Fuel Cost Adjustment and Implementation Methodology The LES Story Presented by Keith C. Brown Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Lincoln Electric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rate Plan. Value Story When asked, our customers identify the following topics as ways MidAmerican Energy provides value – Emergency Response.
Advertisements

Paying A Fair Rate. Notice Regarding New WATER & SEWER RATES  Council Meetings (Open Session) June 18, 2007 – Special Meeting June 18, 2007 – Special.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Trends in Electric Rates in the Midwest by Charlie Higley Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin for Energy Utility Basics Wisconsin Public Utility Institute.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
Jefferson County PUD Preliminary Cost of Service and Rate Design Results December 9, 2014 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
Consideration of Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) Standards A Public Hearing- October 22, 2007.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Contributions In-Aid and Development of Fees Utility Financial Solutions Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA President
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Citizens’ Academy Kathy Viehe GRU Interim General Manager November 12, 2014.
® FY 2007 Integrated Financial Plan Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 1, 2006 H. Glen Walker Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
LONG TERM ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PLAN STAFF RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS, ISSUES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN NOVEMBER 2004 Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission.
Department of Water and Power City of Los Angeles Energy Cost Adjustment Factor Modification August 2009 MODIFIED PROPOSAL WILL BE SUBMITTED ON DECEMBER.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
Alex Anemone, Superintendent of Schools Bob Brown, Interim Business Administrator December 15, 2014.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
1 Chapter 6 Financial Management for Water, Sewer, and Storm Water Systems.
Beyond Mandates, Does Green Pave the Way? Marlene Santos Vice President, Customer Service Florida Power & Light Company October 17, 2009.
WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Gale Klappa Chairman and Chief Executive.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
OPEBs: Implementation Issues For Public Power APPA 2005 Business & Finance Conference September 27, 2005 Jeffrey M. Tuttle, Vice President – Human Resources.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
The Multi- Year Price Determination MYPD Presented by: Thembani Bukula Regulator Member – Electricity Regulation.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Water Supply System Meeting #3 – Allocated FY
Discussion Forum 2004 APPA National Conference June 19 – 23, 2004 Seattle, Washington Issues for Green Power Programs Designing Marketing and Pricing.
Municipal Electric Aggregation Kane County Committee of the Whole October 25, 2011.
Bonneville Power Administration Significance of Rating Agency Ratings May 2002 Predicisional.
Who Pays for Safety? Who Should? November 19, 2015.
1 Strategic Plan | May Decisions on rates, budgets, investments, programs and services for six years ( ) The Strategic Plan.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
Demand Response
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
1 Water Department FY 2014 Sources and Uses FY 2014 Sources Retail Sales$54,788,834 Wholesale Sales646,250 Other Operating Revenues145,000 Non-Operating.
June 17, 2015 (Regina) June 18, 2015 (Saskatoon) SaskEnergy 2015 Rate Application.
FY PROPOSED BUDGET  A "Target Level" expenditure base was established for all departments six- months’ worth of operations (July 1, 2016 – December.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
DATA COLLECTION William McCarty Chairman Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission September 9-10 Riga, Latvia.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Senior Vice President Ashley Venturoni – Project Consultant Presented by: FY 2013 Water, &
Japanese Electricity Market M. Hossein Javidi Iran Electricity Market Regulatory Organization & Administrative Department for Electricity Market Regulatory.
City of Sequim Long Range Financial Plan City Council Study Session June 27, 2011.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Five-Year Financial Forecast August 2007
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
THE MMCC BUDGET January 15, 2015.
City-wide LED Street Light Conversion Program
2018 Adopted Budget February Financial Plan
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
PUBLIC HEARING: ESTABLISH A 20% WATER CONSERVATION TARGET AND IMPLEMENT LEVEL 1 WATER SUPPLY SHORTAGE PLAN March 27, 2017 Item 9.
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Creating a successful consortium
City of Fernley City Council Meeting
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
City Council September 17, 2018 Item 16
Solid Waste Department Rate Stabilization Plan Recommendation
Presentation transcript:

Fuel Cost Adjustment and Implementation Methodology The LES Story Presented by Keith C. Brown Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Lincoln Electric System Lincoln, Nebraska

A Little About Lincoln Electric System (LES): n 40 year old publicly owned electric-only system. n Vertically-integrated electric system with 710 megawatts (MW) of owned-generation, 177 participation-generation and 126 MW contract generation. n 124,430 retail customers with 87% residential and an average 3,100,700 mwh’s of retail and 425,000 mwh’s wholesale sales and a summer peak of 779 MW.

A Little More About LES: n LES is the 22 nd largest publicly owned electric utility by customer count from APPA. n LES has some of the lowest rates (lowest 10%) according to an annual survey including 106 major cities in the U.S. n LES has assets totaling $875 million with utility plant of $1.040 billion and annual revenue of over $215 million.

n LES utilizes a cost of service rate methodology little changed since adopted early in its operation. n With the advent of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of the late 1970’s – LES adopted three primary goals n Energy conservation n Efficient use of facilities and resources at an optimum level n Equitable rates to the electric customer

n As a result of 1980 PURPA hearings, the LES Administrative Board indicated all rate changes would have a public process and although considered did not recommend an automatic adjustment clause. We adopted the ACC clause which stipulated a biannual or every two years review with the Regulatory Authority n STOP – The LES organization structure – a quick review would be helpful: n Rate Staff n Pricing and Products Committee n Administrative Board Budget and Rates Committee n Administrative Board Public Hearing n Administrative Board Approval n City Council – Lincoln – Public Hearing n City Council Approval n PURPA requirements - notification

n Rate Process has successfully worked for years – here’s the history:

n But this is 2006, and the world we live in has changed: n Fuel – coal and transportation – environmental – natural gas – storms and commodities n Other – growth of customer loads – miscellaneous – like droughts, etc.

n LES looks at the 2006 Budget and its assumptions and says wait a minute… n We forecast a $35 million increase in power costs, up almost 40% from 2005 Budget and almost 30% from the estimated/actual forecast for 2005 (55% from 2004). n That would translate into multi digit rate increases. n Natural gas estimated at $13-15 mcf at burner tip. n Purchased power priced on natural gas. n LES executives say it is time to look at an automatic adjustment clause – Power Cost Adjustments (PCA).

n The proposed PCA can be adjusted upwards and downwards as necessary commensurate with cost fluctuations, rather than a base adjustment which remains constant. n The proposed PCA would reflect only changes in power costs i.e., fuel, transportation and purchased power – not other operating expense.

n LES, like everyone, learns from the lessons of life and politics:  Our Administrative Board is committed to maintaining the financial integrity of LES with a double A rating from all three rating agencies. It recognizes the need for adequate revenues to cover costs and maintain adequate financial ratios.  Our Board represents all customers and has the responsibility to oversee the management and operations of LES.  Our Board is committed to the “cost of service” concept which fairly allocates the cost of production and delivery to each and every customer. n Remember these salient points in the rest of this discussion.

n Politics = interesting rate making and public hearings. n In 2006,LES proposed a PCA to cover power cost increases without a flat percentage across the board change. n After the Administrative Board public hearing and the protests from its 20 Industrial customers, the proposal was modified to a 4 ½% increase providing 50% of the revenue and a PCA providing the balance. n STOP – remember from November – December to February natural gas price tumbled from $13 – 15 mcf burner tip to $8 – 10 mcf burner tip. The $35 million increase became a $20 million increase.

n LES presented the 4 ½% across the board plus a PCA of capped structure.5¢ per kwh in the months of October through May and.75¢ per kwh in the months of June through September. n This would provide a rate increase of above 12% for the largest user because the PCA is based on energy used. And the PCA is strictly dedicated to the energy component.

n LES basically had complete Board and City Council support for this rate plan until the City Council public hearing. Then the 20 Industrial users with varying levels of input used the political process to limit the increase to an across the board 4 ½%. n The City Council in unusual negotiation changed and added fees to replace a limit amount of revenue but these are generally regressive and do not follow cost of service concepts. If habits are in fact changed, revenue decreases. n With continually decreasing natural gas prices today barely $6 per mcf burner tip and some annual contracts for replacement power at a reasonable price to cover extended but planned outages at two major sources – LES has survived this scenario.

n LESSONS learned  Education is the best rate tool there is – Rate payers – large and small Policymakers Legislators Regulators  Sound cost of service principles are the best practice BUT That does include tools like automatic cost adjustment Power Cost Adjustment – whatever you call it

n With the Energy Act of 2006, PURPA rules can and must be reviewed – and this offers an opportunity for education of your staff, Board and any other rate regulators. n It was amazing how little information was available, nationwide to look at automatic cost adjustment processes, who uses them, covering what costs, etc. Even the rating agencies lacked a database. n And speaking of the rating agencies, remember one of the selling points to your rate approving bodies is the value of flexible revenue sources to pay costs, especially debt service.

n So far, LES is the PCA dinosaur. Is the natural gas price ever going above $10 again, will the sun come up tomorrow… n At a slower pace, with a strong educational program without a real problem overshadowing the time, we will return with the PCA And now it is time for several quick questions.