Impacts of the December 2006 Solar Radio Bursts on the Performance of GPS NOAA/SWPC Space Weather Workshop Boulder, CO April 27-30, 2010 Charles S. Carrano.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SVN-49 Signal Anomaly Presented by Tom Stansell GPSW POC: Lt. Col. James Lake, Ph.D.
Advertisements

For HF Beginners Gary Wescom – N0GW
HOW DOES MY SIGNAL GET FROM HERE TO THERE? By Forest Cummings, W5LQU And Dave Russell, W2DMR.
URSIGA, New Delhi, Oct 2005 Coordinated Observations of Ionospheric Scintillations, Density Profiles and Total Electron Content on a Common Magnetic.
The Implementation of the Cornell Ionospheric Scintillation Model into the Spirent GNSS Simulator Marcio Aquino, Zeynep Elmas,
29 April 2011Viereck: Space Weather Workshop 2011 The Recent Solar Minimum: How Low Was It? What Were The Consequences? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Weather.
Space Weather Workshop, Boulder, CO, April 2013 No. 1 Ionospheric plasma irregularities at high latitudes as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr and.
E3 Engineering Division Brown Bag Series Lunch with Academia February 15 th, 2008 Coordinated by 4.1.M.1, the Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Engineering.
Space Weather Effects on GPS Thomas J. Bogdan, Director Space Weather Prediction Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA 325 Broadway, DSRC Room 2C109 Boulder, CO 80305,
Space Weather: What IS the Sun Doing? Joe Kunches NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (nee Space Environment Center) Boulder, CO ILA-36 Orlando October.
Abstract Since the ionosphere is the interface between the Earth and space environments and impacts radio, television and satellite communication, it is.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.
Electromagnetic Wave Theory
Ground-Based Altimetry Using a Single- Receiver Single-Frequency GNSS Phase Ambiguity Resolution Technique G. Stienne* S. Reboul J.-B. Choquel M. Benjelloun.
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
1 UNCLASSIFIED – FOUO – Not for Public Release Operational Space Environment Network Display (OpSEND) & the Scintillation Network Decision Aid Dr. Keith.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Y. Bouderba, S. Naitamor, O. Boumia Research Center on Astronomy, Astrophysics and Geophysics. CRAAG (Algeria). 1 International School of Space Science,
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Antenna Techniques to Optimize Pseudorange Measurements for Ground Based Ranging Sources Jeff Dickman Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center The 29.
Lecturer: Jinglin Wang Student name: Hao Li Student ID:
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
SUBELEMENT G3 RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION [3 Exam Questions - 3 Groups]
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future GLONASS Russia’s global satellite navigation system 24 satellites in three.
By Andrew Y.T. Kudowor, Ph.D. Lecture Presented at San Jacinto College.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission April 2008 Joel Johnson, IEEE GRSSSlide 1 Coexistence Issues for Passive Earth Sensing from GHz Notice: This.
Scott M. Bailey, LWS Workshop March 24, 2004 The Observed Response of the Lower Thermosphere to Solar Energetic Inputs Scott M. Bailey, Erica M. Rodgers,
GLOBAL POSITINING SYSTEM WORKING,ERRORS AND CORRECTION USING DGPS Department Of Electronics and Communication Engineering.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
SVY 207: Lecture 7 Differential GPS By now you should understand: –How GPS point positioning works from first principles Aim of this lecture: –To understand.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Global Positioning System Overview
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 2 What is GPS? Global Positioning System Operated.
Chapter 2 GPS Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
Deep Occultations With GRAS C. Marquardt, A.von Engeln and Y. Andres.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Improved Radio Occultation Observations for a COSMIC Follow-on Mission C. Rocken, S. Sokolovskiy, B. Schreiner UCAR / COSMIC D. Ector NOAA.
Assimilating Data Into Ionospheric Models: The Real-Time Revolution Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing.
Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Advanced Licence Course Christopher Chapman G0IPU Slide Set 15: v1.2, 22-Dec-2012 (6) Propagation – Part-1 1 Chelmsford.
Transient response of the ionosphere to X-ray solar flares Jaroslav Chum (1), Jaroslav Urbář (1), Jann-Yenq Liu (2) (1) Institute of Atmospheric Physics,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Ahmed A. HADY Astronomy Department Cairo University Egypt Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle23 and its Impact and its Impact.
Simulations of the effects of extreme solar flares on technological systems at Mars Paul Withers, Boston University Monday
1 AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY Dr. Keith Groves Space Weather Center of Excellence AFRL/VSBXI 29 Randolph Rd Hanscom AFB, MA voice
Practice Questions 2015 General License Course. How is a directional antenna pointed when making a “long-path” contact with another station? A. Toward.
Signal Propagation Basics
IMPACTS OF THE DECEMBER 2006 SOLAR RADIO BURSTS ON GPS OPERATIONS AMS Fifth Symposium on Space Weather New Orleans, LA January 20-21, 2008 Dr. Charles.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH – INPE/MCT SOUTHERN REGIONAL SPACE RESEARCH CENTER – CRS/CCR/INPE – MCT FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA - UFSM.
Solar Radio Bursts and Effects on GPS*
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
A GADGET WHICH CHANGED THE WAY THE WORLD OPERATES Global Positioning System Seminar by: B V Aparna ECE CMR College of Engg. And Tech.
Interminimum Changes in Global Total Electron Content and Neutral Mass Density John Emmert, Sarah McDonald Space Science Division, Naval Research Lab Anthony.
ESSEM Earth System Science and Environmental Management 17/11/ ESWW6-2 M. Messerotti, A. Marassi M. MESSEROTTI 1,2,3, A. MARASSI 1 1 INAF-Astronomical.
GPS, GNSS, and Space Weather A Look Into the Future Paul Kintner and Brady O’Hanlon Cornell University Todd Humphreys UT-Austin
Space weather phenomena in the ionosphere and their effect on GNSS
GPS: Global Positioning System
M.J. Rivas [1,2], C. Cid [1] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INTENSITY OF X-RAY FLARES AND THEIR EFFECTS IN THE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT OF THE.
Ionospheric Science and Space Weather
DIRECT EFFECTS OF SOLAR RADIO WEATHER
Global Positioning System Supplemental from JD Text
Keith M. Groves2 Christopher T. Bridgwood1
The Vertical Structure of the Martian Ionosphere
Presentation transcript:

Impacts of the December 2006 Solar Radio Bursts on the Performance of GPS NOAA/SWPC Space Weather Workshop Boulder, CO April 27-30, 2010 Charles S. Carrano 1 Keith M. Groves 2 Christopher T. Bridgwood 1 (1)Boston College, Institute for Scientific Research (2)Air Force Research Laboratory

Extreme Solar Activity from Active Region X9.0 Dec 5 10:18 10:35 10:45 Strength Date Start Peak Stop X6.5 Dec 6 18:29 18:47 19:00 X3.4 Dec 13 02:14 02:40 02:52 X1.5 Dec 14 21:07 22:15 22:26 Slide 2 The solar flare on Dec 5 was the most intense in terms of X-ray flux, but produced the least power at L band where GPS operates. The solar radio burst on Dec 6 generated unprecedented levels of wideband noise at L band which substantially degraded GPS tracking and positioning accuracy for entire sunlit hemisphere. Reference: Gary (2008) Solar FlareL-band Peak Flux (sfu) Dec 53,900 Dec 6~1,000,000 Dec 13440,000 (1 GHz) Dec 14120,000

x Global Extent of the Impact from the Dec 6 SRB Slide 3 Wide Area Augmentation System Most of the IGS/CORS/WAAS receivers record data at ~30 second cadence. In this talk we examine the impacts on high-rate GPS measurements provided by the AFRL-SCINDA network. Figures from Cerruti et al. (2008)

Slide 4 AFRL-SCINDA Ground Stations (as of Dec 2006) Specialized GPS receivers of the SCINDA network record C/No, pseudorange, and phase on L1 and L2 between Hz (dual frequency systems shown in yellow) Region where the December 6 SRB degraded GPS performance is outlined in purple

December 6, 2006 X6.5 Flare and Solar Radio Burst Slide 5

OVSA Solar Radio Burst RHCP Power Figures from Cerruti et al. (2008) L1 L2 SRB RHCP Power exceeded 10 6 SFU at L band Sub-solar point at 19:34 UT was (22.5S, 115.7W) Slide 6

Slide 7 GPS Carrier-to-Noise at Ancon on Dec 6 L1  C/No dB-Hz18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 L2  C/No dB-Hz18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 L1 tracking loss L2 tracking loss Deepest L1 fade: 25 dB Deepest L2 fade: 30 dB Longest L1 fade: 4 min GPS receiver model: Ashtech Z-12 34° solar incidence angle at 19:15 UT Identical fades on all links (weak dependence on satellite elevation because SIA is the same) Longest L2 fade: 9 min L1 L2

Slide 8 GPS Pseudorange and Phase at Ancon on Dec 6 Ranging errors (not ionospheric delay) SITEC (enhanced ionization from flare) of 5 TECU in 3 min, starting just before peak of flare (18:47) Cycle slip (TEC becomes difficult to measure) GPS receiver model: Ashtech Z-12 34° solar incidence angle at 19:15 UT Ranging errors (on L1, L2 or both) exceed 100 m. These will contribute to net GPS positioning error 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT Meters PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28 Differential Pseudorange Differential Carrier Phase 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT TECU PRN 02 PRN 04 PRN 08 PRN 27 PRN 28

Slide 9 GPS Position Solution at Ancon on Dec 6 Position Errors: 20 m horizontal 60 m vertical Degraded tracking GPS receiver model: Ashtech Z-12 34° solar incidence angle at 19:15 UT Horizontal (m) Vertical (m) No. Satellites GDOP 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT Position Outages (5 min total) 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 Max 43.4 Position Error Satellites Tracked / GDOP

Comparing Observations from Different Locations: Accounting for the Local Solar Incidence Angle and GPS Antenna Gain Slide 10

Slide 11 SRB Power and the Solar Incidence Angle C/No without SRB: C/No with SRB: SRB power (satellite elevation cancels): Vertical equivalent (zenith) C/No with SRB (system noise cancels): Ashtech Choke Ring Antenna Gain, g(  ) system noise broadcast power Atmospheric attenuation neglected (<1 dB at L band)

Slide 12 C/No Reductions at L1 from Different Stations Maximum vertical equivalent L1 fade: 27 dB C/No reductions are very similar for any sunlit location once solar incidence angle correction applied 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT dB-Hz L1  C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT dB-Hz Vertical Equivalent L1  C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein Solar incidence angles at 19:15 UT Ancon:34° Antofagasta:37° Sao Luis:68° Kwajalein:86° Signal blocked by ground obstruction

Slide 13 C/No Reductions at L2 from Different Stations Maximum vertical equivalent L2 fade: 30 dB C/No reductions are very similar for any sunlit location once solar incidence angle correction applied 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT L2  C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 dB-Hz Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein 18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:00 UT Vertical Equivalent L2  C/No PRN 08 PRN 29 dB-Hz Ancon Antofagasta Sao Luis Kwajalein Solar incidence angles at 19:15 UT Ancon:34° Antofagasta:37° Sao Luis:68° Kwajalein:86°

Sources: Gary, D. E. (2008), Cause and Extent of the Extreme Radio Flux Density Reached by the Solar Flare of 2006 December 06, Proceedings of the 2008 Ionospheric Effects Symposium. Kintner, P. M. Jr., O'Hanlon, B., Gary, D. E., & Kintner, P. M. S. (2009), Global Positioning System and Solar Radio Burst Forensics, Radio Science, 44, RS0A08. Why Were these Events Different and will they Recur? Slide 14 These extreme solar radio flux densities were caused by an unusually high density of spike bursts due to the Electron-Cyclotron Maser (ECM) mechanism. The December 6 solar radio burst reached a flux density of at least 10 6 sfu at 1.4 GHz, momentarily reaching flux densities as high as 2.5x10 6 sfu during individual spikes. Bursts of 10 6 sfu, if they follow the general size distribution of solar bursts, should occur every 15 years at solar maximum rates, or every 100 years at solar minimum rates. The events of 2006 December 6 are therefore extremely rare occurrences. In the historical record the largest bursts are missing, however, probably due to instrument saturation effects. This leaves open the question of how often such large events will occur.

Slide 15 Conclusions The solar radio bursts in December 2006 resulted in unprecedented levels of wideband RHCP power at the GPS L1 and L2 frequencies. The solar radio burst on December 6 significantly degraded overall GPS performance on a global basis. All the AFRL-SCINDA GPS receivers on the sunlit hemisphere observed nearly identical patterns of intermittent C/No fading during each burst, lasting up to an hour. The GPS C/No reductions, some as deep as 25 dB, were modulated by the local solar incidence angle and antenna gain. The maximum vertical equivalent reduction at L1 was ~27 dB. SITEC events were observed in conjunction with all four associated solar flares, at rates between TECU/min. These rates appeared to vary according to the solar incidence angle. Under these conditions, the SCINDA GPS receivers experienced difficulty tracking and also incurred ranging errors associated with loss of code lock. These factors led to elevated GPS positioning errors of up to 20/60 meters in the horizontal/vertical directions. These solar radio bursts came as a surprise during solar minimum, and suggest that loss of GPS operations during solar maximum could be more common than previously anticipated.

Carrano, C. S., C. T. Bridgwood, and K. M. Groves (2009), Impacts of the December 2006 solar radio bursts on the performance of GPS, Radio Sci., 44, RS0A25, doi: /2008RS Cerruti, A. P., P. M. Kintner, D. E. Gary, L. J. Lanzerotti, E. R. de Paula, and H. B. Vo (2006), Observed solar radio burst effects on GPS/Wide Area Augmentation System carrier-to-noise ratio, Space Weather, 4, S10006, doi: /2006SW Cerruti, A. P., P. M. Kintner, D. E. Gary, A. J. Mannucci, R. F. Meyer, P. Doherty, and A. J. Coster (2008), Space Weather, 6, 10, doi: /2007SW Gary, D. E. (2008), Cause and Extent of the Extreme Radio Flux Density Reached by the Solar Flare of 2006 December 06, Proceedings of the 2008 Ionospheric Effects Symposium. Kintner, P. M. Jr., O'Hanlon, B., Gary, D. E., & Kintner, P. M. S. (2009), Global Positioning System and Solar Radio Burst Forensics, Radio Science, 44, RS0A08. References Slide 16

Thank You for Listening Slide 17 Chloë Trester Carrano was born on April 11, 2010 in Cambridge, MA. She weighed 7 pounds 9.5 ounces and was 21 inches tall.