8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Lecture 3: MIPS Instruction Set Today’s topic:  More MIPS instructions  Procedure call/return Reminder: Assignment 1 is on the class web-page (due.
Advertisements

MIPS ISA-II: Procedure Calls & Program Assembly. (2) Module Outline Review ISA and understand instruction encodings Arithmetic and Logical Instructions.
1 Lecture 4: Procedure Calls Today’s topics:  Procedure calls  Large constants  The compilation process Reminder: Assignment 1 is due on Thursday.
Wannabe Lecturer Alexandre Joly inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c-te
Lecture 8: MIPS Instruction Set
CS61C L11 Linker © UC Regents 1 CS61C - Machine Structures Lecture 11 - Starting a Program October 4, 2000 David Patterson
Compiling, Assembling, Loading, Linking (CALL) I (1) Fall 2005 Lecture 09: Program Translation.
1 IKI10230 Pengantar Organisasi Komputer Kuliah no. 09: Compiling-Assembling-Linking Sumber: 1. Paul Carter, PC Assembly Language 2. Hamacher. Computer.
1 Starting a Program The 4 stages that take a C++ program (or any high-level programming language) and execute it in internal memory are: Compiler - C++
Lec 9Systems Architecture1 Systems Architecture Lecture 9: Assemblers, Linkers, and Loaders Jeremy R. Johnson Anatole D. Ruslanov William M. Mongan Some.
Instructor: Justin Hsia 7/08/2013Summer Lecture #81 CS 61C: Great Ideas in Computer Architecture Running a Program.
Assembly Process. Machine Code Generation Assembling a program entails translating the assembly language into binary machine code This requires more than.
 Procedures (subroutines) allow the programmer to structure programs making them : › easier to understand and debug and › allowing code to be reused.
CS61C L18 Running a Program I (1) Garcia, Spring 2007 © UCB Gaze-controlled UI!  Researchers at Stanford have designed a system that allows a user to.
inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 19 – Running a Program II (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, Loading) Researchers.
CS61C L18 Running a Program I (1) Garcia, Spring 2007 © UCB Router Security Hole!  Huge security hole has been found – if you have a home router, crackers.
CS 61C L13 CALL (1) A Carle, Summer 2006 © UCB inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c/su06 CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture #13: CALL Andy Carle.
CS61C L18 Running a Program I (1) Garcia, Fall 2006 © UCB Security hole finder  Google’s just-released new /* Code Search */, which allows you to specify.
14:332:331 Computer Architecture and Assembly Language Spring 06 Week 4: Addressing Mode, Assembler, Linker [Adapted from Dave Patterson’s UCB CS152 slides.
CS 61C L14Introduction to MIPS: Instruction Representation II (1) Garcia, Spring 2004 © UCB Lecturer PSOE Dan Garcia inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c.
CS 61C L18 Running a Program aka Compiling, Assembling, Loading, Linking (CALL) I (1) Garcia, Fall 2004 © UCB Lecturer PSOE Dan Garcia
CS61C L18 Running a Program aka Compiling, Assembling, Loading, Linking (CALL) I (1) Garcia © UCB Lecturer PSOE Dan Garcia
CS 61C L19 Running a Program aka Compiling, Assembling, Loading, Linking (CALL) II (1) Garcia, Fall 2004 © UCB Lecturer PSOE Dan Garcia
ENEE350 Spring07 1 Ankur Srivastava University of Maryland, College Park Adapted from Computer Organization and Design, Patterson & Hennessy, © 2005.”
CPSC CPSC 3615 Computer Architecture Chapter 3 Instructions and Addressing (Text Book: Chapter 5)
MIPS Assembler Programming
CS 61C L14Introduction to MIPS: Instruction Representation II (1) Garcia, Spring 2004 © UCB Roy Wang inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c-tf inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c.
Inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 19 – Running a Program II (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, Loading) I’m.
inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 16 – Running a Program (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, Loading) Highlights:
CS61C L13 CALL I (1) Chae, Summer 2008 © UCB Albert Chae, Instructor inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture #13 – Compiling,
Cs 61C L10 Start.1 Patterson Spring 99 ©UCB CS61C Starting a Program Lecture 10 February 19, 1999 Dave Patterson (http.cs.berkeley.edu/~patterson) www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c/schedule.html.
COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE & OPERATIONS I Instructor: Hao Ji.
CS61C L18 Running a Program I (1) Garcia, Fall 2006 © UCB Berkeley beat-down  #10 Cal bears ate the OU ducks They’ve scored 35, 42, 42, 49, 41.
Computer Architecture and Design – ECEN 350 Part 4 [Some slides adapted from M. Irwin, D. Paterson and others]
CS61C L13 Compiling, Linking, and Loading (1) Pearce, Summer 2010 © UCB inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 13 – Running.
CSCI-365 Computer Organization Lecture Note: Some slides and/or pictures in the following are adapted from: Computer Organization and Design, Patterson.
inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 18 – Running a Program I (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, Loading) Researchers.
CDA 3101 Fall 2013 Introduction to Computer Organization Pointers & Arrays MIPS Programs 16 September 2013.
inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 18 – Running a Program I (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, Loading)
Topic 2d High-Level languages and Systems Software
Chapter 10 The Assembly Process. What Assemblers Do Translates assembly language into machine code. Assigns addresses to all symbolic labels (variables.
June 2005Computer Architecture, Instruction-Set ArchitectureSlide 1 Part II Instruction-Set Architecture.
April 23, 2001Systems Architecture I1 Systems Architecture I (CS ) Lecture 9: Assemblers, Linkers, and Loaders * Jeremy R. Johnson Mon. April 23,
CS 61C L3.2.2 Floating Point 2 (1) K. Meinz, Summer 2004 © UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture Floating Point II & Linking Kurt Meinz.
CSCI-365 Computer Organization Lecture Note: Some slides and/or pictures in the following are adapted from: Computer Organization and Design, Patterson.
inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs61c UCB CS61C : Machine Structures Lecture 16 – Running a Program (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, Loading) Research shows laptops.
8.
1 CS/COE0447 Computer Organization & Assembly Language Chapter 2 Part 3.
CENG 311 Starting a Program. Review (1/2) °IEEE 754 Floating Point Standard: Kahan pack as much in as could get away with +/- infinity, Not-a-Number (Nan),
The Assembly Process Computer Organization and Assembly Language: Module 10.
CS 61C: Great Ideas in Computer Architecture Running a Program - CALL (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, and Loading) 1 Instructors: Nick Weaver & Vladimir.
CS 61C: Great Ideas in Computer Architecture CALL continued ( Linking and Loading) 1 Instructors: Nicholas Weaver & Vladimir Stojanovic
Lecture 16: 10/29/2002CS170 Fall CS170 Computer Organization and Architecture I Ayman Abdel-Hamid Department of Computer Science Old Dominion University.
CSCI-365 Computer Organization Lecture Note: Some slides and/or pictures in the following are adapted from: Computer Organization and Design, Patterson.
CS 110 Computer Architecture Lecture 7: Running a Program - CALL (Compiling, Assembling, Linking, and Loading) Instructor: Sören Schwertfeger
Lecture 3 Translation.
faculty “re-imagine” ugrad education
Computer Architecture & Operations I
IT 251 Computer Organization and Architecture
RISC Concepts, MIPS ISA Logic Design Tutorial 8.
Instructor: Justin Hsia
Topic 2e High-Level languages and Systems Software
There is one handout today at the front and back of the room!
Lecture 4: MIPS Instruction Set
Green Subscription Based PC Announced
ECE232: Hardware Organization and Design
Computer Organization and Design Assembly & Compilation
Part II Instruction-Set Architecture
10/6: Lecture Topics C Brainteaser More on Procedure Call
Program Assembly.
Presentation transcript:

8

The 20 MIPS Instructions Covered So Far op 15 8 10 12 13 14 35 43 2 1 4 5 fn 32 34 42 36 37 38 39 8 Instruction Usage Load upper immediate lui rt,imm Add  add rd,rs,rt Subtract sub rd,rs,rt Set less than slt rd,rs,rt Add immediate  addi rt,rs,imm Set less than immediate slti rd,rs,imm AND and rd,rs,rt OR or rd,rs,rt XOR xor rd,rs,rt NOR nor rd,rs,rt AND immediate andi rt,rs,imm OR immediate ori rt,rs,imm XOR immediate xori rt,rs,imm Load word lw rt,imm(rs) Store word sw rt,imm(rs) Jump  j L Jump register jr rs Branch less than 0 bltz rs,L Branch equal beq rs,rt,L Branch not equal  bne rs,rt,L Copy Arithmetic Logic Memory access Control transfer

Interpretation vs. Translation How do we run a program written in a source language? Interpreter: Directly executes a program in the source language. Examples? Translator: Converts a program from the source language to an equivalent language in another language

Interpretation vs. Translation Generally easier to write interpreter Interpreter closer to high-level, so can give better error messages (e.g., SPIM) Interpreter slower (10x?) but code is smaller (1.5x to 2x?) Interpreter provides instruction set independence: run on any machine Assuming interpreter written in a portable format

Interpretation vs. Translation Translated/compiled code almost always more efficient and therefore higher performance Important for many applications, particularly operating systems Translation/compilation helps “hide” the program “source” from the users One model for creating value in the marketplace (e.g., Microsoft keeps all their source code secret) Alternative model, “open source”, creates value by publishing the source code and fostering a community of developers (e.g., Linux)

Steps to Starting a Program (translation) C program: foo.c Compiler Assembly program: foo.s Assembler Object(mach lang module): foo.o Linker lib.o Executable(mach lang pgm): a.out Loader Memory

Compiler Input: High-Level Language Code (e.g., C, Java such as foo.c) Output: Assembly Language Code (e.g., foo.s for MIPS) Note: Output may contain pseudoinstructions Pseudoinstructions: instructions that assembler understands but not in machine. For example: mov $s1,$s2  or $s1,$s2,$zero

MIPS Pseudo-instructions Usage Move move regd,regs Load address  la regd,address Load immediate li regd,anyimm Absolute value abs regd,regs Negate neg regd,regs Multiply (into register) mul regd,reg1,reg2 Divide (into register) div regd,reg1,reg2 Remainder rem regd,reg1,reg2 Set greater than sgt regd,reg1,reg2 Set less or equal sle regd,reg1,reg2 Set greater or equal sge regd,reg1,reg2 Rotate left rol regd,reg1,reg2 Rotate right ror regd,reg1,reg2 NOT not reg Load doubleword ld regd,address Store doubleword sd regd,address Branch less than blt reg1,reg2,L Branch greater than bgt reg1,reg2,L Branch less or equal ble reg1,reg2,L Branch greater or equal bge reg1,reg2,L Copy Arithmetic Shift Logic Memory access Control transfer

Where Are We Now? C program: foo.c Compiler Assembly program: foo.s Compiler writing course Compiler Assembly program: foo.s Assembler Object(mach lang module): foo.o Linker lib.o Executable(mach lang pgm): a.out Loader Memory

Assembler Input: Assembly Language Code (e.g., foo.s for MIPS) Output: Object Code, information tables (e.g., foo.o for MIPS) Reads and Uses Directives Replace Pseudoinstructions Allow programmers to associate arbitrary names (labels or symbols) with memory locations Produce Machine Language Creates Object File

Assembler Directives (p. A-51 to A-53) Give directions to assembler, but do not produce machine instructions .text: Subsequent items put in user text segment (machine code) .data: Subsequent items put in user data segment (binary rep of data in source file) .globl sym: declares sym global and can be referenced from other files .asciiz str: Store the string str in memory and null-terminate it .word w1…wn: Store the n 32-bit quantities in successive memory words

Pseudoinstructions Example of one-to-one pseudoinstruction: The following not $s0 # complement ($s0) is converted to the real instruction: nor $s0,$s0,$zero # complement ($s0) Example of one-to-several pseudoinstruction: The following abs $t0,$s0 # put |($s0)| into $t0 is converted to the sequence of real instructions: add $t0,$s0,$zero # copy x into $t0 slt $at,$t0,$zero # is x negative? beq $at,$zero,+4 # if not, skip next instr sub $t0,$zero,$s0 # the result is 0 – x

Pseudoinstruction Replacement Assembler treats convenient variations of machine language instructions as if real instructions Pseudo: Real: subu $sp,$sp,32 addiu $sp,$sp,-32 sd $a0, 32($sp) sw $a0, 32($sp) sw $a1, 36($sp) mul $t7,$t6,$t5 mul $t6,$t5 mflo $t7 addu $t0,$t6,1 addiu $t0,$t6,1 ble $t0,100,loop slti $at,$t0,101 bne $at,$0,loop la $a0, str lui $at,l.str ori $a0,$at,r.str

Example: C  Asm  Obj  Exe  Run prog.c #include <stdio.h> int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { int i, sum = 0; for (i = 0; i <= 100; i++) sum = sum + i * i; printf ("The sum from 0 .. 100 is %d\n", sum); } printf lives in libc

Compilation: MIPS addu $t0, $t6, 1 .text sw $t9, 8($sp) ble $t0,100, loop la $a0, str lw $a1, 8($sp) jal printf move $v0, $0 lw $ra, 4($sp) addiu $sp,$sp,16 jr $ra .data .align 0 str: .asciiz "The sum from 0 .. 100 is %d\n" .text .align 2 .globl main main: subu $sp,$sp,16 sw $ra,4($sp) sd $a0, 16($sp) sw $0, 8($sp) sw $0, 12($sp) loop: lw $t6, 12($sp) mul $t7, $t6,$t6 lw $t8, 8($sp) addu $t9,$t8,$t7 sw $t9, 8($sp) Where are 7 pseudo- instructions?

Compilation: MIPS addu $t0, $t6, 1 .text sw $t0, 12($sp) ble $t0,100, loop la $a0, str lw $a1, 8($sp) jal printf move $v0, $0 lw $ra, 4($sp) addiu $sp,$sp,16 jr $ra .data .align 0 str: .asciiz "The sum from 0 .. 100 is %d\n" .text .align 2 .globl main main: subu $sp,$sp,16 sw $ra, 4($sp) sd $a0, 16($sp) sw $0, 8($sp) sw $0, 12($sp) loop: lw $t6, 12($sp) mul $t7, $t6,$t6 lw $t8, 8($sp) addu $t9,$t8,$t7 sw $t9, 8($sp) 7 pseudo-instructions underlined

Assembly step 1 Remove pseudoinstructions, assign addresses 00 addiu $29,$29,-16 04 sw $31,4($29) 08 sw $4, 16($29) 0c sw $5, 20($29) 10 sw $0, 8($29) 14 sw $0, 12($29) 18 lw $14, 12($29) 1c multu $14, $14 20 mflo $15 24 lw $24, 8($29) 28 addu $25,$24,$15 2c sw $25, 8($29) 30 addiu $8,$14, 1 34 sw $8,12($29) 38 slti $1,$8, 101 3c bne $1,$0, loop 40 lui $4, l.str 44 ori $4,$4,r.str 48 lw $5,8($29) 4c jal printf 50 add $2, $0, $0 54 lw $31,4($29) 58 addiu $29,$29,16 5c jr $31

Producing Machine Language Simple Case Arithmetic, Logical, Shifts, and so on All necessary info is within the instruction already What about Branches? PC-Relative So once pseudo-instructions are replaced by real ones, we know by how many instructions to branch So these can be handled

Producing Machine Language “Forward Reference” problem Branch instructions can refer to labels that are “forward” in the program: or $v0,$0,$0 L1: slt $t0,$0,$a1 beq $t0,$0,L2 addi $a1,$a1,-1 j L1 L2: add $t1,$a0,$a1 Solved by taking 2 passes over the program First pass remembers position of labels Second pass uses label positions to generate code

Producing Machine Language What about jumps (j and jal)? Jumps require absolute address So, forward or not, still can’t generate machine instruction without knowing the position of instructions in memory What about references to data? la gets broken up into lui and ori These will require the full 32-bit address of the data These can’t be determined yet, so we create two tables…

Symbol Table List of “items” in this file that may be used by other files What are they? Labels: function calling Data: anything in the global part of the .data section; variables which may be accessed across files

Relocation Table List of “items” for which this file needs the address What are they? Any label jumped to: j or jal internal external (including lib files) Any data label reference such as the la instruction

Assembly step 2 Create relocation table and symbol table Symbol Table Label Address (in module) Type main: 0x00000000 global text loop: 0x00000018 local text str: 0x00000000 local data Relocation Information Address Instr. Type Dependency 0x00000040 lui l.str 0x00000044 ori r.str 0x0000004c jal printf

Assembly step 3 Resolve local PC-relative labels 30 addiu $8,$14, 1 04 sw $31,4($29) 08 sw $4, 16($29) 0c sw $5, 20($29) 10 sw $0, 8($29) 14 sw $0, 12($29) 18 lw $14, 12($29) 1c multu $14, $14 20 mflo $15 24 lw $24, 8($29) 28 addu $25,$24,$15 2c sw $25, 8($29) 30 addiu $8,$14, 1 34 sw $8,12($29) 38 slti $1,$8, 101 3c bne $1,$0, -10 40 lui $4, l.str 44 ori $4,$4,r.str 48 lw $5,8($29) 4c jal printf 50 add $2, $0, $0 54 lw $31,4($29) 58 addiu $29,$29,16 5c jr $31

Assembly step 4 Generate object (.o) file Output binary representation for text segment (instructions) data segment (data) symbol and relocation tables Using dummy “placeholders” or “guesses” for unresolved absolute and external references

Object File Format object file header: size and position of the other pieces of the object file text segment: the machine code data segment: binary representation of the data in the source file relocation information: identifies lines of code that need to be “handled” symbol table: list of this file’s labels and data that can be referenced debugging information A standard format is ELF (except MS) http://www.skyfree.org/linux/references/ELF_Format.pdf

Where Are We Now? C program: foo.c Compiler Assembly program: foo.s Assembler Object(mach lang module): foo.o Linker lib.o Executable(mach lang pgm): a.out Loader Memory

Linker Input: Object Code files (e.g., foo.o,libc.o for MIPS) Output: Executable Code (e.g., a.out for MIPS) Combines several object (.o) files into a single executable (“linking”) Enable Separate Compilation of files Changes to one file do not require recompilation of whole program Windows NT source is > 40 M lines of code! Old name “Link Editor” from editing the “links” in jump and link instructions

Morgan Kaufmann Publishers April 14, 2017 FIGURE B.3.1 The linker searches a collection of object fi les and program libraries to find nonlocal routines used in a program, combines them into a single executable file, and resolves references between routines in different files. Copyright © 2009 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology

Linker .o file 1 text 1 a.out data 1 Relocated text 1 info 1 Relocated data 1 .o file 2 text 2 Relocated data 2 data 2 info 2

Linker Step 1: Take text segment from each .o file and put them together Step 2: Take data segment from each .o file, put them together, and concatenate this onto end of text segments Step 3: Resolve References Go through Relocation Table and handle each entry That is, fill in all absolute addresses

Resolving References Linker assumes first word of first text segment is at address 0x00000000 (More on this later when we study “virtual memory”) Linker knows: length of each text and data segment ordering of text and data segments Linker calculates: absolute address of each label to be jumped to (internal or external) and each piece of data being referenced

Resolving References To resolve references: Based on list in each relocation table search for reference (label) in all “user” symbol tables if not found, search library files (for example, for printf) once absolute address is determined, fill in the machine code appropriately Output of linker: executable file containing text and data (plus header)

The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science 14 April 2017 FIGURE 2.13 The MIPS memory allocation for program and data. These addresses are only a software convention, and not part of the MIPS architecture. The stack pointer is initialized to 7fff fffchex and grows down toward the data segment. At the other end, the program code (“text”) starts at 0040 0000hex. The static data starts at 1000 0000hex. Dynamic data, allocated by malloc in C and by new in Java, is next. It grows up toward the stack in an area called the heap. The global pointer, $gp, is set to an address to make it easy to access data. It is initialized to 1000 8000hex so that it can access from 1000 0000hex to 1000 ffffhex using the positive and negative 16-bit offsets from $gp. This information is also found in Column 4 of the MIPS Reference Data Card at the front of this book. Copyright © 2009 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 — Instructions: Language of the Computer

Problem Link the object files above to form the executable file header. Assume that Procedure A has a text size of 0x140 and data size of 0x40 and Procedure B has a text size of 0x300 and data size of 0x50.

  Text Size ???? Data Size ????? Text Address Instruction ??????? lbu $a0, ????($gp) ????????? jal ????? … ?????????? sw $a1, ????($gp) jal ?????????? Data ??????????? (X) (Y)

Static vs. Dynamically linked libraries What we’ve described is the traditional way: “statically- linked” approach The library is now part of the executable, so if the library updates we don’t get the fix (have to recompile if we have source) It includes the entire library even if not all of it will be used Executable is self-contained An alternative is dynamically linked libraries (DLL), common on Windows & UNIX platforms 1st run overhead for dynamic linker-loader Having executable isn’t enough anymore!

Where Are We Now? C program: foo.c Compiler Assembly program: foo.s Assembler Object(mach lang module): foo.o Linker lib.o Executable(mach lang pgm): a.out Loader Memory

Loader Input: Executable Code (e.g., a.out for MIPS) Output: (program is run) Executable files are stored on disk When one is run, loader’s job is to load it into memory and start it running In reality, loader is the operating system (OS) loading is one of the OS tasks