Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
Stuck in the SWMP Storm Water Management Programs: New challenges for the Transportation Community.
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
Austin Peay State University Stormwater Program Kristen Spicer, Ph.D.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of the Hempfield Township’s New Storm Water Management Program.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRIT) Eastgate Shopping Center Chapel Hill, NC September 9, 2008.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
The purpose of the San Dieguito Union High School District’s stormwater management plan is to comply with applicable stormwater regulations, educate.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Implementing the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit Stormwater Division General Services Department Board of Supervisors Work Session October.
Nutrient Management in the Urban Landscape Rebecca Kluckhohn, P.E. Watershed Engineer West Metro Water Alliance Forum, May 18 th 2011 W W e n c k Engineers.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Municipal St rm Water Program. Storm Water Programs Industrial –bus maintenance yards Construction –addition of a gym Municipal.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
TMDL Overview Kurt Spitzer 850/ Estimates of Cost of Compliance Florida Consumer Fertilizer.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Introduction to Storm Water Phase II Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Santa Margarita Region MS4 Permit – Pyrethroids Evaluation Jason E. Uhley, P.E. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Storm Water: Federal Enforcement and Compliance for Phase II MS4.
Overview of Montana’s Stormwater Regulatory Program.
Construction & Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance City of Wenatchee, Public Works Department Jessica Shaw, Environmental Manager.
Workshop on the draft General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water from Small MS4s Fresno August 6, 2002 Redding August 8, 2002 San Luis Obispo August.
IMLA New England Regional Land Use Seminar June 21, 2012 Work Session 2. Storm Water Management James N. Katsiaficas, Esq. P.O. BOX 426 PORTLAND, MAINE.
Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
History of Stormwater Regulations in Atlanta. Prior to 1990 Protect from flooding Protect from flooding Complaint driven inspections & maintenance Complaint.
City Council Meeting January 17, NPDES Permit Background 11/10/2010 – New Permit Adopted by RWQCB 12/10/2010 – Appeal to State Board (in Abeyance)
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
DRAFT PHASE II STORMWATER PERMIT New Requirements Terri Fashing - MCSTOPPP Manager Wendy Atkins – City of Sonoma Stormwater Coordinator With assistance.
Phase II National Storm Water Regulations What’s in it for you?
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT UPDATE & TIMELINE Presented by Nick del Valle County of San Diego Watershed Protection Program.
Stormwater Regulations and Impacts on Industry Integrated Regional Water Management Regional Advisory Committee (RAC) Meeting #45 Ed Othmer PE, CPESC,
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Municipal Stormwater Permit Overview of Order R Issued by: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region NPDES No. CAS
Urban Runoff Greg Gearheart Christine Sotelo Eric Berntsen State Water Resources Control Board.
picture Renee Purdy, Environmental Program Manager Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Renee Purdy, Environmental Program Manager Los Angeles.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
Stormwater 101 History of the Clean Water Act MARCH 22, 2016 WEST COVINA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
NPDES Stormwater Rules Phase 1 implemented in 1990 –Large cities (
Briefing regarding the new State General Stormwater Pollution Control Permit.
TMDL Implementation: Now What?
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
Creating Land Use Datasets for Storm Water Reporting
MACo Winter Conference
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
City of Forest Lake MS4 Program
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
County Water Resources Programs in the Santa Margarita Basin
Presentation transcript:

Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs Jason Uhley Chief of Watershed Protection Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District

Clean Water Act Federal program to protect the Beneficial Uses of lakes, rivers and streams Recreation on Canyon Lake Fishing Water Supply Warm and Cold Water Habitat

Construction Industrial Clean Water Act implemented through National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits Construction Industrial Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) De-minimus (dewatering) Pesticide/Herbicide Use

Today discussing MS4 Permit Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Santa Ana Permit reissued in 2010 Issued jointly to cities and County (Permittees) Regulates Permittee Activities Regulates private Activities Residential Business Development Other governments Construction Industrial De-minimus (dewatering) Pesticide/Herbicide Use

MS4 Permit requires Cities and County to comply with Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Riverside County* Beaumont Canyon Lake Hemet Lake Elsinore Menifee* Moreno Valley* Murrieta* Perris Riverside* San Jacinto Wildomar* * Only applies to portions of the City/County within the San Jacinto Watershed

Permittee TMDL Compliance Activity Timeline 2001 – San Jacinto Construction Permit – interim new development controls 2002 – Third-term Stormwater Permit Adopted 2004 – TMDL Adopted 2006 – TMDL Task Force Formed 2006 – Final Water Quality Management Plan for New Development 2007 – Stormwater compliance programs enhanced to better address TMDL 2010 - Fourth-term Stormwater Permit Adopted 2020 – Compliance with TMDL required

Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan (CNRP) for Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Required by 2010 Permit, due to RWQCB December 31, 2011 Must specify compliance actions and schedule for implementation Allows for adaptive management Allows Permittees to plan and budget Requires RWQCB approval Alternative: Direct liability for TMDL targets Substantive fines and penalties for non-compliance

Typical BMP Design Event 0.5”/day rainfall VOLUME: The impediment to compliance Scenario 1: Typical Storm 83,000 acres of urbanized area (17% of total watershed area) ~90% urban area untreated May need 700 acres set aside for treatment (across urban area) $177 Million capital cost + O&M Typical BMP Design Event 0.5”/day rainfall

VOLUME: The impediment to compliance Scenario 2: The “BIG” Storm Peak rainfall 3”/day Minimum 4,000 acres set aside within urban area for treatment Equivalent to a “NEW” Lake Elsinore Billion dollar solution + O&M Needed once every 20 years January 1993 – 10”/10 days December 2010 – 7”/ 8 days

CNRP Proposal – Identify and Implement Feasible Watershed Based Controls Illegal Discharge Investigations Urban Retrofit Projects New Development Controls Street Sweeping Business Inspection Programs Education/Outreach

Alternative Option: In-Lake Treatment Chemical Addition Water Column Mixing Fishery Management Aeration/Oxygenation

In-Lake Solutions = Greater Cost/Benefit BMP Capital Costs (estimated) Annual Operation Costs (estimated) Lake Elsinore Aeration, Mixing, Fish Management N/A $500,000 Hypolimnetic Oxygenation System $2-4 million $250,000 Lake Water Addition $1,500,000 Chemical Nutrient Binders $300,000 Watershed BMPs only: $1 Billion (?) $ millions (?)

In-Lake Solutions Pros Potentially order of magnitude less expensive Multiple Cost-Share Partners Treat extreme events over time Cons Requires Regional Board approval Will still need watershed controls May require enhancements

Consider other pollutant trading options Agricultural land fallowing / MSHCP conservation Septic system to sewer conversions Other pollutant trading opportunities

Next Steps CNRP Development – Due to RWQCB December 31, 2011 District coordinating draft with City / County staff City staff providing data on existing and proposed BMPs TMDL Task Force providing data on in-lake solutions Review draft with City Managers in November