Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
Advertisements

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S This may not necessarily represent the view of the Government CBA/Justice Annual.
CDM – LULUCF Project Cycle Winrock International Sandra Brown Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects.
Validation and Verification of CDM Projects Climate Change Kiosk on CDM/DNA, COP9 December 6, 2003 Marco van der Linden SGS Climate Change Programme.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Ensuring Effective Monitoring, Certification and Verification of Emissions by Jed Jones Lloyd’s Register.
EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.
Corbin Devlin McLennan Ross LLP October 19, 2007 ALBERTA’S CLIMATE: A Comparison to Canada’s Approach to Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Agriculture – Offsets Brian McConkey Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Sector is engaged –All major farm groups aware of the issue and opportunities for.
The Pathway to Market for Agricultural Carbon Offsets: Science – Policy - Commodity Karen Haugen-Kozyra, M.Sc. P.Ag. Principal, KHK Consulting June 17,
ISO GHG Quantification and Verification Standards Dr. Chan Kook Weng, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Convenor, ISO TC207 WG5.
Introduction to Carbon Market Yves TUYISHIME REMA.
Australian Government Emissions Reduction Fund. Central component of the Government's Direct Action Plan Funding of $2.55 billion Additional funding to.
This may not represent the view of the Government 1 Canada’s Climate Change Plan Large Final Emitters Regime and Domestic Offsets Regime Stéphane Roberge,
Moving existing CFI projects to the ERF. What will be covered in this webinar Main changes in moving from the CFI to the ERF Preparing to participate.
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
Greenhouse Gas ASSESSING & MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE RISK BROKERAGE & STRATEGIC SERVICES 1 Key Elements of a Successful Market-Based GHG Offset Program Key.
CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Exchange Kristin Hall Interim Air Pollution Control Officer Tehama County Board of Supervisors June 9, 2015.
Energy Project Development A Discussion on State and Federal Incentives Presented By Dennis Plaster, General Manager.
Institutionalizing the GHG Protocol Kevin Boehmer, Canadian Standards Association Mark Barthel, British Standards Institution WBCSD/WRI Side Event - The.
Carbon Trading: The Challenges and Risks John Drexhage Director, Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development Agriculture.
Presented by Dean Current, PhD Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Agricultural Management (CINRAM) Department of Forest Resources University of.
GHG PROTOCOL INITIATIVE Emerging Project Accounting Standards & Guidance Mahua Acharya, WBCSD World Resources Institute.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Introduction to Climate Change: - global warming - basis steps in a clean development project - connection of CDM with European Trading Scheme Wim Maaskant.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Offsets Approach Christopher Sherry New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Linking Load-based and.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Stakeholder Group Meeting Albany, New York February 10, 2006.
Carbon Footprints. Nick Main, Chairman Deloitte 26 October 2007.
LULUCF Concepts Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects February 8 th 2008 Timothy Pearson and Sarah Walker Winrock International.
Carbon Business Office
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program Executive Order Matt Gray FEMP Program Analyst Federal Leadership.
Assessment of Different Quantification Approaches and Application of Multiple Practices for a Single Farm Unit Dennis Haak, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Module 6: PINs M6. M6. PINs Contents: Project Identification Notes – how to structure them (including eligibility, baselines and additionality) Two projects.
CDM Project Developers Workshop.  Baselines – what, types of baselines, baseline scenarios, baseline emissions.  Additionality – what, why, how  Establishing.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 21 Atmospheric Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide,
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Region 4 – Atlanta, GA Dec , 2010.
Welcome. The legal framework of CDM - UNFCCC, at Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit, Kyoto protocol, CDM, Parties and Benefits Basic requirements.
How Canada is dealing with key issues in Agriculture and Forestry in a Federal Offsets System: Guidelines for Protocols Ian Campbell Agri-Environmental.
Introduction to The Climate Registry Gary Gero Washington Department of Ecology November 5, 2007.
Overview of the Climate Action Reserve Derik Broekhoff Vice President, Policy M-AGG Workshop Washington, DC June 17, 2010.
Overview of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) David Farnsworth, Esq. Staff Attorney, Vermont Public Service Board.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Massachusetts Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation 310 CMR 7.71 Stacy DeGabriele & Will Space MassDEP Climate Strategies December 10 th and 11 th, 2009.
Biosequestration through GHG offsets: An overview of activity in Canadian federal departments of forestry and agriculture April 28, Washington, DC.
1 The Neutral Effect of Waste Energy Projects on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Peter Sagert, Cirrus Consultants Biomass &Waste Energy Seminar October.
Any regulation adopted by the state board pursuant to this part or Part 5 (commencing with Section 38570) shall ensure all of the following: (1) The greenhouse.
Overview on CDM By Ann Gordon Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment 14 th July 2011.
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
© 2008 Goldman Environmental Consultants Greenhouse Gas Reductions: Challenges in Determining What is Real Henry Balikov Vice President Goldman Environmental.
Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Group September 21, 2005.
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 5: Kyoto Commitment.
MGA Cap and Trade Overview of Cap and Trade and MGA Process For KEC – Ray Hammarlund.
Introduction to Domestic Emissions Trading Warren Bell Associate, IIISD Kyoto Mechanisms Seminar for the Manitoba Business Sector March 14, 2003.
Overview of Critical-Path Implementation Requirements Infrastructure required for successful program launch includes: Emissions & Allowance Tracking System.
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Department of the Environment MDE Overview Air Quality Planning Program June 2, 2010.
Brief Overview of Legal Framework: UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol M.J.Mace Climate Change and Energy Programme, FIELD LDC Workshop Montreal Canada November.
Harry Klodowski, Esq. Betts, Hull & Klodowski LLC Betts, Hull & Klodowski LLC.
Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.
Linkages Workshop November 14/ Outline Alberta context Regulatory framework Compliance options Carbon connections.
Carbon, Energy, and Carbon Credit Markets
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR THE CREATION OF OFFSETS IN THE AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY SECTORS FOR USE IN A POTENTIAL CANADIAN DOMESTIC EMISSION TRADING.
Kyoto Protocol.
Carbon Offset Markets and Utah’s Opportunity
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Presentation transcript:

Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009

Page 2 Overview of the Offset System Helps Canada meet its goal of 20% reduction in total GHG emissions from 2006 by 2020 Encourages cost-effective domestic GHG reductions in activities or sectors that are not covered by the planned federal greenhouse gas regulations Provides an incentive for voluntary GHG reduction projects by issuing offset credits –1 offset credit equals 1 tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent reduced or removed from the atmosphere Regulated entities can use offset credits towards compliance obligation

Page 3 Eligibility Criteria for Offset Projects Offset credits will be issued for GHG reductions that satisfy the following six eligibility criteria: –Scope –Real –Quantifiable –Verifiable –Unique –Incremental

Page 4 Eligibility: Scope, Real Scope Reductions must occur in Canada Project must achieve reductions in one of the following six greenhouse gases: CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O, HFCs, PFCs, SF 6 Real Project must be a specific and identifiable action that results in a net reduction of GHGs Project and baseline must be “functionally equivalent” – i.e. cannot achieve reductions simply by reducing production

Page 5 Eligibility: Quantifiable, Verifiable, Unique Quantifiable Eligible reductions must be quantified as specified in an Offset System Quantification Protocol (OSQP) Verifiable Eligible Verification Body must be able to provide a reasonable level of assurance that reductions have been monitored, quantified, and reported as set out in the OSQP Unique The GHG reduction can only be used once to create an offset credit

Page 6 Eligibility: Incremental Five components: 1.Projects must have started on or after January 1, 2006 except for projects that are susceptible to easy reversal, for which we may specify a normalized baseline 2.Reductions must have occurred on or after January 1, Reductions must go beyond the baseline defined for the project type baseline specified in quantification protocol for that project type

Page 7 Eligibility: Incremental (cont.) 4.Reductions must be surplus to all legal requirements (federal, provincial/territorial and regional). –Ineligible if there are legal requirements to take action that reduces GHGs from any of the relevant sources, sinks or reservoirs, except where: legal requirement specifies performance standard or benchmark; a normalized baseline is prescribed; or can demonstrate an alternate cost-effective way to stay in compliance without the project. –Eligible to receive credits only until the legal requirement comes into force, regardless of the date for compliance

Page 8 Eligibility: Incremental (cont.) 5.Reductions are beyond what is expected from receipt of other climate change incentives (federal, provincial/ territorial) –Defined as: government funding program or tax incentive that includes GHG reductions as a goal or publicly reports on GHG reductions; government program that purchases GHG reductions; or “technology fund” program –Will not affect eligibility if accepted prior to January 1, 2011, or if a tax incentive is claimed under terms as of June 15, 2009 –Projects that accept an incentive may be eligible only if the program has established a reduction benchmark

Page 9 Offset System Quantification Protocols Developed for each project type –Developed by third parties, reviewed and approved by Environment Canada –Available free for use by any project proponent Provides the quantification approach and monitoring and data management requirements to be followed Key verification criteria document used by a Verification Body when verifying reductions Based on the framework and principles of the international standard ISO

Page 10 Projects Registration –Eight year period; typically from the date of project registration –Exceptions: could be delayed up to 1 year, could start on a historical start date Implementation – as per OSQP specified monitoring and data management requirements Reporting – 1 st report within 1 year or 100,000 tonnes, then at discretion of Project Proponent (some exceptions) Verification – Eligible Verification Body provides a reasonable level of assurance that reductions claimed are accurate, and that the project satisfies eligibility criteria

Page 11 Issuance, Use and Trading of Offset Credits Offset System will certify reductions, issue credits into Project Proponent’s account in the tracking system –Tradable and bankable The planned federal GHG regulations will set out the conditions under which regulated entities will be able to use offset credits for compliance purposes Trading will take place in the private sector Financial value of offset credits will be determined by supply and demand in the marketplace

Page 12 Biological Sequestration Projects Several agriculture and forestry project types identified among first protocols to be developed (tillage, biodigesters, afforestation, forest management) –Schedule to be updated with new project types every quarter Permanence: –Key to ensuring the environmental integrity of the credits –Proposed 25-year liability period after last credit issued, during which reversals must be replaced –Also a small discount factor proposed to reflect risk that credits cannot be replaced (e.g. due to bankruptcy) –No temporary credits option (not likely to be fungible)

Page 13 Notional Protocol Submission Schedule Deadlines are notional Will be updated quarterly with additional project types Website identifies external protocols eligible to be adapted for each project type Project typeBase Protocol Plan Submission Deadline AfforestationNovember 1, 2009 Landfill Gas Capture & Combustion November 1, 2009 Reduced or No Tillage November 1, 2009 Wind PowerNovember 1, 2009 Forest ManagementFebruary 1, 2010 Wastewater Management February 1, 2010 Anaerobic biodigesters February 1, 2010

Page 14 Draft program rules for Canada’s Offset System Program rules will be set out in three guides Draft Guide for Protocol Developers was published for public comment in August 2008 –Comment period ended October 2008 Two remaining draft guides published for public comment in June 2009 –Program Rules and Guidance for Project Proponents, and Program Rules for Verification and Guidance for Verification Bodies –Public comment period ended August submissions received, currently being reviewed

Page 15 Next Steps Currently reviewing all comments, considering options for final program rules Plan to release final program rules once this review is complete Once final rules published, will launch the quantification protocol development process –first Protocols may be available in early 2010 (?) Project applications will be accepted for review once approved quantification protocols have been made available publicly Could issue first offset credits by mid-2011 (?)