My Favorite Russian Joke

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For the woman who has a husband is bound by the law to her husband as long as he lives. But if the husband dies, she is released from the law of her husband.
Advertisements

Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic.
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Chapter 1 Section 1.1 Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning.
Other Info on Making Arguments
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Logos Formal Logic.
Deduction and Induction
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
 Monty Python – Argument Clinic video  Monty Python Monty Python.
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Basic Argumentation.
Section 2 Logic.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1D, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.
GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
1 Arguments. 2 What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. A philosophical argument is not.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
FALSE PREMISE.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
1 Is Abortion Wrong? III. 2 Brody’s Project Brody argues that, given Thomson’s presumption that the squidge has a full right to life, her argument that.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning Starts with a general rule (a premise) which we know to be true. Then, from that rule, we make.
Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Making Generalizations. What is a generalization? A generalization is a broad statement about a group of people or things. It states something they have.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Determining Validity and Invalidity in Deductive Arguments PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 6, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Ways of Knowing: Reason Reason. Cogito ergo sum Reasoning Deductive Inductive.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
LECTURE 17 THE MODAL ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (A VARIANT OF HARTSHORNE’S VERSION)
Argument Diagramming Part I
The construction of a formal argument
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
2.3 Methods of Proof.
(not about ships this time)
Some common informal fallacies. Fallacies of: 1. Presumption2. Ambiguity3. Grammatical Analogy.
Text Table of Contents #5: Evaluating the Argument.
Jamie S. Burton PHI 103 Gloria Zuniga y Postigo April 21, 2014.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
a valid argument with true premises.
A Crash Course in Logic : Introduction to Philosophy
Philosophy Logic Lesson 1.
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Making Sense of Arguments
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
Syllogisms.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
Presentation transcript:

My Favorite Russian Joke A Russian Woman borrows a teapot from her neighbor. She returns it broken, and the neighbor sues. In court, the woman makes three statements in her defense:

My Favorite Russian Joke I never borrowed the pot.

My Favorite Russian Joke I never borrowed the pot. When I borrowed the teapot, it was already broken.

My Favorite Russian Joke I never borrowed the pot. When I borrowed the teapot, it was already broken. When I gave it back, it was undamaged.

Nobody knows the future/God is omniscient.

Nobody knows the future/God is omniscient. I can choose what to eat for breakfast tomorrow/God knows what I will choose.

Nobody knows the future/God is omniscient. I can choose what to eat for breakfast tomorrow/God knows what I will choose.

Abortion is wrong because it is always wrong to take a human life/Capital punishment is a just punishment for murder

Abortion is wrong because it is always wrong to take an innocent human life/Capital punishment is a just punishment for murder

I am the same person that I was when I was five years old/Everything changes

I am the same person that I was when I was five years old/Everything changes No animal has a soul/Humans are animals

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions These terms refer to relations between facts.

Necessary Conditions A condition q is necessary for p if it is impossible for something to be p without being q.

Necessary Conditions Example: Being an animal is a necessary condition for being a mammal.

Necessary Conditions Example: Being an animal is a necessary condition for being a mammal. Being married is a necessary condition for getting a divorce.

A Diagram of Necessary Conditions Animals Mammals Everything inside the large circle is an animal; nothing outside the large circle is an animal.

A Diagram of Necessary Conditions Animals Mammals Everything inside the large circle is an animal; nothing outside the large circle is an animal. Everything inside the small orange circle is a mammal; nothing outside the small circle is an animal.

A Diagram of Necessary Conditions Animals Mammals Everything inside the large circle is an animal; nothing outside the large circle is an animal. Everything inside the small orange circle is a mammal; nothing outside the small circle is an animal. Since the small circle is entirely enclosed within the large one, you can say that it has to be animal if it is a mammal.

A Diagram of Necessary Conditions Animals Mammals Everything inside the large circle is an animal; nothing outside the large circle is an animal. Everything inside the small orange circle is a mammal; nothing outside the small circle is an animal. Since the small circle is entirely enclosed within the large one, you can say that it has to be animal if it is a mammal. Thus, being an animal is a necessary condition for being a mammal.

Sufficient Conditions A condition p is sufficient for q if it is impossible for something to be p without being q.

Example of sufficient condition Being a mammal is a sufficient condition for being an animal, because it is impossible for something to be a mammal and not be an animal.

Example of sufficient condition . Animals Mammals Put slightly different, if you know p is a mammal, that’s enough to know that p is an animal.

Example of sufficient condition . Animals Mammals Put slightly different, if you know p is a mammal, that’s enough to know that p is an animal.

Food 4 Thought Being an animal is a _______ condition for being a monkey.

Food 4 Thought Being an animal is a necessary condition for being a monkey.

Food 4 Thought Being an animal is a necessary condition for being a monkey. Being a grandfather is a ________ condition for being a father.

Food 4 Thought Being an animal is a necessary condition for being a monkey. Being a grandfather is a sufficient condition for being a father.

Food 4 Thought Being an animal is a necessary condition for being a monkey. Being a grandfather is a sufficient condition for being a father.

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions.

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions.

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions. Inductive

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions. Inductive “as if” indicates probability rather than logical certainty.

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions.

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions. Deductive

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions. Deductive 1. All D = N

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions. Deductive 1. All D = N 2. J = D.

Deductive Or Inductive? A completely drunk person is not responsible for his actions. John behaves as if he is completely drunk. Therefore: John is not responsible for his actions. Deductive 1. All D = N 2. J = D. 3. Therefore: J = N.

Deductive or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity. Human cloning is certainly not a blessing for humanity. So human cloning immoral.

Deductive Or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity.

Deductive Or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity. Human cloning is certainly not a blessing for humanity.

Deductive Or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity. Human cloning is certainly not a blessing for humanity. So human cloning immoral.

Deductive Or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity. Human cloning is certainly not a blessing for humanity. So human cloning immoral. Deductive 1. Either I or B

Deductive Or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity. Human cloning is certainly not a blessing for humanity. So human cloning immoral. Deductive 1. Either I or B 2. Not B.

Deductive Or Inductive? Either human cloning is immoral, or it will be a blessing for humanity. Human cloning is certainly not a blessing for humanity. So human cloning immoral. Deductive 1. Either I or B 2. Not B. 3. Therefore: I.

Valid or Not? If the premises of a deductive argument are true, then the conclusive must be true.

Valid or Not? No government has the right to force people to pay taxes. Therefore: The U.S. Government has no right to force people to pay taxes.

Valid or Not? No government has the right to force people to pay taxes. Therefore: The U.S. Government has no right to force people to pay taxes. Valid

Valid or Not? No government has the right to force people to pay taxes. Therefore: The U.S. Government has no right to force people to pay taxes. Valid All G = ~R.

Valid or Not? No government has the right to force people to pay taxes. Therefore: The U.S. Government has no right to force people to pay taxes. Valid All G = ~R. U = G.

Valid or Not? No government has the right to force people to pay taxes. Therefore: The U.S. Government has no right to force people to pay taxes. Valid All G = ~R. U = G. Therefore: U = ~R

Valid or Not? All successful people are happy.

Valid or Not? All successful people are happy. Jill is happy.

Valid or Not? All successful people are happy. Jill is Happy. Therefore Jill is successful.

Valid or Not? All successful people are happy. Jill is Happy. Therefore Jill is successful. All S = H.

Valid or Not? All successful people are happy. Jill is Happy. Therefore Jill is successful. All S = H. All j = H.