Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE Agenda 1. No Destruction of local research documents after scanning 2. Training for shipping biological samples/specimens 3. Regulatory.
Informed consent requirements
7 Tips for Quicker IRB Approval And one unavoidable truth.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.

Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
1 Institutional Review Board Review of Research Involving Human Participants Office of Research Compliance Northern Illinois University Division of Research.
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
How to Avoid Problems in the Informed Consent Process Shannon Ontiveros, MS, CIP, CIM Institutional Review Board.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Research Involving Human Subjects
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Northeastern University IRB Division of Research Integrity Application process takes 2-8 weeks.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Research Involving Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) Judette Haddad, PhD, CIP.
Research Involving Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) Judette Haddad, PhD, CIP.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Getting Through the IRB Process at ResU. Each Resurrection facility has its own IRB. ResU uses the Sts. Mary and Elizabeth Medical Center IRB.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Research Involving Human Subjects
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Copyright  2000 by Dr. ?????????, Wright State University Dr. ???????? Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering Institutional.
Informed Consent Process Patrick Herbison, MEd, CIP Research Compliance Manager Office of Human Research (OHR)
HUMAN SUBJECTS QUIZ! TRUE OR FALSE?
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Informed Consent It’s a Process …not a form. Outline  Historical Background  Respect for Persons  Consent Process  Elements of Informed Consent 
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Arkansas Tech University Institutional Review Board
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects)

Where Do I Find Information? Most information on guidelines, procedures, and submitting research applications can be found at Contact Judette Haddad (Compliance Coordinator) at or 370- Contact Christine Hansen (Chair, IRB) at or

Faculty Responsibilities All investigators conducting research involving human subjects need to be familiar with Oakland University IRB Guidelines ( m) m Faculty training is available periodically throughout the year. Take the tutorial at Faculty must inform students with whom they are working to read OU Guidelines All research must be exempted or approved before it can be conducted Research must be conducted as described in the approved or exempted application Research applications must be submitted through the Research Application Manager (RAM)

Review Categories May be “Exempt” Projects that present no more than “minimal risk” to the participants and do not compromise the privacy or confidentiality of the participants involved Reviewed by IRB Chair Common in Educational Research May be “Expedited” Reviewed by 2 IRB Committee Members Common in Educational Research for data collection methods that use audio/visual data collection Full Board Review Full Committee meets once per month (must be received by the Research Office at least 14 days before the next meeting date) Researcher presents the research proposal Committee members ask the researcher questions regarding the research and participation of human subjects Vote is taken (in the absence of the researcher) and recommendations are made

What is “minimal risk”? The risk to the subjects does not exceed the risks encountered in ordinary everyday life or in the performance of routine medical, dental, or psychological examinations.

What Does the Board Consider? The risks to the subjects. Risks must be justified by potential benefits. Risks must be minimized to the extent possible. The anticipated benefits. Must be clearly communicated in research proposal. The importance of the knowledge that may result. The informed consent process to be employed.

Analyzing Risks and Benefits To judge the application the IRB needs full information about: the selection and recruitment of subjects, research design, scientific rationale, conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent Participants must understand the nature of the research. Participants must be able to knowledgeably and voluntarily decide whether or not to participate. Participants must understand the risks and benefits of participation. The IRB must determine that informed consent will be properly obtained.

How to Apply Submit and application at All sections of the form must be completed An endorsed hard copy of the signature page must be forwarded to the Research Office, 544 O’Dowd Hall All research must be conducted or sponsored by an Oakland faculty member.

What Happens? For research falling within the categories of exempt or expedited review, you will receive written notification of approval within 2 weeks of approval. If your project is referred for formal review by the full committee, you will be sent a written invitation to attend the committee meeting at which it will be discussed. Investigator will provide explanations and rationale for all procedures, discuss the risks and benefits, and information about informed consent procedures. If approved by the majority of IRB members attending the meeting, you will be notified in writing within a few days.

Approved Research Any changes to original application must also be approved (report changes to IRB through message to Judette Haddad). IRB approval is valid for a maximum of one year – a “continuing review” application must be submitted to extend the research beyond one year. Continuing review forms are sent 2 months prior to approval expiration date (must be completed by PI and ed back to Judette Haddad).

Important Components of Protection Minimizing Risk Maintaining Confidentiality Maintaining and Destroying Records Maintained for at least 3 years and then destroyed in a manner that will protect the identity of human subjects. Reporting Adverse Events Related to Research

Elements of Informed Consent Information Research Procedures Purpose Benefits Risks Alternatives Who is conducting the research Opportunity to ask questions To researcher (about research) To Chair of IRB (about rights as human subject)

Elements of Informed Consent Comprehension Organized Ample time for consideration Opportunities for questions Lay language appropriate for subject

Elements of Informed Consent Voluntary Consent if voluntary, free of coercive elements Unjustifiable pressures occur when persons in authority urge a course of action for a subject Coercion is likely whenever possible sanctions are involved (implied or actual) Undue influence occurs through an offer of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward Consent process may not involve the use of “exculpatory language” Right to withdraw

Consent Form Requirements Description of study (purpose, duration, procedures) Description of foreseeable risks/discomforts Description of benefits Disclosure of alternative procedures Description of confidentiality of records and anonymity For more than minimal risk, other information* Statement of who to contact for (1) research questions (2) research related illness or injury (3) rights for research subjects Statement that participation is voluntary and that refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and that the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits. Most cases require that informed consent be documented in writing. Assent forms are needed when the study involves children.*

Administering the Consent Form Pass out two forms – one for the subjects to sign and return to you and one for them to keep for their records. Read the form aloud as the subjects read it to themselves. After reading it aloud, summarize what is stated on the form. Allow time for questions. Allow subjects time to consider whether they want to participate or not before signing.

Tips: Before you Apply Write the major components of the application (Abstract, Protocol, Consent Form(s), Instruments) Use the “suggested language” on the checklist within the consent form Include (attach) other items given to subjects such as survey questionnaire or advertisements. Get a login and password for the RAM Be familiar with the questions that are asked on the application Allow ample time for the review process to take place