Amos O. Olagunju Computer Science and Information Technology Department St. Cloud State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Job Analysis and Rewards
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
New Basic Skills. The Original Basic Skills Reading Writing Arithmetic.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
Purpose of the Standards
Melodie Cameron, MA Adapted and Presented by Dr. Elena Klaw.
Science and Engineering Practices
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Impact of Including Authentic Inquiry Experiences in Methods Courses for Pre-Service Elementary and Secondary Teachers Timothy F. Slater, Lisa Elfring,
American Diploma Project Network Webinar December 19, 2012.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Auditing & Assurance Services, 6e
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
School Counselors Doing Action Research Jay Carey and Carey Dimmitt Center for School Counseling Outcome Research UMass Amherst CT Guidance Leaders March.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Designing Assessments Assessment Strategies that Help Students Build the Top 10 Abilities Employers Are Looking For.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
When you LEARN new skills and/or IMPROVE existing skills.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Skills 4 Success 3.00 – Understand the world of work and skills needed for employment success – Understand various skills needed for employment success.
Skills 4 Success.
TRAITS OF A SUCCESSFUL TEACHER: what school districts REALLY want SEPTEMBER, 26 TH 2014 Stephanie Zuckerman-Aviles - Director Jessie Lombardo - Assistant.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
IMT 500: The Information Management Framework Autumn Quarter, 2012.
Job Analysis - Competency Modeling MANA 5322 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Direct Behavior Rating: Using DBR for Intervention.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 3. Designing and Integrating Design-Implement Experiences November 2007.
Demonstrate employability skills required by business and industry.  The following elements should be integrated throughout the content of this course.
3-1 Copyright © 2013 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Hill, Hill, Perlitz, Professional Training & Assessment, 1e C HAPTER 3 TAEDES505A Evaluate.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
OBJECTIVE 1.01: UNDERSTAND INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS/ TRAITS, INTERESTS/PREFERENCES, ABILITY LEVELS, SKILL ACQUISITION, TALENTS/APTITUDES, LEARNING STYLES.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Employment Skills for Communications Technology..
Student Employment Where Learning Happens. Today’s Agenda Overview of Learning Outcomes UWM Employment Experience – What our data says – Student Employment.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Students who graduate college should be prepared with the knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in their selected profession. One necessary skill is.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Julie Kaiser, PhD Doctoral Professional Development Coordinator
Project Category Grade Level
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Presentation transcript:

Amos O. Olagunju Computer Science and Information Technology Department St. Cloud State University

 Skill/QualityWeighted average rating* Ability to work in a team structure4.60 Ability to verbally communicate with persons inside and outside the organization 4.59 Ability to make decisions and solve problems4.49 Ability to obtain and process information4.46 Ability to plan, organize, and prioritize work4.45 Ability to analyze quantitative data4.23 Technical knowledge related to the job4.23 Proficiency with computer software programs4.04 Ability to create and/or edit written reports3.65 Ability to sell or influence others3.51

 What are the goals of your nontechnical skills project?  What activities are designed for assessing the nontechnical skills?  How are you assessing the nontechnical skills?  What are the results to date?  What are the challenges to implementing the nontechnical skills project?  How might Nigerian institutions collaborate on infusing nontechnical skills into the entire CS/IT/IS curriculums?

 To present a framework for operationally defining DSSS, the activities and assessment of soft skills, and a generic tool to facilitate the assessment of DSSS in CISE.  To illustrate the framework using the DSSS of the ITS degree program at St Cloud State University.

CORE COURSES TO SATISFY THE GOALS OF THE DSSS:

 Students work individually and in groups, on specially-designed activities and projects with focuses on DSSS in the core courses to: o Create, analyze, and modify security policy. o Design and implement secure network architecture based on security policies. o Exhibit knowledge of security laws and ethics. o Identify and correct security weaknesses in operating systems, networks, and applications.

 Students work individually and in groups, on specially-designed activities and projects with focuses on DSSS in the core courses to: o Identify and respond appropriately to security breaches. o Apply cryptography and other theoretical foundations of security to secure information and systems. o Use security protocols at each layer of the TCP/IP model to form layered security architectures.

 The ITS core courses provide students DSSS competencies in: o Project and process flows (research, analyze and synthesize, design and implement, test and validate, quality assurance and project management) o Oral, written and workplace communication and teamwork o Task management, professionalism and professional development o Problem solving (data collection, analysis and organization; problem definition, solution development and testing)

 Soft skills infusion into IT security curriculum philosophy strongly supports the alignment between activities/projects and assessment of student learning.  Combining assessments with projects that incorporate real and simulated work-like activities and situations significantly reinforces the learning process.  For each soft skill, three levels of proficiency (basic, intermediate, advanced) with increasing skill performance and complexity are defined.

Criteria and suggestions for the assessment of soft skills in the context of an Information Technology Security core courses for “ Data Gathering, Analysis and Organization”

A. Basic Data Gathering, Analysis and Organization Skills ▪ Sources of data are clearly identified and relevant to the problem ▪ Data is evaluated for validity, completeness and relevance ▪ Conflict between data is appropriately resolved ▪ Data is recorded accurately and organized efficiently

 Documentation of data follows standards and procedures  Sample Activity Students are asked to gather data through direct observation and research, to analyze and document this data in a usable format.

B. Intermediate Data Gathering, Analysis and Organization Skills ▪ Need for data is clearly and accurately specified, and appropriately justified ▪ The scope of data gathering and analysis is congruent with the purpose, and the availability of time and resources ▪ Student accurately judges when there is sufficient or insufficient data ▪ Analysis of data is conducted using appropriate logical and statistical methods

 Data analysis and summaries are organized and documented in appropriate formats Sample Activity Students are asked to analyze complex sets of data and develop effective summaries based on the purpose of the activity.

 In 2005, the Genomic Computation Lab (GCL) at an endowed university received $500,000 grant to purchase 25 servers dedicated to Artificial Intelligence research on the determination of the functionalities of gene structures. All servers were supposed to be secured with padlocks. Unfortunately, two servers were stolen one year later from the GCL in  What was the Exposure Factor for the theft of a server in 2006? Explain all assumptions. [3 points]

 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was asked to look into the theft of the two servers in The FBI recovered the two stolen servers from a technician who worked at the GCL in  What was the Exposure Factor of a stolen server in 2006? Why? [3 points]  Explain the discrepancies (if any) between the responses to (a) and (b) above. What might have happened? [4 points]

 0-3 = [No achievement, level 0]  4-5 = [Basic achievement, Level 1]  6-8 = [Intermediate achievement, Level 2  9-10 = [Advanced, Level 3]

 For all IT courses, SSAS offers features for an administrator to: o Create a file of soft skills list (enter, update and delete a skill) o Record the assessment rubrics for each skill (enter, update and delete a rubric) o View each soft skill and associated rubric; view all soft skills and rubrics. o Merge a set of soft skills files submitted by instructors into MSSFile.

 Continuation o Use MSSFile to generate the progress report of each student across courses. o Use MSSFile to generate the progress report of all students across courses using graphical displays and descriptive statistics.

 For each course, SSAS offers features for an instructor to: o Create a course file, and enroll students (enter, update and delete a record) o View the Soft Skills List and select specific skills to be assesses in the course o Record the activities for assessing each soft skill (enter, update, delete a record) o Record the grades of students for each activity of a soft skill (enter, update, delete a record)

 Continuation o View tabulated results of assessed soft skills for each student, and for all students o Provide summaries (graphical displays and descriptive statistics) for each soft skill using all students’ data

 We have implemented the framework for infusing DSSS into the ITS degree program.  To date, we have a rich databank of the areas in which students are deficient in DSSS.  We continue to fine-tune the individual and team activities for assessing DSSS. Prior to implementing the DSSS, we had no idea of the percentage of our graduates who could be certified as proficient in soft skills.  Today, the percentage of our graduating seniors who achieve at least “intermediate” proficiency in soft skills is increasing.

 The implementation of the framework for infusing DSSS into degree programs is not without problems.  It is difficult to engage faculty members who are overburdened with teaching in new research.  Providing graduate assistants or additional compensation should help overcome this issue.  The design of creative individual and group activities and projects that promote the incorporation of DSSS into teaching is not easy.

 Faculty members ought to seek assistance from industry partners to overcome this problem.  Changing the culture of learning by students to include DSSS sometime faces resistance.  The new expectations of DSSS by employers should be clearly shared with all students in a degree.