Numerology (P. Baudrenghien) For each ring: Convention 1: The 400 MHz RF defines 35640 buckets, spaced by one RF period, and numbered from 1 to 35640 Convention.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

REPHASING TESTS DURING THE TWO BEAM IMPEDANCE MD P. Baudrenghien, J. Noirjean, T. Mastoridis 10/26/2012LSWG meeting 1 Oct 7 th,18:00 – Oct 8 th, 04:00.

Advertisements

Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.

Friday, h10: Stable beams at 1.38 TeV. 09h03: Beam dump.  One bunch dropped too much in intensity and gave BPMS interlock (dump protection). 10h36:

MD status. 50 ns double batch, preliminary results Intensity: extraction Transverse parameters at PS extraction, end of last week LHC50_DB Eh.

Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H. Braun Miniworkshop on Machine and Physics Aspects of CLIC based future Collider Option, Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H.

SPS Syncrotron Telescope Software specifications Aurélie Goldblatt BE-BI-PM

LHCOP / SPS Cycling for LHC1 SPS cycling for LHC injection J. Wenninger AB/OP Introduction to the timing system. Timing and settings constraints.

07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.

CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.

The CERN LHC central timing A vertical slice Pablo Alvarez Jean-Claude Bau Stephane Deghaye Ioan Kozsar Julian Lewis Javier Serrano.

BCT for protection LHC Machine Protection Review April 2005 David Belohrad, AB-BDI-PI

The CERN LHC central timing A vertical slice

0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,

FGC Upgrades in the SPS V. Kain, S. Cettour Cave, S. Page, J.C. Bau, OP/SPS April

1 LTC Timing AB/CO/HT Central timing hardware layout Telegrams and events Postmortem, XPOC LHC Central Timing API Fill the LHC Use Case Julian Lewis.

The CERN LHC central timing A vertical slice Pablo Alvarez Jean-Claude Bau Stephane Deghaye Ioan Kozsar Julian Lewis Javier Serrano.

Production of bunch doublets for scrubbing of the LHC J. Esteban Muller (simulations), E. Shaposhnikova 3 December 2013 LBOC Thanks to H. Bartosik, T.

LHC Progress Friday 30 th October 2015 Coordination Week 44: Massimo Giovannozzi, Wolfgang Hofle, Jorg Wenninger.

00:15: Stable beams fill 1883, 1.1E33 cm-2s-1.  Seems the 144 bunches beam 1 doe not fit properly on the injection kicker waveform. Systematically the.

RF observation from Saturday morning Observation of beam induced voltage/power following the two klystron trips: 03:18 3B1 just at end ramp, 1.26E14 p.

Nominal Workflow = Outline of my Talk Monitor Installation HWC Procedure Documentation Manufacturing & Test Folder Instantiation – NC Handling Getting.

1 LHC Timing Requirements and implementation J.Lewis for AB/CO/HT 21 st /Sep/06 TC presentation.

Some ideas for/from the SPS LIU-SPS team. Scrubbing (only) for ecloud in SPS? aC coating remains baseline..... –but scrubbing has many potential advantages.

Monday :00 Injection for physics fill # :00 Stable beams fill #1816, luminosity ~1.2x1033 cm-2s-1 11:08 Beams dumped. QPS trigger on detector.

LHC Injection Sequencing MD 16/23/2009 Injection sequencing / BCM R, Giachino, B. Goddard, (D. Jacquet), V. Kain, M. Meddahi, J. Wenninger.

Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.

SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.

CERN Timing Overview CERN timing overview and our future plans with White Rabbit Jean-Claude BAU – CERN – 22 March

LHC Injectors Upgrade Project 1/12/2010 R. Garoby.

Bunch Numbering P. Baudrenghien AB/RF for the LHC/RF team.

Filling Schemes for the 2010 Heavy Ion Run Updated (3 rd iteration) version of BCWG presentation initially on 28 September, updated after discussions with.

LIU Beam Parameter Working Group Meeting #1: Ion parameter table Outline: Where we are standing What we need to do (still in 2015)

Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.

LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.

LHC 8 & 9 May :10: Injection kicker B1 faulty on oil level –Check in UA and RA. Leaks fixed, to be further checked in TS1 10:30: Pre-cycle started.

Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.

Lumi scan limits checked (in preparation for next fill VdM scans).  Trims of up to 150 um per beam in IP1 & IP2 both planes both beams were done (IP5.

Injection issues overnight 10:50 Access  QPS & EPC  Vacuum leak SPS – magnet to be replaced Monday – cycling for FT and LHC only over the weekend 12:15.

F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.

Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.

HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.

1 Synchronization and Sequencing for high level applications Julian Lewis AB/CO/HT.

Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]

Beam dump at 03:00:

Monday Recover after trip of RB.A81  Cause of the trip not clear. MP3? 09:00-13:00 Re-inject and Injection verification. In parallel investigations on.

Alternative/complementary Possibilities

Plans for ions in the injector complex D

LHC injection W. Bartmann, M.J. Barnes, C. Bracco, F. Burkart, E. Carlier, B. Goddard, V. Kain, R. Steerenberg, L. Stoel, F. Velotti, C. Wiesner, C. Xu.

Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik

PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities

RF and Sequences Andy Butterworth BE/RF

Pros and cons interleaving the filling of the LHC

Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.

Yesterday Issue of injection kicker not pulsing:

LHCCWG Meeting R. Alemany, M. Lamont, S. Page

Lost at 12:05 to power converter (RTQX2.R1) problem

2017 CAS Erice case study: Design of a beam dumping system for FCC

Week 36 plan Todo’s: And also: 12+b injection.

Yesterday’s morning’s controls issues

Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:

Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC

Saturday Nov Stop proton operation. Switch back to ions

I-LHC NOMINAL ions beam in 2007

Friday 14th September 03:15 Beta* at 1 km. Optics measurements, see yesterday. 07:00 Dump. 08:00 Refill with 3 nominal bunches for high beta. 11:15 Beams.

Saturday 12 March Morning: problem on RSD1.A12B2 – flow rate problem on the cooling water for the converter. 14:00: Loss map -500 Hz (positive energy offset)

Friday 28 October 2011.

Tuesday 6th April 8:00 Injection studies 16:00 RF studies

Wed 12/10 09:30 – 10:30 Ramp down of ALICE solenoid to 50% nominal field on request of ALICE. Increase of the vacuum (e-cloud in this area that has not.

Technical challenges for forming the double intensity section of JLEIC ion beam Jiquan Guo.

Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme

Presentation transcript:

Numerology (P. Baudrenghien) For each ring: Convention 1: The 400 MHz RF defines buckets, spaced by one RF period, and numbered from 1 to Convention 2: Bucket 1 is the first bucket after the 3  s long abort gap (defined from bucket to 35640) For 25 ns operation the bunches will occupy buckets 1, 11, 21 etc. with gaps occurring every PS or SPS kicker gap. For 43 bunch operation the bunches will occupy buckets 1, 811, 1621, etc. (see LHC-OP-ES-0003 rev 1.0 for the different schemes).

LHC filling schemes Why t 3 and t 4 ? When should we use one or the other?

Injection Request Request name Next injection ring Next injection beam type Next injection bunch Int Next injection particle type Is active Injection Bunch configuration Configuration name First Bucket number Bunch pattern Pattern name Description Number of PS batches Number of bunches per PS batch Total number of bunches Bunch spacing n 1 n 1 Bunch pattern Injection Bunch config Injection scheme composed of injection requests Injection Scheme Scheme Name n n Injection Scheme Entry Injection Order Next Injection Delay

Next injection To inject a beam into LHC : –Next injection Ring –Next injection RF bucket (the first bucket filled by the injection) –Number of PS batches –Next Injection Beam Type : divided into 4 groups in the telegram NIBNCH : number of bunches NIBSP : bunch spacing (ns) NIBIN : bunch intensity (*10E9) NIPTY : particle type (0=protons, 1=ions)  Should we add this field into the injection request sent to the CBCM?  These telegrams groups will be set together with ring bucket and number of batches by the CBCM (No need to set it from the application)  These groups won’t be editable (i.e. sequencer can’t change it) OP has to check that the beam in the injector corresponds to what is requested

Replaced by NIBNCH NIBSP NIBIN NIPTY

Next Injection Do we have to publish extra information? –I.e. the injection sequencer set a RF FESA class with the next filled buckets Active injection request –The injection that is being executed (from the request to the CBCM to the injection quality check validation) –Accessible through LSA client API Is it needed to know before we start injecting what is the expected bunch configuration after the injection process?

Circulating bunch config Information about circulating bunch configuration exists : –In a table in LSA DB An array of filled buckets is published from this table. (ACCCON_SYS.ANYDATA_QUEUE/LHC_CIRC_BUNCH_CONF_B1) Extra information needed to be published : –The SPS batch number for each bunch –The bunch intensity CirculatingBunchConfiguration -beam number -bunch number -bucket number to 2808 (number of bunches for 25ns nominal scheme) 1 to : total number of buckets –In the telegram groups As for injection beam type, the circulating beam type groups (BTC1 and BTC2) will be replaced by 4 groups per beam –C1BNCH : number of bunches –C1BSP : bunch spacing (ns) –C1BIN : bunch intensity (*10E9) –C1PTY : particle type (0=protons, 1=ions)

Replaced by C1BNCH C1BSP C1BIN C1PTY Replaced by C2BNCH C2BSP C2BIN C2PTY

Circulating bunch configuration Telegram and database have to be updated after each injection and after a beam dump –Who, how? –Should it be updated as well if a part of the beam is lost?  Depends if it represents –What we have in the LHC –Or what we aim to have in the LHC