Paul Notenboom Deputy Director Criminal Assets Deprivation Bureau Public Prosecution Service Senior Public Prosecutor Head of ARO Criminal Assets Deprivation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU-China Cooperation in Tobacco Sector EU-China Cooperation in Tobacco Sector.
Advertisements

The Work of the Commonwealth in facilitating the repatriation of Assets Veronic Wright Legal Adviser Legal and Constitutional Affairs Division Commonwealth.
Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against corruption and organized crime in Montenegro Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against.
Law Enforcement : Lessons for Investigators & Prosecutors by Ahmer Bilal Soofi Consultant National Accountability Bureau Government of Pakistan.
B ureau O ntnemingswetgeving O penbaar M inisterie Paul Notenboom Public Prosecutor Public Prosecutor Deputy director of B.O.O.M., Criminal Assets Deprivation.
International Telecommunication Union HIPSSA Project Support for Harmonization of the ICT Policies in Sub-Sahara Africa, Meeting with the Namibia ICT Ministry.
STATEMENT BY THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR ETHICS AND INTEGRITY, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT UGANDA AT THE 4 TH IAACA ANNUAL SEMINAR DALIAN, CHINA 25 TH TO 28.
Number of police officers: 720 Chiefs of Police : 15 Experts, lawyers, office staff etc: approx. 185 District Police officers: 67 Temporarily employed.
NEW EXISTING TOOLS FOR ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION Towards a new generation of mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
1. Asset Recovery Rules in Jordan 5 th Pan-European High Level Conference on asset Recovery Offices Cyprus Oct Prof. Fayyad Alqudah (LL.B,
Prosecutor Training Centers Conference Prof. Dr. Mariana SEMINI Jakarta, Indonesia March 16-18, 2011 Albanian Magistrates School.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND CONFISCATION 15 YEARS AFTER TAMPERE SYRACUSE SEPTEMBER 2014.
6 August 2015 Rule of law: implementing a comprehensive and integrated approach in prevention and fight against corruption in the Danube region,
MONGOLIA Technical Expert Workshop on Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and Law Enforcement Cooperation Bangkok, Thailand 30 May – 1 June 2011.
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND ETHICS (THE UGANDA EXPERIENCE) PAPER PRESENTED AT TRAINING WORKSHOP HELD AT DOCKLANDS HOTEL.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Bratislava October 2007 PAR - AC CoP Meeting Anti Corruption Regional Programme Regional Programme.
International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in Transnational Investigations.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Compliance and Corporate Social Responsibility 6th CIS LOCAL COUNSEL FORUM Mr. Alexander Bolkvadze, Partner, BLC Law Office - Tbilisi.
6th ASIAN ROUNDTABLE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Yong-Jin Jung Seoul North Distric Prosecutor’s Office Korea Theme III, Session 2 Relations between Regulators.
CAR PROJECT SERBIA FITZ-ROY DRAYTON CRIMINAL ASSET RECOVERY PROJECT IN SERBIA.
Anti-Corruption, the Swedish way Gunnar Stetler Head of the Swedish Anti-Corruption Unit
Corporate crime prevention project and Best practices manual Dr. Wybe Th. Douma T.M.C. Asser Institute, The Hague.
AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043.
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
Europol Police Directorate International Operational Police Cooperation Department INTERPOL EUROPOL SELEC THURSDAY 12 DECEMBER 2013.
SECI Regional Center for Combating Transborder Crime 22. – 23. June 2010 Bucharest, Romania.
EUROJUST EUROJUST Veronika Keller Seconded National Expert for the National Member for Germany (Eurojust)
CAR PROJECT SIX MONTH WORKPLAN FITZ-ROY DRAYTON CRIMINAL ASSET RECOVERY PROJECT IN SERBIA.
Reporting Suspected Frauds and Corruption Ing. Želmíra Hybská Central Contact Point for OLAF Section of Control and Fight against Corruption Office of.
Fight Against Corruption - Integrative Feedback of Domestic and International Activities OHRID, 15th – 16th October 2010 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Ministry of.
Chapter IV. International Cooperation. 2 2 International Cooperation Mandatory Offences Optional Offences Narrow Dual Criminality Requirements In MLAs.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
Developing an Asset Recovery Programme Fitz-Roy Drayton Criminal Assets Recovery Project Serbia.
Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (ARIN) Keebong PAEK Senior Prosecutorial and Judicial Adviser UNODC RCEAP 4 th IAACA Seminar Dalian, China – June 2012.
BUNDESKRIMINALAMT, 1090 WIEN, JOSEF-HOLAUBEK-PLATZ 1; TEL.: (0) Asset forfeiture in concern with environmental crime Hannes Sedlak,
COORDINATED STRATEGY TO IMPROVE FIGHT against VAT FRAUD in LITHUANIA September 2013, Riga.
Economic and Financial Crime Unit THE DISCOVERY AND SEIZURE OF ASSETS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Sofia (Bulgaria), March 2004.
1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial co- operation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
Amerissa Efstathiou Aikaterini Bouzounieraki Ministry of Economy and Finance, Greece Central Liaison Office 1 NEW MODELS OF VAT EVASION EXPERIENCED IN.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening: Chapter.
Confiscation of assets: the relationship between administrative control and criminal investigation bodies Corina Badea Counsellor Department for the relation.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Module 3: Civic Initiatives for Judicial Reform and Countering Corruption September 16, 2005.
PROACTIVE AND KNOWLEDGE BASED APPROACH IN COMBATING ORGANISED CRIME. VAT RELATED FRAUD Andris Vilks Minister of Finance Republic of Latvia.
Purposes of Exchange of Information Komal Mohindra Global Tax Simplification Team Investment Climate Department July 24, 2012 EOI Workshop – Plantation,
Dr. Heike Neuhaus. Federal Prosecutor General Head of Department Central Tasks; Espionage Staff Espionage 1 Espionage 2 Administration EU IT Espionage.
MONEY LAUNDERING “The Basics”.
ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA THE 6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF IAACA.
ASEAN v Transnational Crime and Terrorism…..an Introduction
Combatting corruption: legal actions by Civil Society Organisations
OLAF and the fight against customs fraud:
International cooperation in criminal matters legal framework and examples from practice - Macedonian experiences Ohrid
(Focused on Investigation Police) Police Training Institute
Introduction to asset recovery in Poland and Wielkopolska region, along with the presentation of the invited guests and discussion of thematic areas presented.
Major international instruments on counteracting corruption and organized crime, ratified by Bulgaria UN Convention against Corruption; Council of Europe.
OPERATIVE ACTION OFFSIDE
REDUCING CRIME AND THE FEAR OF CRIME BY MAKING SURE CRIME DOES NOT PAY
ASSET SHARING Between countries in criminal cases
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COOPERATION
Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR
Department of Cooperative Governance
Eurojust’s involvement in JITs
Eurojust: The EU Judicial Cooperation Unit
A fundamental principle of UNCAC
Dr. Adrian Jung Public Prosecutor
Lukas Stary National Member for Czech Republic
Presentation transcript:

Paul Notenboom Deputy Director Criminal Assets Deprivation Bureau Public Prosecution Service Senior Public Prosecutor Head of ARO Criminal Assets Deprivation Bureau of the Public Prosecution Service (BOOM)

MOTTO and GOAL Crime should not and will not pay To keep criminal assets away from the criminals forever

Sketch of the Dutch deprivation procedure Dutch procedure = value confiscation (not object confiscation) Deprivation procedure is a separate procedure. Apart from the criminal investigation procedure. Deprivation procedure is a criminal procedure itself. - Rules of the Dutch Criminal Proceedings; - ECHR rules are applied; Conviction in the criminal case is needed. (in rem procedure = not possible) deprivation procedure ≠ new criminal charge

Criminal Assets Deprivation Bureau of the Public Prosecution Service (BOOM) The BOOM since 1994 June 2006: the BOOM is organised in a new way More public prosecutors, forensic accountants, civil and international advisors, asset tracers Opening of branches in Zwolle, Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Den Bosch

Position of the BOOM Part of the PPS Separate organisation with dedicated personnel and specific goals Chain of deprivation To improve results of deprivation

Tasks of the BOOM Prosecuting the most important deprivation cases Asset tracing and precautionary seizure Management of the precautionary seizure of capital assets (AMO) Expert centre = knowledge centre Supporting the central fine collection agency (CJIB) regarding the execution of deprivation measures International contactpoint (ARO)

Asset Recovery Office BOOM = ARO = new organisation since 1 January 2010 Central point for requests for mutual legal assistance in deprivation cases (national and EU) Expertice centre Sharing best practices Sharing information on police-police level in deprivation cases

ARO

The Dutch ARO In practise need for: -administration -asset tracing -expertise with regard to international mutual legal assistance - other specialism Occupation of the ARO – window (3 officials): - Administration (1 official); - Asset tracer (1 official); -International legal advisor (1 official);

Occupations in each branch Public prosecutor Assistant of the public prosecutor Administrative officers Advisors:auditor civil advisor international advisor Asset tracer

Asset Management Office (AMO) Centralized administration at BOOM minimize costs maximize revenue’s (artt. 117 and 118 Dutch Criminal Procedure Act)

Asset management Seized items Cash Bank accounts Vehicles Vessels Airplanes Jewelry Art Real estate Stocks Seized goods in the Netherlands on behalf of foreign countries Seized goods in foreign countries on behalf of the Netherlands

Asset management The estimated value of the seized goods current estimated value of seized goods Cash money in the account of BOOM€ ,-- supplemental € ,--

IRC/ARO/BOOM exchange of police information management of assets registration and monitoring of the seized assets and the MLA requests expert centre irc (centre for international legal assistance) rendering of judicial mutual legal assistance (MLA) requests aro (asset recovery office)amo (asset management BOOM)

IRC/ARO/BOOM IRC = Centre for International Legal Assistance; Cooperation Police – PPS; Connection to LURIS system (national registration system for MLA requests); 6 regional IRC’s and 1 national IRC; Ministry of Justice (department for Legal assistance) has also IRC status.

Structure centre for International legal assistance in the Nederlands IRC North and Eastern part of the Netherlands IRC Amsterdam IRC North, West and the middle part of the Netherlands IRC The Hague IRC Rotterdam Dordrecht IRC Southern part of the Netherlands National IRC EU Arrest Warrant Ipol Tribunals, ICC and int. Legal ass. In Civil maters ICP/ARO (boom/irc/aro ) Ministry of Justice

IRC/ARO/BOOM Why ARO/BOOM in IRC structure?: -Need for better overview with regard to international confiscation and international seizure; -Need for better overview (monitoring) with regard to MLA requests and possibility to signal the bottlenecks; -Need for better efficiency with regard to the follow up of the MLA requests (managing of seized assets, transfer of execution); -Transparency with regard to the international confiscation: 1 contact for national chain partners and foreign authorities; -Because of (multidisciplinairy) expert knowledge at BOOM: more efficiënt and quicker seizure in the Netherlands and abroad; -Practical experience leads to knowledge for IRC/BOOM as expertise centre.

Asset Recovery Office Improving the quality on requests for mutual legal assistance in deprivation cases Better registry of amount of requests for mutual legal assistance in deprivation cases Better registry of international pre-judgement seizure => better management of the seized items

Mutual legal assistance and confiscation -Very specific knowledge (combination of expertices, expertice within expertice, special approach is needed); -Much development, much interrest for international confiscation; -Often new legislation (lack of expertise); -Different law systems, different forms of confiscation; -Often complicated investigations;

Questions? IRC/ARO BOOM P.O. Box CG The Hague Tel: – (1682 or 1670) Fax: – Thank you for your attention!

Sketch of the Dutch deprivation procedure Two different schemes of confiscation: a) ‘ordinairy’ confiscation (verbeurdverklaring): punishment; direct link between offence – item; object confiscation;

Sketch of the Dutch deprivation procedure Two different schemes of confiscation: b) special confiscation (deprivation of illegally obtained assets) non-punitive order; link between offence – item = not (always) neccesairy; value based confiscation;

Sketch of the Dutch deprivation procedure How does it work practically? The amount of the assets that have been obtained illegally can be estimated; Estimation is based on legal evidence that is collected during criminal investigation or criminal financial investigation (CFI); To collect the amount of the criminal assets, any item that is of value and belongs to the suspect can be seized precautionary (pre-judgement seizure); Third party seizure/confiscation is possible; The judge determines the estimated amount of the illegally obtained advantage;

New legislation (since 01/07/2011) a) Wider range of the possibility to deprive instrumentalities of crime; b) Introduction of the shifting of the burden of proof; c) Wider range of the possibility to precautionary seize items that belong to another person than the suspect (third party confiscation); d) Possibility to start a CFI (with the possibility to use coersive measures) in the phase between confiscation order and execution (‘SEO’).

Developments Minister of Security and Justice: The deprivation procedure of criminal assets must be followed more frequently and automatically. Both the Police and the Public Prosecution Service must become more acquainted with this procedure (not only with regard to financial crimes); Need for better incasso results; Reinforcement of Police and Public Prosecution Service;

Developments Better focus on confiscation: a) Regional Public Prosecution Services have to reach targets with regard to prejudgement seizure (a percentage of their budget); b) Special confiscation teams; c) Each year a specific amount with regard to the imposed confiscation orders that have become final has to be collected; (€ 55 mio in 2010, € 50 mio in 2011 and eventually € 100 mio in 2018). d) therefore growth in seized assets 50 mio per annum.

Section 117 Dutch Criminal procedure Act 1.The seized objects cannot be alienated....unless an authorisation has been obtained. 2.The authorisation mentioned in section 1 may be given by the Public Prosecutor’s Service as regards objects a. which are not suitable for storage; b. of which the storage costs stand in no relation to their value; c. which can be replaced and the counter value of which can easily be determined Asset management

IRC/ARO/BOOM exchange of police information management of assets registration and monitoring of the seized assets and the MLA requests expert centre irc (centre for international legal assistance) rendering of judicial mutual legal assistance (MLA) requests aro (asset recovery office)amo (asset management BOOM)

Section 118a Dutch Criminal Procedure Act 1.The Public Prosecutor’s Service can either officially or on behalf of the person involved or another interested party order the return against surety of an object seized based on article 94a. 2.The surety implies the transfer of money by the party subject to the seizure or a third party, or in relation to a third party, as a guarantee for an amount and payment method accepted by the Public Prosecutor’s Service Asset management

In actual fact According to UNodc report (published on ) All over the world in 2009 crime brought in: $ 2,1 trillion (= € ) Which is equal to 4 percent of the world economy; The largest part of this amount is laundered by the criminals; According to the report in 2009 less than 1% was seized; There is still a lot of work to do!