A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting By Bruno Bertrand November 19 th 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Quantum Mechanics to Lagrangian Densities
Advertisements

Theories of gravity in 5D brane-world scenarios
Brane-World Inflation
Noncommutative Geometries in M-theory David Berman (Queen Mary, London) Neil Copland (DAMTP, Cambridge) Boris Pioline (LPTHE, Paris) Eric Bergshoeff (RUG,
Boundary conditions for SU(2) Yang-Mills on AdS 4 Jae-Hyuk Oh At ISM meeting in Puri, Dileep P. Jatkar and Jae-Hyuk Oh, Based on arXiv:
Saturday, 02 May 2015 Speeding up HMC with better integrators A D Kennedy and M A Clark School of Physics & SUPA, The University of Edinburgh Boston University.
Hamiltonian Formalism
Uses of Chern-Simons Actions J. Zanelli CECS – Valdivia (Chile) Ten Years of the AdS/CFT Conjecture Buenos Aires, December 2007.
The Unification of Gravity and E&M via Kaluza-Klein Theory Chad A. Middleton Mesa State College September 16, 2010 Th. Kaluza, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad.
Topological current effect on hQCD at finite density and magnetic field Pablo A. Morales Work in collaboration with Kenji Fukushima Based on Phys. Rev.
Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity Hridis Kumar Pal UFID: Project Presentation for PHZ 6607, Special and General Relativity I Fall,
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
Cosimo Stornaiolo INFN-Sezione di Napoli MG 12 Paris July 2009.
E. Rakhmetov, S. Keyzerov SINP MSU, Moscow QFTHEP 2011, September, Luchezarny, Russia.
Standard Model Requires Treatment of Particles as Fields Hamiltonian, H=E, is not Lorentz invariant. QM not a relativistic theory. Lagrangian, T-V, used.
The attractor mechanism, C-functions and aspects of holography in Lovelock gravity Mohamed M. Anber November HET bag-lunch.
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
Centro de Estudios Científicos CECS-Valdivia-Chile.
Instanton representation of Plebanski gravity Eyo Eyo Ita III Physics Department, US Naval Academy Spanish Relativity Meeting September 10, 2010.
Antisymmetric metric fluctuations as dark matter By Tomislav Prokopec (Utrecht University) Cosmo 07, Brighton 22 Aug 2007 ˚1˚ Based on publications: T.
Monday, Apr. 2, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12, 13, 14 Monday, Apr. 2, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Local Gauge Invariance 2.U(1) Gauge.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BRANE KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS Introduction Strings, branes, geometric principle, background independence Brane space M (brane kinematics)
Is Black Hole an elementary particle? By Hoi-Lai Yu IPAS, Oct 30, 2007.
Erasmus meeting Heraklon April 2013 Sophia Domokos Carlos Hoyos, J.S.
3. Classical Physics in Galilean and Minkowski Spacetimes 3.1. The Action Principle in Galilean Spacetime 3.2. Symmetries and Conservation Laws 3.3. The.
Cascading gravity and de gravitation Claudia de Rham Perimeter Institute/McMaster Miami 2008 Dec, 18 th 2008.
Vincent Rodgers © Vincent Rodgers © A Very Brief Intro to Tensor Calculus Two important concepts:
The false vacuum bubble : - formation and evolution - in collaboration with Chul H. Lee(Hanyang), Wonwoo Lee, Siyong Nam, and Chanyong Park (CQUeST) Based.
Relativity Discussion 4/19/2007 Jim Emery. Einstein and his assistants, Peter Bergmann, and Valentin Bargmann, on there daily walk to the Institute for.
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #9 Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Quantum Electro-dynamics (QED) 2.Local.
The embedding-tensor formalism with fields and antifields. Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Moscow, 4th Sakharov conf., May 21, 2009.
Quantum Gravity and emergent metric Quantum Gravity and emergent metric.
Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #13 Wednesday, Mar. 5, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Local Gauge Invariance and Introduction.
Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point Ref. P. Horava, arXiv: [hep-th] ( c.f. arXiv: [hep-th] ) June 8 th Journal Club Presented.
“Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory”
Leading order gravitational backreactions in de Sitter spacetime Bojan Losic Theoretical Physics Institute University of Alberta IRGAC 2006, Barcelona.
Topology induced emergent dynamic gauge theory in an extended Kane-Mele-Hubbard model Xi Luo January 5, 2015 arXiv:
First Steps Towards a Theory of Quantum Gravity Mark Baumann Dec 6, 2006.
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
Topological Insulators
P Spring 2002 L4Richard Kass Conservation Laws When something doesn’t happen there is usually a reason! Read: M&S Chapters 2, 4, and 5.1, That something.
Non-Commutative Einstein Equations and Seiberg–Witten Map Paolo Aschieri,Elisabetta Di Grezia, Giampiero Esposito, INFN, Turin and Naples. Friedmann Seminar,
} } Lagrangian formulation of the Klein Gordon equation
Holographic Renormalization Group with Gravitational Chern-Simons Term Takahiro Nishinaka ( Osaka U.) (Collaborators: K. Hotta, Y. Hyakutake, T. Kubota.
Quantization of free scalar fields scalar field  equation of motin Lagrangian density  (i) Lorentzian invariance (ii) invariance under  →  require.
Monday, Apr. 11, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday, Apr. 11, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge fields.
1 Bhupendra Nath Tiwari IIT Kanpur in collaboration with T. Sarkar & G. Sengupta. Thermodynamic Geometry and BTZ black holes This talk is mainly based.
Boundary conditions for SU(2) Yang-Mills on AdS 4 Jae-Hyuk Oh at 2012 workshop for string theory and cosmology, Pusan, Korea. Dileep P. Jatkar and Jae-Hyuk.
University of Oslo & Caltech
1 ECE Engineering Model The Basis for Electromagnetic and Mechanical Applications Horst Eckardt, AIAS Version 4.1,
Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #19 Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge.
1 ECE Engineering Model The Basis for Electromagnetic and Mechanical Applications Horst Eckardt, AIAS Version 4.5,
Department of Electronics
Quantum Field Theory (PH-537) M.Sc Physics 4th Semester
Canonical Quantization
Lagrange Formalism & Gauge Theories
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
An Introduction to Riemannian Geometry
Chapter V Interacting Fields Lecture 1 Books Recommended:
3D (Higher Spin) Gravity Black Holes and Statistical Entropy
Construction of a relativistic field theory
The Basis for Electromagnetic and Mechanical Applications
Fundamentals of Quantum Electrodynamics
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
in collaboration with M. Bojowald, G. Hossain, S. Shankaranarayanan
前回まとめ 自由scalar場の量子化 Lagrangian 密度 運動方程式 Klein Gordon方程式 正準共役運動量 量子条件
Physics 451/551 Theoretical Mechanics
Gauge theory and gravity
Presentation transcript:

A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting By Bruno Bertrand November 19 th 2004

A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 2 INTRODUCTION

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 3 Why do we work in 2+1 dimensions ? Theoretical ‘‘test’’ laboratory Theoretical ‘‘test’’ laboratory => U nderstanding & methods of quant. field theories + Simpler than 3+1 d. models, sometimes with exact solutions Possible generic results, interests of dim. reduction, etc. + Simpler than 3+1 d. models, sometimes with exact solutions Possible generic results, interests of dim. reduction, etc. + Less trivial than 1+1 d. models (often trivial dynamics) + Less trivial than 1+1 d. models (often trivial dynamics) Specific properties of models with even number of spatial dim. Specific properties of models with even number of spatial dim. => 1+1 d. models closer to 3+1 d. than 2+1 d. models d. models are less ‘‘realistic’’ d. models are less ‘‘realistic’’ - Problem in the extension of 2+1 d. methods to 3+1 d. case - Problem in the extension of 2+1 d. methods to 3+1 d. case + Great interest : Surprising phenomenon. e - and  beavior differing in many ways. + Great interest : Surprising phenomenon. e - and  beavior differing in many ways.

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 4 Table of contents 1 st part : Maxwell theory in 2+1 & 3+1 d. 1 st part : Maxwell theory in 2+1 & 3+1 d. => A case of common quantum field theory √ Lagrangian of pure QED √ Lagrangian of pure QED √ Differences between 2+1 & 3+1 dim. cases √ Differences between 2+1 & 3+1 dim. cases √ Classical hamiltonian analysis √ Classical hamiltonian analysis 2 nd part : Maxwell Chern Simons theory 2 nd part : Maxwell Chern Simons theory => Quantum field theory specific to 2+1 d. case √ The Chern-Simons theory √ The Chern-Simons theory √ Interests and theoretical applications √ Interests and theoretical applications √ The Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory √ The Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory √ Hamiltonian analysis √ Hamiltonian analysis

November 19th 2004A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 5 FIRST PART Maxwell theory in 2+1 and 3+1 dim.

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 6 Lagrangian of pure QED I Pure gauge QED action and fields (without matter) Pure gauge QED action and fields (without matter) √ Action & lagrangian in d+1 dim. : √ Action & lagrangian in d+1 dim. : √ Minkowski metric   in d+1 dim. / Flat manifold R d+1 √ Minkowski metric   in d+1 dim. / Flat manifold R d+1 √ Strenth field (Faraday) antisym. tensor (curvature) [L -2 ] √ Strenth field (Faraday) antisym. tensor (curvature) [L -2 ] √ Fundamental Gauge vector field A  (connection) [L -1 ] √ Fundamental Gauge vector field A  (connection) [L -1 ] Scalar potentialVector potential √ Gauge group coupling constant ‘‘e’’ [E -1/2 L -2+d/2 ] √ Gauge group coupling constant ‘‘e’’ [E -1/2 L -2+d/2 ]

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 7 Lagrangian of pure QED II  S = 0 => Euler-Lagrange equations of motion  S = 0 => Euler-Lagrange equations of motion => Maxwell equation in the vacuum : Lagrangian invariance under U(1) gauge transf. Lagrangian invariance under U(1) gauge transf. √ U(1) ! Abelian group of phase transf. : √ U(1) ! Abelian group of phase transf. : √ Action on the gauge field : √ Action on the gauge field : At this level planar Maxwell theory quite similar to the familiar 3+1 dim. Maxwell theory At this level planar Maxwell theory quite similar to the familiar 3+1 dim. Maxwell theory

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 8 What are changing from now ? 2+1 dim. 3+1 dim. :. Electric field :. 2 dim. Vector [E] 3 dim. Vector [E/L] Magnetic field Pseudo-scalar : Pseudo-vector Spin Pseudo-scalarPseudo-vector Invariance of Max. lagrangian under Parity (x 1, x 2, t) ! (-x 1, x 2, t) (x 1, x 2, x 3, t) ! (-x 1, -x 2, -x 3, t)

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 9 d+1-dim. class. Hamiltonian analysis Phase space degrees of freedom (df) Phase space degrees of freedom (df) √ 2 df coming from the potential vector √ 2 df coming from the potential vector √ 2 df => conjugate momentum : the electric field √ 2 df => conjugate momentum : the electric field √ A 0 non-physical (Lagrange multiplier) √ A 0 non-physical (Lagrange multiplier) Symplectic structure on the phase space Symplectic structure on the phase space => Antisym. Poisson bracket : => Antisym. Poisson bracket : Classical can. hamiltonian $ Class. energy density Classical can. hamiltonian $ Class. energy density Constraint : Gauss law Constraint : Gauss law

November 19th 2004A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 10 SECOND PART Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 11 The Chern-Simons theory Pure Chern-Simons lagrangian Pure Chern-Simons lagrangian √ Topologically invariant (thus Lorentz invariant) lagrangian : √ Topologically invariant (thus Lorentz invariant) lagrangian : √ Non invariant under parity & gauge inv. up to surface term √ Non invariant under parity & gauge inv. up to surface term => Boundary terms : Completely  type of gauge theory specific to 2+1 d. Completely  type of gauge theory specific to 2+1 d. √ 1 st -order in spacetime deriv. √ 1 st -order in spacetime deriv. √ Quadratic in A  √ Quadratic in A  Source-free eq. of motion Source-free eq. of motion √ ‘‘Flat connection’’ : √ ‘‘Flat connection’’ :

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 12 The Chern-Simons theory Is it a boring, uninteresting and simply trivial theory ?

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 13 NO ! 1) TQFT !!! Structures in differentiable geometry Structures in differentiable geometry 1. Topological space (plane, sphere, torus) 1. Topological space (plane, sphere, torus) 2. Manifold with differentiable structure and coordinate system 2. Manifold with differentiable structure and coordinate system 3. Metric  Notion of distance 3. Metric  Notion of distance Topological quantum field theory (TQFT) Topological quantum field theory (TQFT) √ Phys. Observables topologically invariant √ Phys. Observables topologically invariant √ Phys. states invariant under reparametrisation √ Phys. states invariant under reparametrisation √ Sometimes : analytical (non perturbative) solutions exist. √ Sometimes : analytical (non perturbative) solutions exist. Canonical hamiltonian = 0  Phys. States of zero energy ! NB : In quantum field theory, a physical state or observable is gauge invariant

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 14 NO ! 2) Numerous theoretical applic. Mathematics Solid state physics 2+1 d. gravity Chern-SimonsAlone Chern-Simonscoupled 2+1 d. Field theories String theory

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 15 Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory I Lagrangian (only 2+1 d.) Lagrangian (only 2+1 d.) √ Coupling Maxwell + Chern-Simons : viable gauge theory √ Coupling Maxwell + Chern-Simons : viable gauge theory √ CS term breaks parity inv. of Maxwell theory √ CS term breaks parity inv. of Maxwell theory E-L equation of motion E-L equation of motion => 2+1 d. pseudo-vector dual field : => Proca-type equation of massive field with mass :

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 16 Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory II 3+1 d. examples of mass generation 3+1 d. examples of mass generation √ Proca mass term √ Proca mass term …BUT breaks gauge invariance √ Higgs mecanism √ Higgs mecanism 2+1 d. mass generation 2+1 d. mass generation  New surprising mass generation induced by the CS term ! √ Gauge invariant √ Gauge invariant √ No introduction of other field √ No introduction of other field √ Parity breaking √ Parity breaking

November 19th 2004 A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 17 MCS Hamiltonian analysis Phase space degrees of freedom (df) Phase space degrees of freedom (df) √ Potential vector : √ Potential vector : ! Conjugate momentum : ! Conjugate momentum : √ A 0 is non-physical √ A 0 is non-physical Symplectic structure on the phase space Symplectic structure on the phase space √ Antisym. Poisson bracket : √ Antisym. Poisson bracket : ! Non commutating electric field components ! Non commutating electric field components Classical can. hamiltonian Classical can. hamiltonian ! Constraint : Gauss law ! Constraint : Gauss law

November 19th 2004A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting 18 CONCLUSION

A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting By Bruno Bertrand November 19 th 2004