Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

Emerging Technologies Working Group Discussion: AXRs September 24, Contents I.Ready or Not, Here They Come II.ALRs, the Camel’s Nose III.The Whys.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
Raine Cotton  Registered DG settlement is in accordance with Protocol Section as Real-Time Energy Imbalance at a Load.
April 23, 2014 DSWG Loads in SCEDv1 Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher ERCOT Staff.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 28, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
August 17, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting Updated Analysis of Non-Spin Deployments and RUC John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
NPRR425 - Creation of a WGR Group for GREDP and Base Point Deviation Evaluation and Mixing Turbine Types Within a WGR Art Deller, P.E. RARF Workshop 8/29/13.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
1 Market Trials Open Market Participant Call Weekly Kick Off March 01, 2010.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 8, 2008.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
August 8, 2013 Loads in SCED Workshop II Load Participation in SCED NPRR 555 ERCOT Staff Presentation.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Dispute Management System Business Requirements ERCOT.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Rob Bevill January 5, 2012.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
NPRRs NPRR649 Lost Opportunity Payments for HDL Manual Overrides. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes two options for a lost opportunity.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
NPRR 649 Addressing Issues Surrounding High Dispatch Limit (HDL) Overrides Katie Coleman for Air Liquide (Industrial Consumer) ERCOT Board February 9,
ERCOT Update on Day-Ahead Extract and other PUCT Posting changes DEWG Meeting 10/29/07 Matt Mereness.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations June 27, 2012 – ETWG Meeting.
Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee July 1, 2010.
1 Project Update and Summary of Project Priority List (PPL) Activity to Date June 11, 2014.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Market Trials Open Market Participant Call
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Principles of Participation in Real-Time Co-optimization
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
Texas Energy Market About ERCOT ERCOT market participants
Texas Energy Market About ERCOT ERCOT market participants
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Presentation transcript:

Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013

Issues Load Resources providing Non-Spin must be a Controllable Load Resource.  Removes the current capability for Load Resources that do not have the capability to be dispatched by SCED from this market  Potentially leaves Non-Spin AS stranded if the bid price is at SWCAP ERCOT must provide an aggregate energy Demand curve based on the RTM Energy Bid curves available to SCED as it does for generation offers in the RTM  The intent of § Resource Adequacy in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas Power Region, (f) Publication of resource and load information in ERCOT markets. “To increase the transparency of the ERCOT-administered markets, ERCOT shall post at a publicly accessible location on its website…..”]  Without such an aggregate curve, market participants will not understand the true extent of SCED’s ability to control Resources

Issues ERCOT must post the name of the controlling entity for a Load Resource engaged in the RTM  Note the Entity controlling a Load Resource must meet the requirements of § Pricing Safeguards in Markets Operated by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas and of any state laws requiring separation of “control” of generation and load. As such entities controlling a Load Resource in the RTM must be a different entity than the QSE or Generation Entity controlling generation.  Not as likely a problem with Load Resources only participated in the DAM, but now can set prices in RTM potentially to the benefit of generation owners as well as themselves. SCED calculation of HDL and LDL for Load Resources must have a separate Normal Up Ramp Rate Curve from its Normal Down Ramp Rate Curve  Many more loads may be able to participate as the time to stop consuming versus resuming consumption level can be significantly different

Issues The SCED methodology described in the protocols should be clarified that Offers will be considered at Resource Nodes while Bids will be distributed across all the load Nodes in the Load Zone containing the Load Resource Demand Response Capability from a Controllable Load Resource in SCED must be included in Physical Responsive Capability calculations  If a Load Resource is able to set prices for the entire market through automatic dispatch of SCED, then it must also be counted as ERCOT PRC for all operator actions including declaration of the EEA.

Issues Special provisions regarding the Base Point Deviation charges must be provided to resolve performance issues with SCED intervals of 5 minutes versus Settlement Intervals of 15 minutes.  Load Base Points will rarely be different than MPC telemetry (Load remains not deployed as prices are less than its Bid). Measuring performance for such rare events by averaging all actions over an entire month will hide any performance problems that may have occurred when such a load actually set prices.  Suggestion to only validate performance when the Load Resource actually sets the LMP