INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Intellectual Property in the New Electronic Economy Scott Johnson McKee, Voorhees, & Sease, P.L.C.
Advertisements

MELISSA ASFAHANI Patent Attorney El Paso, TX
June 8, 2006 PATENTS: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW Steven R. Ludwig, Ph.D., Esq.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OFFICE OF PATENT COUNSEL March 16, 2001.
TechRoadmap Incorporated Patenting it yourself Saving money or wasting it? Bruce A. Horwitz.
Intellectual Property (Patents) Overview P Intellectual Property (Patents) Overview Presented by Jim Parker S aliwanchik L loyd & E isenschenk 3107 S.W.
MSE-415: B. Hawrylo Chapter 14 - Patents There are 4 types of intellectual property that are relevant to product design and development
© 2010 Woodcock Washburn LLP Patents and Technology Protection “Everything You Wanted to Know About IP – But Were Afraid to Ask” University of Hawai’i.
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
Copyright P.B.Bottino All rights reserved Paul Bottino, Executive Director (617) Mini-MBA in Entrepreneurship.
D ANIELS B AKER Introduction to Patent Law Doug Yerkeson University of Cincinnati Senior Design Class April 6, 2005.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 3, 2008 Patent - Nonobviousness.
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
Intellectual Property Patent Primer Michael Pratt Executive Director, Business Development November 1, 2011.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 16, 2009 Patent – Novelty.
CONFIDENTIAL PATENTS What You Need To Know Robert Benson Office of Technology Development Harvard University Brandeis University – October 20, 2005.
® ® From Invention to Start-Up Seminar Series University of Washington The Legal Side of Things Invention Protection Gary S. Kindness Christensen O’Connor.
Lauren MacLanahan Office of Technology Licensing GTRC.
March 30, 2012 “Patenting 101” Workshop Sponsored by Commercial Ventures & Intellectual Property (CVIP) and Research Development (RD) University of Massachusetts.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
Cochran Law Offices, LLC Patent Procedures Presented by William W. Cochran.
© 2010 Hodgson Russ LLP IEEE Southern Area Entrepreneur’s Day Overview Of The Patent Process R. Kent Roberts Hodgson Russ LLP (716)
Wireless Mobile Devices Patents Dr. Tal Lavian UC Berkeley Engineering, CET Week 3.
Intellectual Property
Information Disclosure Statements
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
An invention is a unique or novel device, method, composition or process. It may be an improvement upon a machine or product, or a new process for creating.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
International IP Issues Federal Lab Consortium Meeting International IP Issues Dr Roisin McNally - European Patent Attorney 20 September 2006.
The Patent Process. Protection of Ideas or Inventions An idea/know how Generally speaking, we would like to protect inventions that have significant commercial.
Intellectual Property What is intellectual property? What is intellectual property? US IP protection- US IP protection- Patent application process Patent.
Intellectual Property Leza Besemann, Technology Strategy Manager November 25, 2014 ME 4054W.
Patent Basics April 9, 2003 Fernandez & Associates LLP Stanford BioDesign Invention Challenge IP Lecture.
Institute of Technology, Entrepreneurship and InnovationBemidji State University Institute of Technology, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Intellectual.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
2/2/09 - L14 PatentsCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU1 Patents.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Introduction to Patents by Patrick Ragains. A Patent is: §a property right granted by the U.S. Government to an inventor “to exclude others from making,
Josiah Hernandez Patentability Requirements. Useful Having utilitarian or commercial value Novel No one else has done it before If someone has done it.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
Side 1 Andrew Chin AndrewChin.com A Quick Survey of the America Invents Act Patent Law October 12, 2011.
11/18/2015Powell Patent Law Associates, LLC1 PATENT BASICS Marvin J Powell, Esquire
Data Governance Patents, Security and Privacy Duke University, November 9, 2015 Ryan Vinelli.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 16, 2009 Class 2 Introduction to Patents.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property
Patents and the Patenting Process Patents and the Inventor’s role in the Patenting Process.
Patent Process and Patent Search 6a Foundations of Technology Standard 3: Students will develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
Nuts and Bolts of Patent Law presented by: Shamita Etienne-Cummings April 5, 2016.
© 2012 Copyright Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC William C. Rowland Fang Liu Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney Introduction to Intellectual Property.
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
An introduction to Intellectual property protection TG © Copyright by Stevens Institute of Technology.
Technology Transfer Office
Professional Engineering Practice
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Patents and Trade Secrets
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Nuts and Bolts of Patent Law
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property Presented by Dawn C. Russell Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC | New York, NY | Los Angeles

Types of patents and applications Criteria for patentability Topics to be covered What is a patent? Why obtain a patent? Types of patents and applications Criteria for patentability Pitfalls: U.S. vs. the rest of the world 2

What is a Patent? A patent is an agreement between the granting government and an inventor wherein, in exchange for the inventor fully disclosing his invention to the public, the government grants the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the patented invention for the term of the patent. Patents are only enforceable within the borders of the granting countries. The patent system promotes the progress of the sciences and the useful arts, as set forth in the U.S. Constitution.

Why Do Companies Obtain Patents? Offensive use of patents: Preventing others from making, using, and selling your product, thereby providing the patent holder with a type of “legal monopoly.” Defensive use of patents: Companies with large patent portfolios do not always actively assert their patent rights. If accused of infringing a competitor's patent, the accused infringer could then assert patent rights in a “defensive counterattack,” in an effort to force a settlement or cross-license. Revenue Generation: Patents can be licensed to generate significant amounts of income for the patent owner, even if the patent owner never builds or sells the patented invention.

Types of U.S. Patents Utility Patents (for “any new and useful” invention): Term is 20 years from filing date. Design Patents (for “any new, original and ornamental design”): Term is 14 years from date of issuance. Plant Patents (for “any distinct and new variety of plant”): Term is same as Utility Patent.

Types of Patent Applications Non-provisional: Examined by a patent office examiner. More formal requirements: requires at least one claim. Provisional: Not examined by a patent office examiner (good for 1 year). Less formal: does not require claims or other formalities. Can be anything from a scientific paper to a hand- written disclosure. PCT: International filing and “preliminary prosecution” with international examiner.

Criteria for Patentability The process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter must be: USEFUL (as required by 35 USC § 101) NOVEL (as required by 35 USC § 102) NON-OBVIOUS (as required by 35 USC § 103)

Criteria for Patentability: Utility Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent problems in biotechnology and software inventions

Criteria for Patentability: Novelty The invention must be newly invented by the inventors. Any public use, offer for sale, publication or commercialization of the product, by anyone including the inventors, more than one year prior to the filing of a U.S. patent application, may bar patentability. Prior invention by another party will bar patentability. Invention can be proven with engineering/laboratory notebooks.

Criteria for Patentability: Non-Obviousness U.S. PTO looks at the differences between the “invention” and the prior art and determines: Would the subject matter, as a whole, have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains

Criteria for Patentability: Three Additional Requirements Written Description: invention must be “described” in the specification. problems in biotechnology inventions Enablement: a person of ordinary skill in the art must be able to make and use the invention given what is provided in the specification. Best Mode: cannot keep the best way of practicing the invention a secret.

Pitfall #1: Novelty “Grace Period” (USA) vs. “Absolute Novelty” USA: 1 year “grace period” for novelty: gives an inventor 1 year from first disclosure to file a patent application. Most of the World: “absolute novelty” needed – first disclosure must be patent application. Solution: keep options open by filing in U.S. before any public disclosure.

Pitfall #2: “First to Invent” (USA) v. “First to File” USA: In a dispute over who invented the invention first, the inventor who can prove a first date of invention (e.g., using lab notebooks) wins. Most of the World: In a dispute over who invented the invention first, the inventor who filed his application first wins. Solution: File early and maintain records.

Pitfall #2 (cont): Proving “Invention” (USA) U.S. patent system awards patents to the first to “invent”; most other countries award patents to the first to file patent applications. (Conception) + (Reduction to Practice) + (Diligence) = INVENTION Careful documentation in engineering/laboratory notebooks can prove all of these elements.

Pitfall #3: Duty of Disclosure (USA) USA: Inventors and each other individual associated with the filing and prosecution of the patent application has a duty to disclose “all information known to that individual to be material to [the] patentability” of the invention. This includes: Prior art cited in search reports of a foreign patent office in a counterpart application. The closest information over which the individual believes the invention defines. All information that refutes an argument made to the USPTO in favor of patentability (e.g., negative test results). Most of the World: No such duty exists. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE DUTY OF DISCLOSURE CAN RESULT IN THE INVALIDATION OF THE PATENT.

Obtain patents to exclude others from practicing your inventions. Summary Obtain patents to exclude others from practicing your inventions. File (at least) a provisional before any public disclosure to maintain option for foreign rights. Carefully document work done by employees and consultants. Understand and comply with the “duty of disclosure” obligations.

Contact Information: Dawn C. Russell PH: 202.775.5771 russell.dawn@arentfox.com Arent Fox LLP 1050 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20036