Proposed Water and Sewer Capital Recovery Fee Revisions DFU Fees DFU Fees Water Resource Recovery Fee (WRR) Water Resource Recovery Fee (WRR) Sanitary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

Average Annual Percent Cost Increase since 1999: EID Water, cost for 1500 cf per month & national CPI-U detail for water, wastewater, & solid waste.
DG Interconnection Working Group Fees and Cost Support for DG Interconnections August 6, 2012.
PROPOSAL TO ADJUST CURRENT WATER RATES Goal: Address frequently expressed concerns of citizens  Simplicity  Understandability  Fairness  Liability.
Sanitary Sewer System Rate Study September 2012 Keystone Municipal Services.
City of Clinton Fiscal Year 2013 Sewer Rate Recommendations Committee of the Whole April 24, 2012.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. February 18, 2015 Tiverton Wastewater District Sewer Construction Program Updates to Proposed Phase 1 Sewer Expansion Note:
Review of Audited Financial Statements as of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2013.
May 30, Meeting & Outreach efforts  February 27th – Proposed Compensation Plan Distributed to Joint Admin/WWOC  March 5th – Joint Admin/WWOC Meeting.
1 RATE SETTING WORKSHOP February 23, RATE CHANGES In accordance with Section of the Charter Plan of the District, any proposed rate change.
Fiscal Neutrality Methodology Development Public Information | January 16 th, 2015 Sarasota 2050 Resource Management Area (RMA) Policy.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
1 Department Department of of Public Utilities Presentation of Study Results August 2006.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Ramona Unified School District First Interim Report December 17, 2009.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Safe Drinking Water Permit and Capacity Requirements Developer Services Summit November 16, 2010 Engineering - Asset Planning Vince Monaco.
Elk Grove Water District Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal April 10, 2013.
Infrastructure – Condition Assessment Overview & Purpose Infrastructure Condition Assessment – General Findings/Conditions –Streets/Sidewalks/Parking Lots.
Waste Water Facilities Plan Update November 2, 2009 Palmer Engineering Company / Hazen & Sawyer / CDP Public Hearing Presentation.
Updated Estimates of Impervious Area, Equivalent Residential Units, IA Rate, and Customer Bill Impacts AOBA October 27, 2008.
PROPOSAL TO ADJUST CURRENT WATER RATES Goal: Address frequently expressed concerns of citizens  Simplicity  Understandability  Fairness  Liability.
Community Development Department DEVELOPMENT FEE STRUCTURE.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Sewage Disposal System Meeting #2 – Projected FY.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Water Supply System Meeting #3 – Allocated FY
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 14, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
“As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.” Albert Einstein.
Economic Development Incentive Agreement Project Modern.
April 21, 2015 Presented by: Heidi Springer, P.E. Brian Ginter, P.E.
2013 Business Planning Process. Business Planning Process Guidelines Budget Preparation Preparation of Business Plans Management Review Presentations.
Water Connection Fee Analysis Elk Grove Water District Finance Committee January 30, 2013.
Multi-Jurisdictional-Use Facilities Capital Cost Allocation Study Update Presented to Blue Plains Regional Committee December 20, 2010 District of Columbia.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 21, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Date Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Agenda Item #13.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
Presented By Public Resources Management Group, Inc. RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY Prepared on October 10 th, 2013.
April 15, Revised Fiscal Year 2011 Proposed Budget October 2009 – General Fund shortfall for Fiscal Year 2011 identified as $179 million December.
1 District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority George S. Hawkins, General Manager June 28, 2012 Blue Plains Regional Committee Briefing for: Cost Allocation.
Town of Yountville B ARTLE W ELLS A SSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Advisors Water and Wastewater Rates Prop. 218 Hearing February 15, 2011.
1 Water Department FY 2014 Sources and Uses FY 2014 Sources Retail Sales$54,788,834 Wholesale Sales646,250 Other Operating Revenues145,000 Non-Operating.
Kevin Colvett, P.E. Nashville Corrective Action Plan and Engineering Report, Phase III for Metro Water Services and the City of Brentwood, TN Presentation.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Resolution 2014R-100 December 18,  Board Direction ◦ Establish a “Stabilized” cost-of-service rate of $ for FYs 2015 & 2016 that includes.
FY 2010 Budget Slide 1 Public Works March 18, 2009 Wastewater User Fees Wastewater Collection Proposed RCO Fee Surcharge Recommendation: Regional Consent.
Village of Tarrytown Tentative Budget Fiscal Year 2012 – 2013 June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013.
Water and Wastewater Rates Public Hearing July 15, 2015 The Reed Group, Inc. 1.
Water Utility General Overview Revenues Overall Revenue Increase 2.6% Expenditures. Overall Expenditure decrease of 1.3% Reservoirs Supplies 203.6% Hydrant.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
1 CITRUS COUNTY Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting August 25, 2015.
City of East Point Determination of PCA and ECCR Chau Nguyen, ECG
May 31, 2016 WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY PRESENTATION 5/9/2016 City of Greenfield, California.
Portugal Cove - St. Philip’s
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Public Works/Municipal Utilities Department
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
City of Delavan 2017 Budget.
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
Large User True-up Process
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
City of Rehoboth Beach Water and Wastewater Financial and Rates Review
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION – Budget Analysis Unit
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Water and Sewer Capital Recovery Fee Revisions DFU Fees DFU Fees Water Resource Recovery Fee (WRR) Water Resource Recovery Fee (WRR) Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee (SSC) Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee (SSC) Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Capacity Fee ($/GPM) Capacity Fee ($/GPM) Landscaping Landscaping Portable Pump Portable Pump Radio Transmitting Unit (RTU) Radio Transmitting Unit (RTU)

WRR and SSC Fees  Recovers capital costs of the City to make water and sanitary sewer services available.  Capital costs allocated in proportion to anticipated demand imposed upon the system.  Allocation based upon Drainage Fixture Units (DFUs)

 WRR Fee –  $66 per DFU since 1986  Effective 7/1/08 - $79 per DFU  Effective 7/1/09 - $92 per DFU  SSC Fee -  $56 per DFU since 1998  Effective 7/1/08 - $59 per DFU WRR and SSC Fees

Proposed Revisions Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Paid by developers who: discharge to an existing SSPS based upon capacity ($/GPM) discharge to an existing SSPS based upon capacity ($/GPM) build a SSPS to offset related City expensesfor: build a SSPS to offset related City expensesfor: Landscaping Landscaping Portable Pump Portable Pump Radio Transmitting Unit (RTU) Radio Transmitting Unit (RTU)

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Objectives: Fair and equitable distribution of costs Fair and equitable distribution of costs Consistency in fee policy Consistency in fee policy Annually adjusted to reflect actual costs Annually adjusted to reflect actual costs

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Current SS Pump Station Capacity fees established in 1987 Current SS Pump Station Capacity fees established in 1987 DPU is not recovering capital costs DPU is not recovering capital costs Current fee $325/GPM (averages about $225 per household) Current fee $325/GPM (averages about $225 per household) Current actual average costs are $1086/GPM (average about $700 per household) Current actual average costs are $1086/GPM (average about $700 per household)

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Pumping Station Capacity Fee Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/08 6/30/09 6/30/10 Actual Cost $ 1,119 $ 1,152 $ 1,187 Current Fee $ 325 $ 325 $ 325 Deficit $ 794 $ 827 $ 862 Proposed Fee $ 756 $ 1,187 Cumulative Increase $ 431 $ 431 Percent Increase 133% 57%

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Related Issue Related Issue SSO Consent Agreement (EPA, HRSD and Localities) SSO Consent Agreement (EPA, HRSD and Localities) Reduction in sanitary sewer design flow requirement Reduction in sanitary sewer design flow requirement Previous – 1000 GPD/Residential unit(RU) Previous – 1000 GPD/Residential unit(RU) New – 775 GPD/RU New – 775 GPD/RU Result: 22.5% reduction Result: 22.5% reduction PSC Fee Increase Impact Lessened PSC Fee Increase Impact Lessened Fee/RU increase of $464, not $599 Fee/RU increase of $464, not $599 Resulting Fee/RU $639, not to $824 Resulting Fee/RU $639, not to $824

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Portable Pump Fee (Not Required with Generator) Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/08 6/30/09 6/30/10 Actual Cost $ 1,571 $ 1,618 $ 1,666 Current Fee $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Deficit $ 571 $ 618 $ 666 Proposed Fee$ 1,000 $ 1,333 $ 1,666 Increase $ 333 $ 333 Percent Increase – Accumulative 33% 25%

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Landscaping Fee Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/08 6/30/09 6/30/10 Actual Cost $ 1,545 $ 1,591 $ 1,640 Current Fee $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 Deficit $ 45 $ 91$ 139 Proposed Fee $ 1,570 $ 1,639 Increase $ 70 $ 70 Percent Increase – Accumulative 5 % 4 %

Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station Fees Radio Transmitting Unit Fee Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/08 6/30/09 6/30/10 Actual Cost $ 5,356 $ 5,517 $ 5,682 Current Fee $ 5,200 $ 5,200 $ 5,200 Deficit $ 156 $ 317 $ 482 Proposed Fee $ 5,441 $ 5,682 Increase $ 241 $ 241 Percent Increase – Accumulative 5 % 4 %