Next Generation Science Standards Adoption and Implementation Workbook.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Advertisements

Kentucky Leadership Networks Why are we here? Why am I here? 1.
Principals Session: Introduction to NTI Goals and Session Framework for Principals EngageNY.org.
Exercise: Defining Your State’s Role. Objectives  Understand the role that your state plays in supporting standards implementation through:  systems.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Next Generation Science Standards Update NRC Fidelity Review  The NGSS have passed a fidelity review by the NRC.  The review panel was made up of some.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Adoption and Implementation Workbook Alissa Peltzman, Achieve, Vice President of State Policy & Implementation.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of State Support (OSS)
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Irv Richardson Coordinator for Public Education and School Support NEA-NH Workshop for Candidates.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Preparing for the CCR Regional Sessions. Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education College and career readiness means an individual.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Planning for Success Effective Communications for NGSS Adoption & Implementation Efforts.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Best Counseling Practices for Addressing the Needs of Long Term English Learners June 28, 2013 New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Education for the Future Bradley J. Geise Using Data for Continuous School Improvement.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Carla Wade Digital Learning and STEM Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Common Core State Standards Where we are as a district and as a state 1.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Leading and Learning in a Time of Change #CCSS.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Common Core State Standards Implications for Leadership Curriculum Leadership Council Networking Session.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Leadership School Leadership Teams. Leadership Team Planning Objective: At the end of this section, you will have one SMART goal written and start on.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Focus groups conducted: ▪ Teachers ▪ Board of education members ▪ Principals ▪ Union leaders ▪ Parents ▪ BPS.
S CHOOL T RANSITION T EAM C OLLABORATIVE L EARNING.
 Effective monitoring of adult actions – teaching and leadership – strongly linked to gains in student achievement  “Implementation gap” between intention.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
Chair: Linda Miller, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Statewide Systems of Support: The RCC & State Story.
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Presentation transcript:

Next Generation Science Standards Adoption and Implementation Workbook

2 ©2013 U.S. Education Delivery Institute and Achieve Now, more than ever, adoption and implementation are closely intertwined ▪ The shifts that the standards will require in the classroom ▪ The scale and complexity at which the shifts must take place – Equipping and motivating thousands of educators to change their day-to-day practices – Ensuring coherence with existing efforts to implement the Common Core State Standards or other College and Career Ready standards in ELA and Math Challenges of implementation ▪ Before they support adoption, policy-makers, educators, stakeholders, and the public will want a clear sense that your system will be able to meet these challenges ▪ In particular, they will need to understand your plans and timeline for adoption and implementation, before implementation even begins Implications for adoption

The basics 1. adoption-and-implementation-workbook 2.Developed by Achieve and EDI 3.Set of tools to assist state and local leaders 4.Meant to be made your own 5.Pushes hard on aspirations, ‘the big picture’

4 ©2013 U.S. Education Delivery Institute and Achieve The tool contains guidance, exercises, and templates for teams to use as they work through each step

5 ©2013 U.S. Education Delivery Institute and Achieve It also includes a diagnostic tool to help you assess your own readiness to implement each step The diagnostic questions are available in the workbook on pages 13-16

4 or 5 Important Points 1.PDF and Word versions available for free 2.Not meant to be linear 3.7 chapters with 2-4 exercises each 4.Glossary of Workbook Terms 5.Diagnostic and formative purposes

Adoption AND Implementation Workbook Team based – don’t try this alone Chapter 1 on Strategic Leadership Team formation Chapter 2 on Defining Your Aspiration

8 A Goal Without A Plan Is Just A Wish

9 ©2013 U.S. Education Delivery Institute and Achieve We have developed a tool for helping state teams to think through the critical steps for adoption and implementation of the NGSS Designate a strategic leadership team, Review capacity, and Create a preliminary timeline Define your aspiration Evaluate past and present performance Determine the state’s role and approach to implementation Set targets and trajectories Develop a stakeholder engagement strategy Establish routines and solve problems

Let’s dig in—Chapter 1, Step 2 Please open your books to page 13; Figure 2: Diagnostic Tool

11 ©2013 U.S. Education Delivery Institute and Achieve To complete this exercise, you’ll use the diagnostic tool in your workbook The diagnostic questions are available in the workbook on pages 13-16

EXERCISE 2 – Review Capacity to Adopt and Implement the NGSS – page 17 Instructions: – Read through the diagnostic tool and take notes individually on evidence of strength or challenge for each critical element. – Determine who has access to/holds the evidence. – Use the evidence to arrive at an individual rating for each critical element. – Share individual ratings (weak = 1 to strong = 4) with the group by marking on the flipchart. – Discuss and come to consensus as a group on areas of relative strength and challenge across the critical elements. Exercise notes: – Guiding questions for discussion. – You may not need to bring the group to consensus; the discussion and agreement on evidence is more important than any specific rating.

Important Reminders!! 1.There is no right answer. 2.There is no sample plan. 3.Evidence is critical. 4.You are building a knowledge base. 5.This is of value to LEAs as well as SEAs.

Let’s dig in again —Chapter 4, step 1 Please open your books to page 47, then to page 50 Exercise 9: Define Your State’s Role (in relation to 5 levers of:  Policy/Guidance  Funding  Capacity-building  Monitoring  Coordination)

EXERCISE 9 – Define Your State’s Role– page 50 Instructions: – Using the template, answer questions for each of the five levers under “Current Use” columns for the CCSS (building on what we have learned from CCSS implementation) and past science standards implementation How has this lever… What has it looked like…successful… What has it looked like…unsuccessful… – Using the template, answer questions for each of the five levers under “Future Use: NGSS Implementation”: How important… What will we do similarly… What will we do differently…

16 Critical Audiences State Board of Education Members Teachers Department or Curriculum Leads School Leaders Governor’s Office Legislators & Staff SEA leaders & Staff Higher Education Officials State Science Supervisors District Leaders District Science Supervisors Business leaders & Chambers STEM Organizations & Networks Workforce Development Organizations & Agencies Philanthropic Organizations School Board Members & Associations Parents & PTAs Advocacy Organizations Civil Rights Organizations Scientific Community Teacher Unions and Associations Regional Service Centers KIDS!!!

Your turn 1.Who in here has used this Workbook and how? 2.What more do you need? – Webinars on specific topics – which ones? – Missing tools – on/for what?

Takeaways 1.Make this your own 2.Push hard on describing your aspiration and how you would measure that 3.Feedback, feedback, feedback 4.Have a rationale for what you are doing, based on state data if at all possible 5.Resources abound – maybe not cash but when have we ever had that?

Contact Tom Keller Senior Adviser, Science