June 23, 2010 SHRM Poll: Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans—Attitudes and Practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: Conducting Criminal Background Checks.
Advertisements

August 25, 2010 SHRM Poll: 401(k) Investment Education and Advice Organizations Are Providing to Plan Participants.
June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
May 2009 SHRM Poll - Assistance Organizations Offer to Help Employees Deal With High Gas Prices.
February 22, 2010 SHRM Poll: Job Search, Data on Unemployed SHRM Members in 2009.
July 7, 2009 SHRM Poll: Credibility of Online Degrees.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Flexible Work Arrangements December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection April 11, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
June 13, 2011 SHRM Poll: Relief Efforts for Victims of the Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California— Flexible Work Arrangements April 23, 2014.
April 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Work/Life Balance Policies.
SHRM Poll: Recruiting Veterans With Disabilities: Perceptions in the Workplace In collaboration with and commissioned by ILR – Employment and Disability.
August 18, 2010 SHRM Poll: Hiring Practices and Attitudes: Traditional vs. Online Degree Credentials Commissioned by:
SHRM Poll, December 2, 2009 | ©SHRM 2009 December 2, 2009 SHRM Poll: Transitioning to a Virtual Organization.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours.
SHRM Poll, November 2, 2009 | ©SHRM 2009 November 2, 2009 SHRM Poll: Assistance Organizations Offer to Help Employees Manage Their Financial Resources.
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: Conducting Reference Background Checks.
SHRM Poll: 2011 Holiday Schedules November 04, 2010.
February 2012 SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace.
May 9, 2011 SHRM Poll: Staff Levels and the Use of Contingent and Part-time Workers.
March 5, 2010 SHRM Poll: Relief Efforts for Haiti.
August 31, 2011 SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks.
SHRM Poll: Holiday Party and 2010 Holidays Organizations Plan to Observe November 2009.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—High-Tech Industry July 31, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: An Examination of How Social Media is Embedded in Business Strategy and Operations ©SHRM 2011 January 2012 SHRM Survey Findings:
The Economic Downturn: The Employees’ Perspective January 12, 2009.
August 13, 2010 SHRM Poll: Healthy Food and Drinks in the Workplace.
October 6, 2010 SHRM Poll: Ethics Officers in Organizations.
August 11, 2009 SHRM Poll: Education Assistance Benefits.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Health Industry August 28, 2012.
Sponsored by AETNA June 29, 2011 SHRM Poll: The State of Consumer-Directed Health Plans in the Workplace.
September 17, 2010 SHRM Poll: Organizations’ Response to Health Care Reform—Challenges and Actions.
September 17, 2010 SHRM Poll: Organizations’ Response to Health Care Reform—Organizations’ Short-Term Decisions.
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: Drug Testing.
January 29, 2010 SHRM Poll: Workplace Policies for Office Pools.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Recruiting and Skill Gaps November 7, 2011.
April 29, 2011 SHRM Poll: Intergenerational Conflict in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Poll: Employee Suggestion Programs November 8, 2010.
August 16, 2011 SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences.
September 17, 2010 SHRM Poll: Organizations’ Response to Health Care Reform—Senior Management’s Requests.
Social Networking Websites and Identifying Potential Job Candidates ©SHRM 2011 June 20, 2011 SHRM Poll: Social Networking Websites for Identifying and.
SHRM Poll: Holiday Parties in 2010? November 12, 2010.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Use of Social Networking Websites and Online Search Engines In Screening Job Candidates ©SHRM 2011 August 25, 2011 SHRM Survey.
September 16, 2010 SHRM Poll: Challenges Facing Organizations and HR in the Next 10 Years.
March 25, 2011 SHRM Poll: Organizational Whistle-blowing—Reporting Unethical and Illegal Behavior in the Workplace.
November 17, 2010 SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning Poll.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Construction, Mining, Oil and Gas Industry March 9, 2012.
SHRM Poll: Military Employment February 20, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees January 10, 2013.
February 7, 2011 SHRM Poll: Health Care Reform: Where Are Organizations in the Decision-Making Process?
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: Post-hire Background Checks.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: General Background Checks.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Global Competition and Hiring Strategies December 14, 2011.
December 1, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2011Holiday Parties Holiday Parties ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  Do organizations plan to have a 2011 end-of-year or.
January 27, 2010 SHRM Poll: Financial Challenges to the U.S. and Global Economy and Their Impact on Organizations—An Update.
SHRM Poll: Military Employment
SHRM Poll: Intergenerational Conflict in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: An Examination of How Social Media Is Embedded in Business Strategy and Operations January 2012.
SHRM Poll: Military Employment
SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences
SHRM Poll: Recruiting Veterans With Disabilities: Perceptions in the Workplace In collaboration with and commissioned by ILR – Employment and Disability.
SHRM Poll: Employee Suggestion Programs
SHRM Poll: Intergenerational Conflict in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Media in the Workplace
SHRM Poll: Intergenerational Conflict in the Workplace
Presentation transcript:

June 23, 2010 SHRM Poll: Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans—Attitudes and Practices

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Introduction The poll examines two areas: 1.Active Duty Service Employees. The poll examines pay and benefits that organizations provide to employees who have been mobilized to serve on active duty service either as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard for an extended period of time (more than two weeks). The challenges organizations face when an employee has been mobilized to serve on active duty service and the overall familiarity that HR professionals have with the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) are also explored. 2.Recruiting and Hiring Veterans. The benefits and challenges of hiring military veterans are examined, as are the areas that would assist organizations in recruiting and hiring veterans. 2

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Active Duty Service Employees 3

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 In the last 36 months, have any employees at your location been mobilized to serve on active duty either as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard for an extended period of time (i.e., more than two weeks)? 4 Note: n = 396. “Not sure” responses were excluded from this analysis.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM What type of direct compensation (i.e., income) support, if any, is your organization offering those employees who are on active duty? (by year) 2003 (n = 372) 2004 (n = 211) 2007 (n = 157) 2008 (n = 165) 2010 (n = 116) Providing no direct compensation support39% 35%42%43% *Providing pay differential (the difference between what the employee is paid by the military and what he/she would be making if he/she were working) for the entire period of the active duty service 34%28%45%40%23% *Providing pay differential (the difference between what the employee is paid by the military and what he/she would be making if he/she were working) for a portion of the period of the active duty service % Providing full pay and benefits for a portion of the period of the active duty service --10%6% Providing full pay and benefits for the entire period of the active duty service --6%1%3% Other17%25%7%1%3% Note: Only respondents whose organizations have had employees mobilized to serve on active duty as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard in the last 36 months were included in this analysis. A dash (“-”) indicates that the option was not included that year. Percentages do not total 100% as multiple response options were allowed. Data sorted in descending order by *In years prior to 2010, these questions were combined in one question that asked about providing pay differentials in general. In 2010, these questions were separated to ask about providing pay differentials for the entire period and a portion of the period of active duty service.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM What type of benefits support (i.e., non-direct compensation) is your organization offering those employees (and their families) mobilized to serve on active duty service either as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard?(by year) 2003 (n = 372) 2004 (n = 211) 2007 (n = 118) 2008 (n = 164) 2010 (n = 110) Providing an extension of health insurance for the employee's family 61%53%64%49%63% Providing an extension of health insurance for the employee50%39%46%49%47% Providing continuing life insurance49%43%52%47%31% Other17%31%20%6% Note: Only respondents whose organizations have had employees mobilized to serve on active duty as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard in the last 36 months were included in this analysis. Percentages do not total 100% as multiple response options were allowed. Data sorted in descending order by 2010.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM What is your organization doing or planning to do beyond what is required by law to help employees who are returning or have returned to work after being mobilized to serve on active duty either as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard? 2008 (n = 164) 2010 (n = 105) Providing employee assistance program (EAP) to help with transitioning back to work -66% Providing catch-up skills training to help with transitioning back to work37%58% Providing flexible work arrangements during the transition back to work-48% Providing recognition by management36%44% Note: “Not applicable” responses were excluded from this analysis. Only respondents whose organizations have had employees mobilized to serve on active duty as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard in the last 36 months were included in this analysis. A dash (“-”) indicates that the option was not included that year. Multiple response options were allowed in Data sorted in descending order by 2010.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM What challenges has your organization faced as a result of employees at your location being mobilized to serve on active duty either as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard? (by year) 2004 (n = 135) 2006 (n = 118) 2008 (n = 119) 2010 (n = 116) Uncertainty about how long employees will be away from jobs77%79%86%74% Burden on remaining employees to cover for open positions52%60%52%51% Finding temporary workers to fill open positions34%23%19%44% Loss of productivity due to open positions18%25%16%35% Continuation costs for employees mobilized to active duty service (e.g. salary, benefits, etc.) 21%35%32%22% Finding a "comparable" job for returning employees20%15%16%22% Cost of temporary workers to fill open positions18%17%13%20% Overall transitioning of returning employees back into the workforce (e.g., cultural issues, psychological issues, need for alternative arrangements, etc.) ---13% Other4% 5% Note: Only respondents whose organizations have had employees mobilized to serve on active duty as a reservist or as a member of the National Guard in the last 36 months were included in this analysis. A dash (“-”) indicates that the option was not included that year. Percentages do not total 100% as multiple response options were allowed. Data sorted in descending order by 2010.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 How familiar are you with the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)? 9

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 How familiar are you with ESGR (Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve)? 10

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Recruiting and Hiring Veterans Definition: For this poll, “veterans” were defined as individuals who have been honorably discharged or retired from the military either as career military personnel, reservists or members of the National Guard. Respondents answered the questions in terms of “veterans” who have been recruited or hired by their organization as new hires, not existing employees. 11

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Within the past 36 months, has your organization hired any veterans as full-time, part-time or temporary/contract workers? 12 Note: n = 328.“Not sure” responses were excluded from this analysis..

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Did your organization make a specific effort to recruit and hire veterans? 13 Note: “Not sure” responses were excluded from this analysis.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 In your experience, do you think each of the following are benefits of hiring employees with military experience? Organizations that have hired veterans (n = ) Organizations that have made an effort to hire veterans (n = 11-18) Organizations that have not made an effort to hire veterans (n = ) Strong sense of responsibility97%94%98% Ability to work under pressure96%94%96% Ability to see a task through to completion92% Strong leadership skills91%93%92% High degree of professionalism91%82%87% Strong problem-solving skills90%83%89% Ability to multitask89%91%84% Ability to adapt to changing situations quickly88%85%89% Ability to give back to U.S. veterans by showing gratitude for their service88%87%93% Positive impact on the image and/or credibility of organization86%82% Sense of patriotism at organization77%82%84% Technology/information technology skills and training77%80%83% Strategic planning/foresight74%73%80% Fulfillment of federal and/or state affirmative action requirements73%82%76% Global perspective61%63%71% Knowledge/expertise of defense issues60%73%79% 14 Note: “Not sure” responses were excluded from this analysis..

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 In your experience, do you think any of the following are challenges of hiring employees with military experience? 15 Note: n = “Not sure” responses were excluded from this analysis..

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 To what extent would each of the following help your organization in efforts to recruit and hire military veterans? 16 Note: n = “Not applicable; experienced in this area, do not need assistance” responses were excluded from this analysis. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Within the past 36 months, how effective have the following national online job boards been in helping your organization recruit veterans as potential job candidates? 17 Note: n = “Not applicable; my organization does not use this source” responses were excluded from this analysis. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Other sources organizations have used to recruit veterans America's Job Exchange Beyond.com Career Link Craigslist Direct recruiters EDD & VA Employee referrals Employflorida.com External military recruiting firms and job fairs GovernmentJobs.com Local Air Force base in city Indeed.com JobsinME.com State/local resources, including veteran-specific job fairs, newspapers, unemployment office, workforce development centers, veterans’ associations, etc. Niche sites for engineers, IEEE and IT staff – DICE Vetjobs.com VetsCentral 18

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 How familiar are you with the following Department of Labor (DOL) veterans’ programs and have you used them in your organization’s recruiting? 19 Note: n = Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Demographics: Organization Industry Manufacturing –other18% Health care, social assistance (e.g., hospitals, clinics, EAP, etc.)15% Services–professional (scientific, technical, legal, engineering, etc.)12% Retail/wholesale trade7% Financial services (e.g., banking)6% Arts, entertainment, recreation4% Consulting4% Educational services/education (e.g., universities, school)4% Services –accommodation, food and drinking places3% Other services (e.g., other nonprofit, church/religious organizations)3% High-tech3% Government/public administration—federal, state/local, tribal3% 20 Note: n = 366. Percentages do not total 100% due to rounding.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Demographics: Organization Industry (continued) Construction, mining, oil and gas3% Insurance3% Real estate, rental, leasing2% Transportation, warehousing (e.g., distribution)2% Publishing, broadcasting, other media1% Biotech1% Manufacturing—auto/auto-related1% Utilities1% Telecommunications1% Association—professional/trade1% Pharmaceutical1% Other5% 21 Note: n = 366. Percentages do not total 100% due to rounding.

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Demographics: Organization Sector 22 Note: n= 366

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Demographics: Organization Staff Size 23 Note: n = 204

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 Demographics: Other 24 Note: n = 368 U.S.-based operations77% Multinational operations23% Single-unit company: Companies in which the location and the company are one and the same. 34% Multi-unit company: Companies that have more than one location. 66% Multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 49% Each work location determines HR policies and practices 2% A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit headquarters determine HR policies and practices 49% Is organization a single-unit company or a multi- unit company? Are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit corporate headquarters, by each work location or both? Does organization have U.S.-based operations (business units) only or does it operate multinationally? Note: n = 362 Note: n = % of organizations indicated that employees at their work location were unionized. Note: n = 363

Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans - Attitudes and Practices | ©SHRM 2010 SHRM Poll: Employing Military Personnel and Recruiting Veterans—Attitudes and Practices Response rate = 16% Sample comprised of 429 randomly selected HR professionals with the job title of manager and above Margin of error is +/- 4 Survey fielded June 8–June 18, 2010 For more poll findings, visit: Follow us on Twitter: 25 Methodology