VARISPOT FS-100-1 BEHAVIOR IN COLLIMATED AND DIVERGING BEAMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS Liviu Neagu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Measuring film thickness using Opti-Probe
Chapter 31: Images and Optical Instruments
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Cavity length alignement 1.Two alignement mirrors -> symmetric beam image 2.PZT sweeping with an amplitude = several FSR 3.Shift two plane mirrors (in.
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 2. The Propagation of Rays and Beams 2.0 Introduction Propagation of Ray through optical element : Ray (transfer)
Ray matrices The Gaussian beam Complex q and its propagation Ray-pulse “Kosten- bauder” matrices The prism pulse compressor Gaussian beam in space and.
 Light can take the form of beams that comes as close
Fundamental of Optical Engineering Lecture 4.  Recall for the four Maxwell’s equation:
Sz. Rózsa: Surveying I. – Lecture 2
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers
Lab 10: Lenses 1.Focal Length 2.Magnification 3.Lens Equation 4.Depth of Field 5.Spherical Aberrations and Curved Focal Plane 6.Chromatic Aberration 7.Astigmatism.
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers A Brief Guide to Understanding and Obtaining the Proper Resolution of the 785 Raman System.
Lens and its forms Faculty Aravind School of Optometry.
SLAC National Accelerator Center
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
Aberrations  Aberrations of Lenses  Analogue to Holographic Model  Aberrations in Holography  Implications in the aberration equations  Experimental.
Nature of light Ray or geometrical optics Wave or physical optics Quantum theory: W p =hf.
Design Realization lecture 26 John Canny 11/25/03.
Physics 52 - Heat and Optics Dr. Joseph F. Becker Physics Department San Jose State University © 2005 J. F. Becker San Jose State University Physics 52.
1 Chapter 10 Diffraction March 9, 11 Fraunhofer diffraction: The single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
The Ray Vector A light ray can be defined by two co-ordinates: x in,  in x out,  out its position, x its slope,  Optical axis optical ray x  These.
Ch 25 1 Chapter 25 Optical Instruments © 2006, B.J. Lieb Some figures electronically reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle.
Chapter 25 Optical Instruments.
Design of photographic lens Shinsaku Hiura Osaka University.
Lenses Chapter 30.
Chapter 30 Key Terms June 4 – June 10 Mr. Gaydos.
OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR VARIABLE RESIZING OF ROUND FLAT-TOP DISTRIBUTIONS George Nemeş, Astigmat, Santa Clara, CA, USA John A. Hoffnagle,
Optical Design Work for a Laser-Fiber Scanned
1 CS6825: Image Formation How are images created. How are images created.
SPECTROSCOPIC DIAGNOSTIC COMPLEX FOR STUDYING PULSED TOKAMAK PLASMA Yu. Golubovskii, Yu. Ionikh, A. Mestchanov, V. Milenin, I. Porokhova, N. Timofeev Saint-Petersburg.
Fiber-Optic Accelerometer Using Wavefront-Splitting Interferometry Hsien-Chi Yeh & Shulian Zhang July 14, 2006.
A diffraction grating with 10,000 lines/cm will exhibit the first order maximum for light of wavelength 510 nm at what angle? (1 nm = 10-9 m) 0.51° 0.62°
Mirrors & prisms MIT 2.71/ /12/01 wk2-b-1 Last time: optical elements, – Pinhole camera – Lenses Basic properties of spherical surfaces Ray tracing.
PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #22-23 MW April 14-16, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1 Cameras, Film, and Digital The Human Eye; Corrective Lenses Magnifying.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
S Optical CT scanning of PRESAGE TM polyurethane samples with a CCD-based readout system S J Doran 1*, N Krstajic 1, J Adamovics 2 and P M Jenneson 1 1.
Optical Density - a property of a transparent medium that is an inverse measure of the speed of light through the medium. (how much a medium slows the.
D. Missiaen Summaries of the discussion. 2 H. Mainaud Durand The iris diaphragm laser alignment system for Spring 8 storage ring magnets Align multipoes.
Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many.
Computing the chromatic number for block intersection graphs of Latin squares Ed Sykes CS 721 project McMaster University, December 2004 Slide 1.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Zero field The 25 ‑ m f /0.7 primary mirror for the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT) is made of seven 8.4 ‑ m segments in a close packed array. Each of the.
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105 & ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 8: Gaussian Beams Prof. Charles A.
March Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECE-1466 Modern Optics Course Notes Part 2 Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University.
Lenses and Imaging (Part I) Why is imaging necessary: Huygen’s principle – Spherical & parallel ray bundles, points at infinity Refraction at spherical.
1.Stable radiation source 2.Wavelength selector 3.Transparent sample holder: cells/curvettes made of suitable material (Table 7- 2) 4.Radiation detector.
Image at:
The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Image formation
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2003 July 2003
Hartmann Sensor for advanced gravitational wave interferometers
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
Introduction to Nanoscan
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
25/05/2007POSIPOL FOUR MIRRORS Fabry Perot resonator at LAL-Orsay Y. Fedala With help of F. Zomer, R.Cizeron.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © All rights reserved. From: A Novel, Real-Time, In.
1 Yi-Pai HuangAdvanced Display Optics Lab 學研計畫 --- 子計畫二 掃描式光學元件 --- 多電極液晶透鏡 Speaker: Yi-Pai Huang ( 黃乙白教授 ) Department of Photonics and Display Institute,
Prism Pairs for Elliptical Beams
3. Beam optics.
Chapter 34 Geometric Optics © 2016 Pearson Education Inc.
MEDICAL LASER SYSTEMS Assist Prof. Dr. Lutfi Ghulam Awazli
Xenon lamp light source:
From: A Novel, Real-Time, In Vivo Mouse Retinal Imaging System
Single Tapered Fibre “Optical Tweezers”
W. Ali, R. Corsini, E. Ciaramella SSSA Pisa Italy
Lab 10: Lenses Focal Length Magnification Lens Equation Depth of Field
The M2 parameter in space ---beam quality factor
Scalar theory of diffraction
Optics John Arthur, SLAC & William W. Craig, LLNL April 24, 2002
Presentation transcript:

VARISPOT FS BEHAVIOR IN COLLIMATED AND DIVERGING BEAMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS Liviu Neagu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania L. Rusen, M. Zamfirescu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania George Nemeş, Astigmat, Santa Clara, CA, USA

OUTLINE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND BEAMS – 4 x 4 MATRIX TREATMENT 3. VARISPOT 4. EXPERIMENTS 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6. CONCLUSION

1. INTRODUCTION Importance of variable spots at fixed working distance - Material processing Drilling, cutting - small spots Annealing, surface treatment - large spots - Biology, medicine (dermatology, ophthalmology) Destroying small areas of tissue Photo-treatment of large areas of tissue - Laser research Adjustable power/energy densities - laser damage research Obtaining variable spots at a certain target plane - Classical: Spherical optics and longitudinal movement - This work: Cylindrical optics and rotational movement  VariSpot

2. OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND BEAMS: 4 x 4 MATRIX TREATMENT Basic concepts: rays, optical systems, beams Ray: R R T = (x(z) y(z) u v)

Optical system: S A 11 A 12 B 11 B 12 A B A 21 A 22 B 21 B 22 S = = C D C 11 C 12 D 11 D 12 C 21 C 22 D 21 D 22 Properties: 0 I S J S T = J ; J = ; J 2 = - I; I = ; 0 = - I AD T – BC T = I AB T = BA T  det S = 1; S - max. 10 independent elements CD T = DC T A, D elements: numbers B elements: lengths (m) C elements: reciprocal lengths (m -1 ) Ray transfer property of S: R out = S R in

Beams in second - order moments: P = beam matrix W M W elements: lengths 2 (m 2 ) P = = = ; M elements: lengths (m) M T U U elements: angles 2 (rad 2 ) Properties: P > 0; P T = P  W T = W; U T = U; M T  M  P - max. 10 independent elements Beam transfer property (beam "propagation" property) of S: P out = S P in S T W = W I Example of a beam (rotationally symmetric, stigmatic) and its "propagation" M = M I U = U I W = W 0 W 2 = AA T W 0 + BB T U 0 In waist: M = 0 ; Output M 2 = AC T W 0 + BD T U 0 (z = 0) U = U 0 plane: U 2 = CC T W 0 + DD T U 0 Beam spatial parameters: D(z) = 4W 1/2 (z);  = 4U 1/2 z R = W 0 1/2 /U 1/2 = D 0 /  ; M 2 = (  /4)D 0  / ; Beam: P

Block diagram 2 - lens system: + Cylindrical lens, cylindrical axis fixed, vertical (f, 0) + Cylindrical lens, cylindrical axis rotatable about z (f,  ) 3. VARISPOT Round spot D(  ) Incoming beam y x z Waist D 0 Target plane d 1 (>0)d 20 (>0)  = 90 0 –   (f, 0) (f,  )

VariSpot and beam parameters d 20 - working distance after VariSpot, where the spot is round d 1 - distance from incoming beam waist plane to VariSpot first lens  = 90 0 –  - control parameter  D 0 - incoming beam waist diameter  - incoming beam divergence (full angle) z R - incoming beam Rayleigh range D(  ) - diameter of the round spot at target plane D m - minimum round spot diameter at target plane D M - maximum round spot diameter at target plane 1: Simple and important cases 1a: Well collimated incoming beam: z R >> f; z R >> d 1 ; d 1 = irrelevant 1b: Diverging beam, incoming beam waist at VariSpot first lens: d 1 = 0 2: General case Diverging incoming beam: d 1  0 VariSpot input-output relations

1. Well collimated incoming beam: z R >> f; z R >> d 1 d 20 = f D(  ) = D 0 [f 2 /z R 2 + sin 2 (  )] 1/2 = D m [1 + sin 2 (  )/(f/z R ) 2 ] 1/2 D m = D(0) = D 0 f/z R =   f D M = D(  2)  D 0 K M = D M /D m  z R /f - dynamic range (zoom range) Compare D(  ) = D m [1 + sin 2 (  )/(f/z R ) 2 ] 1/2 to free-space propagation: D(z) = D 0 (1 + z 2 /z R 2 ) 1/2

VariSpot input-output relations 2. General case: diverging incoming beam, d 1  0 d 20 = f(z R 2 + d 1 2 )/(z R 2 + d d 1 f) D(  ) = D m {1 + sin 2 (  )/[(fz R ) 2 /(z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 2 ]} 1/2 D m = D(0) = D 0 f (z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 1/2 /(z R 2 + d 1 2  d 1 f) D M = D(  2) = D 0 (z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 1/2 [(z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 2 + f 2 z R 2 ] 1/2 /[z R (z R 2 + d 1 2  d 1 f)] K M = D M /D m - dynamic range (zoom range) Compare D(  ) = D m {1 + sin 2 (  )/[(fz R ) 2 /(z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 2 ]} 1/2 to free-space propagation: D(z) = D 0 (1 + z 2 /z R 2 ) 1/2

VariSpot input-output relations 2. General case: diverging incoming beam, d 1  0 Compare D(  ) = D m {1 + sin 2 (  )/[(fz R ) 2 /(z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 2 ]} 1/2 to free-space propagation: D(z) = D 0 (1 + z 2 /z R 2 ) 1/2 D0D0 DmDm VARISPOT D(  ) FREE SPACE D(z)

4. EXPERIMENTS Experimental setup d 20 VariSpot Beam expander or focusing lens Beam profiler (CMOS camera or scanning slits) He-Ne Laser

Data on experiments CMOS camera beam profiler data (Type: WinCamD-UCM, Data Ray, USA) Pixel size: 6.7  m square Detector size: 1280 x 1024 pixels; 8.58 mm x 6.86 mm ADC dynamic range: 14 bits S/(rms)N: 500:1 Attenuator: gray glass, ND = 4.0 Note: Constant correction factor for CMOS camera: D real = 1.4 D displayed Scanning slit beam profiler data (Type: BeamScan, Photon Inc., USA) Two orthogonal scanning slits Slit size: 1  m x 3.4 mm VariSpot data (Type: FS , Astigmat, USA) “FS”  focus-mode, short length; “100”  f = 100 mm; “1”  D M /D 0 = 1 f = 100 mm  = Manually rotatable mount; +/- 1 0 resolution

Data on experiments Original He-Ne laser beam ( = 633 nm) Incoming beam data D 0 = 0.83 mm z R = 780 mm M 2 = 1.1 Collimated He-Ne laser beam after  4 x beam expander Incoming beam data Output results D 0 = 3.3 mm D m theor = 40  m; D m exp = 73  m z R = 8.5 m D M theor = 3.3 mm; D M exp = 3.4 mm (corr.) M 2 = 1.6 d 20 theor = d 20 exp = 100 mm Diverging He-Ne laser beam after f 0 = 300 mm spherical focusing lens Incoming beam data Output results D 0 = 0.32 mm D m theor = 62  m; D m exp = 70  m z R = 120 mm D M theor = 1.93 mm; D M exp = 2.0 mm M 2 = 1.1 d 20 theor = 119 mm; d 20 exp = 122 mm VariSpot first lens placement from incoming beam waist: d 1 = 600 mm

5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Collimated incoming beam: z R >> f; z R >> d 1 ; (z R = 8500 mm; d 1 = 0 mm; f = 100 mm) d 20 = f D(  ) = D m [1 + sin 2 (  )/(f/z R ) 2 ] 1/2 D m = D 0 f/z R D M = D 0 D M theor = 3.3 mm measured on collimated beam D M exp = 3.4 mm from curve below For D(  ) > 2.5 mm CMOS camera gives too small values due to low beam irradiance D(  ) = D 0 sin(  )

General case : diverging incoming beam, d 1  0 (z R = 120 mm; d 1 = 600 mm ; f = 100 mm) d 20 = f(z R 2 + d 1 2 )/(z R 2 + d d 1 f) D(  ) = D m {1 + sin 2 (  )/[(fz R ) 2 /(z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 2 ]} 1/2 D m = D 0 f (z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 1/2 /(z R 2 + d 1 2  d 1 f) D M = D 0 (z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 1/2 [(z R 2 + d 1 2 ) 2 + f 2 z R 2 ] 1/2 /[z R (z R 2 + d 1 2  d 1 f)] D(  ) = D 0 sin(  )

Examples of spots Incoming diverging beam, after 300 mm lens; d 1 = 600 mm. focusing lens Beam profiler He-Ne Laser D 0 = 0.33 mm d1d1

Examples: VariSpot at working distance (WD) Incoming diverging beam; WD = d 20 = 122 mm;  =  1 0. d 20 VariSpot Beam expander Beam profiler He-Ne Laser D(  ) = D m = 74  m

Examples: VariSpot at working distance Incoming diverging beam; WD = d 20 = 122 mm;  = D(  ) = 0.6 mm d 20 VariSpot Beam expander Beam profiler He-Ne Laser

Examples: VariSpot at working distance Incoming diverging beam; WD = d 20 = 122 mm;  = D M = 2.0 mm d 20 VariSpot Beam expander Beam profiler He-Ne Laser

Discussion - Zoom range (K = D M /D m ) scales with z R /f in collimated beams: K = z R /f - Minimum spot size scales with f: D m = D 0 f/z R = D 0 /K - Maximum spot size D M = D 0 for collimated beams - Minimum spots are larger due to cylindrical lens (circularity) aberrations - Errors to measure maximum spots due to insensitivity of CMOS camera and its fixed attenuator (too low power density) - Cheap, off the shelf lenses used, no AR coating for VariSpot

Prototype Zoom factor (dynamic range) K = 7 : 1 D m = 1 mm; D M = 7 mm Incoming beam Output beam

6. CONCLUSION New zoom principle demonstrated using rotating cylindrical lenses in collimated and diverging beam Experiments confirm the device theory High value of zoom factor (dynamic range of round spot sizes) for collimated incoming beam D m = 70  m; D M = 3.4 mm (collimated beam); K = (45-50):1 D m = 70  m; D M = 2.0 mm (diverging beam); K = (25-30):1 Low ellipticity round spots Minimum spot size limited by lens aberrations Improved results expected with good quality and AR coated cylindrical lenses

Thank you for your attention!