2014 Operators Training Seminar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

Results from the 2013 Survey of LSEs to Obtain Retail DR and Dynamic Pricing information Public Summary Frontier Associates LLC June
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
ERCOT Emergency Load Response Sam Jones Paul Wattles Steve Krein PUC Demand Response Workshop Sept. 15, 2006.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
April 23, 2014 DSWG Loads in SCEDv1 Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher ERCOT Staff.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
Presented By: Mark Patterson ERCOT Manager, Demand Integration November 29, Minute ERS Pilot update to TAC 1.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
Price Responsive Load Survey Draft Results Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS Aug. 22, 2012.
Distributed Energy Resources Concept Document Discussion ERCOT Staff DREAM Task Force Aug. 25,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Mandy Bauld ERCOT October 9, 2012 RTM SETTLEMENT TIMELINE.
ERCOT Emergency Interruptible Load Program Paul Wattles Steve Krein WMS Oct. 13, 2006.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Sept. 28, 2007 Interim Update Load Response Survey.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
Retail DR and Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley Updates to DSWG & RMS January 2013.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations June 27, 2012 – ETWG Meeting.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Analysis of Load Reductions Associated with 4-CP Transmission Charges in ERCOT Carl L Raish Principal Load Profiling and Modeling Demand Side Working Group.
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Presentation transcript:

2014 Operators Training Seminar Demand Response in ERCOT 2014 Operators Training Seminar

Introduction This presentation on Demand Response in ERCOT is intended to introduce the various Demand Response Products that are both administered by ERCOT or provided by market participants in the ERCOT region.

Objectives At the completion of this course of instruction you will: Identify the various types of Demand Response participating in the ERCOT region Identify when each of these types may be used to help maintain the reliability of the ERCOT grid.

Demand Response in ERCOT Load Resources Non-Controllable (NCLR) Controllable (CLR) Loads In SCED Emergency Response Service 10-Minute ERS 30-Minute ERS Weather-Sensitive ERS 4CP (Transmission Costs) TDSP Load Management Programs Voluntary Load Response

Load Resources Beginning June 1, 2014 Load Type Service Requirements Description/Notes Non-Controllable Load Resources (NCLR) Responsive Reserve Service (RRS) Interval metering Telemetry Under-Frequency Relay (instantaneous trip) plus 10-minute ramp capability ERCOT Qualification Industrial Loads 217 LRs with 2900 MW of total registered capacity LRs limited to 50% of total RRS Dispatched during Energy Emergency Alert (EEA) or automatically due to frequency drop Controllable Load Resources (CLR) Regulation Service Responsive Reserve Service Ability to move load in both directions in response to AGC-type signals Governor-type frequency response Industrial Loads and storage devices with sophisticated control systems and ramping capability Must move automatically in both directions Very limited participation Beginning June 1, 2014 Controllable Load Resources Energy Only or Non-Spinning Reserve Service Interval metering Telemetry Ability to follow SCED Base Points ERCOT Qualification Existing CLRs or Aggregated Commercial and Residential Loads (ALRs) Energy Bids considered by SCED May set SCED clearing price

Non-Controllable Load Resources Non-Controllable Load Resources Providing RRS can be deployed: Automatic trip based on UFR settings Verbal dispatch by ERCOT during EEA event (by group or as a block*) Verbal dispatch by ERCOT during an Emergency Condition (by group or as a block*) Verbal dispatch by ERCOT to solve a local Emergency Condition (location-specific)

Load Resource RRS Deployments 2011 to Current

Load Resource RRS Deployments 2011 to Current

Controllable Load Resources Energy storage technologies when charging off the ERCOT grid can participate as a Controllable Load Resource Some energy storage technologies can provide fast response to deployment signals A Fast Response Regulation Service (FRRS) Pilot Project was approved by the ERCOT board in November 2012. The FRRS Pilot was initiated in February 2013. When the pilot began, there were 32 MW FRRS UP and 30 MW FRRS DOWN qualified to participate.

Loads In SCED NPRR555, Load Resource Participation in Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch represents ERCOT’s effort to find a way for demand response to contribute to price formation Eligibility to participate: LSE QSEs representing Load Resources capable of following 5-minute SCED base point instructions Existing or new single-site Controllable Load Resources (CLRs) Aggregate Load Resources (ALRs) composed of multiple sites within single ERCOT Load Zone (subset of CLR) QSEs with LRs in SCED will submit Bids to buy (not Offers to sell)

Loads IN SCED (Cont’) Bids will reflect LR’s willingness to consume “up to” a specified five-minute Load Zone LMP Bid will modify the SCED demand curve and have ability to set price SCED Generation to be Dispatched (GTBD) will be adjusted to accommodate LR participation This will ensure proper price formation and reduce the likelihood of oscillating dispatch instructions LR benefits and opportunity: Avoided cost of consumption above specified price Price certainty due to ERCOT dispatch Eligibility to provide Non-spin For ALRs, participation in SCED and Non-spin are both contingent on validation by ERCOT of the QSE’s telemetry at time of LR qualification, and spot-validation thereafter

Loads IN SCED (Cont’) RRS and Non-Spin from CLR will be deployed via economic dispatch of DR capacity via SCED CLR will have RTM Energy Bid that covers the RRS and/or Non-Spin capacity released to SCED Also can optionally bid additional DR capacity for SCED dispatch No change to existing participation in RRS by UFR-type Load Resources UFR-LR-RRS may still be deployed manually in EEA 2 No change to existing ERS

Emergency Response Service Emergency Response Service (ERS) is: An additional emergency tool for ERCOT operators to reduce the likelihood of involuntary firm load shedding (a.k.a. rolling blackouts) Service provided by loads (customers) willing to interrupt during an electric grid emergency in exchange for a payment Deployed ONLY in the late stages of a grid emergency as a last resort prior to firm load shedding (rotating outages) “Controlled interruption of prepared customers vs. uncontrolled interruption of unprepared customers”

Emergency Response Service When will ERS be needed? Emergencies can occur at any time: Cold weather months -- due to natural gas curtailment & higher than expected forced outages Shoulder months -- due to unforeseen weather events & large amounts of scheduled maintenance Traditional summer peaks Anytime, as may be caused by: generation outages (scheduled, forced or both) transmission outages beyond likely contingencies extreme weather events multiple simultaneous contingencies ERS may be more likely to be needed in off-peak or shoulder months than during traditional summer peaks

Emergency Response Service ERS may be provided by: Loads or Back-up-Generation capable of being deployed within specified ramp rates Distributed Generation capable of injecting energy within specified ramp rates ERS Service Types 10-Minute Ramp ERS 30-Minute Ramp ERS Weather Sensitive ERS (starting 6/1/2014) Interval Metering Required No Real-Time telemetry Required Dispatch Sequence 30-Minute ERS Dispatched in EEA Level 1 ( PRC<2300 MWs) 10-Minute ERS Dispatched in EEA Level 2 ( PRC<1750 MWs)

Weather Sensitive ERS ERCOT Board approved WS ERS Pilot Project in March 2013 to test an ERS product with demand reduction capability that varies based on weather. Procured for June 2013 through September 2013 Contract Period (Pilot Only) Pilot Project included 1 Residential Aggregation (2.5 MWs) and 1 non-residential aggregation (0.1 MW) NPRR 571, ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Approved by ERCOT Board in December 2013 Shall be available for the June through September 2014 Standard Contract Term ERS Weather Sensitive Pilot

Participation in ERS by Service Type   Oct11Jan12 FebMay12 JunSep12 Oct12Jan13 FebMay13 JunSep13 Oct13Jan14 FebMay14 BH1 466.800 469.800 513.075 450.060 457.700 472.125 589.095 622.920 BH2 403.500 473.100 364.900 447.560 456.460 351.550 582.995 607.035 BH3 445.300 456.000 357.000 434.310 440.830 345.500 568.470 598.360 NBH 388.700 390.400 451.890 402.385 383.610 384.875 510.320 518.140 ERS-30   Oct11Jan12 FebMay12 JunSep12 Oct12Jan13 FebMay13 JunSep13 Oct13Jan14 FebMay14 BH1 N/A 19.400 80.280 73.000 126.970 134.252 149.310 BH2 16.250 82.330 72.900 87.650 136.348 125.935 BH3 15.800 82.010 59.000 76.190 122.565 118.270 NBH 9.500 71.150 40.500 100.940 111.671 97.295 Weather-Sensitive ERS   Oct11Jan12 FebMay12 JunSep12 Oct12Jan13 FebMay13 JunSep13 Oct13Jan14 FebMay14 BH2 N/A 2.6 BH3 WEH BH1 - Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays BH2 - Business Hours 2 HE 1400 through 1600, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays BH3 - Business Hours 3 HE 1700 through 2000, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays NBH - Non-Business Hours All other hours

What is 4CP? The Four Coincident Peaks in ERCOT are the highest-Load 15-minute settlement intervals in each of the four summer months (June, July, August, September) These intervals are the basis of various Transmission & Distribution (T&D) charges for much of the ERCOT Load Non-Opt In Entities (Muni’s and Co-ops), at the boundary meter level Retail Choice customers with peak demand ≥700 kW (Interval Data Recorder meter required) Combined, over 44% of total ERCOT Load is subject to 4CP charges Retail choice load Chart represents percentages of Load at IE 1700 on Aug. 3, 2011, ERCOT’s all-time system peak “Large C&I” = IDR Required

At wholesale, 4CP is the basis of TCOS funding Each Transmission Service Provider (TSP) calculates its expenses which are added to region-wide Transmission Cost of Service (TCOS) Includes capital costs (typically amortized over 30 years) and current year O&M Investor-owned TSP charges are subject to PUC approval and may be adjusted up to twice a year NOIE charges are approved by the respective governing body TSPs recover these costs by billing DSPs based on the DSP’s prior year 4CP Load Ratio Share This is known as ‘postage stamp’ cost allocation DSPs recover these costs by billing customers (NOIEs) or billing customers’ REPs (investor-owned DSPs)

4CP charges as a DR incentive 4CP was not intentionally designed as an incentive for demand response, but… Reducing Load during these intervals yields considerable savings NOIEs can reduce their 4CP Load Ratio Share, lowering their share of TCOS obligation Retail Choice Loads can directly reduce charges on their bills for the following year Many Loads and NOIEs have acquired 4CP predictors Some are developed in-house Some are offered as a service by the LSE Some are acquired through subscription from an LSE or third party Entities then plan demand response around probable 4CP intervals

4CP Tariffs: Hypothetical case study Let’s assume an industrial customer: Has 10 MWs of Load and is capable of interrupting all of it Is connected at transmission voltage Is in Oncor service territory, where current tariff is $2.840117 per 4CP kW Correctly anticipates and reduces Load to zero for all four 4CP intervals in 2013 Our customer’s transmission charge line item would be $0.00 per month for each month of 2014 If he had been consuming his usual 10 MWs during those 4 intervals, his charge would be: $2.84 x 1000 (kW to MW) x 10 (MW) = $28,400 per month x 12 (months) = $340,800 in savings for the year

TCOS trends = greater 4CP exposure ERCOT Region is very active in building new transmission projects Load growth necessitates new projects Streamlined planning process and single-state regulation expedite approval In addition, transmission build-out in Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ), authorized by legislation and Rule, is in the process of adding nearly $7 billion to TCOS

CREZ Impacts to TCOS CREZ projects are now almost entirely on line Over $5.2 billion in new facilities were energized in 2013 – over 5 times the average These dollars will be recovered thru TCOS rates over the next 30 years Source: ERCOT Transmission Projects Information Tracking (TPIT) Report, Nov. 2013

‘Postage Stamp’ TCOS Rate (per 4CP kW) TCOS Trends Date TCOS Snapshot ‘Postage Stamp’ TCOS Rate (per 4CP kW) 4/16/2010 $1.543 billion $26.05 4/8/2011 $1.670 billion $28.10 4/12/2012 $1.772 billion $29.36 3/23/2013 $2.002 billion $30.95 11/30/2013 $2.724 billion $40.86 Includes approximately 80% of CREZ charges

TDSP Load Management Programs Programs designed to help TDSPs meet their Annual Energy Efficiency Goals set by the PUCT. Available From 1-7 pm weekdays (except holidays) June – Sept months only Dispatched by ERCOT instruction as early as EEA Level 1 Programs vary slightly across TDSPs Approx. 240 MWs

Voluntary Load Response Price Responsive Customers Customers respond voluntarily when real time energy prices go high Special Demand Response incentives from REPS—as simple as a communicating programmable t-stat to more sophisticated dispatchable products ERCOT currently conducting study to determine: How much (MWs) Trigger mechanisms

Demand Response in ERCOT for load resources is classified as _____________. a) Non-Controllable Load (NCLR) b) Controllable Load (CLR) c) Loads in SCED d) All of the above

Which of the following are Emergency Response Service (ERS) types?   10-Minute ERS 30-Minute ERS Weather-Sensitive ERS All of the above

Non–Controllable Load Resources are used for ___________________.   Responsive Reserve Service Off line non-spin On line non-spin Regulation Service

The Four Coincident Peaks in ERCOT are the ___________________settlement intervals in each of the four summer months (June, July, August, September) Lowest-Load 15 minute Highest-Load 15 minute Forecasted-Load 15 minute None of the above

TDSP Load management Programs are designed to help TDSP’s meet their annual energy efficient goals set by the PUCT and are available___________________.   January – March months October – December months June – September months only From 1am - 6am (weekends only)