Results ◦ In general beer drinkers were not able to differentiate between different brands of beer in a blind test ◦ In general beer drinkers were not able to identify their favorite brand in a blind test ◦ Brand identification influenced evaluation Overall preference Attributes
Approaches to conceptualize brand equity ◦ Why look at brands? (Brand effects) ◦ Brand equity Brand associations (differentiation) Brand awareness (identification)
”Brand equity is the added value endowed by the brand to the product” Brand elements (sources to brand equity)
◦ Brand Associations ◦ Brand Awareness
Brand associations Brand associations are memory nodes linked directly or indirectly to a brand name in long term memory A brand image is the set of associations linked to a brand name Different types of associations Primary and secondary associations Desirable qualities of brand associations 6
7 McDonald’s
8 Associative Network Model McDonald’s Burger King Fastfood BigMac Ronald McDonald Capitalism Unhealthy food French fries USA Coca Cola ”Subway” Sandwich Downtown Wait in lines I’m lovin’ it Fun Regret
9 Product attributes Non-product related attributes ◦ packaging, warranties, price, users, etc. Brand benefits ◦ Functional (problem solving)
10
11
12 Product attributes Non-product related attributes ◦ packaging, warranties, price, users, etc. Brand benefits ◦ Functional (problem solving) ◦ Symbolic (status)
13 Symbolic brand benefits
14
15 Product attributes Non-product related attributes ◦ packaging, warranties, price, users, etc. Brand benefits ◦ Functional (problem solving) ◦ Symbolic (status) ◦ Experiential (sensory/hedonic)
16 Experiential brand benefits
17
18 Product attributes Non-product related attributes ◦ packaging, warranties, price, users, etc. Brand benefits ◦ Functional (problem solving) ◦ Symbolic (status) ◦ Experiential (sensory/hedonic) Situations
19 User situation
20
Brand associations Brand associations are memory nodes linked directly or indirectly to a brand name in long term memory A brand image is the set of associations linked to a brand name Different types of associations Primary and secondary associations 21
22 Primary assosiations Mercedes Audi High qualityPrestige BMW Prestige High quality Prestige High quality
23 Primary associations Mercedes Audi High qualityPrestige BMW Prestige High quality Prestige High quality Secondary assosiations Silent/no noice Large cars Royal / offical Formal Competent Respected Intelligent Driving experience Efficient Design Driving experience Large engine Quattro Well equiped Self- confidence Sporty Winter ”Family-sporty” Joy of driving
Favorability Strength Uniqueness 24
Why be interested in brand awareness? Different forms of awareness Consequences of awareness Influencing awareness (Marketing implications)
Customers do seldom intentionally seek information Information overload ◦ People used to spend time to save money, now they spend money to save time
Depth ◦ recognition ◦ Recall Breadth ◦ different use and buying situations
Ask not what the brand can evoke; Ask what can evoke the brand? Use and purchase situations
Brand evaluation versus evocation Brand Prod.cat. Choice sit. Attitudes Benefits Attributes Brand Prod.cat. Choice sit. Attitudes Benefits Attributes Memory in brand evaluationMemory in brand evocation
Memory in Brand Evaluation Volvo Attributes? Choice situation? Prod. category? Benefits? Attitudes?
Memory in Brand Evocation Volvo Attributes? Choice situation? Family car Benefits? Attitudes?
Memory in Brand Evocation Volvo Attributes? New car when the first baby arrives? Family car Benefits? Attitudes?
Memory in Brand Evocation Volvo Safety New car when the first baby arrives? Family car Benefits? Attitudes?
Memory in Brand Evocation Volvo Safety New car when the first baby arrives? Family car Solid, reliable Attitudes?
Memory in Brand Evocation Volvo Safety New car when the first baby arrives? Family car Solid, reliable Traditional
Awareness and communication Awareness and associations Awareness and choice and evaluation processes
Consideration set/Choice sets Liking (mere exposure) Decision Heuristic Perceived Quality
Total set of brands Awareness set Consideration set Choice set
Discussion of the effects of the latest ad campaign Results So, what is the effect for us?
Results Before Retrieval: 13% Consideration: 8% Choice: 4% Intention: 3.39 After Retrieval: 58% Consideration: 27% Choice: 5% Intention: 3.40
Hey, Subway is running an ad campaign What is the effect for us? Results Implications?
Results Before Retrieval: 28% Consideration: 14% Choice: 5% Intention: 4.83 After Retrieval: 60% Consideration: 46% Choice: 19% Intention: 5.67
Exposure/awareness Recall of a brand can not be viewed in isolation independent from its reference frame Memory: ◦ Brand retrieval ◦ Also retrieves the relevant comparison set Study Question: ◦ What are the consequences of increasing the retrieval probability Results
”mere exposure” Information availability Sosial desirability
Message complexity (Anand and Sternthal, 1990) ◦ Execution strategy (Haugtvedt et al., 1994) ◦ Competitive situation Individual factors Repetition and learning ◦ The truth effect
Information regarding previously used brands are more easily accessed in memory Small brands are also typically less exposed in the stores Learning advantage for large and well-known brands
Social desirability influences people’s attitudes and actions We often infer appropriate behavior in different situations by observing others Deviations from socially acceptable behavior are met with sanctions ”Where all think alike, no one thinks very much” - Walter Lippmann
Buys the brands one know ◦ # of brands ◦ time Cue for quality ◦ with or without experience
Exposure ◦ Facilitate initial exposure ◦ Maximize accidental exposure ◦ Maintain exposure Relevance ◦ Emphasis on self-relevance ◦ Situational relevance
Stimuli characteristics ◦ Vividness ◦ Salience (unusual, novel) Comprehension ◦ Knowledge/involvement ◦ Remembering ◦ Miscomprehension ◦ Exposure environment
Pride & Ferrell: Ch. 12 Park, Jaworski & MacInnes (1986). Keller, Kevin L. (2008): Strategic Brand Management, 3rd edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Nedungadi, Prakash (1990): Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3),