DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, 2007 1 First safety approach of the DHR system of XT-ADS B. Arien.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Advertisements

Relevant Thermal-Hydraulic Aspects in the Design of the RRR A. Doval, C. Mazufri F.P. Moreno Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary December NERC lessons learned published in December 2014 Three NERC lessons learned (LL) were published in December.
Issues Associated with the Development of Severe Accident Management Guidelines for CANDU Reactors Keith Dinnie Director, Risk Management Nuclear Safety.
Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison.
Thermal-Hydraulic Transient Analysis of the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) TRTR Annual Meeting September 17-20, 2007 Dr. Robert C. Nelson1,
EUROTRANS – DM1 RELAP5 Model Evaluation with SIMMER-III Code and Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Reactor WP5.1 Progress Meeting KTH / Stockholm,
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
Accidents Happen But Nuclear Accidents Require Special Skill!
EUROTRANS WP 1.5 Meeting FZK – Karlsruhe, November 27-28, 2008 FPN-FISNUC / Bologna EUROTRANS – DM1 EFIT Transients Analysis with RELAP5, SIMMER-III and.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Lyon, October Sophie.
Framatome ANP IP-EUROTRANS Meeting WP 1.5 Progress in safety approach development TEE, March Sophie EHSTER.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
MIS 5241 Three Mile Island What Happened, What Worked, What Didn’t.
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT with RELAP5 and RELAP/PARCS Codes WP5.1 Progress Meeting Empresarios Agrupados - Madrid, November.
EUROTRANS: WP1.5 Technical meeting, Karlsruhe, November 27 – 28, XT-ADS DHR Conceptual Design L. Mansani
IP-Eurotrans DM1-WP1.5 meeting, Lyon, October 10-11, Gas Plenum in XT-ADS Fuel Rod V. Sobolev, B. Arien SCK·CEN, Boeretang 200, Mol, Belgium.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for XT-ADS: Deliverable 1.20 Lyon, October Sophie.
“Design and safety analysis of ALFRED”
1 Safety studies for MYRRHA B. Arien, S. Heusdains, H. Aït Abderrahim on behalf of the MYRRHA Team and Support IP-Eurotrans Workshop DM1-WP1.5Brussels,
EUROTRANS - Helium cooled EFIT Probabilistic assessment of different DHR designs Karlsruhe, November Sophie EHSTER, Laurent VINCON.
ARIES Meeting General Atomics, February 25 th, 2005 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Madrid, Nov XT-ADS Transient Analysis.
WP 1.5 Progress Meeting ENEA – Bologna, Italy, May 28-30, 2008 FPN-FISNUC / Bologna EUROTRANS – DM1 Analysis of EFIT Unprotected Accidental Transients.
Chapter 12: Alternative Technologies To be used with the Guide to Building Energy Efficient Homes in Kentucky.
NUCLEAR SAFETY Barbora Svobodová Angličtina-odborná II.
Investigation into the Viability of a Passively Active Decay Heat Removal System In ALLEGRO Laura Carroll, Graduate Physicist Physics & Licensing Team,
Eric Backus FW System Engineer Exelon - LaSalle Station FSRUG Executive Board Member.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY Rosa Mª Rengel Gálvez Marina B. Gutiérrez García-Arias 11/09/2007 Rosa Mª Rengel Gálvez Marina B. Gutiérrez.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Miss Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR
ERT 322 SAFETY AND LOSS PREVENTION RISK ASSESSMENT
LEADER/ELECTRA Safety Workshop: Petten February 2013 IRSN presentation on its document “ Overview of Generation IV (Gen-IV) reactor designs Safety.
P&ID’s PIPING & INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS.
1. - Condensate pump and feed pump trip! -Turbine trips! 2.
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
V. Kim, V. Kuznetsov, G. Balakan ‑ South-Ukraine NPP, Ukraine G. Gromov, A. Krushynsky ‑ Analytical Research Bureau of SSTC NRS S. Sholomitsky, I. Lola.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
IAEA Meeting on INPRO Collaborative Project “Performance Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (PGAP)” December, 2011, Vienna A.K. Nayak, PhD.
Safety Analysis Results of the DEC Transients of ALFRED LEADER Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor G. Bandini (ENEA), E. Bubelis, M. Schikorr.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
European Organization for Nuclear Research - Organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire SSD/SDD Proposal Upgrade 30/08/2012
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
LEADER Project Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 and CATHARE Giacomino Bandini - ENEA/Bologna Genevieve Geffraye – CEA/Grenoble.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 MELCOR Severe Accident Simulation for a “CAREM-like” Integral Reactor M. Caputo, J. M. García, M. Giménez, S.
Page 1 Petten 27 – Feb ALFRED and ELFR Secondary System and Plant Layout.
Analysis of Representative DEC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 LEADER Project: Task 5.5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
Natural Convection as a Passive Safety Design in Nuclear Reactors
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Johan Bremer, 22th-26th September 2008 Cryogenics Operations 2008, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1 CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN Safety aspects.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making System Analysis Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country XX - XX Month,
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment Advanced Physics Technology Division Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna, Italy.
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Design WP5.1 Progress Meeting AREVA / Lyon, October 10-11, 2006 G. Bandini, P. Meloni, M. Polidori.
Prof. Enrico Zio Fault tree analysis Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
I Overview of EU-APR1400 II Design Concept of Safety Systems III
Prof. Enrico Zio Event tree analysis Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
- Condensate pump and feed pump trip!
ARAC/H/F Air-cooled water chillers, free-cooling chillers and heat pumps Range: kW.
Energy- and mass flows in cooling and in heat pumps
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Compact Nuclear Simulation Analysis
IAEA International Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9 June, 2017 Investigation of performance of Passive heat removal system.
- Condensate pump and feed pump trip!
RSFs & categorisation 20 May, 2019.
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
Presentation transcript:

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, First safety approach of the DHR system of XT-ADS B. Arien

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, General purpose Main objective: identification of the possible failure modes of the DHR system and its weaknesses, its limits Methodological approach: master logic diagram (MLD) method Accidents into consideration:  Loss of heat sink (LOHS)  Loss of flow (LOF)  Combination of LOF and LOHS  Protected and unprotected cases

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Main design assumptions Primary system:  2 groups pump-HX (2 pumps, 4 HXs)  Emergency electrical supply to pumps  Free convection if total loss of pumps Secondary system:  2 independent loops  Emergency electrical supply to pumps  Possibility of natural circulation to be considered Tertiary system: no design information, supposed to work in natural circulation and is treated as a whole Vault system (RVACS): no design information, supposed to work in natural circulation mode and treated as a whole

EUROTRANS-DM1: T1.2.2 meeting, February 28, 2007 XT-ADS Sketch of the Secondary System and DHR System (Proposal)

SCK  CEN’s proposal

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, MLD procedure For each accident type: Step 1: identification of the failure modes that initiate the accident Step 2: development of a MLD for the protected case Step 3: development of a MLD for the unprotected case

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, MLD procedure Symbols: DHR system fulfills its function (=.false.) may contribute to DHR system failure (=.true.) question related to any unresolved problem Accident initiating event Failure in DHR system OK unsuccess yes question ? no Qi

LOHS accident Secondary pump failure Pipe break in SCS Depressurization in SCS Tertiary cooling system failure HX blockage (secondary side) Blockage by debris Partial blockage HX blockage (primary side) Accompanied by LOF LBE freezing in HX Blockage by debris LOF&LOHS LOHS: step 1

Failure of core cooling in LOHS conditions Protected accident Unprotected accident Failure of core cooling under protected LOHS conditions A Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOHS conditions Accelerator shutdown failure B

LOHS: step 2 Failure of tertiary cooling system Failure of core cooling under protected LOHS conditions A If single secondary pump failure If total secondary pump failure If tertiary cooling system unavailable If depressur. in 1 SCS loop If depressur. in whole SCS If pipe break in 1 SCS loop If pipe breaks in whole SCS If partial HX blockage (water side) OK Vault System failure Failure of SCS pressurization Vault System failure OK yes DHR possible at atm. p in SCS ? no Q2 Failure of electrical supply to secondary pumps Vault System failure Failure of emergency electrical supply to secondary pumps Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system yes DHR possible by free convection in SCS ? no Q1 unsuccess SCS pipe breaks caused by external accident Vault System failure Over- pressure in SCS Safety valve failures

LOHS: step 3 Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOHS conditions B If single secondary pump failure If total secondary pump failure If tertiary cooling system unavailable If depressur. in 1 SCS loop If depressur. in whole SCS If pipe break in 1 SCS loop If pipe breaks in whole SCS If partial HX blockage (water side) Failure of tertiary cooling system Failure of SCS pressurization Failure of pressurization in 1 SCS loop Debris formation in SCS Single secondary pump failure Q3 Failure of emergency electrical supply to secondary pumps Failure of electrical supply to secondary pumps Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system yes Nominal power can be removed by free convection in SCS ? no Q3 unsuccess SCS pipe breaks caused by external accident Over- pressure in SCS Safety valve failures Single pipe break in SCS Over- pressure in 1 SCS loop Safety valve failure

LOF accident Primary pump failure HX blockage (primary side) Accompanied by LOF LBE freezing in HX Blockage by debris LOF&LOHS Accidental core bypass LOF: step 1

Failure of core cooling under LOF conditions Protected accident Unprotected accident Failure of core cooling under protected LOF conditions C Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOF conditions Accelerator shutdown failure D

Failure of core cooling under protected LOF conditions C Primary pumps fail to stop If single primary pump failure OK If total primary pump failure OK If accidental core bypass yes DHR possible in free convection mode and with core bypass ? no Q4 unsuccess Core bypass formation Free convection fails to take place LOF: step 2

Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOF conditions D If single primary pump failure Single primary pump failure If total primary pump failure no OK yes Nominal power can be evacuated when 1 group is operating ? Q5 unsuccess Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps Nominal power can be evacuated in free convection mode yes ? no Q6 unsuccess OK If accidental core bypass Primary pumps fail to stop yes Nominal power can be evacuated in free convection mode and with core bypass ? no Q7 unsuccess Core bypass formation Free convection fails to take place LOF: step 3

LOF&LOHS accident Common cause failure generating LOF and LOHS HX blockage (primary side) Freezing induced by LOF LBE freezing in HX Blockage by debris Partial blockage Independent combinations of LOF and LOHS Dependent combinations of LOF and LOHS LOF&LOHS: step 1

Failure of core cooling under LOF&LOHS conditions Protected accident Unprotected accident Failure of core cooling under protected LOF&LOHS conditions E Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOF&LOHS conditions Accelerator shutdown failure F

Failure of core cooling under protected LOF&LOHS conditions E Independent combinations of LOF and LOHS LOHS induced by LOF: HX blockage (primary side) Partial HX blockage by debris OK Total HX blockage by LBE freezing Station black-out Common cause failure for LOF and LOHS Vault System failure Overcooling Vault System failure Total primary pump failure Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps yes DHR possible via VS in ‘degraded’ free convection mode ? no Q9 unsuccess DHR possible by total free convection in the primary, secondary and tertiary systems Q8 yes ? no Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system unsuccess Failure of emergency electrical supply LOF&LOHS: step 2

Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOF&LOHS conditions F Independent combinations of LOF and LOHS Common cause for LOF and LOHS LOHS induced by LOF: HX blockage (primary side) Partial HX blockage by debris Total HX blockage by LBE freezing Overcooling Total primary pump failure Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps Debris formation in primary system Station black-out Nominal power can be evacuated by total free convection in the primary, secondary and tertiary systems Q10 yes ? no unsuccess Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system Failure of emergency electrical supply LOF&LOHS: step 3

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Problems to be solved Q1: is the DHR possible with the SCS working in free convection mode? Q2: is the DHR possible when the SCS is at atmospheric pressure? Q3: can the nominal power be evacuated with the SCS working in free convection mode? Q4: is the DHR possible with the primary system working in free convection mode and with the presence of a core bypass? Q5: can the nominal power be evacuated when only one pump-HX group is operating in the primary system? Q6: can the nominal power be evacuated with the primary system working in free convection mode ? Q7: can the nominal power be evacuated with the primary system working in free convection mode and with the presence of a core bypass? Q8: is the DHR possible with the primary, secondary and tertiary circuits working in free convection mode? Q9: is the DHR possible via the VS with the primary system working in free convection mode and with a total blockage of the PHXs? Q10: can the nominal power be evacuated with the primary, secondary and tertiary circuits working in free convection mode?

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for protected LOF DHR possible in free convection mode and with core bypass ? Q4 Failure of core cooling under protected LOF conditions : Core bypass formation Primary pumps fail to stop and if Q4 true Core bypass formation if Q4 false

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for unprotected LOF Nominal power can be evacuated in free convection mode ? Q6 Failure of core cooling under protected LOF conditions : Single primary pump failure and Accelerator shutdown failure if Q5 false Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps and Accelerator shutdown failure if Q6 false Core bypass formation Primary pumps fail to stop and Accelerator shutdown failure if Q7 true Core bypass formation and Accelerator shutdown failure if Q7 false Nominal power can be evacuated when 1 group is operating ? Q5 Nominal power can be evacuated in free convection mode and with core bypass ? Q7

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for protected LOHS if Q1 true Failure of core cooling under protected LOHS conditions : Failure of tertiary cooling system Vault System failure and if Q2 false and Failure of SCS pressurization Vault System failure DHR possible at atm. p ? Q2 Vault System failure and Failure of electrical supply to secondary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to secondary pumps Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system Vault System failure and Failure of electrical supply to secondary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to secondary pumps if Q1 false DHR possible by free convection in SCS ? Q1 SCS pipe breaks caused by external accident Vault System failure and Overpressure in SCS Vault System failure and Safety valve failures and

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for unprotected LOHS (a) Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOHS conditions : if Q3 true and Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system Failure of electrical supply to secondary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to secondary pumps Accelerator shutdown failure SCS pipe breaks caused by external accident and Accelerator shutdown failure and Failure of SCS pressurization Accelerator shutdown failure and Accelerator shutdown failure Debris formation in SCS Failure of tertiary cooling system Accelerator shutdown failure and Depressur. of 1 SCS loop Accelerator shutdown failure and Single pipe break in SCS Accelerator shutdown failure and Single secondary pump failure Accelerator shutdown failure and Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system Nominal power can be removed by free convection in SCS ? Q3 Overpressure in 1 SCS loop and Accelerator shutdown failure Safety valve failure and Overpressure in SCS and Accelerator shutdown failure Safety valve failures and

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for unprotected LOHS (b) Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOHS conditions : if Q3 false and Failure of electrical supply to secondary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to secondary pumps Accelerator shutdown failure SCS pipe breaks caused by external accident and Accelerator shutdown failure and Failure of SCS pressurization Accelerator shutdown failure and Accelerator shutdown failure Debris formation in SCS Failure of tertiary cooling system Accelerator shutdown failure and Depressur. of 1 SCS loop Accelerator shutdown failure and Single pipe break in SCS Accelerator shutdown failure and Single secondary pump failure Accelerator shutdown failure and Nominal power can be removed by free convection in SCS ? Q3 Overpressure in 1 SCS loop and Accelerator shutdown failure Safety valve failure and Overpressure in SCS and Accelerator shutdown failure Safety valve failures and

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for protected LOF&LOHS Failure of core cooling under protected LOF&LOHS conditions : DHR possible via VS in ‘degraded’ free convection mode ? Q9 Independent combinations of LOF and LOHS Station black-out Vault System failure and Failure of emergency electrical supply Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system and if Q8 true Station black-out Vault System failure and Failure of emergency electrical supply and if Q8 false Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps and Overcooling Vault System failure if Q9 true Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps and Overcooling if Q9 true DHR possible by total free convection in the primary, secondary and tertiary systems Q8 ?

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Cut sets for unprotected LOF&LOHS Failure of core cooling under unprotected LOF&LOHS conditions : Failure of electrical supply to primary pumps Failure of emergency electrical supply to primary pumps and Overcooling Accelerator shutdown failure Debris formation in primary system Accelerator shutdown failure and Independent combinations of LOF and LOHS Accelerator shutdown failure and Station black-out and Accelerator shutdown failure Failure of emergency electrical supply and if Q10 false if Q10 true Station black-out and Accelerator shutdown failure Failure of emergency electrical supply and Free convection fails to take place in the secondary system and Nominal power can be evacuated by total free convection in the primary, secondary and tertiary systems Q10 ?

DM1 – WP1.5 meeting Stockholm, May 22-23, Conclusions and future work A qualitative analysis was performed:  to provide first indications on the DHR performance  to guide the future work Some unresolved questions require a quantitative analysis Design needs to be completed  Choice of the SCS (Ansaldo or SCKCEN) RELAP (or TRAC) model has to be developed for the simulation of the whole system in most of the transients CFD model of the primary system has to be developed  Free convection simulation  Calibration of the RELAP model Reassessment of the DHR system behaviour in accidental situations