BY: CHASTITY REYNOLDS ATKINS V. VIRGINIA (2002) 536 U.S. 304.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court First Amendment Case Freedom of Speech
Advertisements

The Judicial Branch of Government under Article III of Constitution
Gregg vs. Georgia Ethan Reinheimer 10/28/13 Block 2.
By: Nicholas DeJarnette
Gregg v. Georgia Tiffany Browne Karisa Myers 2 nd Hour.
NC Court System.
Capital Punishment Atkins v. Virginia Roper v. Simmons Elizabeth Howell 3/6/06.
Daryl Atkins. In a landmark 6–3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court barred the execution of mentally retarded people, ruling that it constituted "cruel and.
By Bianca Kue Atkins v. Virginia. Background June 20 th 2002 Daryl Renard Atkins  Convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder  Forensic.
Ford V. Wainwright (1986) By:Harschel Reyes & Michelle Singh.
Daryl Atkin. The pieces of the appellant Daryl Renard Atkins found guilty of kidnapping, armed robbery and murder and was sentenced to death in Virginia.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Mr. Noel Ciyanna Clark December 4, 2014 ATKINS V. VIRGINIA.
Judicial Process Do you Remember What is the highest court in the Land? What is the highest court in the Land? Who appoints the justices to the Supreme.
The Death Penalty Will Turanski Alli Morrison. Background Offenses and Crimes that can be punished by death are called capital offenses. Offenses and.
THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. 37 Separate Death Penalty Systems in the United States Each of 35 states has a death penalty system The federal.
DARYL RENARD ATKINS.  York County, Virginia  Scheduled Execution Date: Atkins was found mentally competent by a Virginia jury on Friday 5 August, 2005.
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
The Court System Chapter 5.
The Argument Against Capital Punishment
Daryl Atkins Atkins v. Virginia Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing.
Daryl Renard Atkins York County, Virginia Scheduled Execution Date: Atkins was found mentally competent by a Virginia jury on Friday 5 August, A.
Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,
Courts and Courtroom Work Groups What are the different levels of courts? Roles of Judges, Prosecutors, and Defense attorneys.
Atkins v. Virginia (2002) Chandler Vaughan. Case Outline Supreme Court Title: Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Plaintiff: The Commonwealth of Virginia.
Around midnight on August 16, 1996, following a day spent together drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana, 18 year old Daryl Atkins and his accomplice,
Bill of Rights By: Breeanna Back, Ashley Ingram, and Crystal Jorgensen.
Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Introduction to the American Legal System By Enika.
Jeopardy Guest Speakers The Supreme Court Apply It! The Judicial System Criminal vs. Civil Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400.
The Judicial Branch of the Federal Government
Harmelin v. Michigan 1991 By Jessica Moorefield. What Happened? May 12, 1986  Two undercover policemen witnessed Ronald Allen Harmelin doing a U-turn.
The Constitution explicitly permits capital punishment – if you may not be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law,” then you.
Disabled People and the Justice System: Another Institution Disability and Society Spring 2007.
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing the mentally retarded violates.
Mental Retardation (Intellectual Disability) By: Cindy Infante Psychology (HONORS)
The Judicial Branch American Government Notes. Dual Court System The U.S. has a dual court system, which means that we have federal and state courts that.
Judicial Branch Review.   When someone is accused of a crime, the type of case is.
Chapter 8 NOTES The Federal Court System In The United States.
Around midnight on August 16, 1996, following a day spent together drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana, 18 year old Daryl Atkins and his accomplice,
{ Capitol Square Review v. Pinette Riley Poling PLS 211 Mr. John Noel December 8, 2015.
Atkins v. Virginia Peter Diddy Period 6 Constitutional Law.
Capital Cases: Roles of Forensic Psychology. Roles of forensic psychologist in a capital case Capital cases –Capital means “head” in Latin Punishment.
Rights of Accused Persons April 22, 2013 Objective: To Understand the rights you have as an accused person in the United States.
Group 3 History Mentally disabled living in a home where physical and sexual abuse were regularly subjected Arrested 1989 at the age of thirteen Charged.
Eliseo Lugo III.  Prohibits cruel & unusual punishment.  Text of the Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor.
Darly Atkins (1990). The case involved Daryl Renard Atkins, who was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for abducting, robbing, and killing.
Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Warm Up Paul was caught speeding on Rea Rd last month. He has to go to court next week for his traffic ticket. What type of law did he violate? Sarah.
Robert Crump and Diego Caballero
The Federal Court System In The United States
Cruel and Unusual Punishment The Eighth Amendment
Capital Punishment.
By: Lindsey Haney and Jessica Cunningham
Atkins v. Virginia 班級:四英一B 姓名:王心怡 學號:4000Z027.
Judicial Branch The Supreme Court.
Judicial branch.
8th and 9th Amendment Cases
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Chapter Twenty The Death Penalty
The Court System Appeals.
Judicial Branch Not Guilty!!!.
Judicial Branch Not Guilty!!!.
8th Amendment: Cruel and unusual punishments
Chapter 18 Judiciary.
Capital Punishment.
The Judicial Branch.
SAGE Lecture Spark March 5, 2019.
Ap u.s. government & politics
Gregg vs Georgia.
8th and 9th Amendments: Civil cases
Presentation transcript:

BY: CHASTITY REYNOLDS ATKINS V. VIRGINIA (2002) 536 U.S. 304

DARYL ATKINS (PETITIONER)

BACKGROUND Daryl Atkins & William Jones Marijuana & Alcoholic Beverages Intoxicated while at store Kidnapped and robbed a “21-year-old, man Eric Nesbitt” Nesbitt was shot eight times in the “thorax, abdomen, arms, and legs”

BACKGROUND Surveillance cameras placed Atkins and Jones at the scene of the crime Both arrested Jones took a plea bargain for stating Atkins was the actual murderer

TRIAL February 1998, Atkins was convicted of “capital murder and robbery” in York County, Virginia Verdict was the death penalty Acquitted due to failure of instructions of the jury

RETRIAL Atkins stated that he is mentally retarded Second jury affirmed verdict

VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT (ATKINS ARGUMENTS) Atkins had an “IQ of 59” Death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment Mind of an average nine year old IQ test revealed he suffered from a “mild” case of mental retardation In the “bottom 2%” of the adult people

VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT (COURT ARGUMENTS) Penry V. Lynaugh (1989) 492 U.S.302 Only to avoid death penalty American Psychiatric Association Upheld decision of lower court

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Does the Eighth Amendment prohibit the execution of mentally retarded prisoners convicted of capital crimes?  September 25, 2001 granted certiorari Gravity of the concerns expressed by the dissenters Due to the shift in the “past 13 years” on the view of the execution of mentally retarded individuals.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Final vote: 6 to 3 Ruled in favor of the petitioner Atkins Reversed the judgment of the lower courts

JUSTICES (MAJORITY) Justice Stevens: executing mentally retarded criminals is equivalent to cruel and unusual punishment which is “prohibited” by the eighth amendment standards of decency has consequently changed

JUSTICES (DISSENTERS) Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice Thomas and Justice Scalia majority relied on “foreign laws, views of professional and religious organizations, and opinion polls” violated the eighth amendment, leads to increase in inmates alleging that they also have mental retardation Chief Justice Rehnquist

WORKS CITED Turner, Alison, and Diana Hess. "Street Law, Inc." Supreme Court Case Studies: By Topic. Street Law, Inc., Web. 11 Nov Scott, MD, Charles L., and Joan Gerbasi, JD, MD B. Gerbasi, JD, MD. "Atkins v. Virginia: Execution of Mentally."The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 31.1 (2003): Web. 19 Nov Web. 19 Nov Amazon. Daryl Atkins. Digital image. Amazon. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Nov Bourg, Chris. Chief Justice Rehnquist. Digital image. Stanford, 22 Oct Web. 25 Nov Farlex. Justice Stevens. Digital image. Stevens, John Paul. Farlex, Web. 25 Nov