In cooperation with the Chapter 9 The use of non-custodial measures in the administration of justice Facilitator’s Guide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRC The CRC provisions applicable to juvenile justice administration are: Article 37 - protection from torture Article 39 - rehabilitation and social reintegration.
Advertisements

Fundamental Requirements of a Juvenile Justice System
Policy Analysis and Law Reform. Reform by law States obligation under the CRC (article 4) States parties shall adopt all appropriate legislative, administrative,
Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
XVII CDAP Meeting with Judges and Prosecutors on Overcrowding in Prison Rome Mauro Palma Vice- Chair European Council for Penological Co-operation Council.
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
In cooperation with the Chapter 4 Independence and impartiality of judges, prosecutors and lawyers Facilitator’s Guide.
1 Competences and Responsibilities of States. 2 Competences and Responsibilities of States State sovereignty Sovereignty as a concept of international.
Chapter 5. Human rights and arrest,
PROTECTION OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS Maja Munivrana Vajda Sunčana Roksandić Vidlička Aleksandar Maršavelski.
1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT /UNICEF SEMINAR ON JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN for Judiciary, Magistracy, Police and Social Workers in the Eastern Caribbean.
Right to an Effective Remedy:
Sentencing A declaration, or decision, by a Court of Law to punish a convicted criminal.
The contribution of Probation towards the improvement of detention conditions Leo Tigges, Secretary General CEP ’Improving Detention Conditions through.
Probation in Albania. Probation Service was established in 2009 Key legal changes in 2008 EU Twinning working with English Probation 10,000 cases in past.
 Why would the Canadian Justice system have a separate system just for youth?  What age should “youth” be considered?  Is a separate system beneficial?
In cooperation with the Chapter 10 The rights of the child in the administration of justice Facilitator’s Guide.
In cooperation with the Opening the course Introductory session Facilitator’s Guide.
Irish Penal Reform Trust Reforming the Early Release System in Ireland.
In cooperation with the Chapter 1 International human rights law and the role of the legal professions: A general introduction Facilitator’s Guide.
National Planning Department Bogotá, Colombia National Policy as a Vehicle to Promote Restorative Justice for Children: an example from.
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
YCJA - Senior High Handout
HUMAN RIGHTS BASED APPROACH See Me Brewing Lab Cathy Asante.
Chapter 15. Protection and redress. for victims of crime and
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Guardianship for children deprived of parental care A handbook to reinforce guardianship systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking.
Legal Aid: A Right or a Privilege?. 2 + Sources of international law right to legal aid Scope of international law right to legal aid Canada’s duty to.
UN Standard Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial Measures The Tokyo Rules Karen S. Gomez Dumpit Director, GovLink Commission on Human Rights.
1 The work of the Juvenile Judge Jean Zermatten St. Luciewww.childsrights.org.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Folie # 1 Electronic Monitoring, Human Rights and Jurisprudence Silke Eilzer, Judge at the district court, Offenbach, December 11 th 2014.
The Eighth Asian Bioethics Conference Biotechnology, Culture, and Human Values in Asia and Beyond Confidentiality and Genetic data: Ethical and Legal Rights.
Law Reform Commission Criminal Process Pre-Trial Procedures Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Wednesday, May 7,
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Emma Grimley OVERVIEW: JUVENILE JUSTICE.  Combination of rules, institutions, and people involved in the control, punishment and rehabilitation of young.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
Victims Rights and the Standing of victims in criminal procedures Focus in judicial cooperation lies traditionally on the investigating authorities and.
20 October 2008Maria Lundberg, NCHR1 JUR 5710 Institutions and Procedures CASE OF SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no /88) 07 July 1989.
Corruption, Democracy and justice Pim Albers Special advisor European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ)
PAROLE. Parole  The release of an inmate into the community before the full sentence is served.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
Transfrontier contact concerning children Regional Conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Belgrade,
CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD Art. 40 Promotion of diversion States Parties seek to promote whenever appropriate and desirable measures for dealing.
Are there any national laws about the re integration of offenders serving the community based sanctions? According to the article 2 of Penitentiary Law.
Juvenile Justice Justice Renate Winter. International Standards The UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, “the Beijing.
Youth Criminal Justice Act. to prevent youth crime to have meaningful consequences and ensure accountability for youth crime to improve rehabilitation.
YCJA High School. Youth Criminal Justice Act Applies to all youth in Canada from the ages of 12 to 17.
Convention on the Rights of the Child Justice Renate Winter.
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
CASE MANAGEMENT HOW TO TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR CASES 1 Lady Justice Hallett DBE and Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.
 International non-governmental organization founded in 1979 (International Year of the Child)  Forefront.
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
At virtually every point in the process, law enforcement personnel are empowered to consider alternative to trials and jail time. However, judges have.
SENTENCES AND SENTENCING
Presentation on “ Juvenile Justice System in Cambodia” in The 1st Meeting of the ASEAN Juvenile Organizing Committee (Bangkok from 1st- 4th.
Chapter 4. Independence and impartiality of
Chapter 10 The rights of the child in the administration of justice
Right to an Effective Remedy:
Chapter 9. The use of non-custodial measures
Opening the course Introductory session
Chapter 10.
Unlocking Children’s Rights
Module 7: Alternatives to Imprisonment E4J Initiative
Right to an Effective Remedy:
European Model for Restorative Justice with Children and Young People
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

in cooperation with the Chapter 9 The use of non-custodial measures in the administration of justice Facilitator’s Guide

Chapter 9 Learning objectives I To familiarize the participants with the existing international standards that promote the use of non-custodial measures To explain the aim of non-custodial measures and their use at the various stages of the administration of justice To help the participants identify what kinds of non-custodial measures may be useful in the context of their professional responsibilities Computer slide No. 1

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Learning objectives II To acquaint the participants with the legal protection linked to the use of non-custodial measures To familiarize the participants with the consequences of non-compliance with the dispositions of non-custodial measures Computer slide No. 2

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Questions I What alternatives to imprisonment exist in the country where you work, and in regard to what kinds of criminal offences? Have you, in your role as judge, prosecutor or lawyer, advised, or resorted to, the use of non-custodial measures? In what situations do you think that it would be particularly useful to do so? Computer slide No. 3

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Questions II Are there special groups of people that are more likely to benefit from the use of non-custodial measures than others? If so, identify these groups and explain why they are more likely to benefit from alternatives to imprisonment What legal safeguards exist in the country where you work with regard to the imposition of non-custodial measures? Computer slide No. 4

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Questions III What are the sanctions for violations of the conditions attached to non-custodial measures in the country where you work? How do you think that the use of non-custodial measures might be further developed in the country where you work? Computer slide No. 5

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Relevant legal standards and rules The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (Tokyo Rules), 1990 The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 Computer slide No. 6

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles I The fundamental aims of non-custodial measures (1) The primary purposes of non-custodial alternatives to imprisonment are: To enable the individualization of penal sanctions to the needs of the offender, thereby making the sanctions more effective, with a view to the rehabilitation of the offenders and to facilitate their reintegration into society To promote greater community involvement in the management of criminal justice, specifically in the treatment of offenders, as well as to promote among offenders a sense of responsibility towards society To contribute to preserving the exceptional character of pretrial detention Non-custodial measures are also less expensive for society in general than deprivations of liberty. Computer slide No. 7

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles II The fundamental aims of non-custodial measures (2) Individualized penal sanctions involving non- custodial measures must be considered in the light of the general aim of the criminal justice system, which is to reduce delinquency, and the need to recognize the needs and interests of the victims of crime. The use of non-custodial measures must respect internationally recognized human rights. Computer slide No. 8

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles III The scope of non-custodial measures (1) The flexibility inherent in non-custodial measures implies that they can be used at any time of the proceedings. Non-custodial measures must be applied fairly and objectively; they must not involve discrimination. Differences in treatment are lawful only if they have a reasonable and objective justification. Computer slide No. 9

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles IV The scope of non-custodial measures (2) Authorities must also ensure consistent sentencing when resorting to non-custodial measures. Non-custodial measures should be used in accordance with the principle of minimum intervention; all excessive measures must be avoided. Computer slide No. 10

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles V The scope of non-custodial measures (3) When resorting to non-custodial measures, the competent authorities must consider: The nature and gravity of the offence The personality and background of the offender The protection of society (the prevention of crime) The avoidance of unnecessary use of imprisonment Computer slide No. 11

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles VI Legal safeguards (1) The principle of legality must be fully respected in the resort to non-custodial measures, that is, resort to, and implementation of, such measures must be in accordance with the law. Non-custodial measures shall be based on the following criteria: The nature and gravity of the offence The personality and background of the offender The purposes of sentencing The rights of victims Computer slide No. 12

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles VII Legal safeguards (2) The use of non-custodial measures requires the consent of the offender. The offender has a right to appeal to a judicial or other competent and independent authority against the imposition of non-custodial measures. The dignity of an offender subjected to non-custodial measures must be respected at all times and so must his or her other rights and freedoms. Computer slide No. 13

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 General principles VIII Legal safeguards (3) The severity of the implementation of the non-custodial measure must not go beyond that authorized in the original decision. The right to privacy of the offender and his or her family must be guaranteed in the course of the application of the non-custodial measures. Computer slide No. 14

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 The use of non-custodial measures Non-custodial measures are flexible tools that can be used at the pretrial stage, the trial and sentencing stages or at the post-sentencing stage. They should always be considered in the light of the principle of minimum intervention. Computer slide No. 15

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Non-custodial measures at the pretrial stage At the pretrial stage, the interest of the offender in seeing the proceedings abandoned has to be weighed against: The protection of society Crime prevention/the promotion of respect for the law The rights of victims A common non-custodial measure at this stage is the abandonment of proceedings. Computer slide No. 16

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Non-custodial measures at the trial and sentencing stages I At the trial and sentencing stages, the resort to non-custodial measures should consider: The rehabilitative needs of the offender The protection of society The interests of the victims Victims should be consulted whenever appropriate. Computer slide No. 17

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Non-custodial measures at the trial and sentencing stages II Rule 8.2 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures mentions the following possible non-custodial sentencing dispositions, among others: Verbal sanctions, such as admonition, reprimand and warning Conditional discharge Status penalties Economic sanctions and monetary penalties, such as fines and day-fines Confiscation or an expropriation order Restitution to the victim or a compensation order Computer slide No. 18

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9Computer slide No. 19 Non-custodial measures at the trial and sentencing stages III Rule 8.2 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures further mentions the following possible non-custodial sentencing dispositions: Suspended or deferred sentence Probation and judicial supervision A community service order Referral to an attendance centre House arrest Any other mode of non-institutional treatment Some combination of the above measures

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Non-custodial measures at the post-sentencing stage I At the post-sentencing stage the authorities should have a wide range of non-custodial measures at their disposal in order ensure the earliest possible release of the offender for the purpose of facilitating his or her reintegration into society. Computer slide No. 20

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Non-custodial measures at the post-sentencing stage II According to Rule 9.2 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures, such dispositions may include: Furlough and halfway houses Work or education release Various forms of parole Remission Pardon Computer slide No. 21

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Implementation of non-custodial measures I Supervision (1) The supervision of non-custodial measures is aimed at reducing reoffending and helping the offender’s social reintegration. The need for supervision depends on the nature of the non-custodial measure concerned. The supervision shall be carried out by competent authorities in accordance with conditions prescribed by law. Computer slide No. 22

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Implementation of non-custodial measures II Supervision (2) The supervision has to be adjusted to the needs of the offender and depends, for its success, on his or her consent, participation and cooperation. It should be reviewed periodically. Supervision can be accompanied by psychological, social and material assistance. Computer slide No. 23

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Implementation of non-custodial measures III Duration The duration of the non-custodial measures shall be established by the competent authority in accordance with the law; the measure can be terminated early and may also be prolonged if necessary in the interests of the offender. Computer slide No. 24

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Implementation of non-custodial measures IV Conditions (1) The conditions attached to non-custodial measures shall take account of the needs of society as well as the needs and rights of the offender and victim. The conditions shall be realistic and precise and shall be explained to the offender both orally and in writing. It may be necessary to develop special treatment schemes to deal with the needs and problems of particularly difficult categories of offenders. Computer slide No. 25

Facilitator’s GuideChapter 9 Implementation of non-custodial measures V Conditions (2) In case of breach of the conditions of non-custodial measures, the measures may be modified or revoked. However, such a breach should not automatically lead to a deprivation of liberty. Computer slide No. 26