Hamiltonian Formalism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rae §2.1, B&J §3.1, B&M § An equation for the matter waves: the time-dependent Schrődinger equation*** Classical wave equation (in one dimension):
Advertisements

Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We have focused largely on a kinematics based approach to beam dynamics.  Most people find it more intuitive, at least when first.
Sect. 8.2: Cyclic Coordinates & Conservation Theorems
Physics 430: Lecture 17 Examples of Lagrange’s Equations
Integrals over Operators
Revision Previous lecture was about Harmonic Oscillator.
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.
Symmetry. Phase Continuity Phase density is conserved by Liouville’s theorem.  Distribution function D  Points as ensemble members Consider as a fluid.
Mechanics.
Transformations.
Canonical Transformations and Liouville’s Theorem
Mechanics of Rigid Bodies
Stanford University Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Introduction to Symmetry Analysis Brian Cantwell Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Relativistic Classical Mechanics. XIX century crisis in physics: some facts Maxwell: equations of electromagnetism are not invariant under Galilean transformations.
Central Force Motion Chapter 8
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BRANE KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS Introduction Strings, branes, geometric principle, background independence Brane space M (brane kinematics)
Revision Previous lecture was about Generating Function Approach Derivation of Conservation Laws via Lagrangian via Hamiltonian.
QM 480 “On the Shoulders of Giants” An Introduction to Classical Mechanics.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 02 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
MA4248 Weeks 1-3. Topics Coordinate Systems, Kinematics, Newton’s Laws, Inertial Mass, Force, Momentum, Energy, Harmonic Oscillations (Springs and Pendulums)
The nonabelian gauge fields and their dynamics in the finite space of color factors Radu Constantinescu, Carmen Ionescu University of Craiova, 13 A. I.
L.I. Petrova “Specific features of differential equations of mathematical physics.” Investigation of the equations of mathematical physics with the help.
The Two-Body Problem. The two-body problem The two-body problem: two point objects in 3D interacting with each other (closed system) Interaction between.
MATH4248 Weeks Topics: review of rigid body motion, Legendre transformations, derivation of Hamilton’s equations of motion, phase space and Liouville’s.
Serge Andrianov Theory of Symplectic Formalism for Spin-Orbit Tracking Institute for Nuclear Physics Forschungszentrum Juelich Saint-Petersburg State University,
Final review Help sessions scheduled for Dec. 8 and 9, 6:30 pm in MPHY 213 Your hand-written notes allowed No numbers, unless you want a problem with numbers.
In the Hamiltonian Formulation, the generalized coordinate q k & the generalized momentum p k are called Canonically Conjugate quantities. Hamilton’s.
Ch. 8: Hamilton Equations of Motion Sect. 8.1: Legendre Transformations Lagrange Eqtns of motion: n degrees of freedom (d/dt)[(∂L/∂q i )] - (∂L/∂q i )
D’Alembert’s Principle the sum of the work done by
PHYS 773: Quantum Mechanics February 6th, 2012
Phy 303: Classical Mechanics (2) Chapter 3 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.
Sect. 8.3: Routh’s Procedure
1 Lecture 15: Stability and Control III — Control Philosophy of control: closed loop with feedback Ad hoc control thoughts Controllability Three link robot.
Mathematical Tools of Quantum Mechanics
1. Review of Hamiltonian Dynamics 1.1. Principle of Least Action
The Hamiltonian method
The Lagrangian to terms of second order LL2 section 65.
Monday, Apr. 4, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #16 Monday, Apr. 4, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
Canonical Equations of Motion -- Hamiltonian Dynamics
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Equivalence of Lagrange’s & Newton’s Equations Section 7.6 The Lagrangian & the Newtonian formulations of mechanics are 100% equivalent! –As we know,
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
Lecture from Quantum Mechanics. Marek Zrałek Field Theory and Particle Physics Department. Silesian University Lecture 6.
Celestial Mechanics VII
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Classical Mechanics Lagrangian Mechanics.
Canonical Quantization
MAT Classical Mechanics
Chapter-2 Maxwell-Boltzmann Statistics.
Chapter V Interacting Fields Lecture 1 Books Recommended:
Chapter 3 Formalism.
Fundamentals of Quantum Electrodynamics
Review Lecture Jeffrey Eldred Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism
Hamiltonian Mechanics
Canonical Transformations
Quantum One.
Elements of Quantum Mechanics
Astronomy before computers!.
Relativistic Classical Mechanics
The Stale of a System Is Completely Specified by lts Wave Function
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Physics 451/551 Theoretical Mechanics
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Classical Mechanics Pusan National University
Physics 451/551 Theoretical Mechanics
Physics 451/551 Theoretical Mechanics
Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Presentation transcript:

Hamiltonian Formalism

Legendre transformations Adrien-Marie Legendre (1752 –1833)

What is H? Conjugate momentum Then So

What is H?

What is H?

What is H? If Then Kinetic energy In generalized coordinates

What is H? For scleronomous generalized coordinates Then If

What is H? For scleronomous generalized coordinates, H is a total mechanical energy of the system (even if H depends explicitly on time) If H does not depend explicitly on time, it is a constant of motion (even if is not a total mechanical energy) In all other cases, H is neither a total mechanical energy, nor a constant of motion

Hamilton’s equations Hamiltonian: Hamilton’s equations of motion: Sir William Rowan Hamilton (1805 – 1865)

Hamiltonian formalism For a system with M degrees of freedom, we have 2M independent variables q and p: 2M-dimensional phase space (vs. configuration space in Lagrangian formalism) Instead of M second-order differential equations in the Lagrangian formalism we work with 2M first-order differential equations in the Hamiltonian formalism Hamiltonian approach works best for closed holonomic systems Hamiltonian approach is particularly useful in quantum mechanics, statistical physics, nonlinear physics, perturbation theory

Hamiltonian formalism for open systems

Hamilton’s equations in symplectic notation Construct a column matrix (vector) with 2M elements Then Construct a 2Mx2M square matrix as follows:

Hamilton’s equations in symplectic notation Then the equations of motion will look compact in the symplectic (matrix) notation: Example (M = 2):

Lagrangian to Hamiltonian Obtain conjugate momenta from a Lagrangian Write a Hamiltonian Obtain from Plug into the Hamiltonian to make it a function of coordinates, momenta, and time

Lagrangian to Hamiltonian For a Lagrangian quadratic in generalized velocities Write a symplectic notation: Then a Hamiltonian Conjugate momenta

Lagrangian to Hamiltonian Inverting this equation Then a Hamiltonian

Example: electromagnetism

Example: electromagnetism

Hamilton’s equations from the variational principle Action functional : Variations in the phase space :

Hamilton’s equations from the variational principle Integrating by parts

Hamilton’s equations from the variational principle For arbitrary independent variations

Conservation laws If a Hamiltonian does not depend on a certain coordinate explicitly (cyclic), the corresponding conjugate momentum is a constant of motion If a Hamiltonian does not depend on a certain conjugate momentum explicitly (cyclic), the corresponding coordinate is a constant of motion If a Hamiltonian does not depend on time explicitly, this Hamiltonian is a constant of motion

Higher-derivative Lagrangians Let us recall: Lagrangians with i > 1 occur in many systems and theories: Non-relativistic classical radiating charged particle (see Jackson) Dirac’s relativistic generalization of that Nonlinear dynamics Cosmology String theory Etc.

Higher-derivative Lagrangians For simplicity, consider a 1D case: Variation Mikhail Vasilievich Ostrogradsky (1801 - 1862)

Higher-derivative Lagrangians

Higher-derivative Lagrangians

Higher-derivative Lagrangians Generalized coordinates/momenta:

Higher-derivative Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equations: We have formulated a ‘higher-order’ Lagrangian formalism What kind of behavior does it produce?

Example

Example

Example H is conserved and it generates evolution – it is a Hamiltonian! Hamiltonian linear in momentum?!?!?! No low boundary on the total energy – lack of ground state!!! Produces ‘runaway’ solutions: the system becomes highly unstable - collapse and explosion at the same time

‘Runaway’ solutions Unrestricted low boundary of the total energy produces instabilities Additionally, we generate new degrees of freedom, which require introduction of additional (originally unknown) initial conditions for them These problems are solved by means of introduction of constraints Constraints restrict unstable behavior and eliminate unnecessary new degrees of freedom

Canonical transformations 9.1 Canonical transformations Recall gauge invariance (leaves the evolution of the system unchanged): Let’s combine gauge invariance with Legendre transformation: K – is the new Hamiltonian (‘Kamiltonian’ ) K may be functionally different from H

Canonical transformations 9.1 Canonical transformations Multiplying by the time differential: So

9.1 Generating functions Such functions are called generating functions of canonical transformations They are functions of both the old and the new canonical variables, so establish a link between the two sets Legendre transformations may yield a variety of other generating functions

Generating functions We have three additional choices: 9.1 Generating functions We have three additional choices: Canonical transformations may also be produced by a mixture of the four generating functions

An example of a canonical transformation 9.2 An example of a canonical transformation Generalized coordinates are indistinguishable from their conjugate momenta, and the nomenclature for them is arbitrary Bottom-line: generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta should be treated equally in the phase space

Criterion for canonical transformations 9.4 Criterion for canonical transformations How to make sure this transformation is canonical? On the other hand If Then

Criterion for canonical transformations 9.4 Criterion for canonical transformations Similarly, If Then

Criterion for canonical transformations 9.4 Criterion for canonical transformations So, If

Canonical transformations in a symplectic form 9.4 Canonical transformations in a symplectic form After transformation On the other hand

Canonical transformations in a symplectic form 9.4 Canonical transformations in a symplectic form For the transformations to be canonical: Hence, the canonicity criterion is: For the case M = 1, it is reduced to (check yourself)

1D harmonic oscillator Let us find a conserved canonical momentum 9.3 1D harmonic oscillator Let us find a conserved canonical momentum Generating function

1D harmonic oscillator Nonlinear partial differential equation for F  9.3 1D harmonic oscillator Nonlinear partial differential equation for F  Let’s try to separate variables Let’s try

9.3 1D harmonic oscillator We found a generating function!

9.3 1D harmonic oscillator

9.3 1D harmonic oscillator

9.5 Canonical invariants What remains invariant after a canonical transformation? Matrix A is a Jacobian of a space transformation From calculus, for elementary volumes: Transformation is canonical if

Canonical invariants For a volume in the phase space 9.5 Canonical invariants For a volume in the phase space Magnitude of volume in the phase space is invariant with respect to canonical transformations:

9.5 Canonical invariants What else remains invariant after canonical transformations?

9.5 Canonical invariants For M = 1 For many variables

Poisson brackets Poisson brackets: 9.5 Poisson brackets Poisson brackets: Poisson brackets are invariant with respect to any canonical transformation Siméon Denis Poisson (1781 – 1840)

9.5 Poisson brackets Properties of Poisson brackets :

Poisson brackets In matrix element notation: 9.5 Poisson brackets In matrix element notation: In quantum mechanics, for the commutators of coordinate and momentum operators:

Poisson brackets and equations of motion 9.6 Poisson brackets and equations of motion

Poisson brackets and conservation laws 9.6 Poisson brackets and conservation laws If u is a constant of motion If u has no explicit time dependence In quantum mechanics, conserved quantities commute with the Hamiltonian

Poisson brackets and conservation laws 9.6 Poisson brackets and conservation laws If u and v are constants of motion with no explicit time dependence For Poisson brackets: If we know at least two constants of motion, we can obtain further constants of motion

Infinitesimal canonical transformations 9.4 Infinitesimal canonical transformations Let us consider a canonical transformation with the following generating function (ε – small parameter): Then

Infinitesimal canonical transformations 9.4 Infinitesimal canonical transformations Multiplying by dt Then

Infinitesimal canonical transformations 9.4 Infinitesimal canonical transformations Infinitesimal canonical transformations: In symplectic notation:

9.6 Evolution generation Motion of the system in time interval dt can be described as an infinitesimal transformation generated by the Hamiltonian The system motion in a finite time interval is a succession of infinitesimal transformations, equivalent to a single finite canonical transformation Evolution of the system is a canonical transformation!!!

Application to statistical mechanics 9.9 Application to statistical mechanics In statistical mechanics we deal with huge numbers of particles Instead of describing each particle separately, we describe a given state of the system Each state of the system represents a point in the phase space We cannot determine the initial conditions exactly Instead, we study a certain phase volume – ensemble – as it evolves in time

Application to statistical mechanics 9.9 Application to statistical mechanics Ensemble can be described by its density – a number of representative points in a given phase volume The number of representative points does not change Ensemble evolution can be thought as a canonical transformation generated by the Hamiltonian Volume of a phase space is a constant for a canonical transformation

Application to statistical mechanics 9.9 Application to statistical mechanics Ensemble is evolving so its density is evolving too On the other hand Liouville’s theorem In statistical equilibrium Joseph Liouville (1809 -1882)

Hamilton–Jacobi theory 10.1 Hamilton–Jacobi theory We can look for the following canonical transformation, relating the constant (e.g. initial) values of the variables with the current ones: The reverse transformations will give us a complete solution

Hamilton–Jacobi theory 10.1 Hamilton–Jacobi theory Let us assume that the Kamiltonian is identically zero Then Choosing the following generating function Then, for such canonical transformation:

Hamilton–Jacobi theory 10.1 Hamilton–Jacobi theory Hamilton–Jacobi equation Conventionally: Hamilton’s principal function Partial differential equation First order differential equation Number of variables: M + 1 Sir William Rowan Hamilton (1805 – 1865) Karl Gustav Jacob Jacobi (1804 – 1851)

Hamilton–Jacobi theory 10.1 Hamilton–Jacobi theory Suppose the solution exists, so it will produce M + 1 constants of integration: One constant is evident: We chose those M constants to be the new momenta While the old momenta

Hamilton–Jacobi theory 10.1 Hamilton–Jacobi theory We relate the constants with the initial values of our old variables: The new coordinates are defined as: Inverting those formulas we solve our problem

10.1 Have we met before? Remember action?

Hamilton’s characteristic function 10.1 Hamilton’s characteristic function When the Hamiltonian does not depend on time explicitly Generating function (Hamilton’s characteristic function)

Hamilton’s characteristic function 10.3 Hamilton’s characteristic function Now we require: So: Detailed comparison of Hamilton’s characteristic vs. Hamilton’s principal is given in a textbook (10.3)

Hamilton’s characteristic function 10.3 Hamilton’s characteristic function What is the relationship between S and W ? One of possible relationships (the most conventional):

10.6 Periodic motion For energies small enough we have periodic oscillations (librations) – green curves For energies great enough we msy have periodic rotations – red curves Blue curve – separatrix trajectory – bifurcation transition from librations to rotations

Action-angle variables 10.6 Action-angle variables For either type of periodic motion let us introduce a new variable – action variable (don’t confuse with action!): A generalized coordinate conjugate to action variable is the angle variable: The equation of motion for the angle variable:

Action-angle variables 10.6 Action-angle variables In a compete cycle This is a frequency of the periodic motion

Example: 1D Harmonic oscillator 10.2 Example: 1D Harmonic oscillator

Example: 1D Harmonic oscillator 10.2 Example: 1D Harmonic oscillator

Action-angle variables for 1D harmonic oscillator 10.6 Action-angle variables for 1D harmonic oscillator Therefore, for the frequency:

Separation of variables in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation 10.4 Separation of variables in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation Sometimes, the principal function can be successfully separated in the following way: For the Hamiltonian without an explicit time dependence: Functions Hi may or may not be Hamiltonians