Positrons for a New Measurement of the Positron Magnetic Moment Shannon Fogwell Hoogerheide Lepton Moments 2014 July 21, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atomic masses – Competition worldwide K. Blaum, Phys. Rep. 425, 1-78 (2006) Penning-trap mass spectrometry groups for stable masses: D. Pritchard, MIT.
Advertisements

Participants: C-1:Cryogenic last-stage suspensions (interferometers) (F.Ricci-G.Frossati) Objectives: -Design new suspension elements for the last stage.
Correlated cyclotron and spin measurements to make an improved measurement of the electron magnetic moment Elise Novitski Harvard University Lepton Moments.
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
Interim Design Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16.
Geonium A Fake but Useful Atom BoBo. Overview What is Geonium and why is it useful? A little bit of history What is a Penning trap? Penning trap components.
ICEoxford Limited. Development of ICE Beam line equipment Copyright © 2011 ICEoxford Ltd Starting Point A simple Continuous Flow (CF) system.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
GaAs and CsKSb Photocathodes for DC Gun
Daniel Lenz, University of Wisconsin, Madison 11/05/ APS DNP Cryogenic search for neutrinoless double beta decay Daniel Lenz on behalf of the CUORE.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM24 at RAL June 1, 2009.
S. Stahl: Cryogenic Electronics in Ion Traps Part I S. Stahl, CEO Stahl-Electronics Cryogenic Electronics in Ion Traps.
Status and Highlights of the DC Field User Program as of summer 2010, mid-point in current award period Graphene – in distinct PIs, 9 of them.
M. D. A NDERSON Cancer Center Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 4.7 T, 40 cm Bruker Biospec James A Bankson, Ph.D. and John D Hazle, Ph.D. Small Animal Cancer.
An Autonomous Dilution Microcryostat- Insert for Nano Physics V. S. Edelman, Institute for Physical Problems RAS, Moscow, Russia The cryostat with base.
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
Slide 1 D G Haase, EDM Meeting, 5/06 Refrigeration and Heat Budget for the EDM Cryostat David G. Haase Physics Department North Carolina State University.
Gabrielse New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University.
Lecture 2:Research frontiers 1 9/9/ FYPC Most recent long range planning reports: FYPC (Canada), NSAC (USA) Collision products at RHIC.
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Cooldown Scheme Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
1 Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Workshop on X­ Ray Mission Architectural C oncepts December 14-15, 2011 Approved for public release,
HD target.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
1 NEDM 4 He Purifier and Other Cryogenic Issues David G. Haase North Carolina State University Update on Cryovessel Engineering Evaporative Purification.
By Francesco Maddalena 500 nm. 1. Introduction To uphold Moore’s Law in the future a new generation of devices that fully operate in the “quantum realm”
Gabrielse New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Contribution of Penning trap mass spectrometry to neutrino physics Szilárd Nagy MPI-K Heidelberg, Germany New Instruments for Neutrino Relics and Mass,
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Large TPC Workshop, Paris, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL November 6, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.
111 Antimatter. Congratulations and Thanks Ron! Plasma Fusion Center, MIT Physics of Plasmas ‘95 Plasma Study.
Single photon counting detector for THz radioastronomy. D.Morozov 1,2, M.Tarkhov 1, P.Mauskopf 2, N.Kaurova 1, O.Minaeva 1, V.Seleznev 1, B.Voronov 1 and.
Study of T 1 relaxation time A proposal to test T 1 using a dilution fridge and SQUID NMA at Royal Hollow University,London.
C.KotnigFCC Design Meeting FCC Beam Screen cooling Claudio Kotnig.
CERN: The ATRAP Experiment. Preview Overview of the ATRAP Experiment  History  Ongoing work  Goals Presentation of my jobs and projects.
Cryostat & LHC Tunnel Slava Yakovlev on behalf of the FNAL team: Nikolay Solyak, Tom Peterson, Ivan Gonin, and Timergali Khabibouline The 6 th LHC-CC webex.
Dilution Refrigerators with Superconducting Magnets
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
Cryogenic Cooling Schemes for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
Some considerations about design and technology AE IS DT Science-Techno Tea meeting Diego Perini
Prototyping of Superconducting Magnets for RAON ECR IS S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science.
HIE ISOLDE Linac Short Technical Description W. Venturini Delsolaro Material from: L. Alberty, J. Bauche, Y. Leclerq, R. Mompo, D. Valuch, D. Voulot, P.
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
Review on the fine-structure constant and the g-2 electron
Traps for antiprotons, electrons and positrons in the 5 T and 1 T magnetic fields G. Testera & Genoa group AEGIS main magnetic field (on axis) : from Alexei.
1 K thermal model for QUBIC
Cryogen Free Desktop Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM) to 5 Tesla
Challenges of vacuum chambers with adjustable gap for SC undulators
MiniGRAIL “Extreme Make-over” Giorgio Frossati
Magneto-Photoluminescence of Carbon Nanotubes at Ultralow Temperatures
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
CW accelerating module test progress at DESY
Discussion on the TDI impedance specifications
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
Power Leads for Test Stands
Presentation transcript:

Positrons for a New Measurement of the Positron Magnetic Moment Shannon Fogwell Hoogerheide Lepton Moments 2014 July 21, 2014

Acknowledgements 2 Prof. Gerald Gabrielse Elise Novitski (PhD in progress…) Joshua Dorr (2013) Shannon Fogwell Hoogerheide (2013) New Apparatus Retractable Positron Source Positron Loading

2008 Electron Magnetic Moment Measurement 3 Best measurement of electron g-value: → Most precise determination of fine structure constant: →Most precise test of Standard Model and QED (with independent α) However, best measurement of positron g-value is only 4.3 ppt. This limits test of CPT violation in lepton systems: Could be improved by 15x with 0.28 ppt positron measurement T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, (2012) D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008) R. Bouchendira et.al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011) R. Van Dyck et.al. Phys. Rev. Lett (1987)

2008 Measurement 4 Best measurement of electron g-value: → Most precise determination of fine structure constant: →Most precise test of QED with independent α However, best measurement of positron g-value is only 4.3 ppt. This limits test of CPT violation in lepton systems: Could be improved by 15x with 0.28 ppt positron measurement T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, (2012) D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008) R. Bouchendira et.al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011) R. Van Dyck et.al. Phys. Rev. Lett (1987) Solution: New and Improved Apparatus with Positron Loading Capability!

5 Magnetic Field: 6 T Superconducting Solenoid Electric Field: Silver trap electrodes Axial Magnetron Cyclotron

6 Magnetic Field: 6 T Superconducting Solenoid Electric Field: Silver trap electrodes Dilution Refrigerator: Quantum measurement h c /k B ≈ 7.2 K Run at 100 mK <<1

New Apparatus cm

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability 8

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability 9 Challenge: Lowering warm apparatus straight into a liquid helium dewar without quenching the magnet

Cooldown Procedure hour cooling time Sliding seal plus glove bag

Cooldown Procedure hour cooling time Sliding seal plus glove bag

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability Radial Centering 12

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability Radial Centering Improved Magnetic Shielding 6x More Cooling Power at 100 mK (300 μW vs 50 μW) More Room for Electronics 13

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability Radial Centering Improved Magnetic Shielding 6x More Cooling Power at 100 mK (300 μW vs 50 μW) More Room for Electronics Smaller Magnetic Bottle – Narrower resonance lines 14

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability Radial Centering Improved Magnetic Shielding 6x More Cooling Power at 100 mK (300 μW vs 50 μW) More Room for Electronics Smaller Magnetic Bottle Trap Cavity Mode Design – Allows for new techniques (discussed in next talk) 15

Advantages of the New Apparatus Mechanical Stability Radial Centering Improved Magnetic Shielding 6x More Cooling Power at 100 mK (300 μW vs 50 μW) More Room for Electronics Smaller Magnetic Bottle Trap Cavity Mode Design Positron Source Access 16

Positron Source Source: Radioactive 22 Na capsule Requirements: Smallest source activity possible – Safety considerations – Minimal disruption to high-precision environment Reasonable loading rate 17

Positron Source Requirements Smallest source activity possible Reasonable loading rate 18 Solution: Positron Loading Trap

Positron Source Requirements Smallest source activity possible Reasonable loading rate Retractable source 19

Positron Source Requirements Smallest source activity possible Reasonable loading rate Retractable source – Advantages: Preserve high-precision environment for measurement Able to easily remove source from apparatus if desired 20

Positron Source Requirements Smallest source activity possible Reasonable loading rate Retractable source – Advantages: Preserve high-precision environment for measurement Able to easily remove source from apparatus if desired – Challenges: Move source at 100 mK Minimize heat load on Dil fridge: Dil fridge can only handle ~300 uW at 100 mK – a 1/32” (0.8 mm) hole at 300 K radiates ~200 uW at 100 mK! 21

Retractable Positron Source 22 Take great care to prevent room temperature thermal radiation from reaching cryogenic environment

Retractable Positron Source 23

Positron Loading Mechanism 24 J. Estrada et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 859 (2000) e+e+ Ps* e+e+ e-e-

Comparison of Source Size and Loading Rate 25 Source SizeLoading RateLoading Rate/mCi UW ’81-’87 (resistive damping) 0.5 mCi0.4 e + /min0.8 e + /min/mCi HU ’94-’95 (resistive damping + RMOD) 10 mCi12 e + /min1.2 e + /min/mCi HU ’00 (ATRAP) (TMOD only) 2.5 mCi420 e + /min170 e + /min/mCi HU ’00 (ATRAP) (TMOD + RMOD) 2.5 mCi1700 e + /min670 e + /min/mCi HU ’03 (ATRAP) (TMOD + RMOD) 75 mCi3.2x10 4 e + /min420 e + /min/mCi This work (TMOD only).0065 mCi1-2 e + /min e + /min/mCi

Comparison of Source Size and Loading Rate 26 Source SizeLoading RateLoading Rate/mCi UW ’81-’87 (resistive damping) 0.5 mCi0.4 e + /min0.8 e + /min/mCi HU ’94-’95 (resistive damping + RMOD) 10 mCi12 e + /min1.2 e + /min/mCi HU ’00 (TMOD only) 2.5 mCi420 e + /min170 e + /min/mCi HU ’00 (TMOD + RMOD) 2.5 mCi1700 e + /min670 e + /min/mCi HU ’03 (TMOD + RMOD) 75 mCi3.2x10 4 e + /min420 e + /min/mCi This work (TMOD only).0065 mCi1-2 e + /min e + /min/mCi

Loading Potentials 27

Loading Potentials 28

Positron Loading Rate Maximum positron loading rate: 1-2 e + /min for 6.5 μCi source, or 3-5 e + /s/mCi Similar normalized loading rate to the 2.5 mCi and 100 mCi sources used to demonstrate positronium loading method 3-5 times higher loading rate and 75 times smaller source than used in previous e + g- value measurement 29

Prospects for a New Positron Magnetic Moment Measurement New high-precision apparatus complete and running well Robust positron loading demonstrated Work is underway on transferring positrons to the precision trap Ready for new (and improved!) measurements (NEXT TALK) 30

31