Measures, Metrics, and Systems-of-Systems Bridging a Gap Between Academic and DoD Systems Engineering Terminology Dr. Thomas Holland, Ph.D. Naval Surface.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDIA SoS SE Committee Topics of Interest May 25, 2009.
Advertisements

Cross Cultural Research
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
ERS Overview 5/15/12 | Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, SR Case #s 12-S-0258, 0817, 1003, and 1854 apply. Affordable,
Panel 5: The Latest in OA Innovation and C4ISR 4 November, 2014 Mike Rice President / Senior Systems Engineer R2E Inc.
© 2011 Carnegie Mellon University System of Systems V&V John B. Goodenough October 19, 2011.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 1998 by Carnegie Mellon.
Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 2005 by Carnegie Mellon University 1 Pittsburgh, PA Dennis Smith, David Carney and Ed Morris DEAS.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
OASIS Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0
© 2006 Carnegie Mellon University Establishing a Network Centric Capability: Implications for Acquisition and Engineering Dennis Smith Complex System Symposium.
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
Pittsburgh, PA Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense.
Network Enabled Capability Through Innovative Systems Engineering Service Oriented Integration of Systems for Military Capability Duncan Russell, Nik Looker,
1 Objective of today’s lesson S oftware engineering occurs as a consequence of a process called system engineering. Instead of concentrating solely on.
For more information, please visit: A Framework for System of Systems Tradespace Exploration Debarati Chattopadhyay, SM in Aeronautics.
RISK MANAGEMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RISK MANAGEMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Prepared by Prepared by Sneha Mudumba Sneha Mudumba.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Session 8 Coordination. Session Objectives Define the Principle of Coordination Define the Principle of Coordination Identify characteristics of successful.
Strategic Management Process
UNDERSTANDING BUYERS + MARKETS Principles of Marketing Week 4.
Romaric GUILLERM Hamid DEMMOU LAAS-CNRS Nabil SADOU SUPELEC/IETR.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
CDT Samantha Dorminey CDT Daniel Lasche CDT Angel Santiago CDT Milton Washington 10 DEC 2014.
Strategic Planning. Definitions & Concepts Planning: is a scientific approach for decision making. Planning: is a scientific approach for decision making.
Database Design - Lecture 1
DBS201: DBA/DBMS Lecture 13.
1. 2 Learning Objectives To understand: the elements or stages of the strategic management process the different perspectives on strategy development.
Adaptive Governance and Policy-making Using the ADAPTool.
Student Collaboration Improves Retention Enhances Learning.
High Level Architecture Overview and Rules Thanks to: Dr. Judith Dahmann, and others from: Defense Modeling and Simulation Office phone: (703)
16 October 2007 Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity Science List of Candidate Topics Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity Sciences.
Effective Requirements Management – an overview Kristian Persson Field Product Manager, Telelogic Asia/Pacific.
Transforming Elementary Education Management : a perspective on institutional development Dr Pramila Menon NUEPA, New Delhi.
CPSC 871 John D. McGregor Module 6 Session 3 System of Systems.
Software Project Management Lecture # 3. Outline Chapter 22- “Metrics for Process & Projects”  Measurement  Measures  Metrics  Software Metrics Process.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
The Next Generation Science Standards: 4. Science and Engineering Practices Professor Michael Wysession Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Washington.
Lesson Objectives All of you should be able to: Identify the parts of any given system. Most of you will be able to: Describe all elements of any given.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
Research Methods Ass. Professor, Community Medicine, Community Medicine Dept, College of Medicine.
Embedding Child and Family Outcomes into Practice – Part 2 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Early Childhood Outcomes Center Webinar for the Massachusetts.
1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 15a: Product Metrics for Software Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter.
Foundations of Geospatial System Development Todd S. Bacastow Professor of Practice for Geospatial Intelligence John A. Dutton e-Education Institute The.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Basic Concepts and Definitions
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
Association of Enterprise Architects International Committee on Enterprise Architecture Standards Jan 23, Collaborative Expedition Workshop #57aeajournal.org.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
Toward a New ATM Software Safety Assessment Methodology dott. Francesca Matarese.
Basic Concepts of Software Architecture. What is Software Architecture? Definition: – A software system’s architecture is the set of principal design.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
The Study of Organizations
Unified Architecture Framework NATO Architecture CaT Introduction
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
CS4311 Spring 2011 Process Improvement Dr
CPSC 873 John D. McGregor GQM.
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Housekeeping: Candidate’s Statement
UNIT – OPERATION STRATEGY
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Delivering Conservation
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
Software metrics.
DoD Architecture Framework Overview
Sub-Regional Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics Compilation and Export and Import Unit Value Indices 21 – 25 November Guam.
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
Systems Architecture & Design Lecture 3 Architecture Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Measures, Metrics, and Systems-of-Systems Bridging a Gap Between Academic and DoD Systems Engineering Terminology Dr. Thomas Holland, Ph.D. Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren, VA NSWCDD-PN Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Overview  Measure or Metric?  Systems Perspective and the DoD  MOEs & MOPs  Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  Military Definitions of SoS  In Conclusion 2 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? “By measuring only the amount of merchant tonnage sunk, they did not measure the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have determined a method to measure not only British public opinion, but also grain supply levels and the availability of bread. Another metric worthy of measure might have been American war intentions. These additional metrics assess other aspects of translating their strategy into the desired end state.” 3 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? “By measuring only the amount of merchant tonnage sunk, they did not measure the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have determined a method to measure not only British public opinion, but also grain supply levels and the availability of bread. Another metric worthy of measure might have been American war intentions. These additional metrics assess other aspects of translating their strategy into the desired end state.” 4 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? “By measuring only the amount of merchant tonnage sunk, they did not measure the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have determined a method to measure not only British public opinion, but also grain supply levels and the availability of bread. Another metric worthy of measure might have been American war intentions. These additional metrics assess other aspects of translating their strategy into the desired end state.” 5 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? “By measuring only the amount of merchant tonnage sunk, they did not measure the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have determined a method to measure not only British public opinion, but also grain supply levels and the availability of bread. Another metric worthy of measure might have been American war intentions. These additional metrics assess other aspects of translating their strategy into the desired end state.” 6 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? “By measuring only the amount of merchant tonnage sunk, they did not measure the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have determined a method to measure not only British public opinion, but also grain supply levels and the availability of bread. Another metric worthy of measure might have been American war intentions. These additional metrics assess other aspects of translating their strategy into the desired end state.” 7 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? Measure: a dimension, quantity, or capacity (degree), ascertained by comparison to an accepted standard. length in inches weight in pounds temperature in degrees Celsius (Oxford Dictionary, 2013) 8 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Measure or Metric? Metric: a technical system or standard of measurement; a set of figures or statistics that measure results. Productivity: number of sales calls an employee makes per day. Efficiency: probability of correct data entry. (Oxford Dictionary, 2013) 9 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems Perspective & the DoD  In SE, “metric” refers to performance. “The SoS metrics are collected and analyzed as part of analyses to assess whether the SoS is making progress towards objectives.” (OAD, 2008) Despite these positive indications, the United States has not declared victory against terrorism nor has the U.S. government satisfied world or domestic opinion with explanations of forward progress in the war. Metrics must be developed to give meaning to our military actions.” (Walker, 2005) 10 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems Perspective & the DoD  We can measure many things.  But there are certain measures and collections of measures that are important within the context of our interest.  The right metric helps us answer our specific questions. 11 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems Perspective & the DoD Metric: a set of measures or methods that ascertain the progress a system is making toward achieving its goal.  Did you know, “Metric” is not defined in the DAU Glossary? 12 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 MOEs and MOPs Measure of Effectiveness (MOE): “The data used to measure the military effect (mission accomplishment) that comes from the use of the system in its expected environment. That environment includes the system under test and all interrelated systems, that is, the planned or expected environment in terms of weapons, sensors, command and control, and platforms, as appropriate, needed to accomplish an end-to-end mission in combat.” (Defense Acquisition University, 2013) 13 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 MOEs and MOPs Measure of Performance (MOP): “System-particular performance parameters such as speed, payload, range, time-on-station, frequency, or other distinctly quantifiable performance features. Several MOPs may be related to the achievement of a particular Measure of Effectiveness (MOE).” (Defense Acquisition University, 2013) 14 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 MOEs and MOPs Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 15

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 16 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 17 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 18 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 19 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 20 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 21 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems  System:any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole.  System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. (Fisher, 2006) 22 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 23 Traditional Monolithic Systems Systems-of-Systems Centralized ControlIndependent Decisions Brittle (linear)Adaptive (complex) Behaviors SpecifiedBehaviors Emerge Closed System ConstraintsUnbounded Constraints Hierarchical Structures (Components)Autonomous Decisions (Constituents) Components may have Global VisibilityConstituents have Local Visibility Tight Coupling between ComponentsDynamic Interactions between Constituents Components are IntegratedConstituents are Interoperable

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Military Definitions of SoS System: A functionally, physically, and/or behaviorally related group of regularly interacting or interdependent elements; that group of elements forming a unified whole. 24 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Military Definitions of SoS System-of-systems: a set or arrangement of systems that results when independent and useful systems are integrated into a larger system that delivers unique capabilities. Both individual systems and SoS conform to the accepted definition of a system in that each consists of parts, relationships, and a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts; however, although an SoS is a system, not all systems are SoS. Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 25

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Systems vs. Systems-of-Systems Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 26 SoS: Context not entirely in original systems’ contexts SoS may exclude some of the original context FOS: Shared Context of systems operating independently Context for A Context for B SoS makes some of the original context internal

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Military Definitions of SoS Academic System: any interacting or interdependent group of entities that forms a unified and purposeful whole. DoD System: a functionally, physically, and/or behaviorally related group of regularly interacting or interdependent elements; that group of elements forming a unified whole. Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 27

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Military Definitions of SoS Academic System-of-systems: any adaptive, emergent, scalable, and autonomous system where the behavior changes continuously in response to influence of stakeholders and is composed of systems that are themselves autonomous. DoD System-of-systems: a set or arrangement of systems that results when independent and useful systems are integrated into a larger system that delivers unique capabilities. Both individual systems and SoS conform to the accepted definition of a system in that each consists of parts, relationships, and a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts; however, although an SoS is a system, not all systems are SoS. Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 28

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 In Conclusion  Academic definitions of Systems, Systems-of- Systems, Measures, and Metrics have Military Domain Counterparts.  A working knowledge of the terms are critical to bridge the audiences when addressing different communities or domains.  Do not introduce new terminology, or redefine existing terms, if it is already authoritatively defined.  Introduce new terms in light of new concepts only if necessary. 29 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 In Conclusion Original “By measuring only the amount of merchant tonnage sunk, they did not measure the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have determined a method to measure not only British public opinion, but also grain supply levels and the availability of bread. Another metric worthy of measure might have been American war intentions. These additional metrics assess other aspects of translating their strategy into the desired end state.” (Walker, 2005) Revised “By using only the MOP of shipping sunk, they were not able to ascertain the progress of their strategy in a holistic manner and lost sight of their ultimate strategic goal. In addition to shipping sunk, the planners should have developed an MOE representative of the relationship between British public opinion, grain supply levels, and the availability of bread. Another useful MOE might have assessed American war intentions. These MOEs would have assessed the extent to which their capability achieved the desired end state.” Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release 30

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 Thank You! Thomas Holland, Ph.D. Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren, VA 31 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 References  ASN(RDA) Chief Systems Engineer, Naval “Systems of Systems” Systems Engineering Guidebook, Vol. II.  Defense Acquisition University, Glossary of Defense Acquisition Acronyms and Terms. [Online] Available at:  Fisher, D. A., An Emergent Perspective on Interoperation in Systems of Systems, Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon Software Engineering Institute.  Maier, M. W., Architecting Principles for Systems-of-Systems. In: Systems Engineering. pp  Meyers, B. C., Monarch, I. A., Levine, L. & Smith, J. D., Including Interoperability in the Acquisition Process, Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.  Moffat, J., Complexity Theory and Network Centric Warfare, Washington, DC: DoD Command and Control Research Program. 32 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release

O. T. Holland NSWCDD-PN SEDC 2014, April 3-5 References continued  Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Systems and Software Engineering, Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems. Version 1.0 ed. Washington, DC: ODUSD(A&T)SSE.  Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Systems and Software Engineering. Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology.  Oxford, Oxford Dictionaries. Available at:  Shah, N. B., Rhodes, D. H. & Hastings, D. E., Systems of Systems and Emergent System Context. Hoboken, NJ  Smith, J. D., Topics in Interoperability: Structural Programmatics in a System of Systems, CMU/SEI-2006-TN-037, Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute.  Walker, D. H., Developing Metrics in the Global War on Terrorism, Newport, RI: Naval War College. 33 Public Release Statement A: Approved for Public Release