FORA’s Role in Land Use Decisions September 13, 2013 FORA Board Meeting Jon Giffen Authority Counsel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.T. System Administration Delegation of Authority to Sign Contracts Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel.
Advertisements

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
FORA Board Meeting Friday, June 13, 2014 City of Seaside 2013 Zoning Code Update – FORA Consistency Determination.
Base Reuse Plan Post-Reassessment “Category I” BRP corrections and next steps Fort Ord Reuse Authority March15, 2013.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
County Home Rule in Iowa New County Officers School January 19, 2005 David Vestal General Counsel ISAC (515)
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
Josh Metz, Associate Planner Consistency Determination: City of Seaside – 2013 Zoning Code Text Amendments.
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Governance/Implementation September 4, 2013 Presentation Jonathan Garcia Senior Planner.
Code Comparison Changes 2012 IBC to 2012 NPFA 101 Developed for the Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation Building Codes and Standards.
1 Municipal Ports Training Seminar: Board Governance Issues Prepared for DfT by Fisher Associates June 2007.
Ontario Bar Association Institute 2015 The Development Permit System Katarzyna Sliwa Davies Howe Partners LLP.
Planning & Community Development Department Municipal Code Amendments: Adoption/Certification Authority of California Environmental Quality Act Reviews,
1. 2 This tool focuses on the CSBG requirements relating to tripartite board composition and selection and is divided into the following four parts: 1.General.
Former Fort Ord Prevailing Wage Application and Enforcement Michael Houlemard Fort Ord Reuse Authority.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 15 Article III Air Quality Control Public Hearing Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division June.
HELEN THIGPEN STAFF ATTORNEY LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DIVISION MONTANA LEGISLATURE EDUCATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 18, 2011 County Zoning.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Fort Ord Reuse Authority FY Annual Budget June 13, 2014 Board Presentation Michael A. Houlemard, Jr. Executive Officer.
Annual Training for County Election Officials NC State Board of Elections August 14, 2012.
Thirtysomething: EMS in California 30 Years After SB 125 Workshop Presentation by Emergency Medical Services Administrators’ Association of California.
Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) Environmental Services Cooperative Agreement (ESCA) Remediation Program (RP) 1 FORA Environmental Liability Insurance Presentation.
FORA Board of Directors October 11,  2001 Fort Ord Master Plan Applied Base Reuse Plan policies Found consistent by FORA Board.  2010 Monterey.
Local Powers for Land Use Regulation. Local Land Use Powers Land use regulation is considered a residual power –In most circumstances, that is… –Power.
Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.
1. 2 This tool focuses on the CSBG requirements relating to tripartite board composition and selection and is divided into the following four parts: 1.General.
Amendments to Concurrency Management Regulations.
Changing Environmental Requirements in Minnesota Mn APA Conference September 28, 2011.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
PRESENTATION TO THE FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY 10, 2013 Capital Improvement Program FY 2013/14.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
1 PARCC Data Privacy & Security Policy December 2013.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250, Sacramento, CA fax presented to Fort Ord Reuse Authority.
DANE COUNTY ZONING OVERVIEW “Town-County Relationship As Related to County Zoning Authority” Presented on August 18, 2004 at the Pyle Center for The Dane.
Manoj Patel Enterprises II ZOM Location Map.
Tax & Business Licenses: A Case for City Business Licensing Prepared for GFOA – February 2016 Business and Financial Decisions.
Police Department Authorization to enter into a Contract with LASD for Supplemental Law Enforcement Services for New Year’s Operations Pasadena Police.
School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012 School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012.
Overview of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and Designation Process County of San Luis Obispo Office of the County Counsel January 8, 2015.
1 Nuisance Odor Investigation and Enforcement in the City of Fort Worth October 7, 2008.
Applicant: Robert Ganem Addresses: 7304 & 7312 Black Oak Lane Planning Commission Meeting – August 21, 2015.
U.T. System Administration Delegation of Authority to Sign Contracts Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel.
Sonoma County Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Lytton Rancheria of California August 25, 2015 Supervisor James Gore County Counsel Bruce Goldstein.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Administrative Code Amendment
Introduction to the planning system for elected members​
Update on Special Event Facilities Butte County Code Section
NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIAL ORIENTATION Florida Property Appraisers Florida Tax Collectors February 7-10, 2017.
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Broward Office of the Inspector General
Public Health Law and Policy: Principles, Examples, and Applications
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAWS AMENDMENT BILL [B14 – 2017] PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS MEETING OF 30 JANUARY 2018.
Privacy & Access to Information
Ordinance 661 Consistency Rezone Project
Amendments to Palm Coast Apartment Planned Unit Development Agreement
Broward Office of the Inspector General
Tam O’Shanter Rezoning
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Request Permission to Proceed to the EMC for Approval of Delegation of the Neuse Buffer Program to the Town of Hillsborough.
American Bar Association
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
Farmland Preservation Program
Planning and Zoning Essentials
Request Permission to Proceed to the EMC for Approval of Delegation of the Neuse Buffer Program to Johnston County and Delegation of Further Approval Authority.
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
Overview of HHS/CDC Construction Authorities
Presentation transcript:

FORA’s Role in Land Use Decisions September 13, 2013 FORA Board Meeting Jon Giffen Authority Counsel

Issue Issue: FORA may influence land use decisions in 3 ways: 1)making BRP consistency determinations authorized by the Fort Ord Reuse Act; 2)instituting land use controls by contract; and 3)exerting power over property through direct ownership. Answer: What is FORA’s role in making land use decisions?

1)BRP Consistency Determinations Fort Ord Reuse Act FORA’s powers and duties “prevail over those of any local entity, including any City or County.” FORA Board creates the BRP, and local jurisdictions implement the BRP through their own general plans, zoning ordinances and the permit approval process. FORA Board primarily enforces BRP by declaring general plans, zoning ordinances, and other implementing actions to be “consistent” or “inconsistent” with the BRP. Gov. Code §§ 67675, Fort Ord Reuse Act delegates all development review authority to the “county or city over any development proposed within the area to which the general plan applies.” Gov. Code § One Exception: Actions of the member agency…may be reviewed by the board on its own initiative, or may be appealed to the board. Gov. Code § (b)(2).

2)Contract Land use decisions can also be controlled by contract. Three provisions in the Fort Ord Reuse Act: GC § 67677: agreements with United States… GC § 67680: agreements as necessary to mitigate the impact of the reuse of Fort Ord on rare and endangered species of flora and fauna. GC § : agreements as necessary to mitigate impacts of the reuse of Fort Ord in addition to those specified in § Most important contractual expression: Implementation Agreements

3)Ownership a. FORA authorized to accept title to land from Army. Gov. Code b. No law allows FORA to retain property for express purpose of influencing land use decisions. c. FORA can retain title to property if: Board determines it is necessary or convenient to carrying out FORA’s responsibilities pursuant to law, and Board determines that retention will not cause financial hardship to the city or county with jurisdiction over the property. Gov. Code § 67678(b)(4).

Concluding Points FORA may influence land use by making consistency determinations that ensure compliance with the BRP. FORA may influence land use by contract, primarily through Implementation Agreements. FORA may influence land use by ownership of land, although it can only retain ownership of land if: (i) necessary or convenient to carrying out FORA's responsibilities pursuant to law; and (ii) so long as no significant financial hardship is caused to the underlying jurisdiction.