Change in the criteria for the recognition of NIRs in the APNIC region Prop-060-v001 Author: Kusumba Sridhar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC NIR Meeting What is an NIR? Paul Wilson, APNIC.
APNIC Executive Council Report to APNIC Member Meeting APNIC 21 Perth, Australia March 2006.
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
October 2012 National Quality Framework Assessment & rating overview and authorised officer training Podcast Series: 4.
AREA of STUDY 1 (DP 7) and AOS 2 (DP 1)
Ninth Replenishment of IFAD’s Resources Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2 nd Session of Consultation October 2011.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Draft PTF Overview PECC Telecom Forum Secretariat December 1997.
RATIFICATION OF THE 1986 INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION (ILO) PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE.
Stocks and Commodity Market Operations (MBA 826)
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
“Hot issues” in validation of non- formal and informal learning ECOTEC Research and Consulting 22nd January 2005.
Emergency Briefing Remote Gambling - European Update THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm.
APNIC Update Paul Wilson Director General. APNIC RIR for Asia Pacific –IP address allocation and management –Open policy development Support for Internet.
CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC - THE VIEW OF THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ANETA PLAVINOVÁ SECRETARY TO THE COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHTS.
Project:“Support to the Internationalization of Kosova Higher Education System through establishment of the Kosova Students’ Union” Status Quo on Student.
APNIC Policy Update 1 st TWNIC IP Open Policy Meeting 3 December, 2003 Taipei, Taiwan.
Election procedure for ICANN ASO Address Council in APNIC Region Sept. 5, 2002 ASO Meeting The 14th APNIC Open Policy Meeting APNIC Executive Council.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 29, Kuala Lumpur Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v002.
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
Working Group In-progress Report to APNIC Member Meeting (AMM) APNIC 31, Hong Kong 25 th February 2011 Naveen Tandon – Chair Shyam Nair – Co-Chair Yi Lee.
APNIC Policy Update 1 st TWNIC Open Policy Meeting 3 December, 2003 Taipei, Taiwan.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
2007 NAB’S ORAL REPRESENTATIONS TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL [B ] 31 OCTOBER.
A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb
The Post Service Officer VFW Department Convention June 2010.
SELECTION PROCEDURE Clivio CASALI, Project Officer EM ECW Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation Call for Proposals for mobility activities starting in.
Scalability. What organizational structure will help us achieve the key enablers while allowing us to grow and preserve our principles?
Directorate General for Energy and Transport European Commission Directorate General for Energy and Transport Regulation of electricity markets in the.
Last update 27 May Content  About us Interest & Presence Our Mission Our Goals Structure  Achievements  Memberships Membership.
February, 2007 MH Billy Cheon / Review of APNIC Fee Structure v2.3.
TRADE UNION. 1 Explain the background, the rights to unionism, and the law that govern trade union (C2) 2 Discuss the roles and responsibilities of trade.
CIVIL RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Civil Rights Enforcement and Compliance.
JPNIC Open Policy Meeting Update Yuka Suzuki IP Department Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC) NIR Meeting Aug. 21st, 2003.
APNIC Executive Council Report APNIC22 Member Meeting Kaohsiung Sep 2006.
IP Addressing and ICT Development in the Pacific Islands Anne Lord and Save Vocea, APNIC ICT Workshop, Fiji, November, 2002.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Enterprise Best (Community) Practices Workshop OGF 22 - Cambridge Nick Werstiuk February 25, 2007.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 31, Hong Kong Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v003.
Criteria for the Recognition of NIRs in the APNIC Region NIR Meeting APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.
Outcomes of the online academia consultation Mr. Christopher Clark Head, Partnership and Resource Mobilization Division International.
INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE SOCIETY Promoting Global Growth and Innovation.
1 Proposed Results Management Framework for K. Cleaver, AP/PMD for CRMT, 7 April 2009 Policies and Criteria for IFAD Financing Informal Board.
NI Better Regulation Strategy Forward Work Programme approved by The Executive in July 2010 Implementation will take at least 3 years for all 21 actions.
Prop-073 Automatic allocation/assignment of IPv6 Terry Manderson Andy Linton.
CIPA (Children’s Internet Protection Act) Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando.
APNIC Executive Council Report APNIC 29 Meeting Kuala Lumpur 5 March 2010.
EU Politics CHAPTER 13: Other Institutions. Outline 1) European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) 2) Committee of the Regions (CoR) 3) European Agencies.
SPACES FOR CSO PARTICIPATION. Invited vs Claimed Space.
Euro-IX update IX SIG APNIC17 Kuala Lumpur Feb 25 th Euro-IX update APNIC 17 - IX SIG 25 th February Kuala Lumpur Serge Radovcic Euro-IX.
BoF: Membership Changes. Proposal 1: 1 vote per member Many international organisations have one vote per member APNIC not a country, but company 1 Vote.
1 Welcome to the Policy SIG APNIC 21 Thursday 2 March 2006.
Policy SIG Report APNIC AGM Friday 29 August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand 1.
APNIC Member and Stakeholder Survey 2009 Paul Wilson, Director General.
Information and Network security: Lithuania Tomas Lamanauskas Deputy Director Communications Regulatory Authority (RRT) Republic of Lithuania; ENISA Liaison.
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT for the CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM for CAMBODIA (CD4CDM-CAM) National Workshop on Capacity Development for the Clean Development.
Stefan Mozar IEEE Sections Congress 2017 – Sydney 11 August 2017
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Standards and Certification Training
APNIC Executive Council Report
REGIONAL NETWORK FOR CIVIL ORGANIZATIONS ON MIGRATION – RNCOM
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
APNIC Executive Council Fee Study Report
Overview of policy proposals
WCIT12 Update Planning & International Relations Department
APNIC Member and Stakeholder Survey 2009
APNIC Members Meeting, APNIC 22 8 September 2006
LABOUR LAW TRADE UNION.
Presentation transcript:

Change in the criteria for the recognition of NIRs in the APNIC region Prop-060-v001 Author: Kusumba Sridhar

Proposal to update the criteria for recognising new (NIRs) in the APNIC region. The existing Policy frame work was last published on 1st December 2002 There has been significant change in the Political, Economic and Operational situations in various economies, especially the growing economies. The very structure of Internet and its Resources has changed in several economies. In such a situation, it is important that the very industry decides the future and applicability of the Internet resources and also controls them through a community friendly environment. The Government, while taking a neutral position, is required to support such resources but must refrain from “Controlling” or “manning” the same.

Proposal to update the criteria for recognising new (NIRs) in the APNIC region. The current NIR recognizing criteria requires any Industry representation to have endorsement of the proposal from the Government agency (Section 3.1) that is responsible for Internet related activities including issuing licenses to ISPs etc in a respective country. APNIC considers any application without such endorsement as "in-complete“ proposal and will not forward to the Executive Council for processing or approving a NIR. However, in a situation where such proposal is originated by a unit or division or department of the Government, such proposal could go through since the Government endorsement is easily or sometimes automatically available to them. This is also applicable for National Information Centers, Internet Exchanges etc., that are largely and many times fully controlled and manned by the Government.

Issues arising out of such situation Government represented agencies will have control on Internet Resource allocation in the economy, if such NIR is formed by Government controlled agency. Policy only indicates but may not restrict Government to enforce rules to obtain resources from NIR and not APNIC directly Government under the ambit of National Security may demonstrate the need for the Service Providers to only obtain resources from regional NIR and not from APNIC despite the policy indication. Member or User community may loose opportunity to grow the networks largely due to very reason that they may need to obtain Internet resources only from such NIR and the regulator who is also directly associated with such NIRs or Policy makers, may dismiss or delay such allocation requests against any pending issue or matter concerned to that Service provider and the government or Regulator. Despite NIR proposal being sent through a Government controlled agency, the EC may have right to reject such proposal if it has noticed suitable objections from members. However, in the current policy criteria, the scope of such objections is only "external“ and not within the policy framework or work flow.

Proposed Changes in the Policy Any NIR application must be put on voting process, both through Online Voting and Voting at AMM and must achieve support. OR Any NIR application must be put on voting process, both through Online Voting and Voting at AMM and must achieve atleast 75% support from the members within that Economy. In such a case, voting is open only for members from that Economy. Section must mention that the Board composition of the NIR must have majority representation from Members, followed by Academic or Research Organizations etc., The Government or its participating agencies must have minor role compared to other representations on the Board of NIR.

Effect on APNIC APNIC members would be benefited by such policy since they don't have to fear for undergoing conditional allocations of resources. At the same time, membership communities in several countries, if eligible by this policy, will be able to form NIR that is community controlled rather than any incumbent or Government controlled NIR.

Proposed Changes in the Policy Any NIR application must be put on voting process, both through Online Voting and Voting at AMM and must achieve support. OR Any NIR application must be put on voting process, both through Online Voting and Voting at AMM and must achieve atleast 75% support from the members within that Economy. In such a case, voting is open only for members from that Economy. Section must mention that the Board composition of the NIR must have majority representation from Members, followed by Academic or Research Organizations etc., The Government or its participating agencies must have minor role compared to other representations on the Board of NIR. THANK YOU