Land Development Project Land Use Law Spring 2004 Mark Spykerman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Conditional Use Permit #6084 Proposed Chick-Fil-A Restaurant 1700 East Colorado.
Advertisements

1 May 9, 2014 Nancy S. McNayr, AICP McNayr Paque, LLC Oklahoma Municipal League Oklahoma Municipal League Planning Commissioner Workshop Practical Advice.
Lunenburg County Public Hearing January 29, 2013 Conditional Use Permit Lunenburg County Landfill Tracy Gee, County Administrator Frank F. Rennie, IV,
Board of Standards and Appeals Community Board 3 / Manhattan June 13, 2011 Introduction Introduction Applications: Applications: –Variances –Special Permits.
SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR RELIGIOUS USE AND VARIANCE TO ALLOW UNPAVED PARKING.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: FAITH CENTER MINISTRIES, INC. Orange County Zoning Division May 13, 2014 (Continued.
Zoning 101 Key principles, components and processes Dh 2005.
Candidate Briefing and Update. 45 minutes. Not a lot of time for most, for me IMPOSSIBLE ! ◦ Personal background ◦ Vision ◦ Development of a comprehensive.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
1 Implementing the Municipal Plan. 2 Overview The plan is a vision that must be implemented Many methods of implementation Communities must work to find.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Opposition to Proposed Building Height Variance in Case No. VA
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: FIRST KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ORLANDO Orange County Zoning Division December.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Legal Regulations for High School Road II BAINBRIDGE ISLAND MUNICIPAL CODES & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONDITIONAL USES.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Zoning Regulations Zoning authority is a “police power” granted to the City by the State. Land Development Code Purpose: To implement the City’s Comprehensive.
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2009.
FEBRUARY 21, 2012 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE , Nov. 03, 2011 APPELLANT/APPLICANT: CHANTEL PRESTON.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
Community Development Department Variance Length of Dock Roof 2 Cardinal Court.
January 8, 2007 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE , November 1, 2007 APPLICANT: Sunrise Landscape Supply, Inc. APPELLANT: Daniel Tuttle, (Adjacent.
November 11, 2008 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE , September 4, 2008 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Christian Haitian Church, Inc.
Zoning pt. III. Intensity Regulations Meant to dictate the intensity of use Different standards for different use districts –Minimum lot size –Minimum.
Dockets R-11-06;07;09 Zoning Regulation Amendments Proposed Amendments to the Cochise County Zoning Regulations regarding Lot Development Administrative.
Appeal to the Decision of the Environmental Protection Commission Mark Kassar November 11, 2008 Environmental Protection Division Environmental Protection.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 3, 2016 COND Conditional Use for West Volusia Racing, Inc. 1.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 22, 2010.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Community Development Department Special Exception Vehicle Rental and Leasing St. Joe Plaza.
Community Development Department Variance to 20 ft. Street Side Setback 1 Windsor Place APP. NO Variance to 20 ft. Street Side Setback 1 Windsor.
Community Development Department Rezone Application #1783 Parcel ID No RPOF-0031.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Applicant: Robert Ganem Addresses: 7304 & 7312 Black Oak Lane Planning Commission Meeting – August 21, 2015.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Starling of Palm Coast Assisted Living Facility Tier 2 - Technical Site Plan Review PLDRB Hearing on March 16, 2016.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
JUNE 18, 2013 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , MAY 2, 2013 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: JAIGOPAUL BISNAUTH.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
Planning and Land Development Regulation Board June 21, 2017
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Special Exception Elite Custom Tattooing Studio Application #3322
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
City Council Meeting February 26, 2018
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Special Exception to Reduce the Required Front Yard Setback for
Zoning Code Amendment - Emergency Shelters, Limited
Board of County Commissioners
WSUP The Club at ArrowCreek Grading
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
An Introduction to Land Use Approvals and Appeals
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
An Introduction to Land Use Approvals and Appeals
Presentation transcript:

Land Development Project Land Use Law Spring 2004 Mark Spykerman

 Land Development Project 1.The Proposal 2.The Current Zoning 3.The Zoning Process

1. The Proposal

New Urbanist Light Commercial  Storefronts right up against sidewalk.  On street parking only (will depend heavily on pedestrian traffic)  Possible Uses –Coffee shop –Specialty Retail

Location  Vacant gas station at southeast corner of Delmar at North & South.  Located in University City, ½ mile north of downtown Clayton

The neighbors  Commercial Uses directly South (dry cleaner)  Commercial Uses at all corners of the intersection.

The neighbors, con’t.  High Density Residential (Zoned HR) on North & South  Medium Density residential (MR) along Delmar

2. The Current Zoning

University City Zoning Map

Proposed Project’s Current Zoning: Limited Commercial

Limited Commercial  Section Intent and purpose. The "LC" limited commercial district is intended to accommodate limited retail and service businesses at locations within or adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Such retail and service establishments are intended to serve a relatively small and local market area, or are of such character and intensity which are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (Ord § 1 (Exh. A (part)), 1997)  Section Permitted Uses –Ordinance lists 20 specific uses allowed in LC districts, including retail specialty shops.  Section Conditional Uses –Ordinance lists 18 conditional uses including restaurants and outdoor seating.  Section Schedule of off-street parking space requirements. –Coffee Shop requires 1 spot for every 50 sq feet of customer floor space –Retail specialty requires 1 spot for every 200 sq feet of retail space

Density and Dimensional Regulations

3. The Zoning Process

Issues  Conditional Use permit for coffee shop –(Specialty retail is a permitted use)  Modification of set back requirement requires a conditional use permit  Variance for the off street parking requirement

Conditional Use permit  Conditional uses are those types of uses which tend to be problematic because they; (1) have a tendency to generate significant traffic volumes and/or turning movements, (2) have operational characteristics that may have a detrimental impact on adjacent or nearby properties, or (3) have other characteristics which may impact public health, safety, or welfare; but can be approved if such uses meet the criteria established herein. In order to ensure that detrimental impacts are avoided or mitigated to a satisfactory level, conditional uses must be reviewed, approved and issued a Conditional Use Permit.

Applying for a conditional use permit.  Required Application Materials: –Application –Memo describing property, proposed use, impact to adjacent properties –Site plan and Artist’s rendering  Required Procedures: –Public hearing with planning commission –Notice to general public (publication in newspaper) –Notice to residents within a 185 foot radius (by mail) –Staff report by Zoning Administrator

Approving a conditional use permit  The Planning Commission can recommend to the City Council to grant a conditional use permit if it finds the proposed use: –1. Complies with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Code; –2. At the specific location will contribute to and promote the community welfare or convenience; –3. Will not cause substantial injury to the value of neighboring property; –4. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood development plan (if applicable), and any other official planning and development policies of the City; and –5. Will provide off-street parking and loading areas in accordance with the standards contained in Article 7 of the Zoning Code.  The City Council can then approve, deny or modify the conditional use permit after considering the Planning Commission’s recommendations. The Council can also table the application and ask the Planning Commission for further study.

Why the City Council should approve the conditional use permit application to allow a coffee shop  While conformity with other zoning and off-street parking requirements will depend on approval of variances, the nature of the proposed project will benefit the welfare of the immediate area. It will provide convenient amenities to residents of neighboring dense residential developments and will not negatively affect property values. Moreover, the proposed project is consistent with the comprehensive plan and will aesthetically blend with the surrounding community.

Why the City Council should approve a conditional use permit to modify the set back requirement  The zoning ordinance requires a 15 foot set back, but the proposed project only has room for a 10 foot setback.  However, our 10 foot set back will be buffered with evergreen trees, reducing any impact to neighboring residential uses. The screening is otherwise in conformity with the screening requirements between residential and non-residential uses.

Variances  Variance is a "variation" from the requirements of the Zoning Code for a certain type of construction or use. Variances are granted by the Board of Adjustment (a panel of University City residents) and are discretionary types of relief granted to property owners when they cannot meet the minimum requirements of the Zoning Code. Variances are only granted in special situations (see Section VI. Standards for Granting Variances). They should be viewed only as a last resort option. Variances basically allow the recipient to be permitted to violate a city zoning ordinance while all other citizens must still be required to abide by it. That is why Variances should only be granted when conditions at the subject property are so unusual and atypical that they warrant such special treatment.

Applying for a variance  Required Application Materials: –Application –Memo describing proposed project and potential impact of granting the variance –Site Plan –Any additional information requested by the Zoning Administrator  Required Procedures: –Public hearing before the Board of Adjustment –Notice to general public (newspaper) –Notice to neighbors within a 185 foot radius (mail)

Standards for approving a variance  Section requires that the Board of Adjustment shall not grant a Variance unless it shall, in each case, make specific written findings of fact directly based upon the particular evidence presented to it that support the following conclusions: –1. The Variance requested arises from a condition which is unique to the property in question and which is not ordinarily found in the same zoning district, and is not created by an action or actions of the property owner or the applicant; –2. The strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Code from which a Variance is requested will constitute unnecessary hardship upon the property owner represented in the application; –3. The Variance requested will not adversely affect the adjacent properties or public health, safety, order, convenience, or general welfare of the community; and –4. Granting the Variance desired will not violate the general spirit and intent of the Zoning Code.  The burden of proof is on the applicant to show all of these criteria are satisfied.

Standards for approving a variance, con’t.  In determining whether the evidence presented supports the findings required on the previous slide (by Section ), the Board of Adjustment shall consider the extent to which the evidence demonstrates that: –1. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the property involved would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship upon or for the owner, lessee, or occupant, as distinguished from an inconvenience, if the provisions of the Zoning Code were literally enforced; –2. The request for a Variance is not based primarily upon the desire of the owner, lessee, occupant or applicant to secure a greater financial return from the property; –3. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; and –4. The proposed Variance will not impair an adequate supply of light or air to adjacent property, substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.

Off street parking variance  Zoning ordinance requires: –1 spot for every 50 sq feet of customer space in the coffee shop –1 spot for every 200 sq feet of retail floor space for retail specialty uses  Proposed project allows only limited employee off street parking

Why the Board of Adjustment should grant a variance  1. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would constitute hardship on the property owner because the lot is too small to develop in an economically viable way and still meet parking requirements.  2. The requested variance will not negatively affect adjacent properties and will actually be a community asset to the neighboring residents.  3. The current on street parking facilities (along Delmar and North & South) are adequate to provide for site-generated parking needs without substantially increasing congestion.

If all else fails…amend the zoning code.