ProjectsCompletedUnderway I-5 I-5/I-405 Widening SR-55 SR-57 SR-91 P.E. ROW Purchase Metrolink: OC to LA Metrolink: Riverside to OC Fare Stabilization Transitways Regional Road Projects Local “Turnback” SR-22 I-5 Far North Rail transit

4 Without Measure M… The I-5 would still be six lanes wide from Tustin north No El Toro “Y” improvements No widening of the SR-55, SR-91, SR-57 or SR-22 $1 billion less invested in streets and roads No Metrolink rail service No rail rights-of-way Higher fares for seniors and disabled

5 Beyond Measure M IF NOTHING CHANGES: Orange County loses $310 million of transportation funds in first year Cities lose 50 percent of road maintenance funds Ability to fund new transportation capacity is gone

6 Orange County Future Growth % 39% 27% 15% PopulationJobs HousingTraffic

7 Why So Much Traffic? Growth in Traffic Far Outstrips Population in California Source: Public Policy Institute of California

8 An Aging Population Source: Orange County Projections 2004, Center for Demographic Research, CSUF

9 Renewing Measure M Requires: New Investment Plan Approved by: 1.Majority of city councils representing majority of incorporated population 2.Board of Supervisors 3.Two-thirds of OCTA Board Plus: Two-thirds majority voter approval

10 Why Renew Measure M Now? Promises Made, Promises Kept Current Measure M projects delivered or underway Maintain Progress Begin new projects by 2007 Compete for state/federal funds Limited Options Two-thirds vote may require more than one election cycle

11 “Self-Help” Counties Los Angeles Two 1/2 Cent Sale Taxes No Expiration San Bernardino 1/2 Cent Sales Tax Expires 2039 Riverside 1/2 Cent Sales Tax Expires 2039 San Diego 1/2 Cent Sales Tax Expires 2048 Orange 1/2 Cent Sales Tax Expires Self-Help Counties Have Local Transportation Sales Tax All Southern California Self-Help Counties Except Orange County Have Extended Local Transportation Sales Tax

12 Support for M Renewal VoteNov. 2004Jul. 2005Oct Support71%69% 72% Oppose23%25% 21% No Opinion6% 7%

13 Projects With Countywide Support ProjectsSupport Maintain streets and fill potholes72% Improve the Riverside Freeway (SR-91)70% Improve the Orange Crush interchange65% Improve the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5)64% Coordinate traffic signals countywide64% Clean road runoff to protect beaches63% Improve pedestrian safety near schools63% Transit for seniors and disabled persons58%

14 Emerging Investment Plan: Overview 1.Thirty-year duration for Measure M renewal 2.Revenue estimate of $ billion (2005) 3.Allocation 43 percent for freeways 32 percent for roads 25 percent for transit 4.Environmental Cleanup Program Transportation-related water quality improvements 5.Strong Voter Safeguards and Audit Provisions Annual independent audits Taxpayers’ Oversight Committee 10-year reviews with voter approval for changes

15 Emerging Investment Plan: Freeways Freeway Highlights: 1.Nearly $1.5 billion to improve the SR-91 2.More than $1 billion to improve I-5 in South Orange County 3.Widen I-405 from Irvine to LA County 4.Fix Orange Crush and I-5/SR-55 interchanges 5.Widen SR-55, SR-57 and improve access to SR-22 and I-605

16 Emerging Investment Plan: Streets & Roads Streets & Roads Highlights: 1.More than double funds for fixing local streets 2.Enable “master plan” of roads to be completed 3.Coordinate more than 2000 signals countywide on major roads across city boundaries 4.Provide flexible funds for safer school access and cleaning up road runoff

17 Emerging Investment Plan: Transit Transit Highlights: 1.High-Frequency Metrolink - Reaches two-thirds of jobs and of population -Connect to LA, Inland Empire and San Diego -Upgrade stations, parking, crossings, quiet zones and safety improvements 2.Metrolink Extensions -Cities compete with best projects -Could be monorail, light rail, BRT or other technology 3.High-speed rail links 4.Community mini-bus services 5.Senior/disabled transit -Continue low fares -Continue and expand Senior Mobility Program -Continue and expand non-emergency medical transportation

18 Emerging Investment Plan: Environmental Cleanup Environmental Cleanup Highlights: 1.Nearly $240 million exclusively for transportation-related water quality improvements 2.Competitive grant process; emphasize high-impact, most cost effective capital projects 3.Improvements made by cities, County, water and sewer agencies 4.Strong safeguards and audit requirements

19 Emerging Investment Plan: Safeguards & Audits Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits Highlights: 1.All spending subject to annual independent audit 2.Public review of plan every 10 years; changes need voter approval 3.Annual report to taxpayers 4.Severe penalties for misspending funds 5.All funds kept in separate trust fund 6.Administration limited to 1 percent of funds 7.Taxpayers’ Oversight Committee reviews all spending

20 OCTA Adopts Measure to Go on Ballot Request Cities and County Approval to Place Plan on the Ballot Revise and Refine Draft Investment Plan Release Draft Investment Plan for Review Public Education and Outreach Local Officials and Community Leaders Input Next Steps Community input Through December 2005 Public reviews Draft Plan January 2006 through April 2006 OCTA revises Draft Plan based on cities/public input April 2006 OCTA requests cities and County to approve Plan to go to voters April 2006 through June 2006 OCTA adopts plan and Board of Supervisors places on the ballot July 2006 Public votesNov. 7, 2006