15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 1 1 Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facility Location Decisions
Advertisements

Global Supply Chain Procurement and Distribution
Channel Design The Assumptions of The Channel Manager.
Vehicle Routing & Scheduling: Part 1
Warehousing Decisions
LOG 408: Global Logistics Management Lecture 10: Cases on Supply Chain Operation.
ISQA 458/558 Distribution & Replenishment Professor Mellie Pullman.
INVENTORY AND WAREHOUSING PL201 FUNDAMENTAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
What is Activity Profiling?
4/24/2012 Pu Gong Corentin Lazarus Denis Satria Ralf Schoenherr Fan Yu.
Network Models II Shortest Path Cross Docking Enhance Modeling Skills Modeling with AMPL Spring 03 Vande Vate.
1 1 Summary of First Section: Deterministic Analysis John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
1 1 The Bullwhip Effect John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Transportation & Supply Chain Costs John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
LOGISTICS Supply Chain Management Distribution Logistics
Horizontal Carousel System “Good” carousel stock is typically a subset of the SKUs that have medium velocity They are called for often enough to make automatic.
1 1 Revenue Management Dealing with Uncertainty John H. Vande Vate Spring 2006.
A Case Study: BuyPC.com Developed by Jim Morton; UPS Professional Services David Simchi-Levi; MIT Michael Watson; LogicTools, Inc. See also BuyPC.pdf.
1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Inventory Management and Risk Pooling (1)
Logistics: Elements of Inventory June 5, Required Discussion in Project (1) How are the channels of distribution, from supplier to consumer household,
Performance Mean 65. Solutions to Exam 2 zWe have a single commodity in warehouses around the country and wish to ship it to our customers at minimum.
What Keeps Distributors Awake Plan Execute Transact What are the new items I should be planning for? What quantity should we buy? Are all the inbound shipments.
1 1 Location Problems John H. Vande Vate Spring 2006.
1 1 ISyE 6203 Modeling Multi-DC version of Pooling John H. Vande Vate Spring 2012.
RETAILING-Activities involved in the sale of goods and/or services to final consumers.
1 1 Solutions to Exam #1 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Exam I John H. Vande Vate Spring, Question 1 … centers to minimize its total transportation costs from its 2 plants to its 5 markets. We.
1 1 Modeling Flows John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2006.
Logistics Management LSM 730 Lecture 8 Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal.
1 1 Modeling Inventory (Deterministic View) John H. Vande Vate Spring 2007.
1 1 1-to-Many Distribution Vehicle Routing Part 2 John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2005.
Inventory and Models in Project 3 Load Driven Systems John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
Mitsubishi’s Transition to a Demand-Driven Business Model Greg O’Neill President & COO, Sales Division Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. Forrester.
1 1 Review of Exam 1 John H. Vande Vate Fall 2009.
1 1 Review of Part I Preparation for Exam John H. Vande Vate Fall 2009.
Spring 02 Vande Vate 1 1 Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring.
1 1 Exam 1 John H. Vande Vate Spring, Process 80+ exams to grade Certainly errors, misunderstanding, … Happy to re-grade BUT –Only respond to.
Ford Motor Company’s Finished Vehicle Distribution System April 2001 Ellen Ewing Project Director UPS Logistics Dr. John Vande Vate Exec. Director EMIL.
1 1 Wrap Up John H. Vande Vate Spring, Review of Topics Variability Basics –The big idea Forecasting –The 5 Laws of Forecasting –Actual/Forecast.
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT. OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT 1  Where to produce? What is the best location for the business? In the case of manufacturing, this may.
1 1 Milk Runs and Variability John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 ISyE 6203 Consolidation John H. Vande Vate Spring 2012.
1 1 1-to-Many Distribution with Transshipments John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
1 1 Vehicle Routing Part 2 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Practice Exam #1 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Structuring a DC Network Ken Homa. Manufacturing Plants Distribution Centers Intermediaries End Users Customers.
Network models for Supply Chain Design
1 1 Modeling Inventory (Deterministic View) John H. Vande Vate Spring 2008.
1 1 Frequency: Inventory vs Transportation John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
Modeling Flows and Information
Managing Uncertainty with Inventory I
John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001
What is Activity Profiling?
Many-to-Many Models Multicommodity Flows
Transportation Management
Location Case Study Shanghai GM Service Parts Part II
Transportation & Supply Chain Costs: Answers to Questions
Fulfilling omni-channel demand Introduction
Location Problems John H. Vande Vate Fall,
John H. Vande Vate Spring 2005
Best Practices Consortium
Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven
Automated Warehouse Planning System
Logistics Systems Analysis Mid-Term Review
Incorporating lot sizing into MRP
OUTLINE Questions? Comments? Quiz next Tuesday Assignments reminders
Last year’s Final John Vande Vate Fall, 2009.
Modeling Flows and Information
John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2005
Presentation transcript:

Spring 02 Vande Vate 1 1 Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring 2007

Spring 02 Vande Vate 2 2 Retail Inventory Single “Product”, many SKUs Style Color Size Broad Offering attracts customers Depth in SKU avoids missed sales Stock enough in each SKU to cover replenishment time (OTD)

Spring 02 Vande Vate 3 3 Service Requirement Keep OTD short Reduce depth without losing sales Increase breadth to attract more customers and expand market OTD requirements differ by store –Manhattan, NY –Manhattan, KS

Spring 02 Vande Vate 4 4 What’s in OTD POS system records sale Transmitted to DC Orders batched for efficient picking Order picked Trailer filled (Load driven) Line Haul to Pool Point Delivery

Spring 02 Vande Vate 5 5 Pool Points Asian Port US Port Pool Store Asian Factory US DC

Spring 02 Vande Vate 6 6 Pools Influence Trailer Fill –The greater the volume to the pool the faster the trailer fills Line Haul –Is determined by the distance from the DC to the Pool Delivery –Messier

Spring 02 Vande Vate 7 7 The Trade-offs Too Few Pools –High Delivery Costs –More moving inventory –Less waiting inventory Too Many Pools –Low Delivery Costs –Less moving inventory –More waiting inventory

OTD Dissected POS system records sale Transmitted to DC Orders batched for efficient picking Order picked Trailer filled (Load driven) Line Haul Delivery Constant cost & time Cost & Time depend on Pool Assignment

Spring 02 Vande Vate 9 9 Line Haul Time & Cost Depend on –The Pool Assignment –Which DC’s serve the Pool NY DC to Chicago Pool LA DC to Chicago Pool

Spring 02 Vande Vate Trailer Fill Time Depends on –The Pool Assignments Which pool this store is assigned to What other stores are assigned to this pool Rate at which the Pool draws goods –How the Pool is served The Rate at which the Pool draws goods from each DC

Spring 02 Vande Vate Drilling Down on Service Simple Model –Cube only (trailers never reach weight limit) –One DC only (don’t split volumes to Pool) Many DC’s –Cube only Weight & Cube and Many DC’s Soft Constraints: –Infeasible is not an acceptable answer

Spring 02 Vande Vate Toward a Simple Model Trailer Fill Time (for pool) * Rate Trailer Fills = Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Rate Trailer Fills –Translate annual demand at stores assigned to the pool into cubic feet per day –Rate to pool is: sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool]

Spring 02 Vande Vate Make It Linear Trailer Fill Time * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] = Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Trailer Fill Time * Assign What to do?

Spring 02 Vande Vate Can’t Know Trailer Fill Time Trailer Fill Time * Rate Trailer Fills = Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Max Time to Fill Trailer * Rate Trailer Fills ? Cubic Capacity of the Trailer  Why  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer? What does this accomplish?

What’s Wrong? Max Time to Fill Trailer * Rate Trailer Fills  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Max Time to Fill Trailer* (sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool])  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer

Spring 02 Vande Vate Our Simple Model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Max Time to Fill Trailer depends on the Pool: Service Requirement, e.g., 3 days Constant Order time, e.g., order processing, picking, etc. Line haul time from DC to Pool – varies by Pool Delivery time from Pool to Store

Spring 02 Vande Vate Which Pools? If the Pool is open… –Ensure we get there in reasonable time If the Pool is NOT open… –No Time constraint, but –You can’t assign stores to it

Spring 02 Vande Vate A Simple Model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DayPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Open[pool] Assignment Constraint for each store: sum {pool in POOLS} Assign[store, pool] = 1 Logical Constraint for each pool and store: Assign[store, pool] <= Open[pool] var Open{POOLS} binary;

Spring 02 Vande Vate Realities Silly to include every store-pool pair. Some pools are just too far away. Modeling the impacts on delivery costs is more complicated Operating fewer, larger pools offers economies of scale, e.g., automation