By Timina Olive Kayaviri Supervisor : Dr. Amugune

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Advertisements

 AUTHOR- Musiba Baliruno Denis, B.pharm (MUST) SUPERVISORS ;  Prof. K.A.M. Kuria, PhD - Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, University.
Statistical Approaches to Addressing the Requirements of the New FDA Process Validation Guidance for Small Molecules 1 Jason Marlin, MS/T Statistics, Eli.
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Experience of Pre-Qualification Program.
Pharmacopoeial tests (USP)
BY: PATEL MINAL NARAN U29/35243/2010 SUPERVISOR: DR. P. M. NJOGU
HPLC ANALYSIS OF AZITHROMYCIN SUSPENSIONS AND TABLETS
World Health Organization
Chapter 32 HIGH-PERRORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the most versatile and widely used type of elution chromatography.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
POST MARKET SURVEILLANCE OF MEFENAMIC ACID CAPSULES AND TABLETS RETAILING IN NAIROBI, KENYA Research by : Khushali Naran Pindoria U29/35778/2010 Supervisor:
Abwova Veronica Vugutsa B. Pharm
TABLETS a mixture of powders compacted to form a single, rigid body most common dosage form possess a number of advantages B. AmsdenCHEE 440.
Solid Dosage Forms (Capsules)
World Health Organization
Validation of Analytical Method
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Analytical considerations
Module 1, Part 3: Process validation Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM – 12/2001 Validation Part 3: Process validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing.
PHARMACEUTICS- IV (PHT 414 ) Dr. Shahid Jamil SALMAN BIN ABDUL AZIZ UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY L /9/2015 Factors Affecting Drug Absorption (Dosage.
COMPARATIVE IN VITRO EVALUATION OF GENERIC CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS IN KENYA BY DANIEL MINYETO U59/81286/2012 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry.
A DONE BY: RONO KIPROTICH VICTOR U29/28970/2009 A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF AMOXICILLIN IN AMOXICILLIN CONTAINING CAPSULES AVAILABLE.
QUALITY OF CARBAMAZEPINE TABLETS IN NAIROBI COUNTY BY: KAINGU WINNIE MSINDA U29/2014/2010 SUPERVISOR: DR. K.O. ABUGA OCTOBER 2014.
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Quality control Lecture 1.
Analysis of Ibuprofen in Tablets According to the US Pharmacopoiea using a Varian 920-LC Analytical HPLC and Pursuit ® XRs column By Phuong Truong Varian.
Formulation factors By Dr. A. S. Adebayo.
<701> DISINTEGRATION
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines BCS-Biowaivers - Template Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of.
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas.
Extraction and HPLC of Hypericin Courtney Arnott Intermediate Lab Fall 2001.
1 G&H Meeting 4-5 th October, 2001 G&H Meeting 4-5 th October, 2001 Wellesbourne, UK Wellesbourne, UK WP 7 Pharmaceutics WP 7 Pharmaceutics Objectives.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Solid dosage forms Tablets
Quality control Lecture 1.
Quality Assurance of Medicines under Universal Health Coverage Program by Siriwat Tiptaradol (Presenter) Duangporn Abhigantaphand Sooksri Ungboriboonpisal.
QbD Technologies: Workshop for Risks Management Incorporating Risk Management for Technology Transfer.
OVER THE COUNTER MEDS INTRODUCTION No prescriptions are necessary and no questions need to be answered to attain these drugs OTC med use saves.
Dissolution Test (U.S.P.): Two set of apparatus: Apparatus-1: A single tablet is placed in a small wire mesh basket attached to the bottom of the shaft.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences Al-Ahliyya Amman University
- Pharmaceutical Equivalence Study
Chromatography- TLC & HPLC
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Solid dosage forms Tablets
Capsules, Tablets, and Powders
HPLC ANALYSIS OF AZITHROMYCIN SUSPENSIONS AND TABLETS
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Evaluation of tablet Lab 5.
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
Evaluation of tablet Lab 5.
IPSA (Industrial Problem Solving Ability )
Group members: Firdaus | Sofia | Nurainiza | Hafizah
Factors Affecting Drug Absorption (Dosage form factor)
Disintegration test & Dissolution test (official test)
Quality control Lecture 1.
J.Preethi*, P. Madhu, K. Arshad Ahmed Khan.
Lab -7- Capsules.
Selected Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetic Calculations
Lab -7- Capsules.
Tablets Lecturer: dr. Asmaa abdelaziz Mohamed Faculty of pharamcay
POWDER AND GRANULES FADHILAH FAIROZA FATIN HUSNA
Evaluation of tablet dosage form 4) Disintegration
Quality control Lecture 1.
Evaluation of tablet Lab 5.
Evaluation of tablet dosage form 5) dissolution
Formulation factors By Dr. A. S. Adebayo.
University of sulaimani
Use of a Modified Sodium Bicarbonate and Lubricant Choice to Improve the Dissolution Rate of Weakly Acidic Drugs Michael S. Todd, Greg Simon, Stephen.
Presentation transcript:

By Timina Olive Kayaviri Supervisor : Dr. Amugune SIMULTANEOUS ASSAY AND DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF ACECLOFENAC AND PARACETAMOL IN FIXED DOSE COMBINATION TABLETS ON THE KENYAN MARKET By Timina Olive Kayaviri U29/3570/2010 Supervisor : Dr. Amugune

INTRODUCTION Fixed dose combinations (FDCs)are becoming more popular over the years because they Are convenient and easy to handle Confer increased patient compliance. Reduce development of resistance. Are cheaper than the individual drugs given concurrently Have simpler distribution patterns. Decrease incidences of monotherapy in cases where it’s not recommended.

INTRODUCTION….. Pain is the most common reason patients seek medical attention. Analgesic therapy that combines individual agents with different mechanisms of action has potential advantages Example: NSAID- paracetamol combinations such as with aceclofenac. Combined adverse reactions is a major cause for concern. Systemic absorption of an orally administered drug in a solid dosage form is a function of disintegration, dissolution and the transfer across membranes. There is the need for comparative analysis of different brands to assess factors that affect bioavailability

JUSTIFICATION Few post marketing surveillance studies have been done on aceclofenac and paracetamol FDCs Side effects, widespread use and increasing number of generic products in the market Brands may contain equal active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) content but have varying dissolution profiles.

STUDY OBJECTIVES Overall objective To determine the quality of different paracetamol and aceclofenac FDCs on the Kenyan market as per the official monographs. Specific objectives To carry out assay of paracetamol and aceclofenac in FDCs on the Kenyan market. To carry out dissolution test on these FDCs. To determine whether the different brands are pharmaceutically interchangable.

METHODOLOGY Eight samples were obtained from different Pharmacies in Nairobi. Samples contained 100mg aceclofenac and 500mg paracetamol. Uniformity of weight test was carried out according to the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP). Assay of the API was carried out using HPLC. The samples were separated using HPLC system consisting UV – Visible detector at 210nm and a C16 column (15cm x 4.6mm, 5µm), using a mixture of 0.1% v/v triethylamine (pH 3.0) and acetonitrile (50:50) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 2ml/minute.

Methodology… Dissolution conditions were 900ml dissolution medium (phosphate buffer pH 7.4), medium temperature 37°C Dissolution tests were carried out using the USP dissolution apparatus II set at 75 revolutions per minute for 45 minutes. Amount of API dissolved was determined by HPLC under the same conditions as the assay.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - Uniformity of weight Tablets had total weights ranging between 650mg and 900 mg. % relative standard deviation ranged from -4.2 % to 2.6 % compared to the specified range of -5 % to 5 %. This is the case for all the batches except 004, which had a lower limit of -5.8 %. Uniformity of weight can be viewed as a measure of the uniformity of content.

Uniformity of weight Variations in weight can be attributed to factors such as uneven particle sizes and uneven flow of the particles uneven mixing of the excipients insufficient amount of lubricant or glidant the coating film in coated tablets vibrations These can be overcome by evaluating particle size before compression, incorporating enough amount of excipients and reducing vibrations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - Assay Run time for the assay was set at twelve minutes and chromatograms obtained, a typical one being shown below. Peak at 2.58 minutes represents paracetamol while that at 8.134 minutes represents aceclofenac.

Assay The content was calculated by comparing standard and sample peak areas. % label claim was calculated by comparing the content and the manufacturers label claim. Manufacturers label claim was that each tablet contains 100mg aceclofenac and 500mg paracetamol. General USP specifications state that each batch should have API content between 90% and 110% of the label claim. All the brands complied with the specifications for the assay according to the USP, with values ranging from 95% to 105% for paracetamol and 93% to 104% for aceclofenac except for one (brand 007), whose aceclofenac content was 85%.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - Dissolution Chromatograms for the amount of sample dissolved after 45 minutes were obtained after running the sample for twelve minutes. A typical one is shown below with peak at 3.178 minutes representing paracetamol and that at 6.661 minutes representing aceclofenac.

Dissolution The amount of sample dissolved was calculated by comparing standard and sample peak areas. USP general chapters 711 indicate that every tablet tested for dissolution should be Q+5, where Q is quantity specified in the specific monograph, in this case is considered to be 70%, the lowest % of content dissolved allowed for immediate release tablets. All the brands tested complied except brand 003 where two tablets complied with the test while four failed to comply and 006 where one tablet had a % dissolution content above 200 %.

CONCLUSION Four Brands (001, 002, 005 and 008) complied with all the tests carried out in this study. 50 % of samples complied with all the tests and may be considered to be interchangeable. The objectives of the study were achieved. Results are useful in guiding the regulator, clinicians and patients on brands that comply with monograph specifications. Results may indicate that nearly half of the drugs in the market are not recommended for use.

RECOMMENDATIONS For future studies, the School should facilitate method development and validation for key FDCs. There is need for more frequent and continuous post marketing surveillance studies on these FDCs.