S. Assadi, J. Kellams, P. McIntyre, K. Melconian, N. Pogue, and A. Sattarov Texas A&M University Strong-Focusing Cyclotron: FFAG for High Current Applications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of Resonance Crossing in FFAG Masamitsu Aiba (KEK) Contents 1.Introduction 2.Crossing experiment at PoP FFAG 3.Crossing experiment at HIMAC synchrotron.
Advertisements

Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field Nonscaling FFAG Lattice Design C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG07 April 12-17, 2007 LPSC, Grenoble,
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Extending FETS with a Ring Electron models are not sufficient for simulating the beam.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field FFAG C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG06 Japan f Fermilab.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Part I Optics. FFAG is “Fixed Field Alternating Gradient”. Ordinary synchrotron needs ramping magnets to keep the orbit radius constant. FFAG has Alternating.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Part IV Applications. Prototype of Cancer therapy machine with proton 150 MeV FFAG as a prototype Commissioning to accelerate up to ~15 MeV is done. Tune.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Cyclotrons Chapter 3 RF modelisation and computation B modelisation and computation Beam transport computation 1.
FFAG Nonscaling FFAGs for Hadron Therapy C. Johnstone, Fermilab FFAG08 Sept 1-5, 2008 University of Manchester Manchester, U.K. Fermilab.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Crossing transition at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, N.Abreu, M. Brennan, M.Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, R. Lee, S.Tepikian.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Multi-bunch acceleration in NS-FFAG Takeichiro Yokoi (Oxford University)
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Recirculating Linac Acceleration  End-to-end.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
Study of Beam Properties at SECRAL and The Solenoid Pre-focusing LEBT
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Linac and RLAs – Overview of NF-IDS
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Physics Design on Injector I
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Presentation transcript:

S. Assadi, J. Kellams, P. McIntyre, K. Melconian, N. Pogue, and A. Sattarov Texas A&M University Strong-Focusing Cyclotron: FFAG for High Current Applications

Motivation – Proton driver for Accelerator-Driven Subcritical Fission – What limits beam current in cyclotrons? Superconducting RF Cavity – Fully separate all orbits – Distributed coupling to match beam loading Beam Transport Channel – Control betatron tunes throughout acceleration – Magnetic design – Winding prototype Sector Dipoles – Flux-coupled stack – Fringe field reduction Beam Dynamics Outline FFAG13 TRIUMF2

3 FFAG is typically configured to accelerate a large momentum admittance within a modest magnet aperture. 1 GeV CW FFAG for C Therapy C. Johnstone – Trinity College, to 10 GeV muon double beam FFAG T. Planche - Nufact09 They are brilliant designs, as long as you don’t want too much beam current…

Accelerator Driven Molten Salt System Destroy long lived nuclear waste Close nuclear fuel cycle Subcritical - Safe Produce power TAMU 800 TAMU 100 FFAG13 TRIUMF4

5 Current limits in cyclotrons: 1) Overlapping bunches in successive orbits Overlap of N bunches on successive orbits produces N x greater space charge tune shift, non-linear effects at edges of overlap. Radius (in) # particles _98/beamdynamics_final.pdf FFAG13 TRIUMF

2) Weak focusing, Resonance crossing Cyclotrons are intrinsically weak-focusing accelerators Rely upon fringe fields Low tune requires larger aperture Tune evolves during acceleration Crosses resonances Scaling, Non-scaling FFAG utilize non-linear fields Rich spectrum of unstable fixed pts PSI FFAG13 TRIUMF6 Space charge shifts, broadens resonances, feeds synchro-betatron Even if a low-charge bunch accelerates smoothly, a high-charge bunch may undergo breakup even during rapid acceleration

Strong-Focusing Cyclotron Curing the limits of overlapping orbits and controlling tunes opens the high-current frontier: Proton driver for ADS fission Medical Isotope Production Ion beam therapy Muon Cooling Completely separate all orbits. Put beam transport channels in each sector to control betatron tunes FFAG13 TRIUMF7

SFC Components SRF Cavities Beam Transport Channels Cold-Iron Pole Piece Warm Flux Return Warm Shielding Fins FFAG13 TRIUMF8 Sectors are simple radial wedges – optimum for integrating SRF

9FFAG13 TRIUMF TRITRON was the first to attempt to make a separated orbit cyclotron The good-field fraction of radial aperture was <50% for each orbit, so admittance was limited. The intervening years of superferric magnet technology (and now MgB 2 ) and Nb cavity technology make this a fertile time to make a strong-focusing cyclotron for high current. Energy gain in its superconducting Pb cavities was limited by multipacting.

Motivation – Proton driver for Accelerator-Driven Subcritical Fission – What limits beam current in cyclotrons Superconducting RF CavityFully separate all orbits Beam Transport Channel – Control betatron tunes throughout acceleration – Magnetic design – Winding prototype Sector Dipoles – Flux-coupled stack – Fringe field reduction Beam Dynamics Future Work Outline FFAG13 TRIUMF10

Slot-geometry ¼-wave SRF Cavities Superconducting RF cavities 100 MHz 2 MV/cavity energy gain 20 MV/turn fully separates orbits FFAG13 TRIUMF11

Example SRF Cavity Model 21 MV/m max surface electric field 54 mT max surface magnetic field - less than design fields on SRF cavities for BNL, FRIB FFAG13 TRIUMF12

13FFAG13 TRIUMF Slot-geometry ¼ wave cavity structure and distributed RF drive suppresses perturbations from wake fields RF power is coupled to the cavity by rows of input couplers along the top/bottom lobes. RF power is coupled from the cavity to the synchronous bunches traversing the slot gap. The cavity serves as a linear transformer. Its geometry accommodates transverse mode suppression Energy coupled in Energy coupled out

14FFAG13 TRIUMF Linear coupler array to match drive to beam loading, convolutes to suppress multipacting Distributed drive matches to distributed beam loading for stability under high beam loading. Note: this requires that all orbits are made very close to isochronicity… Each coupler driven by solid state amplifier

Motivation – Proton driver for Accelerator-Driven Subcritical Fission – What limits beam current in cyclotrons Superconducting RF CavityFully separate all orbits Beam Transport Channel – Control betatron tunes throughout acceleration – Magnetic design – Winding prototype Sector Dipoles – Flux-coupled stack – Fringe field reduction Beam Dynamics Future Work Outline FFAG13 TRIUMF15

Sector dipoles - Flux-Coupled Stack Beam Planes Levitated-pole design originated at Riken Common warm-iron flux return Each gap formed by a pair of cold-iron flux plates Multiple SFCs in single footprint ~1 T dipole field, isochronous B(r) Geometric wedges (optimum for rf) FFAG13 TRIUMF16

Sector Dipole Modeling Mid-plane magnetic flux density (T) Top half of single stack cyclotron for modeling FFAG13 TRIUMF17

Fringe Field Reduction Superconducting cavities require the magnetic flux density to be less than 40 mT 10 cm from the warm iron flux return. Cold iron pole piece Warm-iron flux return Fringe field suppression FFAG13 TRIUMF 18 MgB 2 main windings Levitated pole method first pioneered at Riken  T mT

Motivation – Proton driver for Accelerator-Driven Subcritical Fission – What limits beam current in cyclotrons Superconducting RF Cavity Fully separate all orbits Beam Transport Channel – Control betatron tunes throughout acceleration – Magnetic design – Winding prototype Sector Dipoles – Flux-coupled stack – Fringe field reduction Beam Dynamics Future Work Outline FFAG13 TRIUMF19

F-D doublet on each orbit, each sector BTC dimension set by beam separation at extraction >80% of horizontal aperture is useful for orbits. 5.6cm FFAG13 TRIUMF20

Dipole Windings Up to 20 mT Act as corrector for isochronicity, Septum for injection/extraction Beam Transport Channel (BTC) Quadrupole Windings Up to 6 T/m Panofsky style Alternating-gradient focusing Powered in 6 families to provide total tune control FFAG13 TRIUMF21

All BTC windings use MgB 2 Operate with K refrigeration cycle 10 x less AC power to refrigerate, 50 x more heat capacity compared to 4.2 K FFAG13 TRIUMF 22

2D Field Modeling Wire spacing adjusted to kill multipoles Current density required for 6T/m ~ 235 A T Cold iron pole piece FFAG13 TRIUMF23

F-D quads control betatron motion FFAG13 TRIUMF24 We can lock x, y to any desired operating point. BTC quads are tuned in 2 x 5 families. Sextupole correctors at exit of each BTC are tuned in 2 x 6 families. First 2 turns each have dedicated families so that they can be tuned first for rational commissioning Uniform gradient in each channel: excellent linear dynamics.

25FFAG13 TRIUMF We have developed a simulation platform that takes high- current bunches through the spiral orbit, treating it as a spiral transfer line. Elegant Hyper_TAMU, MPI_TAMU Later No access Later Accounts for details of 6-D dynamics: resonance dynamics, synchro-betatron couplings, space charge, wake fields beam loading

26FFAG13 TRIUMF Coordinates, Mesh, Global coordinates, Beam assumptions…

27FFAG13 TRIUMF Equations of motion are nonlinear, coupled, damped: The code enables us to make a self-consistent solution for B(r); RF  E(r) and  (r), BTC gradients, BTC trim dipoles, sextupoles to simultaneously provide isochronicity, constant tunes, stable phase advances. It then tracks, generates Poincare plots, etc for desired bunch properties.

28FFAG13 TRIUMF

Dipole Corrector The BTC dipole correctors are used to maintain isochronicity and locally manage beam spacing at injection, extraction. Example of ability to adjust orbits to optimize design (from a 6 sector 100 MeV SFC design): Design orbits working in from extraction: First try gave problematic injection Then adjust orbit pattern using dipole correctors – ideal accommodation for injection FFAG13 TRIUMF29

30FFAG13 TRIUMF We are now modeling 6-D transport through the SFC including effects of x/y coupling, synchrobetatron, and space charge 300k particle simulation

31FFAG13 TRIUMF Longitudinal charge distribution 20k particle Charge Density for 10 mA beam 2K particles 20K particles

32FFAG13 TRIUMF Matched optics from injection to extraction. Left pictures shows how a bunch transfers from one sector To another. headtail Plots of slice energy spread and  mismatch after first turn, sensitive to bunch length – no hourglass from synchrobetatron I  radial E from space charge inside bunch 10 mA beam, ± 5 o total phase width

33FFAG13 TRIUMF Effect of ±.3 MeV energy mismatch on a bunch injected at 9 MeV bunch is clumping after half-turn (after 2 cavities)

34FFAG13 TRIUMF Longitudinal line charges along a bunch - 10 mA beam, injected at 9 MeV. Distortion in distribution comes from the space charge After first cavityjust before extraction Radial E from space charge

35FFAG13 TRIUMF Accelerating bunch at injection, extraction 100 MeV9 MeV Axial E from space charge

36FFAG13 TRIUMF Longitudinal phase space with 10 mA 9 MeV injection100 MeV extraction ±5 o phase width ±6 o phase width Energy width increases ~30%.Sextupole correction at exit from each BTC (2 x 6 families)

37FFAG13 TRIUMF Transverse phase space of 10 mA bunch through acceleration: x/y profile Vertical Emittance Horizontal Emittance First at injection:

38FFAG13 TRIUMF Now look at effects of synchrobetatron and space charge with 10 mA at extraction: 1/3 order integer effect1/5 order integer effect 1/5-order islands stay clumped, 1/3-order islands are being driven. Likely driving term is edge fields of sectors (6-fold sector geometry). We are evaluating use of sextupoles at sector edges to suppress growth. Move tunes near integer fraction resonances to observe growth of islands After two turns … bunch is lost by 20 MeV

39FFAG13 TRIUMF Synchrobetatron/space charge in longitudinal phase space: Injectionextraction Phase width grows x5 at extraction Tunes again moved to approach resonances, but retaining transmission through lattice

Poincare Plots of 5  contours Injection 40 MeVExtraction 3.5 mA beam Now change the tune to excite a 7 th order resonance An example favorable operating point: ( x, y) = (3.196, 3.241) FFAG13 TRIUMF40

41FFAG13 TRIUMF Conclusions  The strong-focusing cyclotron is a new member of the FFAG family.  It is optimized to accelerate the highest possible CW beam current with low losses and high energy efficiency.  We have validated the capability of the design to accelerate 10 mA with excellent transport.  Control of betatron tunes and ability to naturally match input RF to beam loading across the entire width of the spiral orbit are key strategic elements.  Phase space dynamics for optimized orbit should be simple to diagnose – no COD, no E-  serpentine, no resonances  Anyone who can tune a synchrotron or linac for low loss, high current could tune a SFC.  So far as we can determine from these early studies, it is not yet clear what will be the ultimate limits to beam current.

To Do: SRF cavity Wake fields, beam loading, optimize input coupler array Build/test prototype cavities Beam Transport Channel: Finalize copper test wind Quench modeling and protection MgB 2 winding Sector Magnet Refine pole piece and shielding fins - FEA models and prototypes Beam dynamics Model beam loading, wake fields, patterns of input couples in SRF cavities Future plans FFAG13 TRIUMF42

Come collaborate with us! Thank you! FFAG13 TRIUMF 43