Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Permitting and Compliance Smithfield Foods Environmental Conference Chicago, IL July 2013.
Advertisements

Development and Application of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios to Account for PM2.5 Secondary Formation in Georgia James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia.
How NAAQS Revisions Can Affect Your Facility trinityconsultants.com Michael Ballenger, P.E. and Russell Bailey Central District’s Power Generation Conference.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
The Monte Carlo Method A Case Study for 1-Hour NO2 Modeled Impacts Greg Quina SC DHEC Bureau of Air Quality
Impact Area 1-hour standards. SILs used to determine when a proposed source’s ambient impacts warrant a comprehensive (cumulative) source impact analysis.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
Use of Emergency Engines for Emergency DR Is Good Policy June 24, 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Nevada May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Jersey May 2013.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
North Dakota’s Approach to a Periodic Review to Determine the Status of Consumption of PSD Class I Sulfur Dioxide Increments WESTAR Fall Technical Conference,
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
SIP Steering Committee Meeting March 29,  In October 2011, EPA issued draft SIP and modeling guidance related to the 1-hour SO2 standard issued.
Air Quality Regulations – What’s New? (for Ethanol Plants) Shelley Schneider Air Quality Division Administrator.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Utah May 2013.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
EPA’s New National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Sunil Kumar MWAQC July 28,
Compliance Challenges in Meeting 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) NAAQS Sube Vel, GHD Co-speaker: James VanAssche, GHD.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Arkansas July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Using Measurements and Modeling to Understand Local and Regional Influences on PM 2.5 in Vicinity of the PRGS.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011
1-hour NO2 Modeling Issues
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Use of Emergency Engines for Emergency DR Is Good Policy June 24, 2013
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011

Overview of New NO 2 NAAQS 1-hr NO 2 = 100 ppb (189 ug/m3) Effective on April 12, 2010 Based on 98th percentile of annual distribution of daily max. 1-hour values Current NJ 1-Hour Background Levels: 37% to 67% of NAAQS

NO 2 1-Hour Modeling EPA Guidance Memos of June 28, 2010 and March 1, 2011: Interim SIL (7.5 ug/m 3 ) 3-Tiered NO to NO 2 conversion approach Treatment of intermittent emissions (limits modeling of start-up/shutdown, emergency equipment)

NO 2 1-Hour Modeling NJDEP Guidance: Interim SIL of 10 ug/m 3 (NESCAUM) July 29, 2011 memo – Emergency generator and fire pump exemptions from modeling 1-hour NO 2 /SO 2 impacts (specific to combined-cycle plants, case- by-case for others)

Example of 1-Hour NO 2 Modeling LS Power West Deptford Station 600 MW Combined-Cycle Plant Natural gas with 0.05% sulfur oil backup Modeled before EPA and NJDEP guidance memos (intermittent sources; emergency generator/fire pumps)

Scenarios of Interest Normal Operations (NOx natl. gas = 37 lb/hr, NOx oil = 70 lb/hr) Startup Operations (NOx = 323 lb/hr) Emergency Generator (NOx = 10 lb/hr) Fire Pump (NOx = 1.3 lb/hr)

1-Hour NO 2 Impacts (Highest 98 th percentile / 8 th high concentration) Normal Operations (70 lbs/hr, oil) = 8.1 ug/m 3 Startup Operations (323 lbs/hr) = 42 ug/m 3 Emergency Equipment(11.3 lbs/hr) = 43 ug/m 3 (no testing during turbine startup/shutdown) (1-hour NO2 NAAQS = 189 ug/m 3 )

Lesson : Smaller sources with short stacks and transitional scenarios at large facilities can cause big 1-hr NO 2 impacts!

Overview of New SO 2 NAAQS 1-hr SO 2 = 75 ppb (196 ug/m3) Effective on August 23, 2010 Based on 99th percentile of annual distribution of daily max. 1-hour values Current NJ 1-Hour Background Levels: 18% - 47% of NAAQS

SO 2 1-Hour Modeling August 23, 2010 EPA Guidance Memos: Suggested interim SIL (7.8 ug/m 3 ) Methods of demonstrating NAAQS compliance, calculating background, etc. 24-hour and annual SO 2 NAAQS revoked Intermittent emissions not as important as with NO 2

Example of 1-Hour SO 2 Modeling Portland Power Plant Coal-fired Unit 1 – 160 MW / 1958 Unit 2 – 240 MW / 1962 No existing emission controls for SO 2 Average 2007 – 2010 annual emissions of 29,067 tons

1-Hour SO 2 Modeling Conducted with Two EPA Models 1. AERMOD (guideline model) 2. CALPUFF (complex terrain model) Designed for locations with complex wind fields Must conduct a model validation showing it performs better for the given application than EPA’s guideline model (see June 2011 JAWM article)

CALPUFF – Allowable Emissions Max. Impact 1.4 times over 3-hr NAAQS

Summary of CALPUFF Results 1-Hour SO 2 NAAQS (196 ug/m 3 ) Meteorological Time Period Emissions Days Violating NAAQS % Over NAAQS 2002Allowable % (~ 17 x NAAQS) 2002 Actual (CEM data) % (~ 10 x NAAQS) (background not included)

M m

Summary of AERMOD Results 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS (196 ug/m 3 ) Meteorological Time Period Emissions Days Violating NAAQS % Over NAAQS Allowable % (~ 6 x NAAQS) Actual (avg. monthly)5 138 % (~ 1.4 x NAAQS) (No predicted violations of the 3-hour or 24-hour NAAQS, background not included)

Columbia Lake SO 2 Monitor Data collected at Columbia Lake Monitor since Sept. 23, exceedances of the 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS of 75 ppb (196 ug/m 3 ) recorded since Sept. 23, 2010 Monitor located where both models predicted high impacts but not maximum

Columbia Lake - Sept. 23, 2010 to Sept. 15, 2011

1-Hour SO 2 Modeling Conclusions SO 2 1-Hour NAAQS is much more easily violated than the 3 and 24-Hour NAAQS Columbia Lake monitoring confirms both CALPUFF and AERMOD predictions of 1- hour NAAQS violation at that location Principal sources of concern are older, large sources burning No. 6 oil or coal (especially after Sub. 9 Sulfur in Fuel Rule)