Virtual Patent Marking Joel Lutzker General Counsel March 27, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recommended Pre-Suit Case Analysis Likelihood of infringement Likelihood of validity Size of potential recovery Likelihood of injunction and its importance.
Advertisements

What’s Yours In Mine: Intellectual Property and Copyright For the Magazine Media Publisher Jim Sawtelle Partner and Co-leader, Media, Publishing and Marketing.
© 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Nov. 22, 2005 Jack Ko 1 Awarding Lost Profits for “Unpatented” Products: Rite-Hite and Other Cases By Jack Ko.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
CBA IP LITIGATION COMMITTEE MEETING FEBRUARY 23, 2010 “Patent Marking: How the General and IP Lawyer Can Advise Clients” Brett A. Schatz, Wood, Herron.
Indirect and Foreign Infringement Prof Merges Patent Law –
Indirect Infringement II Prof Merges Patent Law –
Damages I Patent Law
Indirect and Foreign Infringement Prof Merges Patent Law –
Patent Infringement II Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 31, 2007 Copyright – Indirect Liability.
Chapter 5 Intellectual Property & Internet Law
INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Professor Fischer Class 1: Introduction August 20, 2009.
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
1 Exemption Administration Training Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January, 2011.
1 Copyright & Other Legal Issues. 2 WHAT IS COPYRIGHT? Copyright is the form of protection provided by the laws of the United States to authors of “original.
Infrastructure II commercial relationships Chris Reed Professor of Electronic Commerce Law Centre for Commercial Law Studies 1.
Patent Prosecution Luncheon March White House Patent Reform: Executive Actions Draft rule to ensure patent owners accurately record and regularly.
Peter L. Michaelson, Esq. Michaelson and Associates Red Bank, New Jersey US © , P.L. Michaelson All rights reserved M&A -- Case.
Page 1 Patent Damages Brandon Baum James Pistorino March 26, 2015.
Conditions and Terms of Use
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
Bradley Lecture International IP Law IM 350 – Fall 2012 Steven L. Baron November 15, 2012.
PUBLISHING ONLINE Chapter 2. Overview Blogs and wikis are two Web 2.0 tools that allow users to publish content online Blogs function as online journals.
U.S. Copyright Enforcement Benjamin Hardman Attorney / Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy & Enforcement, USPTO.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 29, 2004.
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
Best Practices in Licensing Diane M. Reed Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear Rouz Tabaddor Vice President, Chief IP Counsel Corelogic Information Solutions,
Establishing a Robust Due Diligence Process: Tips for Finding the Warts before Finalizing the Deal Patents and Other Intellectual Property Issues: Coverage.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 5 Intellectual Property.
Chapter 12 Intellectual Property McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Fundamentals of Business Law Summarized Cases, 8 th Ed., and Excerpted Cases, 2 nd Ed. ROGER LeROY MILLER Institute for University Studies Arlington, Texas.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Intellectual Property.
Indirect Infringement Defenses & Counterclaims Class Notes: March 20, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.
IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING DISCUSSION OF IFTA FULL TRACK BALLOTS AND
Chapter Eight Formation of Corporations. Things to consider when forming a corporation include:  Preincorporation activities by promoters  Selection.
Virtual Business Virtual Communication Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Patent Remedies Class Notes: April 1, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Exhaustion after Quanta Patent Law – Prof. Merges
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association THE STATUS OF INDUCEMENT Japan Intellectual Property Association Tokyo Joseph A. Calvaruso.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Slide Set Eleven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights 1.
AIPLA 2016 U.S. Patent Law: Application to Activities Performed Outside the United States January 2016 Presented by: John Livingstone.
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ©2010. All rights reserved. Ensuring Compliance with Patent Marking Requirements While Avoiding Civil.
© 2015 Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP. All Rights Reserved. Ready to Patent? Value and Risk Considerations Nicolo Davidson.
Cyber Law Title: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC COPYING Group Members Amirul Bin Jamil Engku Nadzry Bin Engku Rahmat Mohd Danial Shah Bin Shahzali.
SMEs and private enforcement of competition law Rachel Burgess Ph:
Chapter 12: Customers & Sales
Infrastructure II commercial relationships
America Invents Act: Litigation Related Provisions
Loss of Right Provisions
Computer Law th class: Open Source.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CYBER PIRACY
Cooper & Dunham LLP Established 1887
US Antitrust Limitations on Patent Licensing
SMITH-LEAHY AMERICA INVENTS ACT
Trade Secrets 2018: International
WesternGeco v. ION: Extraterritoriality and Patents
Patent Damages Pupilage Groups 3 & 4
3D Printing and Patents Professor David C Musker
Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights
Pitfalls and privilege in a post-halo World
Dr. Achim Seiler, EU-Project” Support of Yemen’s Accession to the WTO”
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
Presentation by Seung Woo Ben Hur September 2019
Presentation transcript:

Virtual Patent Marking Joel Lutzker General Counsel March 27, 2013

Topics Why Mark? Who Must Mark? What to Mark? When to Mark? How to Mark? Virtual Marking Primer Questions 2

Why Mark? 35 U.S.C. §287(a): “In the event of failure so to mark, no damages shall be recovered by the patentee in any action for infringement, except on proof that the infringer was notified of the infringement and continued to infringe thereafter, in which event damages may be recovered only for infringement occurring after such notice. “ Failure to mark deprives patent owner of ability to collect damages for pre-notice infringement. 3

Who Must Mark? 35 U.S.C. 287(a): “Patentees, and persons making, offering for sale, or selling within the United States any patented article for or under them, or importing any patented article into the United States ….” Patentees and licensees (including under covenants-not-to sue) must mark Failure to include marking obligation in license agreements is a common problem 4

What to Mark? 35 U.S.C. 287(a): “any patented article … or when, from the character of the article, this can not be done, by fixing to it, or to the package wherein one or more of them is contained, a label containing a like notice.” Preferably affixed to the patented product Alternatively to a label or package 5

What to Mark? Courts have generally taken a flexible approach in determining whether marking on packaging or a label is permissible alternative to marking on product Factors considered include: Size of product Cost of marking Industry custom Aesthetics Whether there are other markings on the product 6

What to Mark? Marking must be applied to complete patented product Also must be applied to components having no substantial use except for assembly into complete patented product See, Amsted Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 23 F.3d 374 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (failure to mark center plate component suitable only for use in complete patented railroad car frame resulted in denial of pre- notice damages) 7

When to Mark? Marking must commence on products sold after patent issuance Marking must be substantially continuous No marking required for pure process patents Marking is required for patents containing both product and process claims (failure to mark product will result in denial of pre-notice damages even for process claims) See, American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Medical Engineering Corp., 6 F.3d 1523 (Fed. Cir. 1993) 8

How to Mark Conventional marking 35 U.S.C. §287(a): “by fixing thereon the word “patent” or the abbreviation “pat.”, together with the number of the patent” 9

How to Mark Conventional marking has significant shortcomings Difficulty in listing large number of patents Difficulty in updating (newly issued or expired patents) Expense (tooling, labeling) Inventory control Aesthetics 10

How to Mark America Invents Act amended to Section 287(a) to authorize virtual marking: “or by fixing thereon the word “patent” or the abbreviation “pat.” together with an address of a posting on the Internet, accessible to the public without charge for accessing the address, that associates the patented article with the number of the patent” 11

Virtual Marking Website Examples 12

Virtual Marking Primer Website may be internally developed and maintained or maintained through an outside vendor, e.g

Virtual Marking Primer In-house or outside factors to consider Size of portfolio Velocity of portfolio Availability of internal resources Ability of IT system to track availability and versions Ease of proof Budget 14

Virtual Marking Primer Website features Unique landing page for patent marking data, e.g. or May be unique landing page for each product, but most companies have adopted a single landing page with a list of products and patents Landing page may link to pdf files for each product (may be subject to attack) 15

Virtual Marking Primer Elements of proof Availability of site Maintenance of data What patents listed When listings changed Security of site Records of access (not required but may help in proving willfulness) 16

Virtual Marking Primer Marking on product, label or packaging must comply with the statute, i.e., “patent” or “pat.” followed by url url alone will not suffice. See, A to Z Machining Services, LLC v. National Storm Shelter, LLC, 2011 WL (W.D. Ok. 2011) 17

Virtual Marking Primer International issues Virtual marking may not comply with marking provisions of foreign jurisdictions and may give rise to innocent infringement defense and denial of damages, e.g.: Australia United Kingdom Ireland Others? 18

Virtual Patent Marking QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? Joel Lutzker Ocean Tomo, LLC