Determine Scope of Assessment Select Assessment Team Notify Laboratory & Request Records Determine Team Assignments Sample Receipt and Storage Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIV Drug Resistance Training
Advertisements

Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Radiopharmaceutical Production
© WHO – PSM Quality Control Laboratory Pharmaceutical Quality, Good manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence Kiev, Ukraine October 2005 Maija Hietava.
Kenya AIDS Vaccine Initiative
Legal Defensibility in the Laboratory To Protect and Enhance Kentucky’s Environment KWWOA April 17, 2013.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
Good Manufacturing Practices Guilin, PRC Dr AJ van Zyl for Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards Health Technology and.
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download, adapt, and distribute this.
Corrective & Preventive Action Programme l Corrective and preventive action managed by one programme l Closely linked to the internal audit programme l.
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
Dr Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 1 CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr El-deen Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Nasr.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
Documents and Records-Writing a Quality Manual-Module 16 1 Quality Manual Structure and Contents Quality Manual Structure and Contents - optional.
Developing a Quality Management System Viki Massey Quality Coordinator A Joint Venture of London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph’s Health Care London.
Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice
Developing a Chemical Risk Management Program
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
World Health Organization
World Health Organization
Quality Control Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
5.2 Personnel Use competent staff Supervise as necessary
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
Ireland Army Community Hospital CLSI Quality Series.
Quality Assurance Plans (QAP)
Detecting Improper Laboratory Practices
Instructions and forms
Photocopies Occasionally need uncontrolled copies
QC | Slide 1 of 16 June 2006 Good Practices for Quality Control Laboratories P art 4: Inspecting the laboratory Supplementary Training Modules on Good.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
By Drudeisha Madhub Data Protection Commissioner Date:
U.S. Department of Energy’s Consolidated Audit Program (DOECAP) U.S. Department of Energy’s Consolidated Audit Program (DOECAP) Dr. Todd L. Hardt DOECAP.
NVLAP Overview and Accreditation Process March 2006.
1 HIPAA Security Overview Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Personnel. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety The.
Regulatory Overview.
Module 4 Assuring the Quality of Testing: A Systems Approach to Quality (ISO 15189:2012) Assuring the Quality of Laboratory Testing: A Systems Approach.
1 Accreditation and Certification: Definition  Certification: Procedures by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process or service.
Module 5: Assuring the Quality of HIV Rapid Testing
RAISING THE BAR Meeting CSA Guidelines And Preparing for Health Canada
Data management in the field Ari Haukijärvi 2nd EHES training seminar.
P1 External Quality Assessment (EQA) Proficiency Testing.
QA/QC in Lab Performance Renu Joshi, Ph.D. CAEAL Assessor Certified by the National Quality Institute, Canada.
Step What happens?. Who is responsible? Procedures needed?
Office of Research Oversight 1 ORO Research Suspensions and Other ACOS/R Concerns Tom Puglisi, PhD Local Accountability in Research April 8, 2010.
Laboratory Certification Update Part 2 Common Findings KWWOA Louisville April 15, 2015 Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 2015 Introduction to Quality Control.
1 Privacy Plan of Action © HIPAA Pros 2002 All rights reserved.
Regulatory Issues in Laboratory Management
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Verification, Validation and Internal Audits - Jose Jimenez Federal Facilities Program Manager – EPA Region III.
CM&C Inspections The Pre-Approval Inspection (PAI) in the US 27 May 2010.
Scientific data storage: How are computers involved in the following?
WHO - PSM Basic Principles of GMP Documentation - Part 1 Workshop on GMP and Quality Assurance of HIV products Shanghai, China 28 Feb - 4 March 2005 Maija.
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER NAFDAC CENTRAL DRUG CONTROL LABORATORY YABA
Overview of Quality Assurance
HIV Drug Resistance Training
QC | Slide 1 of Good Practices for Quality Control Laboratories Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report.
Achieving ISO Compliance
An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Analytical Science
Good Laboratory Practices
GBRA’s Superhero: Qualtrax
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Presentation transcript:

Determine Scope of Assessment Select Assessment Team Notify Laboratory & Request Records Determine Team Assignments Sample Receipt and Storage Assessment SOPs Process Demonstration Sample Receipt and Storage Records Sample Custodian Interviews Security Sample Storage Glassware and Bottle Preparation Data Transfer (from technical areas to reporting) ELECTRONIC DATA Audit Trail HARD COPY DATA Archives - Original - Copies Summary Reports Case Narratives Conduct Pre- Assessment Records Review Plan On-Site Assessment PRE-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES ON-SITE ASSESSMENT PROCESS DATA ASSESSMENT Process Waste Disposal and Material Throughput SOPs Process Demonstration Logbooks, Bench Sheets, Maintenance Records Analyst Interviews Access and Computer Security Data Reduction and Review (Process) Equipment and Facilities Technical Area Assessments Quality Systems Documentation Organization and Functions Training Records Management Interviews Records Management & Archives Computer Access & Security (LIMS, Data Systems) Data Integrity Program (Records/ Policy) Internal Audits Corrective Action Document Control Quality Systems and Management Assessment ASSESSMENT PROCESS FLOW CHART RED FLAGS: DATA ASSESSMENT F Incomplete case narratives F Unexpected sample results F Too-perfect QC results F Reports missing secondary reviewer signatures or dates F Discrepancies between CoC and reports F Unexplained gaps/changes in records F Discrepancies in QC performance between analysts F Calibration records missing reviewer signature/dates F “Reappearing” quality control results F Screen-printed reports F Routine dead time on auto- injection run logs F Samples or blanks diluted without apparent justification F Too few quality control records to support data output F Chronological chromatograms that do not display prevalent background RED FLAGS: PRE-ASSESSMENT F Lack of documented assessment follow- up or corrective action F Questionable proficiency F Questionable technical depth F Recent, significant, organizational changes F Lack of responsiveness F Lack of management commitment to data integrity RED FLAGS: OPENING MEETING & LAB TOUR F Time wasters (e.g. lengthy health and safety overview, non-relevant briefings (e.g. history, sales) F Selected staff not available for interviews F Housekeeping practices F Unexplained, restricted access Opening Meeting & Laboratory Tour On-Site Assessment RED FLAGS: SAMPLE RECEIPT & TECHNICAL AREA ASSESSMENTS F Denials of access or conditional access F Attempts to distract the assessment team F Records not readily accessible F Discrepancies between method and SOP F Referenced methods out of date F Presence of pencils, white-out F Extremely clean, neat logbooks F Uncontrolled records F Logbook entries all aligned F Discrepancies between SOP and practice F Expired standards F Disabled audit trails F Shared log-on and password access F Unlabeled containers or illegible labels F Sample volume discrepancies F Materials inventory does not match throughput F Sample throughput exceeds time required to process the samples F Managers translating or clarifying analysts’ responses to questions F Emphasis on production F Inadequate sample-handling procedures for evening or weekend deliveries F No mechanism for reporting problems F Analysts not allowed to use their judgment F Analysts unable to describe data review and/or oversight RED FLAGS: QUALITY SYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT F Lack of data integrity policy F Unclear communication of either expected behavior or improper practices F Lack of a “no-fault” reporting mechanism F Emphasis on production F Inadequate back-up (personnel and equipment) F Poor coordination for accepting new work F Excessive overtime F “Bottleneck” departments F Lack of technical depth F High staff turnover F Gaps in training records F QA Staff lacks direct access to senior management F Unclear roles and responsibilities F QA staff performing competing functions F Inadequate internal assessments F Lack of data surveillance F Incomplete assessment files F Repeat assessment findings F Inadequate procedures for handling complaints F Corrective action fails to address root cause F Lack of timely follow-up or documentation of corrective action F Lack of record verification in archiving procedures F Inadequate procedures to ensure data retrieval