Point-in-Time Count/Survey & Homeless Needs Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Homelessness in Orange County Homelessness in Orange County Orange County Government Board of County Commission Meeting January 29, 2013.
Advertisements

Homeless Planning Council of Delaware. Purpose Methodology Summary Statistics Future Plans.
Crisis Shelter Program GOALS To stabilize youth and families in crisis To develop stable living conditions for youth To engage families in the resolution.
Housing First: Where it Works
The Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) January 1, 2006 – June 30, 2006.
2012 Point-In-Time Count (PIT), Housing Inventory Chart (HIC), and a Tool for Determining Unmet Need Utah State Community Services Office May 9, 2012.
“Untangling the Web: Collaborations Between Housing Agencies and School Districts to Meet HEARTH Act Requirements” October 28, 2012 How one model in Atlanta.
PPA786: Urban Policy Class 8: Homelessness. Urban Policy: Homelessness Class Outline ▫Definition of Homelessness ▫Counting the Homeless ▫Who Are the Homeless?
Every Georgian Counts : Understanding Homelessness in Your Community.
Homelessness and Poverty in Las Cruces. What is Homelessness? Places not meant for human habitation, such as cars, parks, sidewalks, and abandoned buildings;
2013 Homeless Enumeration Results for the Washington Metropolitan Region Presented by: Michael Ferrell, Chairman MWCOG Human Services and Public Safety.
The Gap Analysis and Homeless Populations Metro Detroit’s Community Summit on Ending Homelessness.
Burke County 2009 Point in Time Count of homeless people Martha Hemphill, Facilitator Burke County Continuum of Care For the Homeless.
2012 Kitsap Homeless Point-In-Time Count Results.
MONTEREY COUNTY HOMELESS CENSUS AND SURVEY 2009 Prepared by The Coalition of Homeless Service Providers Monterey County, CA.
2013 Georgia Homeless Count. Objective Count of homeless and precariously housed families and individuals Understand the scope of the problem locally.
2015 Point In Time Count: Broward County CoC Plan to End Homelessness
HOW TO MAKE HOMELESS POINT-IN-TIME (PIT) COUNT MORE SUCCESSFUL The Second Annual Nebraska-Western Iowa Symposium on Homelessness Homeless in the Heartland.
For every 1,000 Sonoma County residents, 9 had an episode of homelessness last year. Sonoma County Homeless Data Sourcebook, Source: 2013 Sonoma.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
OCTOBER 24, 2012 PRESENTED BY RENEE LAMBERJACK, RESEARCH & EVALUATION ASSISTANT Annual Homeless Assessment Report Presentation to Safe Harbors Partners.
2010 Point-in-Time Homeless Count Training for Survey Volunteers.
HUD’s 2008 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Dennis Culhane, University of Pennsylvania Jill Khadduri, Abt Associates, Inc. Alvaro Cortes, Abt Associates,
2011 Point-in-Time Homeless Count Training for Survey Volunteers.
Maryland’s Interagency Council on Homelessness Tuesday February 10, 2015.
Annual Point-in-Time Count of Homelessness in Vermont January 30, 2013 TRAINING GUIDE.
Presented by: Michael Ferrell, Chairman MWCOG Human Services and Public Safety Policy Committee APRIL 17, 2015 Photo Credit: Bob Jagendorf 2015 Homeless.
1 The Point in Time Enumeration Process in Washington, D.C. Darlene Mathews The Community Partnership for the Prevention of Homelessness
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2013 Program Staff Training January 2013 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition to End Homelessness.
Homelessness in Delaware: Summary of the 2011 Point-in-Time Study.
Homeless Point in Time Counts : The ultimate indicator of community wellbeing Community Indicators Consortium 9/31/14: Indicators for best practice
Conducting Better Point-in-Time Counts of Homeless Persons Erin Wilson Abt Associates Inc. Washington, DC July 9, 2007.
2015 POINT IN TIME & HIC. Sheltered PIT Data 2015 People in Households with Children.
JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION Statewide THP-Plus Data Collection and Outcomes: Results from the First Year California Connected by 25 Initiative Convening May.
E151U: Housing & Urban Development Homelessness Images of the Homeless When you hear the word homeless, what do you visualize?
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2014 Emergency Shelter Project Staff Training January 2014 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition.
Volusia/Flagler County Coalition for the Homeless Eggs & Issues Presentation July 19, 2013.
The 2007 Annual Homeless Assessment Report: A Report to Congress on Homelessness in America Paul Dornan, Office of PD&R, HUD Jill Khadduri, Abt Associates.
MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.
2014 POINT IN TIME COMMUNITY REPORT SHELTERED PERSONS REPORT.
2010 Florida HMIS Conference 1. Using HMIS to Inform Performance Measurement Outcomes Objective: –Enhance awareness and understanding on using HMIS to.
2009 Georgia Homeless Count. Objective Count of homeless and precariously housed families and individuals Understand the scope of the problem locally.
Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Survey: DRAFT Final Report April 8, 2015.
District Homeless Contact - Ash Bailey Homeless Liaison & Office of Federal Programs – Kathy Varner
Point-in-Time Count January What Does It Mean to Count Homeless People? A “count” = collecting information about the sheltered and unsheltered homeless.
Prepared by Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The First Annual Homeless Assessment Report.
2016 St. Johns County Point In Time Count When: Thursday, January 28, 2016.
2016 Point-in-Time Count of UNSHELTERED Persons Experiencing Homelessness PIT Volunteer Training by Diana T. Myers & Associates, Inc. (DMA) on behalf of.
2015 POINT IN TIME & HIC. Homeless Survey Sectors.
2016 Homeless Count Housing & Career Services Anne Lansing, Project Planner April 25, 2016.
McLennan County Homeless Population Count Project Summary of Findings September 2007.
Point In Time, 2017 CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR
2017 Housing Inventory & Point-in-Time Night January 25, 2017
Point in Time Count/Housing Inventory Count Presentation
2017 HIC & PIT January 26, 2017.
HOMELESSNESS IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY - WHAT DOES THE DATA TELL US?
Point In Time, 2017 CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR
What is the Homeless Point-in-Time Count?
Point-in-Time January 24, 2017
Housing & Career Services Anne Lansing, Project Planner April 24, 2017
2017 State of Homelessness.
Jennifer O’Reilly-Jones Homeless Program Coordinator April 30, 2018
Without a Home in [COUNTY/REGION NAME]
Shelter Count Training
Annual Homeless Point-in-Time & Housing Inventory Count
Point in Time Count/Housing Inventory Count Presentation
Point In Time, 2017 CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR
Point in Time Count & Housing Inventory Count Final Report 2018
Introduction This report provides an overview of homelessness in Monroe County for the time period: 10/1/2107 – 09/30/2018. The time period selected is.
2018 Annual Point-in-Time Report
Presentation transcript:

Point-in-Time Count/Survey & Homeless Needs Assessment

Point in Time Survey Regarding this Point In Time Summary Information: The methodology employed in Orange County’s 2007 Point In Time County used a conservative approach and utilized HUD’s restrictive definition of homelessness. As such, the characteristics of those that because they have no other choice are forced to live doubled and tripled up and those that use motels as de facto shelters are not represented here. Those unsheltered homeless that chose not, could not or were not identified to participate in the count and survey are underrepresented as well. This information is being provided as a snapshot of a subset of Orange County’s homeless population and while it may not represent the actual findings of the broader homeless community, it does provide insight into the challenges faced by those residents with the greatest needs in our community.

2 Point in Time Survey What is it? Point in Time Count & Survey is a one night count of unsheltered homeless as directed by HUD A simultaneous count of sheltered homeless Survey conducted the next day A “point-in-time” snapshot of homeless on the street and in shelters within one 24-hour period Meant to show “bare minimum”- does not include precariously housed (RV parks, hotel/motel, doubled up, etc)

3 Point in Time Survey Why do we count? Mandated by HUD to be conducted every other year in January Provides information to HUD and Congress ensuring that much needed programs continue to receive adequate funding Results are reported in the HUD Continuum of Care application Provides information to our community regarding gaps and needs

4 Methodology Sheltered Homeless –HUD defines sheltered homeless as adults, children and unaccompanied youth who, on the night of the count, are living in shelters for the homeless, including: Emergency Shelters Transitional Housing Domestic Violence Shelters Residential programs for runaway/homeless youth Any hotel, motel or apartment voucher arrangements paid for by a public or private agency because the person or family is homeless (note: not captured due to limited resources)

5 Point-in-Time Count Results Only captured homeless in shelters and in previously identified outdoor locations at one point-in-time Identified 3,649 unduplicated persons identified as homeless in shelters and on the streets in Orange County on January 25, 2007 Average incidents per homeless client as reported by shelters was 7.6 Extrapolation of count resulted in 27,732 incidents of homelessness estimated over a twelve month period

Homeless Needs Assessment  Summarizes total homeless persons served and turned away in Orange County shelters over a twelve month period  Total homeless episodes over a twelve month period: 35,065  Total homeless episodes for persons in families with children over a twelve month period: 24,545 (10,227 family units)  Total homeless episodes for unaccompanied individuals over a twelve month period: 10,520

7 Weaknesses in Count Methodologies The federally mandated Point-in-Time Count only captures people in shelters and on the streets in a single 24-hour period It under-represents families and children because people using homeless services over time is different than the population at a single point in time Point-in-time estimates capture a higher share of chronically homeless who use shelters for long periods of time and under-represent persons and families whose homelessness is episodic and who often use motels as de facto shelter The Homeless Needs Assessment primary data only captured persons and families seeking shelter and receiving shelter Orange County MUST develop a methodology that quantifies the thousands of homeless families and individuals living in motels, cars, and other places not captured in the annual needs assessment or bi-annual count Resources are needed to accomplish this goal

8 Households by Shelter Type

9 Subpopulation Demographics (Sheltered and Unsheltered)

10 Survey Respondents Male Female Unsheltered Emergency Shelters Transitional Shelters Mixed Shelters 29.2% 70.8% 34.6% 65.4% 60.3% 39.7% 67.8% 32.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% Figure 2. Gender by Shelter Type Unsheltered Emergency Shelters Transitional Shelters Mixed Shelters Unsheltered Respondents (24% of survey respondents) 270 surveys completed 79 (32.2%) female 166 (67.8%) male 25 did not report gender Sheltered Respondents (76% of survey respondents) 855 surveys completed 477 (56.3%) female 370 (43.7%) male 8 did not report gender

11 Respondent Age

12 Unsheltered Respondents by Age and Gender

13 Sheltered Respondents by Age and Gender

14 Last Known Permanent Address (Sheltered Homeless) 814 respondents 642 (78.9%) Orange County 63 (7.7%) Los Angeles County 9 (1.1%) San Diego County 100 (12.3%) identified a county other than OC, LA or SD San Bernadino-14 Riverside-24 Kern-2 Kings-1 Monterey-1 San Joaquin-1 San Jose-1 Santa Barbara-1 Santa Clara-2 Shasta-2 Sutter-1 Ventura-1 49 reported last known permanent address outside of California

15 Usual Sleeping Places

16 Length of Homelessness 269 (78.2%) unsheltered survey respondents 794 (92.9%) sheltered respondents Unsheltered respondents homeless longer than sheltered respondents Mean length of time Unsheltered-2.97 years Sheltered-1.38 years

17 Reasons for Homelessness

18 Current Monthly Income by Survey Location

19 Sources of Income

20 Reasons for Not Receiving Assistance

21 Services Needed but Not Received