Response to LDEQ Consolidated Compliance Order and Notice of Potential Penalty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Government Spending Matt Timmons Vince DAlanno Dan Curtis.
Advertisements

CMOM CMOM Capacity, Management, Operation & Maintenance and Remote Wireless Monitoring of Collection Systems 5 th Annual FVOA Mini Conference August 18,
JEFFERSON PARISH SHERIFF’S OFFICE RENEWAL OF THE 1994 ¼ CENT LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRICT SALES TAX.
Town of Nashville Public Utilities Grease Education Reducing Grease in Our Sewer System “FOG” is the acronym for Fats, Oils, & Grease.
Sanitary Sewer System Rate Study September 2012 Keystone Municipal Services.
INFORMATION on RATE increase On May 6, 2008, the Clark County Water Reclamation District Board of Trustees approved a rate increase at a public hearing.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
City of Clinton Fiscal Year 2013 Sewer Rate Recommendations Committee of the Whole April 24, 2012.
2 Water and Waste Loans and Grants United States Department of Agriculture??? Rural Development: Mandate to improve the quality of life in Rural America.
The Clean Water Act Objective: To restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters PHOTO OF 2007 OUTFALL AT.
City of South Burlington City Council Adopted January 12, 2013 FY 2014 Budget - Keys to Financial Success Prepared by Sandy Miller, City Manager and Bob.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
FISCAL YEAR BUDGET MONROE METROPOLITAN POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM BUDGET 1 Presented by Barry S. LaRoy, P.E. Director of Water & Wastewater Utilities.
FY Budget Presentation to Board of Finance March 31, 2014 SWPCA William P. Brink, Executive Director Rhudean Bull, Administration Manager.
Wastewater Fund. Wastewater Revenue $296,
Wastewater Neighborhood Meetings Code of Conduct: Be willing - participate fully; Be Kind - treat others with dignity and respect; Be open - consider new.
1 RATE SETTING WORKSHOP February 23, RATE CHANGES In accordance with Section of the Charter Plan of the District, any proposed rate change.
1 CITY OF MONROE WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT BUDGET Presented by Barry S. LaRoy, P.E. Director of Water & Wastewater Utilities March 27, 2010.
City of Modesto FY Proposed Budget Utility Funds Utility Planning & Projects Public Works Finance.
Copyright Rehmann Robson Pennfield Charter Township Water and Sewer Utilities Rate Study.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
The coming storm: Managing Roanoke’s Stormwater Infrastructure Challenges Solutions for Roanoke’s future.
Dean Marriott Environmental Services Director Janet Gillaspie Oregon ACWA Executive Director.
1 Department Department of of Public Utilities Presentation of Study Results August 2006.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Utility Extension Project
2012 City Budget Public Hearing Budget Process Annual Revenue Survey – February 22 First Budget Work Session – May 2 Second Budget Work Session.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
1 WASTE TIRE PROGRAM Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners April 30, 2013.
MONROE METROPOLITAN POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM BUDGET 1 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET Presented by Barry S. LaRoy, P.E. Director of Water & Wastewater Utilities.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
1 TOWN OF LOCKPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW Focus on the Sewer Plant and Sewer Collection Service.
City of South Burlington City Council Adopted January 12, 2013 FY 2014 Budget - Keys to Financial Success Prepared by Sandy Miller, City Manager and Bob.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
January 6,  INTRODUCTION  BACKGROUND  SUMMARY  QUESTIONS  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ◦ PROPOSED BUDGETS, LEVIES AND CIRCUIT BREAKER 2.
The LDEQ BEP Process CHERYL EASLEY LDEQ - Office of Environmental Compliance MARCH 28,2008 Presentation to The 2008 Statewide Clean Cities Coalition Conference.
January 6,  INTRODUCTION  OVERVIEW OF FUNDS  SUMMARY  QUESTIONS  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ◦ Background Information and Capital Projects ◦
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
Local Government Serving the People. Public Safety Includes police and fire protection, animal control, traffic regulation, building codes Police, firefighters,
5/29/021 Informational Meeting May 29, 2002 Perry Township Administration Building Fourth Street/Bowman Road Sewer Improvement Area.
Village of Almont WATER, SEWER, AND SSO RATES 2012 – 2013 FISCAL YEAR.
Environmental Fees January 2007 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP IDEM Commissioner.
City of Springfield Office of Public Works Street & Sewer Infrastructure Analysis 1 Mayor J. Michael Houston Mark Mahoney, Director.
Proposed Biennial Budget July 1, 2013 Through June 30, 2015.
Sanitary Sewer Fee Study March 4, Summary Sausalito’s 75-year-old sewer system is old and deteriorated. While the current rates have allowed the.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Changes FY 2013 Facility Managers’ Meeting August 16, 2012 Ipek Connolly, Senior Resource Planner.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department Karen Rhodes-Whitley FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY FISCAL YEARS
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Phase II and Compost Facility Upgrade Projects February 16, 2012.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
Oak Lodge Sanitary District FY Budget OLSD Budget Committee Preliminary Budget Meeting April 21,
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
UTILITY PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STOCKTON & OMI / THAMES WATER SERVICE CONTRACT.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY (FY )
2015 Annual Financial Report December 31, Total Revenue $13,068,887Total Expenditure $14,006,870 Revenue Budget $14,957,884Expenditure Budget $15,669,564.
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Sewer User Rate Increase PUBLIC HEARING
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Public Hearing Sanitary Sewer Fees
Presentation transcript:

Response to LDEQ Consolidated Compliance Order and Notice of Potential Penalty

LPDES Overview 2CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ♦Wastewater system discharges to the Mississippi River. ♦Requires a Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) permit. ♦Permit requires operating the collection and treatment facilities under the terms and conditions of the LPDES permit or face civil fines. ♦The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) is responsible for enforcement all permit requirements.

LDEQ Background 3CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ♦LDEQ conducted several inspections of wastewater facility records and discovered 444 overflows had occurred within the system. ♦Age of the system, poor soil conditions causing subsidence, and lack of maintenance over the years contributed to the overflows within the sewer system. ♦On August 26, 2009, the City received a Consolidated Compliance Order and Notice of Potential Penalty Enforcement Tracking No. WE- CN for noncompliance activities from February 1, 2004 through May 31, 2009.

Summary of Overflows CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Sub- Totals Grand Totals Mainline Blockage Broken Force Main Power Failuresa.)Hurricanes15 90 b.)Normal Rain Storm/ I & I Issues (Sewer System Up) a).Heavy1 Hurricane b). Normal Miscellaneous overflows from grit chamber, aeration tank, etc Mechanical Failures of Lift Station Totals

Importance of Regulatory Compliance 5CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Why is it important for the COK to meet its LPDES permit requirements? ♦Overflows discharge raw sewerage into nearby roads, drainage, and waterways ♦Threat to public health, animals, the environment and the federal and state waterways. ♦Violation of the Federal Clean Water Act ♦The City’s failure or refusal to comply with the Compliance Order could result in the assessment of a civil penalty in an amount of not more than $50,000 for each day of continued violation or noncompliance resulting in possible millions of dollars of fines.

Response to the Compliance Order 6CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ♦In response to the Compliance Order, related to the reported Overflows, the City was required to prepare a Sanitary Sewer System Overflow Corrective Action Plan. ♦Purpose of Corrective Action Plan -mitigate, reduce, and prevent Overflows in the City -comply with LPDES discharge permit requirements, related Louisiana Laws, and the Federal Clean Water Act. ♦$62,137,196 total in capital improvements to reduce and prevent future overflows ♦Corrective Action Plan only considered the SSO’s cited in the LDEQ compliance order and was not meant to correct every deficiency in the City’s system.

Corrective Action Improvements Funded 7CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Funded Improvements Project Funding SourceTotal Amount Funded LRA/CDBG Grant$4,145,275 LDEQ Low Interest Loan$10,510,613 City Capital Funds$3,428,255 Total Funded Improvements$18,084,143 ♦These improvements will be completed without any additional tax or fee increase ♦LRA/CDBG Grant Money does not have to paid back. ♦A list of funded improvements is available separately

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN8 Corrective Action Improvements Future Funded Projects Contingent Upon Sewer Fee Increase Project Funding SourceTotal Funds Required LDEQ Low Interest Loan$12,067,440 Municipal Bonds$31,985,613 Total Funds Required$44,053,053 Future Funds Required ♦A list of future projects is provided separately ♦$6,900,000 planned for “Green Project” +Discharge to La Branche Wetlands +Provides wetland restoration and enhanced Hurricane Protection

Budget Observations and Comparisons 9CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ♦Last user rate increase 19 years ago (1991) ♦Cost of equipment, repair, services and electricity, chemicals and inflation have risen significantly. ♦City does not collect enough revenue currently to operate and maintain the system ♦There is insufficient funds within the City to pay for the plan along with operation and maintenance costs

Proposed Rates 10CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ♦ An estimated $44,053,053 of additional funding is needed. ♦Necessary to consider a user rate increase or face possible civil penalties. ♦Phased increase to meet future expenditures for principal and interest. ♦Pay as you go for citizens through increases over four years ♦Two separate bond issues proposed to spread out the increase

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN11 Proposed Rates ♦ 2011 increase to $2.01 per 1,000 gallons covers operating and maintenance and remaining LDEQ loan money ♦2012 increase to $2.63 per1,000 gallons covers first municipal bond of $16 million ♦2013 increase to $2.68 per 1,000 gallons covers the estimated CPI increase in 2013 ♦2014 increase to $3.031per 1,000 gallons covers second municipal bond of $16 million

Proposed Rate Chart 12CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Calendar Year Residential Customers Monthly Usage Charge per 1,000 gal$1.35$2.01$2.63$2.68$3.31 Avg. Monthly Sewer Bill$10.81$16.04$21.02$21.43$26.45 Commercial Customers Monthly Usage Charge per 1,000 gal$1.59$2.36$3.09$3.15$3.89

Sewer Rate Comparisons 13CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Municipality /Parish Sewer Fee/1,000 gallons Monthly Min Avg. Bill/8,000 gallons Additional Fee Harahan$1.02$5.25$8.16None Kenner (Current) $1.35$3.27$10.80None Jefferson Parish (2012) $2.41$3.90$20.45$1.17 monthly Kenner (2014) $3.31$8.01$26.45None Gretna$3.70$10.14$29.60None Slidell$3.96$29.64$31.68None New Orleans$4.04 $40.40$1.01/1,000 gallons toward Federal consent decree with US EPA Baton Rouge$4.36$13.08$34.91$.30 cents/100 gallons for more than 3,000 gallons. $2,150 one-time connection fee Covington$6.00$15.18$48.00None Houston$6.52 $53.30$1.14 additional service fee for more than 7,000 gallons

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN14 Utility Comparisons UtilityAvg. Monthly Bill 2010 Sewer Fee$ Sewer Fee$26.45 Avg. Gas Bill Based on 100 ccf usage$ Avg. Electric Bill Based on 1,000 kWh usage$ Basic Cell Phone Based on 450 minutes usage per month $39.99

Options CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN15 ♦ Do nothing – Millions of dollars in possible fines from LDEQ and EPA plus the City still will be expected to pay for repairs to the system ♦Increase fees to levels shown +Fair to users because proportionate use pays for system +Few City services produce revenue to pay for itself

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN16 Consequences of No Action ♦If sewer fee increase is not approved outstanding bills owed to system operator (Veolia) will continue to increase ♦LDEQ will take back the remaining $11,000,000 in low interest (0.95%) loan money ♦EPA will step in for violation of Clean Water Act ♦Taxes may increase to pay fines ♦City services may be cut that don’t generate revenue (Recreation, Community Services, etc.)

Conclusions 17CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ♦ Fee increases are not popular but to take no action would be irresponsible and cost more over time ♦2014 the average residential homeowner would pay $26.45 per month for its wastewater services. ♦Comparable to other utilities and municipalities the proposed rates are not out of the ordinary