Patent Term Matters Term and Scope AIPLA 14 May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Richard J. Berman, Partner Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC
Advertisements

Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company.
AATS LLC Accounting and Tax Solutions The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 and The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 Alan Yee Tax Partner.
1 Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp July 19-20, 2010 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
Batch Reworking and Reprocessing
Patent Term Adjustments and Extensions
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
Safekeeping of 35 U.S.C. 156 Extensions
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Aswath Damodaran1 Session 20: The Option to Delay Valuing patents and natural resource reserves.
The Patent Process and the America Invents Act
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
© 2009 Pharmaceutical Law Group PC Market Exclusivity Paradigm Gregory J. Glover, MD, JD Pharmaceutical Law Group
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
1 35 U.S.C. § 102(e): The Legislative Fix (S.320) and Serial Abandonment of Provisional Applications Stephen G. Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination.
Stages of drug development
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) Recent Developments in PTA Practice and Strategies for Maximizing PTA Presented to NJIPLA December 9, 2009 Jack Brennan Fish.
0 Charles R. Macedo, Esq. Partner. 1 Brief Overview of Priority Under AIA Implications for Public Disclosures and Private Disclosures Role of Provisional.
Scottish Teachers’ Superannuation Scheme Reforms to STSS Sheila Armstrong Pensions Change Manager.
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2011 | 1 ACI's Maximizing Pharmaceutical Patent Life Cycles Conference PTE-PTA Boot Camp.
Direct Lending Borrowing to 150% of the Program Length NYSFAAA 45 Long Island, NY October 16, 2013 George Chin, Senior Federal Policy Consultant, AASCU.
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Korean Patent Practice - Pharmaceutical field - Jonghyeok Park MS., Ph.D.course Jonghyeok Park MS., Ph.D.course Partner Pharmacist Patent Attorney.
Pioneers, Imitators, and Generics – A Simulation Model of Schumpeterian Competition The authors develop a computer simulation model of R&D competition.
Update: “A” “B” “C”s of USPTO Patent Term Adjustment IP Practice in Japan Pre-Meeting Seminar 2013 AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute Ron Harris The Harris Firm.
H I R S C H & P A R T N E R S A v o c a t S o l i c i t o r R e c h t s a n w a l t Pharmaceutical settlement agreements and competition law A litigation.
International Max Planck Research School for Competition and Innovation WIPO – Owais Hassan Shaikh IMPRS-CI 2010 Data Exclusivity Provisions.
S10 CONS5Q25 Lara Tookey. Review of estimators workings Decision on what margin to apply Bid submission details Submit your Tender.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
Example 2.5 Decisions Involving the Time Value of Money.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Patent.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office PTA Post Wyeth USPTO OPLA - Kery A. Fries PTA Post Wyeth Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2010 )
Safe Harbor or Not: Application of 271(e)(1) to Pioneering Drug Discovery Activities Susan Steele October 21, 2003.
Due Diligence Strategy for In-house Counsel Jen Sieczkiewicz, Ph.D., J.D. Research & Business Development Counsel.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
© 2008 Dechert LLP Pharma v. Pharma or Pharma & Pharma: The Legal Interface Between the Makers of Original and Copied Versions of Medicines AIPLA Antitrust,
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Patent Prosecution May PCT- RCE Zombie 371 National Stage PCT Applications –Not Allowed to file an RCE until signed inventor oath/declaration is.
[ w w w. d u a n e m o r r i s. c o m ] ● ©2008 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. ●
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Biosimilars 2009 Update Pending Legislation Review Pam.
Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Strategies to Maximize Patent Term Balancing Scope and.
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Report to the AIPLA’s IP Practice in Japan Committee January 22, 2012 USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules Presented by: Stephen S. Wentsler.
For financial professional use only Slide 1 of 19 CL ST Web 24 (12/15) Columbus Life Insurance Company, Cincinnati, Ohio is licensed in the District of.
LYDON - TERMINAL DISCLAIMERS1 Terminal Disclaimer (TD) A Terminal Disclaimer states that the patent –will expire on the same date as a related.
LIHTC Pitfalls and Solutions Presenter: Harold R. Berk, Esquire
Recent FTC Pharmaceutical Cases: Background and Examples Sue H. Kim This presentation was prepared from public sources. The views expressed herein do not.
Yuichi Watanabe Osha Liang LLP January 26, 2016 Practice Tips: Prosecution of Japan-origin US applications 1 © AIPLA 2015.
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
Free Trade and Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for the Canadian Pharmaceutical Environment Joel Lexchin MD School of Health Policy & Management.
Patent Term Extension In Israel
Corporation Tax Loss Relief
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
HSC Pension Service Choice 2 Workshop.
Scope of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs)
Step One Make Contact Visit the school or schools within your club area The right contact person is important Be prepared to discuss Rotary and the concepts.
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA
Teachers’ Pension Scheme Final Salary Section – A Brief Guide
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
Data Protection, USMCA and Spending on Biologics in Canada
Presentation transcript:

Patent Term Matters Term and Scope AIPLA 14 May 2009

Patent Term Matters James J. Kelley Ass’t General Patent Counsel Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indiana Jeffrey P. Kushan Partner Sidley Austin Brown & Wood Washington, D.C Vicki G. Norton Partner Duane Morris LLP San Diego, CA Pamela Politis Patent Attorney Endo Pharmaceuticals Chadds Ford, PA May 20092AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Motivation for This Session Conference Speakers – “PTE = ½ day/day during testing phase + 1 day/day during review phase (≤5, ≤14)” Due diligence observations – premature filings – protracted, non-strategic prosecution RCEs, CIPs, TDs, extensions, late submissions final rejections, not ready for appeal pursuit of “scope” no apparent concern about term How does pursuit of “scope” potentially jeopardize >14-year effective patent term for drugs? 14 May 20093AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

How Much Does Term Matter? One extra day of exclusivity for a $1B/year drug is $2.75 million. Decisions that may affect patent term must be made carefully. – Example: direct non-provisional US filing vs. PCT followed 18 months later by US national filing – NPV for $1B/year drug – up to ~$150 million. 1 2 assuming 8% discount rate, 9-month difference in patent term (18 months ÷ 2), and complete loss of market at end of term 14 May 20094AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Agenda Discussion Starters Jeff Kushan – PTA Jim Kelley – PTE and PTA Vicki Norton - Scope: Enemy of Term? The Impact of Recent Decisions Pam Politis – Strategy Questions Panel and Audience Discussion Questions May be Asked at Any Time 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections5

35 U.S.C. PTE Provisions PTE is applied after PTA - § 156 (a) PTE accrues only after patent issues - § 156 (c) Lack of diligence deduction; ½ day per day; 14-year limit - § 156 (c) Regulatory review period = testing phase plus review phase - § 156 (g)(1)(B)(i) and (ii), resp. 5-year limit - § 156 (g)(6)(A) 14 May 20096AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

PTE = PTR Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act Must “lose” patent term before it can be “restored.” PTE “credits”  Regulatory review period minus any time during which there was lack of diligence;  ½ day per day from when the patent has issued and an IND has become effective until a complete NDA is submitted, plus  1 day per day from when the patent has issued and the NDA is complete until the NDA is approved, Total patent term restored ≤ 5 yrs Total period of Effective Patent Term (EPT) ≤ 14 yrs 14 May 20097AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Effective Patent Term (EPT) Patent Term Starts IND Effective NDA Complete DT P Patent Issues R NDA Approved EPT (≤14 years) Patent Expires Inputs:P = time from beginning of patent term to patent issue (“pending phase”) D = time from beginning of patent term until IND effective date (“delay”) T = time from IND effective date until NDA complete (“testing phase”) R = time from NDA acceptance until NDA approval (“review phase”) Output:EPT = time from NDA approval until patent expires PTE “Credits” ½ day per day 1 day per day Expiry of 17- or 20- year term PTE (≤5 years) 14 May 20098AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Effective Patent Term (EPT) Patent Term Starts IND Effective NDA Complete DT P Patent Issues R NDA Approved EPT (≤14 years) Inputs:P = time from beginning of patent term to patent issue (“pending phase”) D = time from beginning of patent term until IND effective date (“delay”) T = time from IND effective date until NDA complete (“testing phase”) R = time from NDA acceptance until NDA approval (“review phase”) Output:EPT = time from NDA approval until patent expires PTE “Credits” ½ day per day 1 day per day 14 May 20099AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections Patent Expires Expiry of 17- or 20- year term PTE (≤5 years)

Effective Patent Term (EPT) Patent Term Starts IND Effective NDA Complete D < 0 T P Patent Issues R NDA Approved EPT (≤14 years) Inputs:P = time from beginning of patent term to patent issue (“pending phase”) D = time from beginning of patent term until IND effective date (“delay”) T = time from IND effective date until NDA complete (“testing phase”) R = time from NDA acceptance until NDA approval (“review phase”) Output:EPT = time from NDA approval until patent expires PTE “Credits” ½ day per day 1 day per day 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections Patent Expires Expiry of 17- or 20- year term PTE (≤5 years)

Attorney Influence Over EPT Variables No control: T, R Some influence: D – time between start of patent term and start testing phase Most influence: P – time to issue patent Patent Term Starts IND Effective NDA Complete DT P Patent Issues R NDA Approved EPT Patent Expires 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Survey 48 human drugs that qualified for PTE (no devices or animal products) Sources – USPTO site – US patents – Federal Register Approval YearNumber in Survey May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Survey Results – Averages PDTREPT 17-year (18) year (30) Biotech (18) Small Mol. (30) Total (48) May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections P = time from beginning of patent term to patent issue (“pending phase”) D = time from beginning of patent term until IND effective date (“delay”) T = time from IND effective date until NDA complete (“testing phase”) R = time from NDA acceptance until NDA approval (“review phase”) EPT = effective patent term, i.e., time from NDA approval until patent expires

Survey Results – Ranges PDTREPT Minimum st quartile nd quartile rd quartile Maximum May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections P = time from beginning of patent term to patent issue (“pending phase”) D = time from beginning of patent term until IND effective date (“delay”) T = time from IND effective date until NDA complete (“testing phase”) R = time from NDA acceptance until NDA approval (“review phase”) EPT = effective patent term, i.e., time from NDA approval until patent expires

An EPT “Mountain” – PTE Only 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections15

Topographical View 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections16

14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections17

EPT Observations The longer the testing (T), the smaller the “plateau.” Longer prosecution (P) and greater delay (D) lower likelihood for 14 years. Length of prosecution (P) has least effect when D=0, that is, when patent term starts at the same time that clinical testing starts. Length of review (R) has little to no effect when T = 4-6 years, but longer review (R) lowers likelihood for 14 years when T = 8-10 years. 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

PTE Summary Must have a patent before PTE “credits” accrue – therefore want to issue sooner than later. Realizing this will affect drafting, filing, and prosecuting strategies: – Longer prosecution => less EPT – Earlier patent filing => less EPT Longer development time => less EPT If short development times (<~4-5 years), then less concern about prosecution time. 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections19

PTE and PTA § 156 (c) The term … shall be extended by the time equal to the regulatory review period for the approved product which period occurs after the date the patent is issued, except that- … (3) if the period remaining in the term of a patent after the date of the approval of the approved product … when added to the regulatory review period as revised under paragraphs (1) and (2) exceeds fourteen years, the period of extension shall be reduced so that the total of both such periods does not exceed fourteen years; 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections20

156(c)(3), 154(b), 156(a) Patent Term Starts IND Effective NDA Complete Patent Issues NDA Approved Patent Expires Expiry of 17- or 20- year term PTE (≤5 years) 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections PTA EPT (≤14 years) 156(c)(3) if the period remaining in the term of a patent after the date of the approval of the approved product … when added to the regulatory review period as revised under paragraphs (1) and (2) exceeds fourteen years, the period of extension shall be reduced so that the total of both such periods does not exceed fourteen years

Incorrect Interpretation of 156(c)(3) Patent Term Starts IND Effective NDA Complete Patent Issues NDA Approved EPT (≤14 years) Patent Expires Expiry of 17- or 20- year term PTE (≤5 years) 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections PTA 156(c)(3) if the period remaining in the term of a patent after the date of the approval of the approved product … when added to the regulatory review period as revised under paragraphs (1) and (2) exceeds fourteen years, the period of extension shall be reduced so that the total of both such periods does not exceed fourteen years

PTE and PTA Does the 14-year limit apply to both PTE and PTA? – Statutory language seems clear – No. – But, will the USPTO take a different interpretation, as in Wyeth? – No cases yet. – Some could be in process now. 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections23

PTE and PTA PTA vs.PTE PTE – want to issue sooner, to start accruing “credit” sooner – only ½ day per day during testing phase PTE – want to issue later, but without incurring deductions – 1 day per day 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

PTE and PTA Poor correlation between pendency and PTA – see Patently-O blog, March 14, 2008 Average PTA = ~1.1 years over-all – Longer for pharma & biotech patents covering products? Longer for such patents that receive PTE? No data yet (Wyeth and other cases) No patents that obtained PTE also obtained PTA, yet – PTE data are very delayed (2-3 years from approval) – Only 2 patents in survey were filed after May 29, 2000 and neither qualified for any PTA. 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

PTE and PTA Summary PTA will extend PTE-extended patent term beyond 14 years. – But, will USPTO take a different view? Must be very careful not to lose PTA after lengthy prosecution – e.g., lost appeal, RCE, TD – could jeopardize both PTE and PTA 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections26

Back up Slides 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections27

PTE and PTA 35 U.S.C. § 156 (a) The term of a patent … shall be extended … from the original expiration date of the patent, which shall include any patent term adjustment granted under section 154(b) if …. 14 May AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections

Requirement for Patent Issue 35 U.S.C. § 156 (c) The term of a patent eligible for extension under subsection (a) shall be extended by the time equal to the regulatory review period for the approved product which period occurs after the date the patent is issued, except that- 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections29

Deductions, Partial Credit, 14-year Limit 35 U.S.C. § 156 (c) … (1) each period of the regulatory review period shall be reduced by any period [in which diligence was not exercised]; (2) after any reduction required by paragraph (1), the period of extension shall include only one-half of the time [described in 35 U.S.C. § 156 (g)(1)(B)(i) – i.e., from IND to NDA]; (3) if the period remaining in the term of a patent after the date of the approval … exceeds fourteen years, the period of extension shall be reduced so that the total of both such periods does not exceed fourteen years 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections30

“Regulatory Review Period” 35 U.S.C § 156 (g) For purposes of this section, the term "regulatory review period" has the following meanings: … (1)(B) The regulatory review period for a new drug, antibiotic drug, or human biological product is the sum of – – (i) the period beginning on the date [an IND] became effective … and ending on the date an [NDA] was initially submitted, and – (ii) the period beginning on the date the [NDA]was initially submitted and ending on the date such [NDA] was approved. 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections31

5-year limit 35 U.S.C. § 156 (g)(6) A period determined under any of the preceding paragraphs is subject to the following limitations: (A) …, the period of extension determined on the basis of the regulatory review period … may not exceed five years. 14 May 2009AIPLA Chemical and Biotechnology Sections32