AQS Data Handling (Under the Hood) AQS Conference August 23, 2012 Robert Coats.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AQS Futures (Where is AQS Heading?) AQS Conference August 22, 2012 Robert Coats.
Advertisements

Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Colorado May 2013.
Using Web Discoverer with AQS ADVANCED Way Poteat & Fletcher Clover USEPA – National Air Data Group 2012 AQS Conference – August 24, 2012 Providence, Rhode.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Nevada May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Ohio July 2013.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Jersey May 2013.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Management of Air Quality Monitoring Data Debbie Miller National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS CONFERENCE Jake Summers June 9, 2010.
Introduction to Standard Reports. Standard Reports 2 How to get information out of AQS Standard Reports Site / Monitor Metadata Detail Data Reports “
Treatment of Natural Events WESTAR Planning Committee & WESTAR NEP Workgroup March 28, 2006.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Utah May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Virginia May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New York May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Central States May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Maryland May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Florida May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Arkansas July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Midwestern States July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Michigan July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Iowa May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Northeastern States July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Wisconsin July 2013.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Sites Impacted by ‘Special’ Events
Number of Hours Above 1-hour Ozone NAAQS
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

AQS Data Handling (Under the Hood) AQS Conference August 23, 2012 Robert Coats

Topics Sample measurement acceptance/rejection rules ½ MDL Substitution Rounding and truncating Allowed and disallowed qualifiers Summary statistics – pollutant standards and exceptional data types Collection frequency Data completeness AQS Conference2Providence, Rhode Island

Standard Value Calculation Process AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island3

Acceptance / Rejection Rules for Raw Data Site-Monitor configuration: –Monitor exists and is active, monitor ownership, and etc. Valid protocol: Combination of (parameter, method, unit, duration, collection frequency) No duplicates Value between absolute min and absolute max for method AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island4

One-Half MDL Substitution The default behavior for AQS is to perform ½ MDL substitution As of this writing, there are 85 parameters where ½ MDL substitution does not occur. They are listed at under the name parameters_nomdlsub.xls. If an alternate MDL is provided on the RD transaction, it is used instead of the Federal MDL for the Methodology The AQS Team has been directed to reverse the present configuration, so that no ½ MDL substitution is the default. AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island5

Rounding and Truncating AQS allows values to be reported with up to 5 digits after the decimal as Raw Data. AQS calculates a value in Standard Units for the parameter –The number of digits after the decimal is specified by the summary scale for the method –Rounding or truncating is specified for the parameter. Depending on the parameter, AQS may compute a multi- hour rolling or block average (rounded or truncated). AQS computes daily, quarterly, and annual statistics from the “Standard Value” or above average (not rounded or truncated). The statistic (e.g., annual mean) used for comparison to the NAAQS standard is rounded or truncated as per 40 CFR Part 50. AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island6

Allowed and Disallowed Qualifiers AQS maintains a table of qualifiers that are allowed for each parameter (posted at ) For Regulatory parameters, the OAQPS monitoring staff have explicitly specified qualifiers that should be disallowed by parameter For non-regulatory parameters, qualifiers allowed on request subject to approval by the OAQPS monitoring staff. (i.e., many are presently configured to be allowed, but not all. New ones can be requested ( AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island7

Summaries and Pollutant Standards (1) Each criteria pollutant has a set of NAAQS standards: –Lead: 3-Month Rolling Average, Quarterly Standard (old) –CO: 8-Hour Standard, and 1-Hour Standard –SO2: 1-Hour Standard, Annual Standard, 24-Hour Standard, Secondary 3-Hour Standard, –PM 10: 24-Hour Standard –PM 2.5: 24-hour Standard, Annual Standard –NO2: 1-Hour Standard, Annual Standard –Ozone: 8-Hour 2008, 8-Hour 1997, 1-Hour Standard For each standard, separate summary records are computed at each time period (daily, annual, etc.) –Caveat: Only summaries that “make sense” are computed. See: AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island8

Summary Statistics – Exceptional Data Types For each summary, a record is created for each Exceptional Data type: –0: No Flagged Data –1: All Flagged values excluded from statistics –2: Nothing excluded from statistics (i.e. ignore flags) –5: Exclude regionally concurred exceptional event flags The net effect of the combination of Pollutant Standards and Exceptional Data types, is that there may be many records for a given summary period (e.g., Annual Summary) AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island9

Collection Frequency Collection frequency shows up in two places in AQS – At the Monitor level as “Required Collection Frequency”, and for Raw Data as the “Collection Frequency Code” on the RD transaction. The “Collection Frequency Code” from the RD transaction is deprecated; it is not used for any processing in AQS. All completeness calculations, for other than hourly data, are controlled by the Monitor Required Collection Frequency. AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island10

Data Completeness Annual data completeness for criteria pollutants is determined as specified by 40 CFR Part 50. For non-criteria pollutants with daily duration (or a longer time period), it is determined using the Monitor Required Collection Frequency (RCF). In the past, there have been issues with the AQS Data Completeness Report, AMP430, for non- criteria pollutants. A change is in progress to this report, so that its results will exactly agree with the annual summaries for those pollutants. AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island11

AQS ConferenceProvidence, Rhode Island12 Questions?