Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Clinical Guidance and Monitoring for Change Cecilia Fenerty MD FRCOphth.

Advertisements

Providing the full range of Local Enhanced Services: The case of Manchester Karen O’Brien Associate Director Primary Care Commissioning.

Corneal biomechanical properties and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) Dimitrios P. Bessinis 1, Pandelis.

A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology,

Recent Advances in IOP measurements

Comparison between Dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and Ehlers-corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes after Laser In.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

Corneal Biomechanics, Pachymetric Progression Profile and Corneal Volume: Indices for Detecting Ectasia and Screening Refractive Candidates Renato Ambrósio.

E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Comparative Study of Corneal Biomechanical Properties.

The Canadian Association of Optometrists

Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes

University of Verona Eye Clinic Department of Neurological and Motor Science Head: Prof. Giorgio Marchini Prevalence of Corneal Ectasia in Patients With.

OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA Frank J. Weinstock, MD, FACS Professor of Ophthalmology- NEOUCOM Canton, Ohio USA.

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. David Zadok, MD, Yakov Goldich, MD, Yaniv Barkana,

A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.

Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.

TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.

Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanics and Wavefront Aberrations Alejandro Rivera, MD Private Practice Mexico City The author has no financial interest.

TARIQ ALASBALI WHICH PATIENTS ARE AT RISK FOR THE PROGRESSION?

Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.

Relationship between Pachymetry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements Alejandro Rivera MD.

Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.

Cataract Surgery After Trabeculectomy: The Effect on Trabeculectomy Function Husain R, Liang S, Foster PJ. Cataract surgery after trabeculectomy: the effect.

Photorefractive Keratectomy in Posterior Polymorphous Dystrophy [CONTROL ID: ] Edward W. Trudo 1, Kraig S. Bower 2, Charles D. Coe 2, Denise A. Sediq.

Effect of Corneal Thickness on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty to Decrease Intraocular Pressure as Primary or Secondary Treatment of Glaucoma ASCRS 2010.

Combined Phacoemulsification and Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery Leonidas Traipe, M.D. Felipe Valenzuela, M.D. Carlos Nieme, M.D Juan Stoppel,

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana,

“Corneal CXL for the Treatment of Non- Responding Infectious Keratitis ” Cristian A. Cartes, MD ; Miguel Srur, MD; Leonidas Traipe, MD Fundación Oftalmológica.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Miguel A. López M.D., María A. González Reiley M.D. The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Combined cataract surgery and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in patients with glaucoma without prior incisional glaucoma surgery Matthew P. Traynor,

Naomi R. Goldberg, MD PhD Kenneth J. Wolf, MD Eric J. Wolf, MD FACS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Comparison.

A Prospective Trial Comparing Pneumotonometry of Cornea and Sclera Usiwoma Abugo BS 1, Sara Duke MD 2, Shuchi Patel, MD 2 1 Loyola University Chicago,

Dr. Abdullah Al-Amri Ophthalmology Consultant

E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group The study of the correlations of the optic disc size with Cornal Geometry and Biomechanical.

E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group e-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group Clinical.

Glaucoma Care Project Team Members: Geoffrey T. Emerick, M.D. Erin Herlihy, B.S. Marilyn Hauser, M.B.A. Dianna Greening, R.N. Walter M. Jay, M.D Opportunity.

Zonular Weakness in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Yong Yeon Kim 1, Keny Kirti 2, Bokun Rho 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University.

بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم. Limbal relaxing incisions versus penetrating limbal relaxing incisions for the management of astigmatism in cataract surgery Sara.

Ahmed El-Massry, M.D. Professor of Ophthalmology - Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria Egypt long-Term Results of Corneal Biomechanical Changes.

Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Analysis in the Ectatic Corneas: Correlation of the New Corneal Biomechanics Parameters and Severity of Keratoconus Kristin.

Authors: Leonidas Traipe Magdalena Rios Edison Villagra Allister Gibbons Marcelo Hidalgo Claudia Goya Authors have no financial interest.

Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.

Corneal Hysteresis Role of Corneal Biomechanics in Refractive Surgery Luis Rodriguez, MD Anny Villegas, MD Clínica de Córnea Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad.

Clinical Effectiveness Of Contrast Sensitivity Function In Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) And Ocular Hypertension (OHT ) MOUSUMI SAIKIA.

Mathematical Description of the Ocular Response Analyzer Applanation Signal in Post-LASIK Ectasia Mujtaba A. Qazi, M.D. 1,2 David A. Luce, Ph.D. 3 Jay.

PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA PROF.DR.ÖZCAN OCAKOĞLU.

BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE CORNEA IN PSEUDO-EXFOLIATION SYNDROME Aylin Kılıç Ertan, MD Özgür Bilen, MD Kudret Eye Hospital, Ankara, Turkey There is.

Corneal Biomechanical Changes Following Surface Keratorefractive Surgery Teeravee Hongyok, MD, Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, Ajoy Virdi, MBBS, Elisabeth.

D.r Nishant Nawani, MS Dr. Surinder Singh Pandav, MD Dr. Amit Gupta, MD Dr. Sushmita Kaushik, MD Advanced Eye Centre PGIMER, Chandigarh The authors have.

Instituto para Preservación de la Visión

and Microperimetry visual field parameters for Glaucomatous Loss

Pseudoexfoliation syndrom and cataract: results and complication frequency in immature and mature cataract surgery Marijana Bilen Babić Department of.

CRF variations ( initial CRF – final CRF )

Ophthalmology – Raised IOP Referrals (Adults only)

Characteristics of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure at the First Visit Won Hyuk Oh1, Bum Gi Kim1, Joo Hwa Lee2.

Safety of medication reduction for Primary Angle Closure (PAC) –

Early Intraocular Pressure Rise After Phacoemulsification In Non-Glaucomatous And Eyes With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Milos Todorovic 1, Suncica Sreckovic.

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Pathogenesis of Glaucoma Translaminar-pressure difference

Influence of UVA-Riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking on biomechanical properties of keratoconic eyes David Zadok MD, Yakov Goldich MD, Yaniv Barkana.

Keratometric Changes in Noninflammatory Corneal Ectasic Diseases After Intraocular Pressure Reduction Authors has no financial interest. Renata T Kashiwabuchi,

Associate Professor of Ophthalmology

Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

Yakov Goldich MD,Yaniv Barkana MD, Isaac Avni MD, David Zadok MD,

Corneal Biomechanics after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Samer Hamada MRCOphth FRCS(Ed)1,3 Louai.

Hyuck Jin Choi, Joo Youn Oh, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim,

Jun Her MD. PhD, Sung-wook Kim MD, Jae-hwan Ahn MD

The Effect of Corneal Thickness on Ocular Drug Penetration

Presentation transcript:

Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons Universidad de Chile. Fundación Oftalmológica los Andes. The authors have no financial interest

Purpose/Objectives To evaluate corneal Hysteresis (CH), Corneal resistance factor (CRF), Corneal Compensated IOP (ccIOP) and Goldman type IOP (gIOP), in patients with the diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma.

Materials/Methods We analyzed 49 eyes of 26 patients seen in our center. 22 (84.6%) of patients were female. The total sample had on average 68 ± 9.9 years. We identified the patients through the retrospective revision of clinical charts, and posteriorly examined them between March and July of The patients were examined with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Ultrasonic Pachimetry (CCT).

Inclusion Criteria Confirmed Diagnosis of Normal-Tension Glaucoma (NTG) IOP < 21 mmHg with the Goldman aplanation Tonometer in all examinations without treatment Open Angle determined by gonioscopy Typicall glaucomatous optic disc damage, excavation size, notch, etc. Visual Field Defect compatible with the Optic Nerve Defect No previous intraocular surgery Exclusion Criteria IOP > 21 mmHg with the Goldman aplanation Tonometer in any examination without treatment Corneal ectasia Contact lens user Pregnancy

Results / CH R = p< R = p<0.0001

Results / CRF R = p < R = p <0.0001

Practically no correlation (r = 0.407). This means aproximately only 16.6% of ccIOP could be explained by the CRF (R 2 = 0,166) R = p < 0.004

Results / gIOP R = p < R = p < 0.002

ccIOP and CCT do not seem to be governed by a linear relantionship. Either: –There is no relationship –The relationship is more complex R = p < 0.19

ccIOP was significantly higher than the gIOP. The average difference was 2.01 mmHg

Conclusions In our sample of NTG patients, Corneal Compensated IOP was higher than goldman simulated IOP - Approximately 2 mmHg. Corneal Resistance Factor: Correlated positively with gIOP (R=0,76) Correlated poorly with ccIOP (R=0,41) There was a strong correlation between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor.

In our study population, our results differed from expected in that: – We found some correlation between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with the Central Corneal Thickness. – There seems to be none or poor correlation between gIOP or ccIOP with Central Corneal Thickness. This could be explained in part because: – We used a diseased population. – We studied a population (chilean) for which we have no normal values calculated. Conclusions