Philosophy Program 2008 - 2013. Faculty and Courses Carlos Colombetti (full time) Anton Zoughbie (part time) Three courses are offered every semester:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
Advertisements

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
A Guide to Analyzing PrOF Instructional Data Packets CRC Research Office 2009.
2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning Resources and Teaching Strategies.
Faculty Learning Circle Introduction The goal of Achieving College Success Now! project is to impact post-secondary academic success of students with disabilities.
Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going? Using Student Surveys to Assess and Improve Literature Courses Kelly Douglass, PhD Asst. Professor, English Riverside.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
M I L L I K I N U N I V E R S I T Y Critical Writing, Reading & Research I & II MPSL First-Year Writing Requirement Report for Academic Year
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
9 th Grade AP ® World History Pilot Proposal Think Like a World Historian.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Anne Zeman, Ed.D., Director, Curriculum/Professional Learning Don Azevada, Program Specialist, History/Social Science Ray Pietersen, Program Specialist,
Philosophy Program Overview  FACULTY oCarlos Colombetti oAnton Zoughbie oEd Kaitz  COURSES oIntro to Philosophy oCritical Thinking oLogic.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Khan Academy Implementation Models Making the Best Use of Khan Academy with Your Students 1.
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences________________ Department: Political Science and International Studies.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an award-winning environmental education program designed for teachers and other educators, parents, and.
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
Maximizing Learning Using Online Assessment 2011 SLATE Conference October 14, /12/ P. Boyles, Assistant Professor, Chicago State University,
INTERACTION, ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION. WELCOME o Facilitator name Position at university Contact info.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
SOCCIAL STUDIES MATTERS New High School Social Studies Curriculum Phase 1 Implementation August 28, 2014.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
Tachelle Banks, PhD & Debbie Jackson, EdD Project C.R.E.A.T.E The Curriculum Redesign Effort Advancing Teacher Education.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Assessed: 2007, 2010, 2011,  PHIL 101 (Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics)  GE elective choice  BA 300 (Ethical Decision Making in Business)
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Cultural Diversity in Health Science Barry L. Rimpsey.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Saddleback College In-Service August 18, We are at a distinct disadvantage because few of our programs require students to follow a sequence of.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Template Jami Anderson.
Teaching Business: BADM Major Requirements Six Foundational Courses BADM 101 Introduction to Business BADM 110 Foundations of Management BADM 226 Organizational.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Core Curriculum Outcomes Retrofit: Backing Into Assessment Seth Matthew Fishman, Ph.D. Marylu Hill, Ph.D. Peter Spitaler, Ph.D. Villanova University.
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Cultural Diversity in Health Science Barry L. Rimpsey.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Program Review Presentation April 13, 2011
Program Review Presentation March 17, 2016
Subject specialist teaching
History Department Program Review
PDP Presentation Trinity Washington University
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
Bringing Active Learning to Scale at Bronx Community College (BCC) of the City University of New York (CUNY) Dr. Nancy Ritze August 3, 2016.
Closing the Assessment Loop
Program Review Presentation April 30th, 2015
Indiana University School of Social Work
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
The Heart of Student Success
John Symons, Department of Philosophy
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Program Director: D. Para January 2016
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy Program

Faculty and Courses Carlos Colombetti (full time) Anton Zoughbie (part time) Three courses are offered every semester: Introduction to Philosophy Critical Thinking Ethics Five courses are rotated. Three are currently banked.

Courses Humanities: IDEAS AND VALUESCritical thinking: METHOD / LOGIC PHIL 100: Introduction to Philosophy PHIL 160: History of Philosophy – Ancient PHIL 240: Ethics PHIL 280: Political Philosophy (PLSC cross-listed) PHIL 300: World Religions PHIL 312: Philosophy of Religion Banked Courses PHIL 175: History of Philosophy – Modern PHIL 195: History of Philosophy – Contemporary PHIL 320: Asian Philosophy PHIL 103: Critical Thinking PHIL 200: Symbolic Logic PHIL 103 is also offered as a hybrid/online course

Student-focused Goals of the Program 1. inspire interest in core philosophical questions that are foundational to the sciences and humanities 2. offer a range of courses that teach students to think critically about philosophical themes 3. instruct students in the methods of evaluating arguments and theories 4. acquaint students with the diverse human cultural and intellectual heritage 5. prepare students to transfer successfully by maintaining rigorous academic standards 6. encourage students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens of a democratic society

Program Student Learning Outcomes PSLO 1: Demonstrate familiarity with the history of philosophical thought and contemporary currents in the discipline. PSLO 2: Assess influential claims and theories in the philosophical tradition using rigorous methods of critical thinking and logic. PSLO 3: Compose a reasoned essay that responds to a philosophical problem or that applies a philosophical theory to a contemporary issue.

Effectiveness: SLOs Overall, assessment of SLOs indicate successful results: Four courses that map onto PSLO 1 were assessed and all show successful results. Five courses that map onto PSLO 2 were assessed and all show successful results; however, one assessment (PHIL 200-Symbolic Logic SLO #3) shows as "barely passing." Five courses that map onto PSLO 3 were assessed and all show successful results. Students have performed relatively well in this area (writing essays), though there is room for improvement.

Notable Aspects of Program The program reflects the analytic tradition in philosophy that places a premium on clarity of prose and good argument. Our students learn how to analyze and evaluate controversial claims and theories using the standards and methods of logic. The program keeps up with developments in the discipline to ensure that course content remains current and rigorous. The Philosophy Program participates in the Honors Transfer Program by offering one or two honors sections per year. Our honors sections incorporate a high level of student participation in the form of student-led seminars. Our Critical Thinking (PHIL 103) and Symbolic Logic (PHIL 200) courses train students in advanced and state-of-the-art methods of critical analysis. What students learn in these philosophy courses has application to any discipline that aims to justify its claims (e.g., the natural and social sciences).

Data on Program Efficiency FTEF FTES WSCH LOAD Fall , Spr , Fall , Spr , Fall , Spr , The LOAD for the Philosophy Program has consistently been above 640 (and reached a high of 836 in the Fall of 2009). This is consistently higher than the College, but comparable to other programs in the SS/CA Division. Our best enrolled course, not surprisingly, is PHIL 100 (Introduction to Philosophy). The highest LOAD for this course was 948 (Fall '08). PHIL 103 (Critical Thinking) is a close second, with a peak LOAD of 922 (Fall '10).

Summary of Program Demographics The ethnic distribution is very close to the college as a whole; the program has slightly more males than females (50/48) in comparison to the college (46/52). One notable difference in the demographics is the age distribution: 75% of philosophy students are years of age (53% college), and only 5% are (12% college). The program has a relatively young population of students. 69% of students enrolled in the program are continuing students. 76% of students enrolled in the program intend to transfer. The ratio of day to evening students in the program is 62 to 37.

Summary of Data on Student Success The 5-year average for the Philosophy Program are 64% success and 81% retention. This pattern is similar to that of other programs in the social sciences. Program rates are slightly lower than the college average of 69% and 84%. Success rate for females is slightly higher than for males. Student populations with under-performing success rates (5-years) that are below the average of 64% for the department: African Am: 45% +/- 15% (with about 20 students per year), Filipino: 61% +/- 10% (with about 140 students per year), Hispanic: 59% +/- 6% (with about 115 students per year). These rates are similar to several comparable programs in the social sciences.

Needed modifications Faculty Hire: Our course in Asian Philosophy (PHIL 320) has been dormant for the past three years due to the difficulty of finding a qualified specialist to teach it. We will need to hire an instructor for this course. This is crucial to maintaining the program's commitment to a globally-oriented curriculum. Ideally, we would hire a full-time instructor (who might also be able to teach courses in the History of Philosophy sequence). Distance Education: We recently shifted our hybrid section of Critical Thinking (PHIL 103) to the WebAccess platform. The program should continue to enhance its digital modes of instructional delivery.

Needed Improvements Student Success: The program should continue to look for new strategies to improve student success while maintaining high academic standards. Examples of approaches that have recently been implemented, and that we will continue to experiment with, include but are not limited to: 1. outreach to individual students who might perform better through personal interaction with faculty. 2. use WebAccess to deliver supplementary materials that target specific topics or skills where students are having difficulty. 3. review materials for our most enrolled course (PHIL 100) for relevance, inclusion, accessibility. 4. more consistent use of "early warning" as well as referrals to counseling/support services. Many of our students could perhaps also benefit from a more structured curriculum and individualized academic plans. The Philosophy Program can contribute the this broader institutional effort by making the courses themselves more structured (including more frequent testing and assignments).

Use of WebAccess - examples Video tutorial for Venn Diagrams (Critical Thinking / Logic) Video mini-lecture by text author – Elliott Sober (Introduction to Philosophy)

Plan of Action 1. Faculty hire to teach PHIL 320 (Asian Philosophy). De-bank this course at the earliest opportunity. 2. The next courses to be assessed are PHIL 200 (Logic) and PHIL 240 (Ethics - honors). In Fall 2014 we will asses PHIL 103 (Critical Thinking) and PHIL 312 (Philosophy of Religion). In the case of PHIL 200 (Logic), which had a "barely passing" assessment for SLO #3, changes are already underway and the same SLO will be assessed again later this semester. We are experimenting with a hands-on workshop format (similar to a "flipped classroom") for the tasks associated with this student learning outcome (constructing proofs of arguments and theorems). 3.Implement the “needed improvements” as noted above.

Philosophy Program