Scientific Ethics and Ethical Decision Making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
ETHICS. Business Conduct  The Agent agrees to conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws in conducting business under this agreement.
Integrity and impartiality
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Dheeraj Agarwal Ethics Advisor Health Resources and Services Administration U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
Ethics Issues for Federal Advisory Committee Members Maureen O. Wilson, Ph.D. Deputy Ethics Counselor March 3, 2008.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
E thics Module 4 N ational G uard T echnician P ersonnel M anagement C ourse.
1 Overview of Ethics Requirements for Employees of Montgomery County This is a summary to help identify issues; it is not the law. Please address ethics.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
FERPA and IRB: Implications for Testing Centers Judith W. Grant, Ph.D.,CIP NCTA Conference San Antonio, Texas August 6, 2009.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. THE TITLE “INTRODUCTION”
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Ethical Issues in Research
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Five Activities Contracting Officers and Government Contractors Should Avoid Presented by: James F. Moseley, Jr. of Moseley, Prichard, Parrish, Knight,
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Governing a Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Corporation The Basics MPCC December 16, 2010.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
E thics 1 William (Bill) H. Poppler: (916) LT Brian E. Thomas: (916) LT Daniel W. Pauley: (916) SSgt Eric M. Kelly: (916)
The Ohio Ethics Law Carrie Williams. Purpose  Provide an overview of The Ohio Ethics Commission and The Ohio Ethics Law  Explain the components of The.
GSA Expo 2009 Ethics: Know the Rules of the Road Nicole Stein Desk Officer/Office of Government Ethics.
Ethics – Dos and Don’ts Mary Garcia Melissa Miller Dennis McGuire Office of Regional Counsel.
Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.
Submitting IRB Applications (or “Do I have to do an IRB?”) Linda A. Detman, Ph.D. Research Associate Lawton & Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
1 Insert Physical & Addresses, Phone and Fax Numbers of your Ethics Counselors Insert Names of your Ethics Counselor Insert Name of your Office.
The Role of IRBs and Ethics Susan Kornetsky, MPH Children’s Hospital, Boston.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND GOVERNMENT ETHICS
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Ethics 2008 NPA UPDATE. Public Service is a Public Trust Each employee has a responsibility to the U.S. government and its citizens to place loyalty to.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Medical Ethics  A set of guidelines concerned with questions of right & wrong, of duty & obligation, of moral responsibility.  Ethical dilemma is a.
1 The Nature of Ethics Ethics is generally concerned with rules or guidelines for morals and/or socially approved conduct Ethical standards generally apply.
Technology Transfer and
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Joint Ethics Regulation DOD R
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Scientific Ethics and Ethical Decision Making Leonard Ortmann Renee Ross Natalie Brown Betty Wong Office of the Director Office of the Associate Director for Science

Who You Gonna Call? An investigator has worked with his Center ADS and Human Subject Contact to determine that the activity he proposes is classified as non-exempt research involving human subjects. Which office facilitates the work of the IRB? You are attending a conference hosted by a pharmaceutical company and are asked to go to lunch with the organizer. They have agreed to pay. Which office can give you advice on whether you can accept the lunch? Your program is developing recommendations relating to a public health policy and you want to ensure that you have considered all of the ethical ramifications. Which office would you turn to for assistance? 2

Ethics Is About … Avoiding wrong doing, doing the right thing, doing what is best, doing what we should do Establishing ethical principles of action Reflectively analyzing and evaluating the rightness or wrongness of actions Practically making decisions often in the context of conflicting values or competing stakeholders Prioritizing and integrating diverse values in crafting decisions, policies or recommendations 3

Stop Sign Versus Green Light Ethics Observe caution in order to comply with relevant legal codes Series of either/or compliance determinations made in unbiased manner Based on legal statutes informed by ethical principles Expedite practical decision making in context of multiple stakeholders Choice of best option among alternatives Based on the decision-maker’s prioritization of values, which align with ethical principles and the law

Office of the Associate Director Office of Science Integrity for Science Office of Science Integrity Ethics Program Activity Office Stop Animal Care and Use Office Animal research Human Research Protection Office Protecting human subjects in research IRB process Privacy Unit Privacy legislation and regulations, HIPAA, FERPA Confidentiality Unit Certificates and Assurances of Confidentiality Information Collection Review Office Paperwork Reduction Act Public financial disclosure Outside activity requests Official duty requests Award approvals Advice and counseling Seeking employment and post-employment restrictions Gifts Hatch Act Go Public Health Ethics Unit Public health ethics consults and training for public health practice Ethics desk activities in the Emergency Operation Center 5

Public Health Ethics: Addressing ethical issues in the practice of public health Leonard Ortmann, Ph.D. Public Health Ethicist Public Health Ethics Unit Office of Science Integrity Office of the Associate Director for Science

Common Ethical Challenges in Public Health Practice Allocating scarce resources fairly: in regard to undocumented aliens, in emergencies, etc. Respecting individual rights and freedom while protecting the public good Protecting underserved and marginalized populations and building trust with them Engaging and sharing information with communities in a transparent manner Protecting data confidentiality and individual privacy while conducting surveillance activities

Code of Ethics for Public Health Sets a standard of accountability to ethically orient public health institutions and practitioners Lays out 12 key principles for analyzing ethical challenges and practicing public health Key concept: interdependence of community members http://www.apha.org/NR/rdonlyres/1CED3CEA-287E-4185-9CBD-BD405FC60856/0/ethicsbrochure.pdf

Clinical vs. Public Health Ethics Clinical Emphasis Public Health Emphasis Focus on patient-provider interactions Biomedical determinants Respect for autonomy, privacy, liberty Informed consent Beneficence and non-maleficence Justice Focus on institutions and populations Social determinants Interdependence and interrelatedness Public engagement Social good and avoiding social harm Social justice

Focus of Activities Development of ethics guidance on specific program areas Development of capacity of CDC staff to address ethical issues Training Center level public health ethics teams Consultation procedures Support of state and local health departments

CDC Ethics Consult Procedure The process of a public health ethics consult can be categorized into three actions - to identify, analyze, and resolve. 9-step framework provides a systematic step-wise approach to ethical decision making http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/phethics/startConsultation.htm IDENTIFY ANALYZE RESOLVE

Example of Public Health Ethics Question Your program is developing recommendations relating to a public health policy and you want to ensure that you have considered all of the ethical ramifications. Which office would you turn to for assistance?

Employee Ethics Renee Ross Ethics Program Specialist Ethics Program Activity Office Office of the Chief Operating Officer

Responsibilities Public Financial Disclosure Outside Activity Requests Official Duty Requests Award Approvals Advice and Counseling Seeking Employment and Post Employment Restrictions Letters of Support Hatch Act

14 General Principles of Ethical Conduct Public Service is a Public Trust Requires employees to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principals above private gain Employees have a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens, and shall respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct

Misuse of Position You should never use your public office for your private gain. Employees are not to use their position, title or any authority associated with their office to coerce or induce a benefit for themselves or others. Employees also are not to use or allow the improper use of nonpublic information to further a private interest, either their own or another's.

Confidential Financial Disclosure Reports OGE 450 Annual Requirement used to determine if an employee has a potential conflict of interest with their investments and activities as those issues relate to their official duties Criminal Conflict of Interest Statute 18 U.S.C. § 208 This means that employees must not participate in any official matter that would have a direct and predictable effect on their own or imputed financial interests. Annual Ethics Training – due December 30, 2011

Outside Activity Requests Employees must obtain approval before engaging in an outside activity which requires the use of professional qualifications readily identified with CDC employment. Employees shall not engage in any outside activity that conflicts with his/her official duties. Employees are prohibited from participating in activities that create an appearance of using public office for private gain, or create the appearance that the employee’s official position was used to obtain an outside business opportunity. Employees may receive compensation

Official Duty Requests What are official duty activities? Federal Liaison; Advisory Board/Committee or Editorial Board; Voluntary Consensus Standard Organization (standards setting body); and Officer, Director, or Trustee Approval is granted: If the activity is related to employee’s official duties If the activity is consistent with the authority and mission of the agency The employee may not receive compensation

Awards from Outside Sources Awards may be accepted for meritorious public service or achievement, including work performed at CDC/ATSDR. Awards that have a market value of more than $200 requires prior written determination by the Deputy Ethics Counselor. Awards may not be accepted from entities that have interests that may be substantially affected by the performance or non-performance of the employees official duties. 20 20

Letter of Support Permanent Residency Can I use CDC Letterhead using my official title? Must have personal knowledge of the ability or character of the individual, and Must be a person you have dealt with in the course of your Federal employment, OR This person is seeking a Federal job. 18 USC 205 (Appearing on behalf of another before a Federal Agency) Employee must write the letter based on his own knowledge Letter must not be written by applicant or by the applicant’s direction

Letter of Support Grant Application Letter should be: General in nature Outline importance of the work or subject matter, not the application Straightforward and factual 5 CFR 2635.101(b)(8) – Impartiality 5 CFR 2635.702(c) - Endorsement

Conflict of Interest Statutes 5 CFR 2635.702(c) – Endorsement Provides that an “employee shall not use or permit the use of his Government position or title or any authority associated with his public office to endorse any product, service, or enterprise.” 5 CFR 2635.101 (b)(8) – Impartiality Provides that an employee “shall act impartially and not give preferential treatment to any private organization or individual.”

Gifts Question: Answer - Yes: 2635.204(a) – An exception to gift rule: I am attending a conference hosted by a pharmaceutical company and I’m asked to go to lunch with the organizer. They have agreed to pay – can I accept the lunch? Answer - Yes: As long as the gift was not given because of your official position As long as the value of the lunch does not exceed $20 2635.204(a) – An exception to gift rule: allows that federal employees may accept unsolicited gifts with an aggregate value of $20 or less per source per occasion, not to exceed $50 from that same source in a calendar year.

Hatch Act Permitted Activities Employees may: Register and vote Contribute money to political candidates or organizations Assist in nonpartisan voter registration drives Participate in nonpartisan campaigns (such as most school board elections) Campaign for or against referendum questions, constitutional amendments, etc. Employees may not: Run for public office in a partisan election Use official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election Use official title in connection with any partisan political activity Solicit or discourage the political activity of anyone having business before the Department Engage in political fundraising

Hatch Act Presidential Photographs Can I display a picture of a candidate for partisan political office in my workspace? No, as a general rule, employees may not display pictures of candidates for partisan public office in the federal workplace. Exception to the rule - All of the following must apply: Photo was on display in advance of election season The employee is in the photograph with the candidate The photograph is a personal one (i.e., the employee has personal relationship with the candidate and photo is taken at personal event)

Advice and Guidance The Ethics Program Activity Office offers individual counseling on: Conflicts of Interest Political Activities Post Employment Restrictions Recusals

Human Research Ethics Natalie Brown, MPH, Senior IRB Administrator and Betty Wong, MPH, CHES, IRB Administrator Human Research Protection Office Office of Science Integrity Office of the Associate Director for Science

Overview Regulatory overview Public health research or public health practice Research involving human subjects CDC’s institutional review board (IRB) process 29

CDC Policy Considerations CDC has ethical and legal obligation to ensure individuals are protected in all public health activities All CDC activities must be reviewed to determine if they are research involving human subjects CDC and collaborators must comply with 45 CFR part 46 and 21 CFR parts 50 and 56 to assure the protection of human subjects Prevention and control of disease or injury to improve public health programs, clearly without a research component, is deemed nonresearch Incorporating a research component is a possibility during emergency situations, but the appropriate approvals must be obtained prior to the commencement of the research http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf 30

Public Health Practice Public Health Research Distinguishing Public Health Research and Public Health Practice: A CDC Perspective Public Health Practice Public Health Research Purpose is to identify and control a health problem or improve a public health program or service Purpose is to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge Benefits of the project are primarily or exclusively for the participants or their community Benefits may or may not include study participants, always extend beyond the study participants Data collected are needed to assess or improve the program or service, the health of the participants, or their community Data collected exceed requirements for care of study participants or extend beyond scope of activity http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf 31

References, Policies, and Guidance Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR 46 45 CFR 46.102(d) http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html CDC’s policy on Distinguishing Public Health Research and Public Health Nonresearch, July 2010 http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf CSTE’s Public Health Practice vs. Research: A Report for Public Health Practitioners, May 2004 http://www.cste.org/pdffiles/newpdffiles/CSTEPHResRptHodgeFinal.5.24.04.pdf 32

The Belmont Report 1979 report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/hrpo/codes/belm-eng.pdf) Guide the resolution of the ethical problems based on 3 principles Respect for persons Beneficence Justice 33

Additional Determinations for Research Once an activity is classified as research, three additional determinations must be made: Is the activity research involving human subjects? If the activity is nonexempt research involving human subjects, which institutions are engaged in research and are required to certify IRB approval? If the activity is research involving human subjects, does the research meet the criteria for exemption from 45 CFR 46? 34

What is Research Involving Human Subjects? Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR 46 45 CFR 46.102(f) – Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or Identifiable private information Excludes research that uses existing anonymous data and data about deceased individuals Once the project is determined to be research involving human subjects, 45 CFR 46 applies Except that there are a few exemptions for certain activities that generally carry negligible risk There are special considerations for vulnerable persons 35

Engagement of Institutions in Human Subjects Research Institutions are considered engaged in human subjects research when its employees or agents for the purposes of the research project obtain Data about the subjects of the research through intervention or interaction with them Identifiable private information about the subjects of the research The informed consent for research 36

Determination for Review All projects undergo a formal review by the Associate Director for Science in each CIO Projects that are determined to be research involving human subjects where CDC is engaged are routed to HRPO Nonexempt human subjects research is reviewed by an IRB Exempt human subjects research is reviewed by the Chief of HRPO or designee 37

CDC Options for IRB Review CDC IRB: Convened Board (Quorum) Expedited review not permitted May meet the criteria for expedited review, but the research project is controversial or includes sensitive topics or issues CDC IRB: Expedited Review (45 CFR 46.110) Permissible categories Experienced reviewer outside convened meeting Non-CDC IRB: Reliance Request Reliance on an outside IRB Limited criteria primarily based on CDC’s role 38

CDC IRB Review HRPO provides worksheets and guidance to all IRB members to ensure that all regulatory requirements are met; standard operating procedures are also available HRPO utilizes the primary IRB reviewer system An expert reviewer reviews protocol, consent form, and all supporting documentation A less experienced reviewer will review with concurrence from an expert reviewer IRB reports are issued to the principal investigator upon completion of the review Once all regulatory requirements are met, the study is approved for no more than one year 39

Example of Human Research Protection Question An investigator has worked with his Center ADS and Human Subject Contact to determine that the activity he proposes is classified as non-exempt research involving human subjects. Which office facilitates the work of the IRB? 40

Public Health Ethics Unit Drue Barrett, Lead Email: DBarrett@cdc.gov or phethics@cdc.gov Telephone: 404-639-4690 FAX: 404-639-7341 Website: http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/phethics/

Ethics Program Activity Office Teresa Walker-Mason, Ethics Program Officer Email: Ethics@cdc.gov Telephone: 770-488-8970 Fax: 770-488-0265 Website: http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/ethics/

Human Research Protection Office Barbara R. DeCausey, Chief Email: huma@cdc.gov Telephone: 404-639-7570 Fax: 404-639-3249 Website: http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/hrpo/