Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hardware Integration of the Prototype Wes Grammer NRAO September 24-26, 2012EOVSA Prototype Review1.
Advertisements

3mm Testing in July 2001 Tony Wong ATNF Epping CA Forum, 6 Sep.
Digital FX Correlator Nimish Sane Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ EOVSA Technical Design Meeting.
PAPER’s Sweet Sixteen: Imaging the Low Frequency Sky with a Sixteen Element Array Nicole Gugliucci for the PAPER Team* USNC/URSI National Radio Science.
Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO – Green Bank November 2012.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, EVLA Hardware Testing Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/24/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/15/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review Meeting.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 11/7/2011OVSA Technical Design Meeting.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 11/7/2011OVSA Technical Design Meeting.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 11/7/2011OVSA Technical Design Meeting.
Advances in Plasma Astrophysics, Giardini-Naxos, 6-10 Sept D Modeling of Solar Flaring Loops New Interactive Solar Flare Modeling and Advanced Radio.
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
Prototype SKA Technologies at Molonglo: 3. Beamformer and Correlator J.D. Bunton Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, CSIRO. Australia. Correlator.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting May , EVLA Technical Performance Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Cross Correlators Walter Brisken.
BY MD YOUSUF IRFAN.  GLOBAL Positioning System (GPS) receivers for the consumer market require solutions that are compact, cheap, and low power.  This.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Scientific Commissioning Plan Claire Chandler.
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 03/15/2012Preliminary Design Review.
Backend electronics for radioastronomy G. Comoretto.
GBT Spectral Baselines – Tuesday, 11 March 2003 GBT Spectral Baseline Investigation Rick Fisher, Roger Norrod, Dana Balser (G. Watts, M. Stennes)
Rick PerleyNSF Mid-Project Review May , EVLA Technical Performance Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski, Vivek.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/26/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO – Green Bank July 2009.
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
TelCal Phasing Engine description Draft Robert Lucas
ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #2 Santiago, January 2014 Control Group Planning Rafael Hiriart, Control Group Lead.
Polarization at IRAM Status and Plans S.Guilloteau Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux.
TOW 2007: Correlator Theory Kerry Kingham - U.S. Naval Observatory Roger Cappallo – Haystack Observatory Mike Titus - Haystack Observatory.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 03/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
8/12/201514th RHESSI Workshop 1 Dale E. Gary, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research, Physics Department, NJIT.
EOVSA Data and Database System Gordon Hurford and Jim McTiernan EOVSA Prototype Readiness Review 24-Sept-2012.
Correlator Growth Path EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
1 EVLA System Commissioning Results EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Observing Modes from a Software viewpoint Robert Lucas and Philippe Salomé (SSR)
Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) : Design and Status Divya Oberoi, Lenoid Benkevitch MIT Haystack Observatory doberoi, On behalf.
1 KFPA Critical Design Review – Fri., Jan. 30, 2009 KFPA Data Pipeline Bob Garwood- NRAO-CV.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
ASKAP: Setting the scene Max Voronkov ASKAP Computing 23 rd August 2010.
Back-end overview (both analog and digital) for VLBI2010 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting Feb, 2011, Haystack Observatory Bill Petrachenko.
A real-time software backend for the GMRT : towards hybrid backends CASPER meeting Capetown 30th September 2009 Collaborators : Jayanta Roy (NCRA) Yashwant.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Sept 24-28, 2001, ATCA Narrabri Calibration & Flagging Mark Wieringa  Theory of calibration  Practice - RFI & malfunctions.
Atmospheric phase correction at the Plateau de Bure interferometer IRAM interferometry school 2006 Aris Karastergiou.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
K-Band Focal Plane Array Project Engineering Overview Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 2/27/2008.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
Rick PerleyEVLA Front-End CDR – On the Sky Tests April 24, EVLA Front-End CDR On the Sky Tests.
Abstract The purpose of this project is to design a high-performance FPGA-controlled amplifier for Teradyne Corporation. This will constitute Phase IV.
Achieving a Quantum Leap in Observation Density Bill Petrachenko, NRCan.
Astrochemistry with the Upgraded Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy D. N. Friedel Department of Astronomy University of Illinois.
FUNCTION GENERATOR.
What’s New with EOVSA 2017 January What's New with EOVSA 01/10/2017.
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Phased Array Feeds Wim van Cappellen
The Development of Broadband VLBI Technologies in SHAO
EVLA Prototype Correlator (PTC)
Oxford Algorithms Workshop
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Prototype Correlator Testing
Feed & Front End PDR—Sys. Reqts
Correlator Growth Path
EVLA Advisory Panel Mtg. System Overview
KFPA CDR R. Norrod Feb 27, 2008.
EVLA Technical Performance
SKAMP Square Kilometre Array Molonglo Prototype
Presentation transcript:

Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting

 Purpose of the prototype  Expectations of performance  Prototype sensitivity  Prototype stability  Evaluating performance  Total power checkout  Phase and amplitude stability (vs. frequency)  Sensitivity on calibrators (vs. frequency)  Polarization sensitivity  Solar performance  Prototype Operation 2 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting

 Primary purpose, of course, is to evaluate the performance of the design before building out the remainder of the array.  Secondary purpose is to learn to operate the array  Use the experience to develop data handling, analysis software, database structure.  Debug the control system, add features (e.g. subarray control), develop operator display, schedule.  It is very likely that the correlator will need some redesign/tweaking.  The prototype is also useful for science (but should not distract us)  Evaluate extent to which we can calibrate the prototype => sensitivity on calibrators. 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting 3

 This prototype integrated over a 500 MHz band will be 10 times more sensitive than OVSA was:  EOVSA T sys = 560 K, OVSA T sys = 2000 K  EOVSA D = 2.1 m, OVSA D = 1.8 m  EOVSA  = 500 MHz, OVSA  = 100 MHz  Expected sensitivity on a baseline is so we should expect 10  on 3C84 (~28 Jy) in 25 s. It should be feasible to calibrate 500 MHz bandwidths.  Also have dual polarization, and can flag RFI.  Conclude that sensitivity will permit calibration of individual baselines (baseline determination, amplitude and phase calibration—for 500 MHz bandpass—perhaps even some bandpass calibration). 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting 4

 Wes has designed an analog system with excellent stability, shooting for 1% in amplitude and 1° in phase.  The front end includes peltier coolers for temperature stabilization.  There are no “moving parts” in the front end (for a given attenuator setting), and downconversion occurs in the environmentally stable electronics room.  Power levels are designed for optimum linearity through the system.  Power levels are measured in the front end and at the backend prior to downconversion, to ensure correct setting of the front-end attenuation for variable input signals.  These steps in design of the analog system should make the system very stable against temperature and other environmental effects.  We will house the correlator and computers in the electronics room in EMI-shielded racks, which should minimize self-induced RFI.  Our main source of instability will likely be external RFI. 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting 5

 This section assumes we do not have 27-m antennas (yet).  Total power checkout  Check power levels through system against cascaded noise spreadsheet.  Check bandpass ripple versus spreadsheet.  Verify power level and stability over temperature.  Check linearity for various RFI conditions (i.e. over entire sky).  Evaluate RFI and create RFI flag table.  Inter-compare the six TP channels (3 antennas x 2 polarizations).  Cross-correlation checkout  Phase and amplitude stability vs. frequency, phase closure  GPS, XM, and Geostationary satellites will give strong, restricted band phases (amplitudes may vary)  Sun will give strong, all-band phases (but with variable amplitude & phase)  Will need 3C84 observations to check broadband stability  Cross-talk (evaluate need for phase switching) – long run on blank sky, look for anomalous correlation  Evaluate RFI effects, especially weak RFI, over entire sky and on Sun 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting 6

 Sensitivity on Calibrators  Check quantitative sensitivity on 3C84 vs. integration time  Check quantitative sensitivity on weaker calibrators and long integrations  Characterize array parameters (beam efficiency, T sys, etc., vs. frequency)  Polarization Sensitivity  Evaluate single-dish cross-talk (geostationary satellites have linear polarization, GPS has RCP—limited frequency range, though).  Verify correlator digital hybrid (converting linear to circular polarization).  Evaluate the extent to which cross-talk can be eliminated via adjustment of digital parameters in the correlator.  Solar Performance  Check on/off Sun power levels and setting of attenuation.  Check solar increment (on/off Sun) and stability thereof vs. frequency.  Check pointing performance of each antenna over a full day. 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting 7

 Once we have baselines determined, and establish phase and amplitude stability, we can obtain calibration and attempt to operate the array.  There are many benefits to attempting operations besides science:  Stability of performance: We can determine how stable the system is between calibrations (i.e. how often calibrations are necessary).  Automation: We can work on the necessary infrastructure to ensure nearly unattended operation. This is essential, since Kjell and Dan will remain very busy and cannot be distracted by daily operations.  Data handling: We can work on automation of some of the metadata creation (light-curves, spectra) and begin to build the web access to the database.  Public Relations: It will be good to advertise availability of data, and some science results, to keep the community aware of EOVSA. 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting 8