Surrogate Testing and Proposed Certification Procedures for Altered Interior Surfaces Tim Marker FAA Technical Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Woodharbor Doors & Cabinetry is a registered provider with the American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned on completion.
Advertisements

Page 1 Flammability Assurance for Printed Wiring Boards Certification by Similarity Analysis Proposal Boeing Commercial Airplanes Group PWB Material Working.
Fiber Reinforced Plastic beam manufacturing process
Federal Aviation Administration Evacuation Slide Test Method: Round Robin 3 Results 0 Evacuation Slide Test Method: Comparison Test Results Federal Aviation.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Case 1. To Build a Production Power Boat. A Production Power Boat The boat itself is Length 8 M, Beam 2.5 M, DISP 3200 KG, HP 225 Yamaha Outboard. What.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Filling Compounds IAMFT.
CompTest 2003, January 2003, Châlons-en-Champagne © CRC for Advanced Composite Structures Ltd Measurement of Thermal Conductivity for Fibre Reinforced.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Discussion on Format of New Test.
Design of Machine Elements
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
1 COMPARATION OF KENAF FIBER COMPOSITES TO STRUCTURAL COMPOSITES PRODUCED BY “EUROKOMPOZIT “ V.Srebrenkoska ECO-PCCM Third Meeting, Azpettia, Spain,
NICK TSAMIS AERE 423 FALL 2009 Composite Rockoon Parts.
Emerging Standards and their effect on Exterior Continuous Insulation in Commercial Wall Construction.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Reliability based design optimization Probabilistic vs. deterministic design – Optimal risk allocation between two failure modes. Laminate design example.
Cabin Component Design Features Fire Properties of Corefiller, Adhesive, „Ditch and Pot“ March 2009 Presented by Ingo WEICHERT TBCEE12.
Process Specification Guidelines FAA/NASA Workshop 6 August 2002.
Review of FAA Guidelines for Fabric Prepreg Material Specification
9/17/2003 1LRM Spec Review LRM Material and Process Spec Review Cindy Cole Certification Manager The Lancair Company.
Testing and Modelling of a Severely Tapered Composite Specimen
YALE UNIVERSITY SOCIAL SCIENCES BUILDING GPHB & ASSOCIATES Brad Otto, Client Liaison/Editor-in Chief Jake Wagle, Project Engineer Jimmy Murray, Project.
FAA Workshop on Key Characteristics for Advanced Material Control
FAA FAA Advisory Circular Presented at 9/16/03 Workshop (Chicago, IL) Background – Purpose of the advisory circular – Related regulations & guidance materials.
FAA/NASA Meeting on Industry Composite Specifications August 2002 FAA Report on Proposed Industry Prepreg Specifications Ric Abbott Abbott Aerospace Composites.
Federal Aviation Administration AVIATION HEAT FLUX CALIBRATION STANDARD 2013 Triennial International Fire & Cabin Safety Research Conference Philadelphia,
132,000 sq ft  Fabrication  Composite Structures  Cabin Interiors  Structural Bondments  Compression Molding  Vacuum Forming  NDI  Composite Assembly.
Composite reinforcements come in many styles
1 COMPOSITE MATERIALS What are composite materials? Two or more materials bound together Example from civil engineering: Concrete reinforced with steel.
INTERNATIONAL AIRCRAFT MATERIALS FIRE TEST WORKING GROUP ROUND ROBIN TEST III DATA ANALYSIS Khang D. Tran, Ph.D., Sr. Scientist The Mexmil Company, Santa.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City By: Rich Lyon, AJP-6320 Date: October 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Substrate-Paddle-Base Peter Cooke. Peter Cooke 28 Feb - 1 March VELO PRR2 Substrate- Paddle-Base Substrate Production Paddle – Base – Feet Component.
INTD 54 other components. moldings cover, enhance and decorate a plain surface standing trim: fixed length—doors & windows.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group – Köln, Germany By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Federal Aviation.
Review of Handbook Chapters Pat Cahill
Swissair 111: Where Do We Go From Here? Royal Aeronautical Society Flight Operations Group Meeting London, England October 22, 2008 Henry Wright, Board.
Copyright © 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Synthetic Materials.
1 The Second Addition of LTMS (Theoretical Sneak Peak for the VG) VG SP: May 2010.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Savings from Electric Water Heaters in Commercial Applications Danielle Gidding.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration In-Flight Burn- Through Tests Aluminum vs. composite materials Aircraft Systems Fire Working Grp.
Engineering Analysis of NFPA 285 Tested Assemblies
Flammability Standardization Task Group 1 IAMFTWG UPDATE.
Toulouse Aeronautical Test Centre (CEAT)
Design and Manufacture of an Adaptive Suspension System Michael Gifford (ME), Tanner Landis (ME/AE), Cody Wood (ME) Advisors: Professor Cagdas Onal (RBE/ME),
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
FORUM GUIDE TO SUPPORTING DATA ACCESS FOR RESEARCHERS A STATE EDUCATION AGENCY PERSPECTIVE Kathy Gosa, Kansas State Department of Education.
RADOMES.
Tim Marker Discussion of Burner Heat Flux Mapping for Proposed Insulation Burnthrough Test Standard FAA Technical Center.
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Special Conditions for Passenger Airplanes,
Interior doors.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
J Developments in: - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Floor Coverings - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Interior Repair Compounds.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Class A Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Body Panels on The MG Rover SV.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Tim Marker Discussion of Burner Heat Flux Mapping for Proposed Insulation Burnthrough Test Standard FAA Technical Center.
David Blake FAA Technical Center Atlantic City Airport, NJ Phone: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Wood Building Products (Surface Coating) NESHAP
Response to Aircraft Ducting Working Group Members’ Questions
NSM LAB Net Shape Manufacturing Laboratory
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Technical Communication 1
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Surrogate Testing and Proposed Certification Procedures for Altered Interior Surfaces Tim Marker FAA Technical Center

-the difficulties associated with the fire test approval of renovated material systems, -investigates the results of heat release and flammability tests conducted using surrogate materials produced by three independent manufacturers. This report discusses: “Heat Release and Flammability Testing of Surrogate Panels”

Problem: How to administer OSU or VBB certification tests on renovated cabin interior surfaces when appropriate test substrates are unavailable. Objective: To determine if surrogate materials can be used as accurate HR and BL predictors for in-service materials being renovated. A substrate used in-place of existing interior panels for the purposes of conducting HR or VBB certification tests. A substrate which has the same basic construction and build-up as the OEM Panel, with a comparable lay-up process during manufacture. Honeycomb core thickness, number of pre-preg plies per side, and reinforcement must be identical to the in-service panel. Surrogate Material:

Surrogate Test Panel Basic Construction Paint/Decorative Laminate Top-Facing 2-ply Fiberglass Bottom-Facing 2-ply Fiberglass Core: 0.50-inch Nomex Paper/Phenolic Resin

Panel Description Code

Heat Release Test Matrix

Flammability Test Matrix

Surrogate Testing Baseline Panel Numerical Averages

Surrogate Testing

Baseline Comparison

Paint Q Comparison

Paint R Comparison

Paint S Comparison

Laminate T Comparison

Laminate U Comparison

Surrogate Testing Results

Conclusions Normal fluctuations between different labs will only compound the inaccuracy of test results. Unfinished surrogate panels did not produce nearly-identical HRR traces, but different peaks that occurred at different times. HRR differences are compounded when various finishes are applied; these cases represent typical in-service situations likely to occur during certification testing of renovated interiors. All tests were performed: At one facility, With one tester, Based on a large number of replicate tests;

Conclusions (con’t) Based on the above, it would be very difficult to adopt a standardized procedure in which renovated interiors could be certified using surrogate materials. Expectation: The increase in HR caused by a particular paint or decorative should be independent of the identity of the surrogate panel. Result: HR increase not independent of surrogate identity

Proposed Methodology for Certifying Renovations/Alterations (65/65 interior) Option 1: Use flat panel spares supplied by manufacturer of A/C Option 2: Use Cut-out specimen from A/C TBM (To Be Modified) Option 3: If the original HR information is available for the component TBM, and the HRR is: Less than 35/35: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with HRR NLT 40/40 Less than 45/45, but greater than 35/35: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with HRR NLT 50/50 Less than 55/55, but greater than 45/45: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with HRR NLT 60/60 Greater than 55/55: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with HRR NLT 63/63 *note: surrogate specimen must mimic the interior component TBM in every way, including core type, resin type, and thickness and number of pre-preg plies, plus any/all finishes such as paint or decorative. *note: if original HR information is not available, this approach cannot be utilized.

Proposed Methodology for Certifying Renovations/Alterations (Pre 65/65 interior) Option 1: Use flat panel spares supplied by manufacturer of A/C Option 2: Use Cut-out specimen from A/C TBM (To Be Modified) Option 3: If the original 60sec VBB information is available for the component TBM, and the BL is: *note: surrogate specimen must mimic the interior component TBM in every way, including core type, resin type, and thickness and number of pre-preg plies, plus any/all finishes such as paint or decorative. *note: if original 60sec VBB information is not available, then a surrogate specimen with BL NLT 5.5 inches may be used Less than 1 inch: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with BL NLT 1.5 inches Less than 2 inches, but greater than 1 inch: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with BL NLT 2.5 inches Less than 3 inches, but greater than 2 inches: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with BL NLT 3.5 inches Less than 4 inches, but greater than 3 inches: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with BL NLT 4.5 inches Less than 6 inches, but greater than 4 inches: Fabricate and use surrogate specimen with BL NLT 5.5 inches